Should plans to put cancer warning labels on alcohol go ahead? A doctor and a wine expert debate
Frank Murray: Yes. As a liver specialist, I have seen first hand the catastrophic harms of alcohol
Alcoholic drinks should carry a warning label because these labels speak a plain truth: alcohol causes enormous amounts of illness and death in Ireland.
As a liver specialist, I have seen at first hand the catastrophic harms of alcohol on individuals. Alcohol is a silent killer.
Unfortunately, the vast majority of patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis only come to healthcare when their liver disease is irreversible and will lead to their death. Death from liver failure often occurs after many prolonged hospital and ICU admissions, and involves real suffering.
It was witnessing this that led me – alongside many of my medical colleagues – to become involved in advocating to reduce alcohol consumption and its harmful consequences. We are passionately committed to the introduction of alcohol health warning labelling in May 2026.
READ MORE
Alcohol kills four people a day in Ireland, and causes more than 200 types of illness and injury, including seven types of common fatal cancers, foetal alcohol spectrum disorder and fatal liver diseases.
These clear, evidence-based facts are the subjects of the alcohol warning labels. Citizens have a right to know the inherent risk and be warned, while Government and producers have a responsibility to inform them.
Most Irish citizens do not know or understand the risks of alcohol consumption. In recognising this lack of knowledge, and the public health objective to reduce alcohol consumption and harms, the Public Health (Alcohol) Act (PHAA) was passed unanimously by Oireachtas in 2018. This included provisions to place alcohol health warning labels on all alcohol products sold in Ireland. The issue was thoroughly examined and approved after 1,000 days of debate.
Against the enormous harms of alcohol, the suggestion recently from a senior Government minister, Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe, that the introduction of Ireland's regulations on health information and warning labelling of alcohol products should be 're-examined' amid concerns about tariffs is shocking and disturbing.
Why has it taken so long for alcohol products to carry health warnings? The answer is the inappropriate influence of the alcohol industry
Ireland's labelling regulations are a health measure and must be understood in the context of the burden that alcohol places on individuals, families, the health service and our wider society.
Attempting to link global trading uncertainty as a result of
US tariffs
to the issue of alcohol health-warning labelling designed to protect our citizens' health is disingenuous. Labelling measures apply only to alcohol products sold in Ireland and have no impact on alcohol exports.
As stated by the
World Health Organisation
and others, the alcohol industry cannot have a direct role in formulating and implementing public health policy. The alcohol industry is alarmed that these labels will reduce alcohol sales and their profits, precisely because the product will state the truth of the risks of alcohol consumption.
With all of these proven harms from alcohol in mind, the real question to be asked is why has it taken so long for alcohol products to carry health warnings? The answer to this is the inappropriate influence of the alcohol industry.
The eyes of the world are on Ireland and our introduction of alcohol health warning and nutrition labelling in May next year. Delaying their operation would be seen as a victory for 'Big Alcohol' over citizens' rights and their health, and damage Ireland's reputation.
Prof Frank Murray MD FRCPI is a consultant hepatologist in Dublin, chair of Alcohol Action Ireland and past president of the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (RCPI)
Jean Smullen: No. Current labelling regulations will place a big burden on small retailers
On May 26th next year Ireland will become the first country in the world to introduce on label health warnings in relation to the sale and consumption of alcohol. Section 12 of The Public Health (Alcohol) (Labelling) Regulations 2023 was signed into law by Stephen Donnelly, then minister for health, following the dismissal of many objections.
The law provides that the labels of alcohol products will have to state the calorie content and grams of alcohol in the product. Retailers will also need to ensure that every container that contains alcohol they have for sale carries a specified health message printed in red against a white background: 'drinking alcohol causes liver disease' and 'there is a direct link between alcohol and fatal cancers'.
Drinking Alcohol
There can be no doubting the good intentions of the former minister in introducing these new regulations, which aim to educate consumers on the dangers of excessive alcohol consumption and to provide calorie information.
However, as is often the case in Ireland, the impact on small businesses in meeting the requirements of the new regulations was not fully examined before their introduction.
These will place a significant burden on small retailers and hospitality businesses already facing an uncertain future from the US tariffs and a looming global recession. These unintended consequences must be recognised by the Government. They can be addressed in a way which will allow the policy to achieve the desired effect.
EU Law requires the nutritional information to be displayed on a wine label per 100ml from the 2024 vintage onwards, alongside a QR code linking to the ingredients.
Our new regulations will require the same information to be presented per container, without any reference to the unit of measure. We feel that this goes against the spirit of the legislation by causing confusion rather than clarity. The priority should be to provide clear information to guide consumers in their choice.
