Sole survivor of Air India crash recounts escape
NEW DELHI: The sole survivor of the Air India plane crash that killed more than 240 people said he walked out of a broken emergency exit after the aircraft hit a medical college hostel in the city of Ahmedabad.
Ramesh Viswashkumar, who police said was on seat 11A near the emergency exit and managed to escape through the broken hatch, was filmed after Thursday's crash limping on the street in a blood-stained T-shirt with bruises on his face.
That social media footage of the British national of Indian origin was broadcast on nearly all of India's news channels after the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner plummeted soon after take-off and erupted in a ball of fire.
It was the worst aviation disaster in a decade.
'I don't believe how I survived. For some time I thought I was also going to die,' 40-year-old Viswashkumar told Indian state broadcaster DD News from his hospital bed on Friday.
'But when I opened my eyes, I realised I was alive and I tried to unbuckle myself from the seat and escape from where I could. It was in front of my eyes that the air hostess and others (died)'.
Police said some people at the hostel and others on the ground were also killed in the crash. Rescue workers were searching for missing people and aircraft parts in the charred buildings of the hostel on Friday.
Viswashkumar said the plane appeared to come to a standstill in midair for a few seconds shortly after take-off and the green and white cabin lights were turned on.
He said he could feel the engine thrust increasing but then the plane 'crashed with speed into the hostel.'
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who arrived in his home state of Gujarat to visit the crash site, also met Viswashkumar in the hospital on Friday.
Doctors told local media that he did not sustain any major injuries.
'The side of the plane I was in landed on the ground, and I could see that there was space outside the aircraft, so when my door broke I tried to escape through it and I did,' Viswashkumar said.
'The opposite side of the aircraft was blocked by the building wall so nobody could have come out of there.'
Viswashkumar said he walked out of the crash site with only burn injuries on his left arm.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
18 minutes ago
- The Star
Helicopter crashes in northern Indian state, six people on board, ANI reports
(Reuters) -A helicopter carrying six people has crashed in the northern Indian state of Uttarakhand, news agency ANI reported on Sunday. The aircraft was flying from Dehradun to Kedarnath before it went missing in Gaurikund and crashed, ANI reported, citing an official. (Reporting by Rishabh Jaiswal in Bengaluru; Editing by Lincoln Feast)
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Some bosses thrive on humiliating employees
Some managers use shouting and humiliation as tools to enforce compliance or assert their authority. — Photography AnVr / Getty Images, via ETX Daily Up You might think that abusive bosses act out of anger or stress. Think again. An American study reveals that some of them deliberately mistreat their teams to assert their authority or boost performance. And, contrary to what you might think, they feel no remorse. From offices to construction sites, toxic management poisons many professional environments with behavior like shouting, humiliation, inappropriate comments and more. However, a study conducted by researchers at the University of Georgia (UGA) is challenging our understanding of this phenomenon. This kind of abusive behavior does not always signal a loss of control, due to stress or tiredness, for example. Some managers use it as a carefully calculated strategy. This insight came to Szu-Han Lin, professor of management at UGA's Terry College of Business, while watching 'Hell's Kitchen.' In this television show, two teams of chefs compete for a position as head chef in a restaurant. This all takes place under the watchful eye and, above all, the harsh comments of British chef Gordon Ramsay. Over the course of the episodes, we see him yelling, humiliating, and sometimes even insulting the contestants. For hours on end. Millions of viewers watch this spectacle without batting an eye. Szu-Han Lin, however, saw it as a subject of study. Her team interviewed 100 supervisors from various sectors, including construction, nursing, and retail. Then, in a second phase, 249 other managers were monitored daily for two weeks. The question was simple: why do you mistreat your employees? And how do you feel afterward? When abuse becomes a management tool Their answers are disturbing. Some supervisors openly admit to using shouting and humiliation as management tools to enforce compliance or assert their authority. And unlike those who crack under pressure, these managers feel no guilt. Worse still, they feel a sense of satisfaction. "If they engage in these behaviors