Getty's landmark UK lawsuit on copyright and AI set to begin
The case is one of several lawsuits brought in Britain, the US and elsewhere over the use of copyright-protected material to train AI models. PHOTO: REUTERS
LONDON - Getty Images' landmark copyright lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Stability AI begins at London's High Court on June 9 , with the photo provider's case likely to set a key precedent for the law on AI.
The Seattle-based company, which produces editorial content and creative stock images and video, accuses Stability AI of breaching its copyright by using its images to 'train' its Stable Diffusion system, which can generate images from text inputs.
Getty, which is bringing a parallel lawsuit against Stability AI in the United States, says Stability AI unlawfully scraped millions of images from its websites and used them to train and develop Stable Diffusion.
Stability AI – which has raised hundreds of millions of dollars in funding and in March announced investment by the world's largest advertising company, WPP – is fighting the case and denies infringing any of Getty's rights.
A Stability AI spokesperson said that 'the wider dispute is about technological innovation and freedom of ideas', adding: 'Artists using our tools are producing works built upon collective human knowledge, which is at the core of fair use and freedom of expression.'
Getty's case is one of several lawsuits brought in Britain, the US and elsewhere over the use of copyright-protected material to train AI models, after ChatGPT and other AI tools became widely available more than two years ago.
Wider impact
Creative industries are grappling with the legal and ethical implications of AI models that can produce their own work after being trained on existing material.
Prominent figures including Elton John have called for greater protections for artists.
Lawyers say Getty's case will have a major impact on the law, as well as potentially informing government policy on copyright protections relating to AI.
'Legally, we're in uncharted territory. This case will be pivotal in setting the boundaries of the monopoly granted by UK copyright in the age of AI,' Ms Rebecca Newman, a lawyer at Addleshaw Goddard, who is not involved in the case, said.
She added that a victory for Getty could mean that Stability AI and other developers will face further lawsuits.
Ms Cerys Wyn Davies, from the law firm Pinsent Masons, said the High Court's ruling 'could have a major bearing on market practice and the UK's attractiveness as a jurisdiction for AI development'. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump says China will supply rare earths, US to allow students
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump gestures while he poses for a picture at the presidential box at the Kennedy Center, in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 17, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo Trump says China will supply rare earths, US to allow students WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the U.S. deal with China is done, with Beijing to supply magnets and rare earth minerals while the U.S. will allow Chinese students in its colleges and universities. "WE ARE GETTING A TOTAL OF 55% TARIFFS, CHINA IS GETTING 10%. RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT!" Trump wrote on Truth Social without elaborating. Trump said the deal is subject to final approval by him and President Xi Jinping. "FULL MAGNETS, AND ANY NECESSARY RARE EARTHS, WILL BE SUPPLIED, UP FRONT, BY CHINA. LIKEWISE, WE WILL PROVIDE TO CHINA WHAT WAS AGREED TO, INCLUDING CHINESE STUDENTS USING OUR COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES (WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN GOOD WITH ME!)," Trump said. U.S. and Chinese officials said on Tuesday they had agreed on a framework to get their trade truce back on track and remove China's export restrictions on rare earths while offering little sign of a durable resolution to longstanding trade tensions. At the end of two days of intense negotiations in London, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the framework deal puts "meat on the bones" of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs that had reached crushing triple-digit levels The Geneva deal had faltered over China's curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls of its own preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, aircraft and other goods to China. Trump's shifting tariff policies have roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
38 minutes ago
- Straits Times
At G-7 summit, S. Korea's President Lee faces delicate balance in US-China rivalry
