logo
Israel killed at least 14 scientists in an unprecedented attack on Iran's nuclear know-how

Israel killed at least 14 scientists in an unprecedented attack on Iran's nuclear know-how

Arab Times12 hours ago

PARIS, June 24, (AP): Israel's tally of the war damage it wrought on Iran includes the targeted killings of at least 14 scientists, an unprecedented attack on the brains behind Iran's nuclear program that outside experts say can only set it back, not stop it.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Israel's ambassador to France said the killings will make it "almost" impossible for Iran to build weapons from whatever nuclear infrastructure and material may have survived nearly two weeks of Israeli airstrikes and massive bunker-busting bombs dropped by U.S. stealth bombers.
"The fact that the whole group disappeared is basically throwing back the program by a number of years, by quite a number of years," Ambassador Joshua Zarka said. But nuclear analysts say Iran has other scientists who can take their place.
European governments say that military force alone cannot eradicate Iran's nuclear know-how, which is why they want a negotiated solution to put concerns about the Iranian program to rest.
"Strikes cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades, nor any regime ambition to deploy that knowledge to build a nuclear weapon," U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy told lawmakers in the House of Commons.
Here's a closer look at the killings:
Zarka told AP that Israeli strikes killed at least 14 physicists and nuclear engineers, top Iranian scientific leaders who "basically had everything in their mind.'
They were killed "not because of the fact that they knew physics, but because of the fight that they were personally involved in, the creation and the fabrication and the production of (a) nuclear weapon," he said.
Nine of them were killed in Israel's opening wave of attacks on June 13, the Israeli military said. It said they "possessed decades of accumulated experience in the development of nuclear weapons' and included specialists in chemistry, materials and explosives as well as physicists.
Zarka spoke Monday to AP. On Tuesday, Iran state TV reported the death of another Iranian nuclear scientist, Mohammad Reza Sedighi Saber, in an Israeli strike, after he'd survived an earlier attack that killed his 17-year-old son on June 13.
Experts say that decades of Iranian work on nuclear energy - and, Western powers allege, nuclear weapons - has given the country reserves of know-how and scientists who could continue any work toward building warheads to fit on Iran's ballistic missiles.
"Blueprints will be around and, you know, the next generation of Ph.D. students will be able to figure it out," said Mark Fitzpatrick, who specialized in nuclear non-proliferation as a former U.S. diplomat. Bombing nuclear facilities "or killing the people will set it back some period of time. Doing both will set it back further, but it will be reconstituted.'
"They have substitutes in maybe the next league down, and they're not as highly qualified, but they will get the job done eventually,' said Fitzpatrick, now an analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a London think tank.
How quickly nuclear work could resume will in part depend on whether Israeli and U.S. strikes destroyed Iran's stock of enriched uranium and equipment needed to make it sufficiently potent for possible weapons use.
"The key element is the material. So once you have the material, then the rest is reasonably well-known,' said Pavel Podvig, a Geneva-based analyst who specializes in Russia's nuclear arsenal. He said killing scientists may have been intended "to scare people so they don't go work on these programs.'
"Then the questions are, 'Where do you stop?' I mean you start killing, like, students who study physics?" he asked. "This is a very slippery slope.'
The Israeli ambassador said: "I do think that people that will be asked to be part of a future nuclear weapon program in Iran will think twice about it.' Israel has long been suspected of killing Iranian nuclear scientists but previously didn't claim responsibility as it did this time.
In 2020, Iran blamed Israel for killing its top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, with a remote-controlled machine gun.
"It delayed the program but they still have a program. So it doesn't work,' said Paris-based analyst Lova Rinel, with the Foundation for Strategic Research think tank. "It's more symbolic than strategic."
Without saying that Israel killed Fakhrizadeh, the Israeli ambassador said "Iran would have had a bomb a long time ago' were it not for repeated setbacks to its nuclear program - some of which Iran attributed to Israeli sabotage.
"They have not reached the bomb yet,' Zarka said. "Every one of these accidents has postponed a little bit the program.'
International humanitarian law bans the intentional killing of civilians and non-combatants. But legal scholars say those restrictions might not apply to nuclear scientists if they were part of the Iranian armed forces or directly participating in hostilities.
"My own take: These scientists were working for a rogue regime that has consistently called for the elimination of Israel, helping it to develop weapons that will allow that threat to take place. As such, they are legitimate targets,' said Steven R. David, a professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University.
He said Nazi German and Japanese leaders who fought Allied nations during World War II "would not have hesitated to kill the scientists working on the Manhattan Project' that fathered the world's first atomic weapons.
Laurie Blank, a specialist in humanitarian law at Emory Law School, said it's too early to say whether Israel's decapitation campaign was legal.
"As external observers, we don't have all the relevant facts about the nature of the scientists' role and activities or the intelligence that Israel has,' she said by email to AP. "As a result, it is not possible to make any definitive conclusions.'
Zarka, the ambassador, distinguished between civilian nuclear research and the scientists targeted by Israel.
"It's one thing to learn physics and to know exactly how a nucleus of an atom works and what is uranium,' he said.
But turning uranium into warheads that fit onto missiles is "not that simple,' he said. 'These people had the know-how of doing it, and were developing the know-how of doing it further. And this is why they were eliminated.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil prices crash as Iran blinks
Oil prices crash as Iran blinks

