Iran launches missiles at US base in Qatar in retaliation for American bombing
There were no US casualties, Donald Trump said as he dismissed the attack as a 'very weak response', adding that Washington was warned by Tehran in advance.
'Most importantly, they've gotten it all out of their 'system,' and there will, hopefully, be no further HATE,' the US president posted on Truth Social.
Qatar condemned the attack on Al Udeid Air Base but said it intercepted the short and medium-range ballistic missiles.
Satellite image showing Al Udeid Air Base (Planet Labs PBC/AP)
Iran said the volley matched the number of bombs dropped by the US on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, adding that it targeted the base because it was outside populated areas.
Those comments, made immediately after the attack, suggested Tehran wanted to de-escalate with the US, something Mr Trump said after the strikes early on Sunday on Iran.
He said Iran might be able to 'now proceed to Peace and Harmony' and he would encourage Israel to do the same.
However, Israel's war on Iran continued, with the Israeli military expanding its campaign on Monday to target sites symbolic for the country's theocracy.
Iran announced the attack on Qatar on state television as martial music played. A caption on screen called it 'a mighty and successful response' to 'America's aggression'.
Meanwhile, Iraqis said they were informed by US officials that missiles had been launched toward the the Ain al-Assad base housing US troops in western Iraq, but the missiles never arrived, according to an Iraqi security source.
A US military official said there was no confirmed attack on the base in Iraq.
Donald Trump (Carlos Barria/AP)
Iran fired 19 missiles at the base in Qatar, and one impacted the facility but caused no casualties, a Qatari military officer said.
Major General Shayeq Al Hajri told reporters that seven missiles were fired initially from Iran and all were intercepted over the water between the two countries by Qatari air defences. Iran then fired 12 more missiles and 11 were intercepted over Qatari territory, but one hit the US base, Maj Gen al Hajri said.
It was not clear how much damage was caused by the missile.
Mr Trump said 14 missiles were fired, 13 were brought down and one was 'set free' because it posed no threat.
The Al Udeid base is home to the Combined Air Operations Centre, which provides command and control of air power across the region, as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, the largest such unit in the world.
Just before the explosions, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote on the social platform X: 'We neither initiated the war nor seeking it. But we will not leave invasion to the great Iran without answer.'
The retaliation came a day after the US launched a surprise attack on Sunday morning on three of Iran's nuclear sites.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
36 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Donald Trump announces Israel and Iran have agreed to ceasefire after US bombing raids
US President Donald Trump has announced that Israel and Iran have agreed to a ceasefire after US bombing raids on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend US President Donald Trump declared on Monday evening that a ceasefire between Israel and Iran had been agreed, expressing hope for enduring peace. "It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in-progress, final missions! ), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED," Mr Trump posted on social media. This historic announcement follows Iran's barrage of missile attacks on US airbases across the Middle East on Monday, a fiery retaliation to America's weekend strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Targets in Qatar, Bahrain and Iraq were struck in the onslaught. US President Donald Trump responded defiantly, asserting the devastation caused by America's earlier action was catastrophic, reports the Express. Iran retaliated to unexpected attacks labelled as "gamechanging" by experts, carried out by the US over the weekend, which "obliterated" the three key nuclear facilities of Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. Israel had pressed the United States to use its formidable 30,000lb "bunker buster" bomb against Iran's heavily fortified nuclear sites - a move that led to last night's B-2 stealth bomber operation known as Operation Midnight Hammer. Shocking images from the aftermath show six craters at the attacked site, correlating with the sextet of bombs deployed in the dead of night. In his address, Donald Trump lauded the successful US operation and proclaimed Iran had been significantly weakened. Addressing Tehran, he warned: "Remember, there are many targets left," suggesting that any further military actions would be less challenging for American forces than the previous incursion. Later that day, US Air Force General Dan Caine, the Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, announced: "The goal of the operation - destroying nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan - has been achieved." Evaluations so far confirmed that each of the three sites sustained considerable damage. In an impassioned message on Truth Social, Trump declared: "We have completed our very successful attack on Iran's nuclear programme. All US aircraft are now outside of Iranian airspace." He menacingly suggested the possibility of more strikes should Iran remain defiant, cautioning that any subsequent assault would be "easier than last night." With a 12-hour ceasefire presently in effect, global attention is fixated on Iran's reaction and whether this pause in aggression might extend into a lasting peace.