South Korea's new President Lee Jae-myung and his wife Kim Hye-kyung (left) at the Seoul National Cemetery on June 6. PHOTO: REUTERS – As South Korea's new President Lee Jae-myung gears up for his international diplomacy debut at the Group of Seven (G-7) summit next week, all eyes are on whether he will be made to pick sides in the Sino-American rivalry. Mr Lee has acknowledged that the South Korea-US alliance remains the foundation of South Korea's diplomacy and security, and has pledged to strengthen the alliance along with the trilateral partnership with Japan. But he has also said South Korea should not be made to choose between the United States and China and 'put all our eggs in one basket'. Mr Lee was elected with a 49.42 per cent mandate in a snap election on June 3 after his predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol's failed martial law bid saw the former leader deposed by the country's Constitutional Court. Mr Lee's win under the liberal flag, which traditionally prioritises relations with China and engagement with North Korea, has Washington watching his foreign policy directions closely, said Dr Lee Seong-hyon, a senior fellow at the Washington-based George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations. The previous conservative administration under Yoon had antagonised Beijing by openly taking sides with the US, and also seeding rife speculation of Chinese espionage and interference in South Korean domestic politics. During his election campaign, Mr Lee had taken a more centrist stance by repeatedly emphasising a non-committal 'pragmatic diplomacy' to maximise South Korea's national interests. Amid growing rivalry between the two superpowers, however, Mr Lee's vision, which requires a delicate balancing act between its biggest security ally, the US, and its largest trading partner, China, will likely be put to the test. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth had earlier cautioned allies against playing both sides by 'seeking both economic cooperation with China and defence cooperation with the United States', during his speech at the Shangri-La Dialogue, an annual defence and security forum, on May 31 in Singapore. Mr Hegseth had also urged allies to increase their defence spending as regional deterrence against China. Seoul's share of the defence cost-sharing for US troops stationed in South Korea has been a major bugbear of US President Donald Trump, who has said that 'money machine' South Korea can afford to pay much more. Recent leaked plans about the possibility of the US redeploying its forces stationed in South Korea to other parts of the Pacific to exercise 'strategic flexibility' in its plans to contain China, also called into question the commitment of US security in the region. South Korea's participation as an observing country at the G-7 summit on June 15-17 in Vancouver is, thus, seen as important. Issues related to China, Russia and North Korea are expected to feature high on the meeting agenda. Besides the US, other members of the political and economic forum are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United Kingdom. Seoul is also pushing hard for a face-to-face meeting between Mr Lee and Mr Trump on the sidelines of the meeting to ride on the momentum of the first phone call between the two leaders that took place on June 6. The 20-minute courtesy call had ended with an agreement to meet in person at the earliest possible opportunity for more in-depth talks. The call had taken place later than usual – three days after Mr Lee was elected – causing concern when it had not happened. Past South Korean presidents had traditionally spoken to their biggest ally either on the day of their election or the day after. A cryptic congratulatory message issued by the White House after the election had affirmed the 'ironclad alliance' between the US and South Korea , before going on to express concern over 'Chinese interference and influence in democracies around the world'. That had fuelled speculation that the message was a hint for the new Lee administration to distance itself from Beijing. While Washington does not expect Mr Lee's administration to 'diverge significantly from the established US-South Korea alliance framework', it will, nevertheless, be keenly watching any potential policy reversals, such as weakening ties with Japan while gravitating towards China and resuming inter-Korean engagement, Dr Lee told The Straits Times. Research fellow Lee Dong-gyu, from the Asan Institute for Policy Studies in Seoul, said the broaching of the idea of a US troop drawdown could be a diplomatic signal to South Korea to step up and play 'an augmented role' to contain China. 'But if the new government under Mr Lee pursues a revitalisation of South Korea-China relations, then it may result in the erosion of the US' containment efforts,' he said. While it is clear that President Lee's priority is in forging ties with Mr Trump and to iron out tariff negotiations before the July 9 deadline, rising tensions over Chinese-built structures in the South Korea-China Provisional Maritime Zone in the West Sea will also be an immediate test of his diplomacy tight-rope act, said international politics professor Mason Richey from Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. He added that Seoul needs to be prepared to respond strategically, and 'to be clear with China that even though they are economic partners, South Korea will not be easily bullied'. After his first phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping on June 10, Mr Lee has called China an important partner to South Korea 'in all aspects, including economy