Arab Times

time7 hours ago

  • Arab Times

Oil prices crash as Iran blinks

NEW YORK, June 24, (AP): If oil prices are any measure, Iran just flinched. The price of oil tumbled Monday afternoon in an historical move as traders bet that Iran's decision to bomb a U.S. base in Qatar signaled it was not planning to do the one thing that could really hurt America: Shut down the flow of oil by attacking crude shipments. 'When the response comes and it is muted, oil drops,' said Tom Kloza, chief market strategist at consultancy Turner Mason & Co, calling the limited Iran response far short of what many traders feared. 'This rivals some of the historic selloffs.' There's still plenty Iran could do to push prices back up, and the markets could be getting it all wrong, But oil analysts say there are plenty of reasons fear has receded. Adding to the odds that prices will settle, President Donald Trump announced that Israel and Iran had agreed to a complete ceasefire, though the situation remained unclear. The price of West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark, fell 7.2% to $68.51 per barrel in regular trading on Monday after Iran announced a missile attack on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which the U.S. military uses. Traders were relieved because Iran said it had matched the number of bombs dropped by the U.S. on Iranian nuclear sites this weekend, a possible sign of a desire to de-escalate the conflict. The price of oil fell further after Trump announced a 'complete and total ceasefire' to be phased in over 24 hours. Oil fell almost 4% to $65.84 a barrel early Tuesday, and is now below where it was before fighting between Iran and Israel began over a week ago, when a barrel of U.S. crude was just above $68. Markets were initially nervous Sunday as oil futures opened for trading. The price of Brent crude, the international standard, had jumped 4% as traders anxiously watched the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway on Iran's southern border that legislators in Tehran were demanding be closed in retaliation. That would have walloped the global economy because much of world's crude and liquified gas passes through it. Brent crude was trading at $68.06 per barrel, down 3.5%, early Tuesday. That's good news for Trump, who wants the Federal Reserve to stop worrying about inflation and start cutting interest rates. It's also good for motorists this summer if the trend holds. Drivers were already paying higher prices at the pump before the U.S. attack. The average price nationwide is $3.18 per gallon, according to GasBuddy surveys, about 10 cents more than two weeks ago. Some traders doubted Iran would try to close the Strait of Hormuz even before its limited attack Monday. Much of country's own crude passes through the waterway - 1.5 million barrels a day - and oil is a big revenue generator for the country that they would be loath to disrupt. 'It's a silly notion that the Iranians would look to do that,' said Kloza. 'I've been covering oil for 50 years and we've never seen the Strait of Hormuz compromised.' Asked about the prospect of a shutdown on NBC's 'Meet the Press' Sunday, Vice President J.D. Vance put it more simply: 'I think that would be suicidal.' At current oil prices, Tehran receives roughly $40 billion in revenue annually from oil transiting the same waters. That is a tenth of what the entire of country produces in goods and services. Andy Lipow, an Houston based oil analyst, says history suggests Iran won't disrupt its own flow of oil, but that countries, like people, don't always act in their economic interests. 'The question for the oil markets is, 'Is his time different?',' he said. 'You might have an emotional decision.' He notes also that Iran has other ways to push oil higher without completely closing off the waterway. Iran could jam navigational devices, slowing transit, or drop mines in the water, forcing the U.S. Navy to do more escorts. Or it could bomb a tanker, he said, sending the premiums that shippers need to pay insurers sky high. If traders are wrong and oil shoots back up, the impact could be widely felt. A surge in oil prices would come at a bad time. Trump insists that the inflation scare is largely over, but many economists think higher prices are still coming because the full impact of his tariffs are only now beginning to show up on everyday goods. Trump is clearly aware things could change fast. 'To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' he wrote on Truth Social Monday, adding. 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING!'