In a clear case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing, it is introducing a policy that will further squeeze a sector already hanging by a thread
Unlike beers and spirits, the nutritional values on wines change with every vintage, meaning that each wine and each vintage has a unique label. A simple calculation would estimate that more than a quarter of a million different labels would be needed to be produced, putting undue pressure on small independent retailers, restaurants and distributors.
As importers and distributors of wines, we have actively engaged with our suppliers regarding the implementation of the health warning. The new regulations stipulate that the label must be in landscape format. In some cases, we are having difficulty fitting the PHAA-mandated warning along with other regulatory information on to the label.
Given the cost and complication of complying with the legislation, many small wine producers, and even some larger ones, have decided to leave the Irish market. This will reduce competition and leave many smaller Irish wine importers fighting for their survival.
We could overcome this if the information could be displayed in portrait or landscape formats. Portrait format would display the same information with the same overall label size, achieving the same desired effect, but in a format that works with more bottle's shapes and label formats.
Logistics aside, we also need to ask if this is the right time to introduce these new regulations. CSO data points to sharp falls in overseas visitors – 30 per cent down in January and February compared to the same months last year – raising fears that Irish industries reliant on tourism are facing a sharp downturn.
US president
Donald Trump
's tariff policy may yet lead to a global economic downturn, if not an outright recession. We are already seeing market instability, disrupted supply chains and increased costs for businesses.
The Government, in keeping the 9 per cent VAT rate, has recognised the need to support the hospitality sector. But now, in a clear case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing, it is introducing a policy that will further squeeze a sector already hanging by a thread.
In the context of the emerging crisis of US tariffs and the pressure that this brings for businesses large and small, if Government wants to focus on doing everything possible for competitiveness and avoiding unnecessary regulatory burdens, then it needs to defer the proposed alcohol labelling regulations.
Jean Smullen WSET Dip has worked in the wine industry in Ireland for 34 years and is administrator for the Irish Association of Wine Suppliers (IAWS), an association representing independent wine importing companies in Ireland
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
10 hours ago
- The Journal
FactCheck: Have one in eight women in Ireland visited an emergency department after an abortion?
THIS WEEK, AN anti-abortion group called for a meeting with the Minister for Health over concerns about a study into medical outcomes of Irish women who had abortions. The Pro Life Campaign highlighted the study to claim that the legalisation of abortion in 2018 has led to 'adverse consequences' for women that are not being acknowledged. They claim that the study reveals one in eight Irish women has visited the emergency department after having an abortion. But is this figure accurate? The Claim The Pro Life Campaign claim that one in eight – or 12% – of women in Ireland have visited a hospital emergency department after having an abortion. An article on the group's website is headed: ' One in Eight Women in Ireland Visited Emergency Department After Abortion '. It also refers to a study of Irish women carried out between 2019 and 2022, and states that '12% of the women who underwent abortions during this period presented to an emergency department on an unplanned basis'. Pro Life Campaign Pro Life Campaign The Evidence The study referenced in the article called 'Termination of early pregnancy in Ireland: Review of the first four years of inpatient service at a tertiary maternity unit', which was published in the Irish Journal of Sociology on 28 May. The study analysed outcomes for 149 women who had abortions at a single, unnamed maternity hospital in the south of Ireland between 2019 and 2022. It is a broad study that looks at the experiences of the women, where they came from, whether they had been pregnant before, the length of time that they had been pregnant before seeking an abortion, whether they experienced any complications, and other aspects of their care. It is not a nationally representative survey, such as those carried out for opinion polls in newspapers or occasionally for advertising purposes, both of which involve carefully weighting responses by categories such as gender, age, or social class. The findings are instead based on the medical outcomes of a select group of women who attended one hospital over four years; those findings cannot be extrapolated to the wider population to represent the experience of all Irish women. The study is not even representative of all women who had an abortion during the years 2019 to 2022. It only looked at women who had what is called a medical abortion – a termination of pregnancy that is induced by taking medication – after they presented to a hospital to receive one (as opposed to doing so in a community setting). It did not include women who had a medical abortion after being prescribed medication by a GP in a community setting, which is permitted when pregnancies are under nine weeks. This is crucial, because the study says that 90% of terminations in Ireland are community-based, which is relatively unique by international standards. Hospital-based terminations of pregnancy – such as those analysed in the study – make up just 10% of abortions in Ireland. Furthermore, the study excluded those who first presented to the hospital for surgical abortions, which involve the use of instruments and women going under anaesthetic. It is therefore completely false to suggest