Sky News
41 minutes ago
- Sky News
Iran confirms it has agreed to ceasefire with Israel - as Trump declares it will begin within hours
A "complete and total ceasefire" has been agreed between Israel and Iran, according to Donald Trump. The US president made the announcement on Truth Social - hours after Tehran launched a missile strike on a US army base in Qatar. In a post shared at just after 11pm UK time, Mr Trump said the first stage of the ceasefire would begin six hours later. This means both countries could still launch strikes in the meantime - and soon after, Israel announced evacuation orders for two areas in Tehran. A senior Iranian official told the Reuters news agency that Tehran has agreed to the ceasefire after being persuaded by Qatar. Mr Trump wrote: "Officially, Iran will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 12th Hour, Israel will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 24th Hour, an Official END to THE 12 DAY WAR will be saluted by the World. "On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12 DAY WAR.' "This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn't, and never will!" 2:58 Just hours earlier, people in the Qatari capital Doha had stopped and gazed up at the sky as Iranian missiles flew to the American al Udeid base and interceptors fired. Officials said there were no casualties, and the US later confirmed it had been warned about the attack by Iran. Mr Trump was in the Situation Room in the White House as the strikes took place. He later claimed on his social network that the missiles were a "very weak response", which the US "expected" and "very effectively countered". The Iranian attack came after the US dropped "bunker buster bombs" on three key nuclear sites in Iran over the weekend. 1:08 In a new interview on Fox News, US Vice President JD Vance claimed Iran is no longer able to build nuclear weapons after the American attacks. "Iran was very close to having a nuclear weapon," he said. "Now Iran is incapable of building a nuclear weapon with the equipment they have because we destroyed it."
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The West has finally rediscovered its resolve in the fight against terror
SIR – The American and Israeli operations against Iran (Letters, June 23) represent a profound reassertion of Western resolve in the face of state terror. These countries have shown that it is possible to confront a regime bent on acquiring weapons of mass destruction with moral clarity rather than appeasement. They have weakened an Iranian state that has for decades spewed undiluted hatred against the West, and sponsored murderous terrorism across the globe. Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump have made the world a safer place. Dr Jeremy Havardi Director, B'nai B'rith UK Bureau of International Affairs Pinner, Middlesex SIR – Before his re-election, President Trump frequently said that he would end wars and bring about world peace during a second term. However, since his inauguration the wars in Gaza and Ukraine have deepened, with no signs of the promised peace agreements, and we are now faced with a potential catastrophe in the Middle East. Perhaps those who voted for him are now realising that the trust they put in him was misguided. Anthony Haslam Farnham, Surrey SIR – The American raid on Iran's nuclear facilities was a masterpiece of military planning and execution, but it is too soon to be cock-a-hoop about the results, and a fact-based intelligence assessment must be awaited. That said, President Trump's resoluteness will have sent a strong message to Moscow and other potential adversaries. Further enrichment of Iranian uranium has been impeded, if not stopped altogether. However, it seems likely that at least some stocks were dispersed before the attack took place. Although these may be insufficient to make a fission weapon, their very existence constitutes a real and present threat to Iran's enemies. The regime in Tehran is heavily beleaguered and may well resort to desperate measures, including the unconventional. The price of true security is maximum vigilance. Air Commodore Michael Allisstone Chichester, West Sussex SIR – Have those marching in support of Iran (report, June 22) never heard of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, who was held by the regime for six years on bogus espionage charges? Have the women waving placards in support of the Supreme Leader ever been to Iran? I have. My visa photograph had to have no hair showing. My clothes had to be long and baggy, and sandals had to be worn with socks. No bare flesh was allowed. The only time I could remove my headscarf was in the hotel bedroom. Ordinary people would accost us in the street, begging us to ask our prime minister to help them get rid of the 'evil mullahs'. Susan Day Sutton Coldfield Assisted dying division SIR – Opponents of the assisted dying Bill are all crying foul now that it has passed through the House of Commons. Your Leading Article (June 21) was aghast that nearly 10 per cent of deaths in Canada are now 'assisted'. Could this possibly be because the majority of the population is in favour of simple compassion? S Marco (Letters, June 21) writes that, in 25 years working in a hospice, he has seen several family members and friends die peacefully, without pain. I would suspect that he saw many more patients who didn't – and there are, of course, plenty of people who do not get the benefit of access to a palliative care facility. On the same page, Keith Phair says that there should be a national referendum on the issue. Is he aware that repeated polls have shown that about 75 per cent of the population think that assisted dying should be legal in principle? For once, Parliament has reflected the will of the people. It should now make every effort to ensure that the law is enacted as soon as possible. Chris and Ray Knight Thaxted, Essex SIR – Many people, including academics, fear that they will not be taken seriously if they are thought to hold views that are founded on faith. Having ministered to the dying as a Roman Catholic priest for decades, I can't recall a single instance of anyone dying in severe pain or approaching