Iran attacks US base in Qatar
Iran attacks US base in Qatar

Kuwait Times

time7 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

Iran attacks US base in Qatar

Amir calls Qatar Amir to offer support • Crown Prince chairs Defense Council meet DOHA/KUWAIT: Iran's military said it carried out a missile attack on the Al-Udeid US airbase in Qatar on Monday after explosions were heard across the Qatari capital following Tehran's threat to retaliate for US airstrikes on its nuclear sites. The Iranian military said the attack was 'devastating and powerful,' but US officials said no US personnel were killed or injured in the attack on the airbase, the largest US military installation in the Middle East. Iran, which had been warned by Washington not to retaliate or face massive US military action, had informed the US via two diplomatic channels hours ahead of the attack, as well as Qatari authorities, a senior regional source told Reuters. Qatar's defense minister told Al Jazeera its air defenses had intercepted missiles directed at the Al-Udeid air base, the largest US military installation in the Middle East. Qatar said it 'reserved the right to respond' after the attack. 'We affirm that the State of Qatar reserves the right to respond directly in a manner proportional to the nature and scale of this blatant aggression,' foreign ministry spokesman Majed Al-Ansari said in a statement, adding that the US base had been evacuated as a precaution ahead of the attack. HH the Amir Sheikh Meshal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah on Monday called Amir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani in the aftermath of the missile attack launched by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps on Al-Udeid airbase. HH the Amir voiced Kuwait's emphatic condemnation and denunciation of this obvious aggression as a clear breach of Qatar's sovereignty and airspace, as well as international law and the UN Charter. He reiterated that Kuwait absolutely stands side by side with Qatar's leadership, government and people, and utterly backs all measures and decisions it is taking to safeguard its sovereignty, security and stability. He also underlined Kuwait's readiness to use all its potential and resources to support Qatar, stressing that Qatar's security and stability are an integral part of Kuwait's security and stability. The Amir of Qatar, for his part, voiced much thanks and appreciation to HH the Amir, wishing him good health and Kuwait and its people progress and development. Kuwait's Supreme Defense Council held an emergency meeting on Sunday at Bayan Palace to discuss the latest regional developments. The meeting was chaired by HH the Crown Prince Sheikh Sabah Al-Khaled Al-Hamad Al-Sabah and attended by HH the Prime Minister Sheikh Ahmad Al-Abdullah Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah. The council reviewed recent regional escalations and ongoing security challenges. Kuwait Army denied rumors that a military air base in the country was subjected to a missile attack, stressing that there was no attack or violation of Kuwait's sovereignty. In a statement Monday, the army urged the public to obtain news from official sources and refrain from sharing or reposting unverified news. This handout picture provided by the Iranian Army media office on June 23, 2025 shows the Army Commander-in-Chief Amir Hatami attending a meeting in the Iranian Army's War Command Room. (Right) . - AFP This frame grab take from TV footage shows the remnants of an Iranian missile intercepted over Qatar, as it lies on a pavement near a fence on June 23, 2025. Kuwait strongly condemns Iran's missile attack on Al-Udeid airbase in Qatar, the foreign ministry said in a statement on Monday, calling the strike a 'flagrant violation of Qatar's sovereignty and airspace'. The attack represents a violation of international law and UN Charter, and poses a major threat to regional peace, security and stability, the ministry said. Kuwait stands fully with Qatar and fully supports all measures it may take in order to protect its sovereignty, security and stability, including its right to retaliate in the way it deems fit, the ministry said, reiterating Kuwait's readiness to provide all capabilities in helping Qatar. Kuwait renews the call for stopping military operations in the region, halting the expansion of the conflict that started with the Zionist forces' attacks, and intensifying regional efforts in order to resolve conflicts through diplomacy, the ministry said. Kuwait also said it was closing its airspace 'until further notice' on Monday after a similar move from Qatar and Bahrain as Iran attacked the US base in Qatar. The Kuwaiti Directorate General of Civil Aviation later said the airspace had reopened. Kuwait's Civil Defense Committee held a meeting on Monday, chaired by First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Interior Sheikh Fahad Al-Yousef Al-Sabah, to enhance preparedness considering recent regional developments. The meeting took place at the Crisis and Disaster Management Center in the Nawaf