that one-in-eight women who had an abortion in Ireland since the procedure was legalised had to go to an emergency department afterwards. So where did the figure come from? Advertisement The Journal contacted the Pro Life Campaign, who referred us to a sample size outlined under 'Table 4′ of the study, which deals with 'complications' that resulted from some abortions. The section on 'complications' describes how some of the women involved in the study required blood transfusions and extended hospital stays after receiving an abortion, while there were also a small number of admissions to high-dependency units. The group of women who were recorded as suffering 'complications' was 34 – the majority of the 149 women did not. Those 34 women – or 23% of the women in the study – were counted because they sought a medical review after they were discharged from the hospital. Of those 34 women, 18 involved unplanned presentations by individuals to the emergency department (the other 16 attended for scheduled clinic appointments). That is the figure referred to in the claim by the Pro Life Campaign: 18 out of 149 women – equivalent to roughly one in eight, or 12% – made an unplanned presentation to an emergency department after terminating their pregnancy. The study states that these presentations were 'primarily due to concerns regarding infection or heavy/irregular vaginal bleeding'. In response to the query about its headline, a spokesperson for the Pro Life Campaign said the group was 'not referring to the entire female population of Ireland, whether or not they had abortions'. (At the time of publication, the claim that one-in-eight women in Ireland visited an emergency department after having an abortion still featured in a headline and graphic on the group's website.) The group also called for more research and said it 'remains to be clarified' whether the findings would be replicated among the wider population. 'It is normal for research studies to obtain data from a specific sample of the population,' the spokesperson said. 'Most media reports, including those in The Journal , do not cover a statistical discussion of how representative they are of the wider population.' The group highlighted two articles by this publication by way of example, both of which involved nationally representative surveys carried out among the wider population, a contrast to the abortion study which involved a relatively small group of women at one hospital. The authors of the study concluded that there were 'low complication rates' among the women whose abortion procedures were analysed, something that is in keeping with international studies that show that early abortions (ie before 12 weeks) are safe. It should be noted that in any area of healthcare, complicated outcomes are – because of their nature – more likely to be seen in a hospital setting rather than by a GP in the community. Rather than suggesting that the complicated outcomes were a cause for concern about abortion services, the study concluded by suggesting there should be more open access to abortion in Ireland, and pointed to the negative impact of the mandatory three-day wait that women must undergo between being certified by a GP and having an abortion. The Verdict The Pro Life Campaign claimed that one out of every eight women in Ireland has visited an emergency department after an abortion. The group also said that '12% of the women who underwent abortions' between 2019 and 2022 made an unplanned visit to an emergency department afterwards. The figure is based on 18 (or 12%) of 149 women who had abortions at one hospital in the south of the country over a four-year period, whose experiences were analysed as part of a recently published study. It is not a nationally representative sample, and did not include those who specifically presented to the hospital for surgical abortions or the 90% of women whose terminations take place in a community setting. In responses to queries from The Journal , the group said it was not referring to the entire population of Ireland, and defended its wording about the study's overall findings about 'women in Ireland' as normal practice by the media. We therefore rate the claim that one-in-eight women who had abortions in Ireland over a four-year period as FALSE . As per our verdict guide , this means the claim is inaccurate. The Journal's FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network's Code of Principles. You can read it here . For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader's Guide here . You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here . Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Multinational nursing home operators do not deliver lower standards of care, says spokesman
There is no evidence to support the claim that private sector nursing homes provide poorer care than public ones, a spokesman for the private and voluntary nursing home sector has said. Tadhg Daly, Chief Executive of Nursing Homes Ireland was speaking in the wake of an RTÉ programme on two Irish nursing homes run by French multinational Emeis . The undercover documentary alleged serious failings in the care being delivered. Mr Daly cited a 15-year review of the sector last year by the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa) that noted a 'clear trend' of large corporate groups purchasing Irish nursing homes but found no associated negative effect on care. The report said Hiqa 'does not currently have any specific concerns' regarding the quality of care provided in nursing homes that are owned or operated by these large corporate groups. READ MORE [ What is Emeis and where are its Irish care homes located? Opens in new window ] However, it said the consolidation of nursing home ownership by a small number of large operators represented a 'systemic risk' that should be addressed as part of an overall strategy for the sector. Mr Daly said there must be a regulatory regime that delivers the 'high quality care that our older people require and deserve'. The policy of 'Ireland Inc' was to encourage foreign direct investment in all sectors of the economy, including the healthcare sector, he said. 