and security' and that he looks forward to developing relations between Seoul and Beijing. Mr Lee has also asked China to play a constructive role for the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula, to which Mr Xi replied that promoting peace and stability on the peninsula was a matter of mutual interest to both South Korea and China. Carnegie Mellon Institute for Strategy and Technology's non-resident fellow, Dr Troy Stangarone, told ST that while the new administration's repairing of relations with China is a priority after the deterioration of ties under the previous Yoon administration, it will need to 'take a realistic view of the relationship'. He believes that Mr Lee would likely have a bit more time before being made to pick sides between the US and China at the G-7 summit, as South Korea is ultimately not a member country but just an observer. However, he warns that 'geostrategic shifts and US-China rivalry may create limits to improving relations with China'. 'The Lee administration should focus its efforts on maintaining good economic ties while also working to bring China back as a constructive partner for dealing with the North Korean nuclear issue,' he said. Wendy Teo is The Straits Times' South Korea correspondent based in Seoul. She covers issues concerning the two Koreas. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Passengers reschedule travel plans and seek refunds following Jetstar Asia's abrupt closure
Jetstar Asia cancelled seven flights from Changi Airport on June 11 and re-timed another seven more. ST PHOTO: CHONG JUN LIANG SINGAPORE - Mr Fin Guo was scheduled to fly home to Singapore from Okinawa at 9.20am on June 11 but the night before he was due to head to the airport, he received a message that said his Jetstar Asia flight would be delayed by over 12 hours. Because of the delay, the 38-year-old will land in Singapore at 2.30am on June 12 - just hours before he's due at work at 9am. The budget carrier is the only airline that offers a direct flight between Okinawa and Singapore, so Mr Guo, who works in advertising, could only sit and wait 'Now I'm typing this in Naha airport,' he said to ST in a text message. 'I just want to fly back to Singapore tonight.' Mr Guo was among thousands of passengers who were affected by flight delays or cancellations following the surprise announcement on June 11 that Jetstar Asia would cease operations from July 31. The airline cancelled seven flights from Changi Airport on June 11 and re-timed another seven more. Aside from disrupted travel plans, other affected passengers also told The Straits Times that they found it difficult to get refunds for flight bookings. In a June 11 statement, the Singapore-based airline announced that it would close, citing rising costs and growing regional competition. The Straits Times understands that Jetstar Asia had decided to suspend flights at Changi Airport on the morning of June 11, so its crew would not receive the news of the airline's closure while in the air. Madam Heather Cher had her family's flight to Penang delayed by eight hours, from 7.25am to 3.25pm. 'We lost a day, because we'll reach only at the end of the day. It's a waste of time,' she said. Madam Cher, 50, said she was disappointed by Jetstar's closure. She frequently takes the airline to Penang to visit relatives. Mr Gary Cheong said he and his family woke up at 5am to leave for the airport, not knowing that their flight had been retimed. He had missed the email Jetstar sent on June 10 that their flight to Penang had been re-timed. 'They should have let us know through SMS since it's urgent,' said the 58-year-old, who works as an assistant manager. Jetstar Asia's closure will mean one less option for Mr Cheong and his family, who travel to Penang at least four times a year. The airline's closure came as a surprise to many passengers, including Ms Hayley P and her husband. They had booked a direct flight to Labuan Bajo on July 27. The route was recently released by the carrier. On June 11, they were informed that the flight has since been cancelled, and they would receive a refund within seven days. 'I'm hoping they follow through with an easy process and people don't need to chase,' she said. The 42-year-old floral stylist will now have to make a longer trip, since she has to fly through Bali, which will mean additional flights and two nights of accommodation. The changes come at a significant expense, she said. Some other passengers such as Ms Charlotte Tan, 38, are worried that they will have difficulty getting refunds. Ms Tan has over $500 in travel vouchers with the airline from a flight cancellation in 2023 and said she was concerned about getting her money back. 'I just hope that there is some clarity soon,' she said. Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) president Melvin Yong urged passengers to approach the consumer watchdog if they require assistance. 'Case is working with Jetstar Asia to clarify how it intends to handle and process these refunds and rescheduled flights, and the recourse available to consumers should there be a dispute,' Mr Yong wrote on Facebook. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
