
‘Policies skewed against women'
House of cards: Despite constitutional assurances of gender equality and the right to housing, women find themselves up against patriarchal norms, unequal treatment under customary practices and little protection from the law. Photos: Seri
A
The 52-page shadow report, compiled by the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (Seri) and the Women and ESCR Working Group of the International Network for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, outlines widespread discrimination against women regarding access to housing and security.
The report paints a bleak picture of women facing entrenched patriarchal norms, unequal treatment under customary law and weak enforcement of legal safeguards.
'We are not illegal occupiers. We are mothers, workers, survivors — this land is the only place we have,' said Thoko, a resident of an informal settlement outside Durban, who did not want to give her real name.
She has faced constant eviction threats for more than 10 years, despite calling the settlement home.
The Constitution guarantees gender equality and the right to housing, while laws such as the
But the report outlines that land and housing policies often prioritise married, male-headed households. Women living in informal settlements, farming areas and urban townships find themselves sidelined by a system that continues to see them as dependents, rather than rights-holders.
'Women are treated as invisible in housing policy. You only matter if you are someone's wife,' said Nandipha Mntambo, a community organiser with the
'And if your husband dies or leaves, you can lose everything.'
Interviews with residents of Slovo Park, Johannesburg and in Cato Crest in Durban found that in rural areas under traditional authorities women often can't get land because of patriarchal customs.
'Land allocations are rarely given to single women and those without male relatives often face social stigma and institutional exclusion,' the report said.
It states that
'They came at 4am and started tearing down my shack while my children were still sleeping,' recalled Zanele, a domestic worker in Gauteng, who also did not want to be named. 'I have nowhere else to go and every week they come back with more threats.'
(Graphic: John McCann/M&G)
The report points out that city teams tasked with stopping land grabs often use force and scare tactics and wreck the property of women living in makeshift camps. Yet accountability remains elusive.
'We don't ask for special treatment — just to live without fear,' said Amina, an asylum-seeker from the DRC in Joburg. 'But they treat us like criminals for trying to survive.'
The report added that housing policies ignore the specific struggles of migrant women, despite the Constitution promising housing rights for all.
The report highlights a major issue — national
According to Seri researcher Mary Maseko: 'If you can't count us, you can't serve us.' She added: 'Budgets, data and laws need to work together. Right now, they don't.'
The report calls for a gender-focused strategy in housing and land reform requiring joint ownership in government housing projects, securing women's rights to use customary land and ensuring accountability by gathering data and changing laws.
South Africa is set to meet the UN committee later this year. It will review how countries are meeting their responsibilities under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which South Africa signed in 2015.
'Women's rights to land and housing are not just legal issues — they are life and death,' said Seri executive director Nomzamo Zondo.
'We need a state that sees women, not as appendages to men, but as citizens in full.'
The report warns about how urban growth and planning rules have created gender-based exclusion. In many cities, authorities carry out evictions under the guise of upgrades and 'cleaning up' of urban spaces, which has hit women-led households in informal areas and urban centres the hardest.
The removals often happen without offering new housing that considers women's caregiving needs, school access and closeness to jobs.
Abahlali baseMjondolo housing activist Thandeka Mlambo said: 'We've seen women pushed to the edges of cities where there's no transport, no clinics or schools. This is a planned form of displacement.'
The report urges an immediate need to revise how government housing is allocated.
'Current systems often work against single women, queer people or domestic violence survivors who cannot show proof of cohabitation or nuclear family ties,' it said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
No bail for man accused of killing Gqeberha pupil and her mom
News Alleged mastermind could pose a potential threat to witnesses, says magistrate Premium By Riaan Marais - 12 June 2025 Found to be a potential danger to state witnesses, the alleged mastermind behind the double murder of a Collegiate Girls' High School pupil and her mother was denied bail on Wednesday. Nceba Maji, 44, accused of planning the botched hit that claimed the lives of Hailie-Jade Coboza, 19, and her mother, Lusanda, 40, looked dejected as court orderlies led him back to the holding cells at the Gqeberha magistrate's court...