with a goal in mind, like boosting compliance or preserving their identity as leaders, they're satisfying an emotional need," explains Szu-Han Lin in a news release. This discovery challenges two decades of research on the subject. "We have been studying abusive behavior in the workplace for 20 years, and we have known it always has bad outcomes for performance and productivity," the researcher says. "But we also know that people keep doing it. I think we assumed that if managers engage in these behaviors, they'd feel bad, and it would always have a negative effect on them. But that's not the case." For Szu-Han Lin, this new awareness must change the way managers are trained. "It's important for leaders to recognize they may have motivations for acting abusively to help them find better leadership tools," she explains. "You may want your followers to listen to you, or you may want to make sure you establish your role as a leader. That's fine, but there are other ways to achieve that." Regardless of the motivations, managerial mistreatment remains counterproductive. It destroys motivation instead of stimulating it. "If you engage in abusive behaviors, it will always lead to negative outcomes. No one will be motivated at all," says Szu-Han Lin. A lesson that should give pause to anyone who thinks that authority goes hand in hand with brutality. – ETX Daily Up
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Is 11A the safest seat on a plane? Not so fast, say experts
LONDON, June 15 — The survival of a passenger who escaped through an exit door seconds after his Air India flight crashed killing everyone else on board has prompted speculation over whether his seat, 11A, is the safest. Aviation experts say it is not so straightforward because aircraft vary widely in seat configurations, crashes are unique, and survival often hinges on a complex interplay of factors. 'Each accident is different, and it is impossible to predict survivability based on seat location,' said Mitchell Fox, a director at Flight Safety Foundation, a US-based nonprofit. Vishwas Kumar Ramesh said his 11A seat was near an emergency exit on the London-bound Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner that crashed in Ahmedabad on Thursday and he managed to walk out. Sitting next to an exit door might help you survive an accident, but it won't always be 11A because aircraft can have dozens of different configurations. 'In this particular instance, because the passenger was sitting adjacent to the emergency exit, this was obviously the safest seat on the day,' said Ron Bartsch, Chairman at Sydney-based AvLaw Aviation Consulting. 'But it's not always 11A, it's just 11A on this configuration of the Boeing 787.' A 2007 Popular Mechanics study of crashes since 1971 found that passengers towards the back of the plane had better survival odds. Some experts suggest the wing section offers more stability. Sitting next to an exit door, like Ramesh, gives you an opportunity to be one of the first out of the plane, although some exits don't function after a crash. The opposite side of the plane was blocked by the wall of a building it crashed into, he said. In January of last year, a panel missing several bolts blew off the side of a Boeing 737 MAX mid-flight, creating a gaping hole and damaging the adjacent seat. Fortunately, no one was seated there at the time, and the incident resulted in no fatalities. Sitting by the aisle might offer you a speedier escape but it increases the likelihood of being hit in the head by luggage falling out of the overhead bins — a much more common occurrence than major crashes. Safety briefings Paying attention to the safety briefing at the start of your flight - often dismissed as routine ‚ is likely the best way to improve your chances of survival, experts compliance with cabin crew evacuation advice, including leaving bags behind, was a key factor in saving the lives of all 379 passengers and crew aboard a Japan Airlines flight in January last year. The Airbus A350 aircraft had collided with a Coast Guard plane at Tokyo's Haneda Airport, killing five of the six crew members on the smaller aircraft. Safety briefings typically cover critical instructions such as how to fasten your seatbelt securely, adopt the correct brace position and plan your evacuation route. A common tip is to count the number of rows between your seat and the nearest exit — vital knowledge if the cabin fills with smoke and visibility is low. Despite disasters such as the Air India crash, plane designs have evolved to increase the likelihood of passengers walking away from a rare plane accident, Fox said. These include floor path lighting, fire detection and extinguishers, less flammable cabin materials and improved access to emergency exits. 'There have been remarkable advancements in airplane cabin design that have improved the survivability of accidents on or near the ground,' Fox said. — Reuters