death with great suffering. Indeed, I witnessed very many peaceful and calm deaths, even of the extremely ill. Palliative care can provide all that is necessary to allow folk to meet death with real dignity. As a person of faith (but not, I think, a zealot), I happen to agree with the sentiments so neatly expressed by Professor June Andrews ('Alarming implications of the assisted dying Bill', Letters, June 23). I am shocked at the recklessness of what the Government has done, and I fear that it is now too late to rescue this tragic situation. Fr Terry Martin Rottingdean, East Sussex Reform and non-doms SIR – I appreciate that Nigel Farage is trying to make Reform UK electable, but if he is going to resort to classic socialism to get his party into government – charging non-doms £250,000 to give to the lowest paid in our society (report, June 23) – he will not be getting my vote. That will be going to the party that promises to simplify and streamline government, produce radical plans to attract inward investment, reduce taxes across the board and generally stop interfering with our lives. Georgina Stanger Caerwent, Monmouthshire SIR – How disappointing it was to read the article by Nigel Farage (Comment, June 23). Do we really need two parties 'of working people'? His reasoning was very difficult to understand: what does 'the lives of everyday British citizens' mean? Tennis with no chat SIR – I watched the recent French Open tennis tournament on the Discovery+ channel, which gave me the choice of commentary or 'ambient noise' (Letters, June 23). To be allowed to watch such great tennis matches without the irritating banalities produced by commentators was a blessed relief. Jack Fillingham Stroud, Gloucestershire Peerage rules SIR – Lady Kinvara Balfour calls for the abolition of male primogeniture in the succession to peerages. Every society has its own traditions concerning inheritance. In England, we see the traditional predominance of male primogeniture, but also, in some places, the custom of Borough English, whereby estates pass by default to the youngest male offspring. In the 20th century, we saw the growth of estates being partitioned among all offspring, and even the fiscal incentivisation of inheritance by spouses. Peerages work differently. Their succession is determined by the conditions of their creation. Most (not all) modern peerages descend by male primogeniture to the exclusion of female lines, but older English peerages do allow for female succession, as do most Scottish titles. Campaigners often wish to alter the rules so that the eldest daughter may inherit, even if there are younger brothers, and they take the Succession to the Crown Act 2013 as their inspiration. They tend to argue on grounds of sexual equality. Such a change would not settle the matter, as it would open up complaints on the basis of age discrimination. It would be much more sensible to accept that each peerage is unique and that each creation reflects the mores of its time. It should not be surprising if, now that writs of summons to Parliament will no longer be issued to hereditary peers, the Crown were to create hereditary peeresses, with their succession remaindered to heirs female. This would add yet another stitch to the colourful quilt that is the gradually evolving British constitution. Shoe of respect SIR – My mother thought that asking visitors to remove their shoes (Letters, June 23) indicated that my carpets were more important than their comfort. I agree. Rosie Clarke Nailsea, Somerset SIR – I live in a three-storey house. Visitors who remove their shoes can go upstairs to the carpeted lounge. Those who don't are led to the dining room, which has a slate floor. No one feels like they are missing out, as, while the lounge has comfortable seats, the dining room has views and access to the garden. Stephen Bloor Telford, Shropshire Lessons in eating toast at the breakfast table SIR – Having read Mary Lovell's fascinating book, The Mitford Girls, I anticipated the televised version with interest ('Debutantes are gone, but the class divide remains', Features, June 21). The attention to detail is excellent, though there is perhaps one instance of inaccuracy – regarding the partaking of toast at the breakfast table. As children we were taught that toast was never to be buttered in one go and eaten whole. We were instructed to break it into smaller pieces, and then add a little butter and jam, honey or marmalade from the side of our plates as we ate. However, when we returned hungry from school in the afternoon, we were fed mountains of hot buttered toast. In this case, for practical reasons, the butter was spread over the entirety of the slice, but even then it was cut into neat triangles. The only other exception was when we were offered Marmite, a smidgen of which was scraped across the piece of toast – though it was still never devoured whole in the fingers. Bryony Hill Hard work wasted thanks to strawberry thieves SIR – I congratulate Christine Williams (Letters, June 23) on so successfully growing colossal quantities of strawberries. I have fed, watered, weeded, sheltered and nurtured my strawberries for many months, watching them grow, flower and fruit. And now the blasted blackbirds have eaten the lot. I am too soft and stupid to stop this blatant theft. Andrew Barker Elkstone, Gloucestershire SIR – I have been eating strawberries grown in my modest suburban garden for breakfast and dinner for the past two weeks – with enough left over for my Pimm's. I have a few plants, and the fruits are tastier than those in the shops, which are bred for appearance and shelf life, not flavour. David Oliver Langley, Berkshire SIR – During summers in the late 1960s, my school friends and I picked strawberries in South Gloucestershire. We were allowed to eat as many as we wanted, and strawberry fights were common – but only if we used spoiled fruit. Woe betide anyone who wasted strawberries that were saleable. Letters to the Editor We accept letters by email and post. Please include name, address, work and home telephone numbers. ADDRESS: 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 0DT EMAIL: dtletters@ FOLLOW: Telegraph Letters @LettersDesk