The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
'You are rude': McKenzie slams DA MP Jacobs' conduct in parliamentary meetings
'Jacobs knows that I haven't breached any act or law, hence he's talking about ethics. My ethics and his are different. We are not dealing with what he feels and what I feel. The act allows me to appoint Eugene Botha,' McKenzie said. 'I've breached no act. The PA is not the first party and certainly will not be the last party to do that. Your party in the Western Cape is riddled. When you say I've done something wrong, quote the act, not your feelings.' McKenzie also addressed Jacobs' conduct during the meeting, referencing a previous committee meeting where Jacobs grilled Safa president Danny Jordaan over his leadership and travel expenses. 'What I will never allow is for this honourable member to speak when I'm speaking. On a personal level, I want him to know that when he showed Danny Jordaan his finger, I will never allow him to do that to me. I respect you; respect me. When you speak, I am obliged to listen, and when I speak, you should listen. You should not come in as you feel. You can only interject with a point of order through the chairperson. 'You are rude. I will never stand for this rudeness of Jacobs.' TimesLIVE

The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
Godongwana declares contentious Budget the new normal as parly adopts fiscal framework
While finance minister Enoch Godongwana did not run this past weekend's Comrades marathon, his 2025 Budget finally reached the last mile of its race for adoption, after three lockups, two tablings and a court challenge. The National Assembly voted to adopt the 2025 fiscal framework and revenue proposals as well as the committee report thereof on Wednesday afternoon, with 268 voting in favour of the adoption, 88 voting against the adoption, and two abstentions. Godongwana told the National Assembly sitting that he suspected that over the next four years, the management of the Budget as well as the fiscal framework would be similar to how it was handled this year. 'We have had a painful journey to arrive at this date, where the fiscal framework is being approved. It has been a very painful journey. Definitely, from the Treasury perspective, we've drawn a number of lessons, but I suspect, also members of this house, must draw a number of lessons as to how, in practice, are we going to manage the debates around the fiscal framework moving forward?' Parliament's February sitting to table the Budget was postponed over resistance at a cabinet level to a VAT hike proposal. Godongwana returned to parliament in March with a revised VAT hike proposal, and the fiscal framework was challenged in court. He finally tabled a Budget in May with a fuel levy hike in place of the scrapped VAT hike. He challenged the assertion that his 2025 Budget was an austerity budget. 'This budget is not austerity. We are increasing taxes, not to focus on debt, but to focus on funding social services. Education, health and so on.' ANC MP and standing committee on finance chair Joe Maswanganyi moved for the adoption of the fiscal framework and revenue proposals report, saying that processing a budget within a coalition government can be complex due to the competing interests involved. In Godongwana's defence, Maswanganyi said anyone calling for Godongwana's head was out of tune with the realities facing coalition governments around the world. 'Considering these realities, particularly the tariffs and trade tensions initiated by the US , it is prudent to pay attention to the five-year plan ... This is not an austerity budget. The Budget has garnered praise for being pro-poor and pro-growth.' He said stakeholders welcomed the scrapping of the proposed VAT hike ahead of its effective day of May 1, but raised concerns over the financial impact of the fuel levy hike on business as well as middle-to-low-income households around the country. MK Party MP and former finance minister Des van Rooyen said his party rejected the committee's report on the 2025 budget as a 'sell-out pact' led by the parties that came together to form the government of national unity after last year's election. 'It is in this report that the ANC, DA, IFP, FF Plus, Action SA, and other GNU beneficiaries agreed that the majority of our people should be subjected to the fuel levy hikes and personal income tax. Think-tanks are in agreement that the fuel levy is the most regressive tax: even worse than VAT.' South Africans will pay more for work, school and travel expenses, and the buying power of people's income will be whittled away due to bracket creep. He said the report sought to protect the interests of a wealthy few. DA MP Wendy Alexander said for the first time in years, the budget process included ordinary South Africans rather than being rubber-stamped by a legislature where the ANC enjoyed a strong majority. She called the scrapping of the VAT hike a victory for democracy and South Africans. 'When citizens watch, comment and engage the budget process, the democracy grows, and this is precisely what the constitution envisioned — a government accountable to the people and not the other way around.' She said the GNU must prove that government can function across spheres when the stakes demand it. She said the projected 77% debt-to-GDP ratio was unsustainable and that the country could not be expected to build more schools and hospitals on the back of untenable debt levels. EFF MP Omphile Maotwe said her party rejected the fiscal framework and revenue proposal report as a project which would condemn South Africans to considerable tax burdens, courtesy of the 'former liberation movement', the ANC. 'It took the EFF to approach the Western Cape High Court to stop the VAT increase. If it were not for the EFF South Africans would already be paying 15.5% VAT today. The people of South Africa know now without any doubt that the EFF is the only dependable tool in the hands of the poor and the working class.' She said the fuel levy increase was an attack on motorists, the poor and the working class, who were already facing rising costs before the proposal was tabled. IFP MP Nhlanhla Hadebe said his party accepted the report. Supporting the report, Patriotic Alliance MP Ashley Sauls said the 2025 budget process tested the GNU's resolve as the government remained intact through an ordeal that has collapsed coalition governments elsewhere in the world. Freedom Front Plus MP Wouter Wessels pointed out that MPs calling for a wealth tax were calling for a deeper tax on themselves and their steep salaries. He said a credible budget was one where every rand and cent was channelled towards the benefit of ordinary South Africans. Action SA Alan Beasley said his party was among the first to oppose the proposed VAT hike, saying it was immoral to ask the poor to pay more for essentials while corruption goes unchecked. 'We welcome the minister's decision to scrap the VAT increase and are proud of the role we played in securing this outcome. We also welcome the R7.5bn n allocated to Sars over the medium term, an investment ActionSA championed.' He said that while Action SA rejected the R22bn raised through regressive taxes like fuel levy hikes and bracket creep, strengthening Sars is essential. 'Properly funded, Sars can close the tax gap, tackle illicit trade and boost revenue collection by a conservative R50bn annually. We are encouraged that the minister has committed to monitoring Sars's performance and will provide tax relief in next year's budget if revenue exceeds targets.' ACDP MP Steve Swart said the National Treasury should produce the fuel levy review that was promised to the legislature. He said while the ACDP believed in miracles, it appeared to be a remote possibility that South Africa's GDP would grow well beyond 2% in the coming years. UDM MP Nqabayomzi Kwankwa said the fuel levy was worse than VAT as there was no way of mitigating its regressive impact on low-income households, and anyone who considered the scrapping of VAT a victory for these households was being 'hypocritical'. Supporting the report, RISE Mzansi MP Songezo Zibi said the national balance sheet remained unsustainable as over 80% of the revenue collected by the SA Revenue Service (Sars) pays for over R820bn in salaries, R420bn in debt service costs and R440bn a year to the social security package. 'That leaves very little money to invest in the things we need to unlock economic growth and create sustainable jobs. [Dated] national and local infrastructure continues to choke our economy, together with policy assumptions that still assume we live in the 1960s.' BOSA MP Mmusi Maimane said one of the grimmest realities in the Budget's fiscal framework was that the rate of investment remained low, leaving the government with little funding for its spending programmes. 'I fear it is a missed opportunity for us to really speak about reform. The question we should be obsessed about is not just GDP growth or actually looking at debt. It should be the rate of investment in this country. And on the same budget, it proposes that our rate of investment is at 4.2%.' TimesLIVE