Al-Ahmad Building and was attended by Acting Undersecretary of the Ministry of Interior, Maj Gen Ali Al-Adwani, along with 32 representatives from various government institutions. The meeting discussed operational mechanisms of specialized field evacuation and shelter teams, emphasizing the importance of strengthening effective communication among concerned authorities. The discussions stressed unifying efforts within an integrated system that ensures swift response and the highest levels of coordination in crisis and emergency management. It also underlined the need to activate early warning systems and unified control centers to expedite decision-making and resource allocation, thereby reinforcing national readiness and achieving the highest standards of safety and stability. Iran's National Security Council confirmed it had attacked the US military base in Qatar on Monday in retaliation for American strikes on its nuclear facilities, adding its response did not 'pose any threat' to its Gulf neighbor. 'In response to the US aggressive and insolent action against Iran's nuclear sites and facilities, a few hours ago, the powerful armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran struck the US airbase in Al-Udeid, Qatar,' the council said in a statement, adding that the number of missiles used 'was the same as the number of bombs that the US had used in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities'. 'This action does not pose any threat to our friendly and brotherly country, Qatar,' it added. The Iranian attack in Qatar will impact relationship-building efforts that have been underway between the Arab Gulf states and Iran, a Gulf official told Reuters on Monday. 'Iran's actions play into the hands of (the Zionist entity), which wants to sow discord and derail recent improvements in relations between Iran and the Gulf countries,' the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. In recent years, Gulf countries Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have restored once-frayed ties with Iran. Iran had issued threats to retaliate against the United States after US bombers dropped 30,000-pound bunker-busters on Iranian underground nuclear facilities at the weekend, joining the Zionist entity's air war against Tehran, and President Donald Trump mooted the possibility of the Iranian government being toppled. The attack came shortly after a Western diplomat told Reuters there had been a credible threat to a US military base in the Gulf state following the unprecedented US airstrikes on Iran's uranium enrichment program. A source familiar with the matter told Reuters that Qatar, situated just across the Gulf from Iran, had shut its airspace after receiving the advance warning from Iran. Bahrain, another US-allied Gulf Arab state just to the north of Qatar, said it had also shut its airspace after the Iranian strike against the Al-Udeid base. In addition, the US Ain Al-Asad air base in Iraq had activated its air defense system out of concern for a potential attack, military sources said. The main US military base in Iraq's western neighbor Syria was also on full alert for possible attack by Iran or Iran-aligned militia groups, a Syrian security source said. Qatar had earlier announced it had closed its airspace temporarily to ensure the safety of residents and visitors. That followed an advisory from the US embassy in Qatar to Americans to shelter in place, out of what it said was 'an abundance of caution'. Two US officials said Washington had assessed that Iran could carry out attacks targeting American forces in the Middle East soon, although the US was still seeking a diplomatic resolution that would see Tehran forgo any reprisal. Foreign oil firms including giants BP, Eni and TotalEnergies evacuated some foreign staff from southern Iraq amid regional tensions, the state-owned Basra Oil Company said Monday. 'Firms operating in the fields of the Basra Oil Company have temporarily evacuated some of their foreign personnel,' the company said in a statement. It added that operations were not affected in the southern province of Basra, which produces most of Iraq's crude oil. The evacuations are due to the 'security situation' in the region, an official from the company told AFP. British energy giant BP, which is one of the biggest foreign players in Iraq's oil sector, evacuated staff from the huge Rumaila field. The evacuation 'has not affected' production since Iraqi staff are handling operations in coordination 'remotely' with the British firm, Basra Oil Company said. The Italian firm ENI 'has gradually reduced its staff from 260 to 98 employees,' while France's TotalEnergies 'evacuated 60 percent of its personnel in anticipation of an emergency'. Russian oil giant Lukoil and Chinese companies have not evacuated their staff. Iraq is a founding member of the OPEC cartel, and its crude oil sales make up 90 percent of Iraq's budget revenues. Iran-aligned Iraqi armed group Kataib Hezbollah had warned it would resume attacks on US troops in the region if the United States intervenes in Iran. – Agencies