'You can have bad outcomes in the private system and bad outcomes in the public system,' he said. [ Review of all nursing homes operated by Emeis Ireland requested by Department of Health Opens in new window ] Emeis Ireland, formerly Orpea, apologised for what was revealed by the RTÉ documentary, which involved secret filming inside The Residence, in Portlaoise, Co Laois, and the Beneavin Manor nursing home, in Glasnevin, Dublin 11. Minister for Older People Kieran O'Donnell met Hiqa in the wake of the programme which he described as 'extremely distressing'. The share price of the French multinational, then called Orpea, collapsed a few years ago following the publication of a book in France about care standards in its homes, with a French state investment fund eventually bailing it out. The fund remains the largest shareholder of the business, which had global revenues of €5.6 billion last year. The French multinational is the largest operator in the Irish nursing home sector, with its Irish subsidiaries owned by way of a company in Luxembourg called Central & Eastern Europe Health Care Services Holding Sarl. Shane Scanlan, chief executive of The Alliance – Supporting Nursing Homes, a nursing home trade association said smaller independent nursing home groups provide a better standard of care in general than multinational groups do, because they are 'on the ground' and their owners are more in touch with what is happening in their home. 'Emeis has €5.6 billion generated in global funding and you look at the programme and there aren't even sheets, basic incontinence wear, there's poor staffing levels. That's completely unacceptable from an organisation generating that level of revenue.' A Hiqa report from an inspection of the Portlaoise nursing home in February noted a weak organisation structure was affecting the quality of care being provided. It also noted 'noncompliance' in a number of key areas. There were 70 residents in the home at the time of the visit. Although changes had been introduced in the wake of criticisms made after a previous inspection, the report said, 'this inspection found that the overall governance and management of the centre had deteriorated since'. A November 2024 inspection of the Beneavin home, where there were 72 residents at the time, did not find any instance of noncompliance. 'From what the residents told the inspector and from what was observed, it was evident that residents were very happy living in Firstcare Beneavin Manor and their rights were respected in how they spent their days,' the report said. In a statement on Friday, Emeis noted a request from the Minister for Older People for Hiqa to conduct a national review of its nursing home facilities and said it will co-operate fully with all regulatory and statutory bodies. It said Hiqa and the HSE have visited Beneavin Manor and The Residence Portlaoise, and it has separately initiated on-site audits and 'detailed corrective actions'. It said the 'shocking and unacceptable' footage showing 'poor and abusive practice' is not representative of the professionalism and commitment of its employees in Ireland.
The Journal
16 hours ago
- The Journal
Taoiseach calls for HIQA's regulations to be examined following RTÉ nursing home investigation
TAOISEACH MICHEÁL MARTIN has called for a review of HIQA's regulatory framework after an RTÉ Investigates programme highlighted poor treatment and practice within two privately-owned care homes. Both care facilities – The Residence Portlaoise and Beneavin Manor in Glasnevin – are under the ownership of Emeis Ireland, formerly known as Orpea. Emeis operates 27 nursing homes across the country after entering the Irish market in 2022. It was revealed this week that the nursing homes regulator HIQA (Health Information and Quality Authority) had stopped new admissions to The Residence in Portlaoise in April. HIQA said it was 'very concerned' over the 'distressing' scenes in the RTÉ programme. Speaking to reporters today, Martin described the scenes in the RTÉ Investigates programme as 'horrific, shocking and absolutely unacceptable'. He said there was a lack of a 'clear ethos and framework' and that there are 'issues for HIQA's approach to this'. 'I think HIQA will be examining that aspect of it,' said Martin, 'in terms of the methodology used to inspect. Advertisement 'Are there better ways of getting under this to make sure that this does not happen again.' He then called for 'increased vigilance from the regulatory approach' and added that this is 'something that the government will be looking at'. Martin said he has spoken with both Kieran O'Donnell, Minister of State for Older People, and Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill on the issue. He further remarked that the issue is 'fundamentally about regulation' but added that HIQA is 'well resourced'. And while Martin said HIQA has been 'effective and impactful in many areas', he added that 'there has to be an examination' because the 'regulatory framework didn't catch very horrific and shocking behaviour towards elderly people in nursing homes'. Martin also said that there will now be a 'full look' at all the homes under Emeis's ownership. Meanwhile, Martin remarked that Ireland is 'one of the more young populations in Europe, but we're aging fast'. However, he said there is a 'multi-stranded approach to aging' by the government and that a new national safeguarding policy is being developed. But while he remarked that this new policy 'would be an additional help', he added: 'But fundamentally, it's behaviour on a day-to-day basis and how homes are operated, and it's the regulation of that that ultimately will still have to be the first response and key response to situations like this.' He also said there will continue to be a mix of public and private care homes due to the need to be 'absolutely realistic and pragmatic about the population growth and the aging of the population'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