Iran must face reality
Iran must face reality

Arab Times

time8 hours ago

  • Arab Times

Iran must face reality

AFTER 13 days of direct Iranian-Israeli conflict, a ceasefire was finally reached through Qatari mediation and American sponsorship. With the negotiating table set and all parties weighing their gains and losses, several important points must be emphasized. The disruption of the Iranian nuclear project, achieved through this confrontation, is credited to the United States, which accomplished this goal through a highly precise surgical operation. This proves the fact that when a superpower intervenes, supported by the European Union and regional states, it aims for a decisive outcome rather than merely managing the crisis. Secondly, Iran's violation of the sovereignty of the sisterly state of Qatar revealed the true nature of the destructive mullahs' regime in Tehran. This regime shows no respect for good neighborliness or the excellent relations between Tehran and Doha. Through this reckless act, the Iranian leadership exposed their disregard for approaches that benefit their people, prioritizing instead their terrorist agenda in the region. There was indeed a prior agreement for a limited and 'controlled' Iranian response to the US attack, similar to the reaction following the assassination of former Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani near Baghdad airport. At that time, US President Donald Trump stated that Iran had informed the Americans it would strike the Ain al-Assad base, mainly to create an excuse for its people, a gesture seen as a merciful or 'brotherly' bombing. What does this mean? It means that no power can truly challenge the United States. Iran, for its part, cannot confront this superpower directly. Moreover, the United States and Europe consider Israel's security a red line that must not be crossed. In contrast, Iran has demonstrated its weakness in direct confrontation. While Iran once waged wars against Israel through proxies and supplied arms, allowing Tel Aviv to score several points in its favor, the situation today is very different. Iran no longer controls four Arab capitals, nor does it possess the capability to threaten Israel's annihilation. Neither Lebanese Hezbollah, the Iraqi sectarian militias, nor the destructive Houthis can seriously threaten any country, especially Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states. Overall, Iran's network of proxies is weaker than ever. Based on this, experience has shown that Tehran must adopt a more realistic vision that aligns with its distinguished position, its large population of 94 million, and its considerable capabilities. We have stated before, and reiterate now, that neither anyone in the region nor the international community wants a country governed by such a regime to possess nuclear weapons. No rational Islamic state supports the proliferation of nuclear arms, especially in an extraordinarily sensitive region like the Middle East. Now that the war has ended, a realistic Iranian assessment of the confrontation's outcome is a must. Iran must seriously consider changing its political and economic course and seeking common ground with its neighbors, who unanimously condemned Iran's aggression against Qatar. This united stance confirms that the Gulf Cooperation Council countries share an unshakable destiny and makes clear that any attempt to undermine regional security will be met with severe consequences. The day after the ceasefire, any rational observer can see who the biggest losers and winners are. Iran faces the daunting task of rebuilding, requiring a lot of time, money, and resources, none of which are easily available due to the sanctions imposed on it. Meanwhile, Israel continues to benefit from unlimited logistical and financial support from the United States and Europe, along with a workforce of 400,000 Palestinian laborers in Israel. Is this truly the outcome Iran sought from the war? To strengthen Israel's position? Regardless of the outcome, Iran must adopt a wise and pragmatic approach to the future. It is time for Tehran to understand that stubbornness only leads to the harshest consequences.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store