Chinese customers are rejecting new jets due to tariffs, Boeing confirms
Boeing's Chinese customers are refusing delivery of new planes built for them due to tariffs, the U.S. planemaker has confirmed, as a third Boeing jet started returning to the U.S. on Thursday.
"Due to the tariffs, many of our customers in China have indicated that they will not take delivery," CEO Kelly Ortberg said during a first quarter earnings call on Wednesday.
Ortberg said China was the only country where Boeing was facing this issue and the planemaker would redirect new jet supply to other customers eager for earlier deliveries due to a global shortage of new commercial planes.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Co-Founder of Google Brain, Andrew Ng, Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around
Blinkist: Andrew Ng's Reading List
Undo
Before President Donald Trump's global trade offensive, commercial jets were traded duty-free worldwide under a 1979 civil aviation agreement.
A Chinese airline taking delivery of a Boeing jet could now be hit hard by the retaliatory tariffs imposed by Beijing on the import of U.S. goods. A new 737 MAX has a market value of around $55 million, according to IBA, an
aviation consultancy
.
Live Events
Two 737 MAX 8s, which had been ferried to China in March for delivery to Xiamen Airlines, returned to Boeing's production hub in Seattle in the past week.
A third 737 MAX 8 left Boeing's Zhoushan completion centre near Shanghai for the U.S. territory of Guam on Thursday, data from flight trackers AirNav Radar and Flightradar24 showed.
The plane was initially built for national carrier Air China , according to the Aviation Flights Group tracking database. Air China did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
It had been ferried from Seattle on April 5, in the period between Trump first announcing tariffs on China and Beijing starting to enforce its own ramped up tariffs on U.S. goods.
Guam is one of the stops such flights make on the 5,000-mile (8,000-km) journey across the Pacific between Seattle and Zhoushan, where planes are ferried by Boeing for final work and delivery to a Chinese carrier.
The Chinese government has not commented on why the planes were being returned.
ORDER BOOK
CFO Brian West said that China represents around 10% of Boeing's backlog of commercial planes.
Boeing had planned to deliver around 50 new planes to China during the rest of the year, West said, and was assessing options for re-marketing the 41 already built or in-process airplanes.
"For the nine airplanes not yet in the production system, we're engaged with our customers to understand their intentions for taking delivery and if necessary, we have the ability to assign those positions to other customers," Ortberg said.
"We're not going to continue to build aircraft for customers who will not take them," Ortberg said.
Tracking data from Aviation Flights Group shows 36 built aircraft for Chinese customers at various stages of production and testing are now in the U.S., including the three returned planes.
Boeing data shows 130 unfilled orders for China-based airlines and lessors, including 96 of its best-selling 737 MAX model. Industry sources say a significant portion of the more than 760 unfilled orders for which Boeing has yet to name a buyer are for China.
The tariff war comes as Boeing has been recovering from an almost five-year import freeze on 737 MAX jets into China and a previous round of trade tensions.
West said the issue is a short-term challenge, and that either China starts taking planes again, or Boeing prepares the jets for re-marketing.
"Customers are calling, asking for additional airplanes," he said.
Washington signalled openness to de-escalating the trade war this week, stating that high tariffs between the United States and China are not sustainable.
However, analysts say that confusion over changing tariffs could leave many aircraft deliveries in limbo, with some airline CEOs suggesting they would defer plane delivery rather than pay duties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
41 minutes ago
- The Print
Operation Sindoor: How Rafales, Pakistani J-10s & lots of propaganda moved global defence markets
But as the fog of war began to clear and these claims were found to be exaggerated, Dassault's shares staged a recovery, reflecting a broader market correction. A rally in defence stocks, particularly among Chinese firms, may be attributed to the speculation or claims that Pakistan Air Force (PAF) fighters, mainly Chinese-origin JF-17s and J-10Cs, had downed multiple Indian Rafale jets. This was the first instance of Chinese fighter jets being tested in real combat, attracting attention from defence watchers globally. Equally, it was the first time any claim emerged of a Rafale being shot down, an event that weighed on market sentiment, including on Dassault Aviation's stock. New Delhi: The impact of Operation Sindoor extended far beyond the battlefield as aerial battles continued in the stock markets. After India carried out precision strikes on nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in the early hours of 7 May, global defence markets reacted with notable fluctuations, reflecting investor sensitivity to regional tensions. ThePrint examines how the 88-hour India-Pakistan standoff sent ripples through global defence markets, impacting the stock prices of the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) and its subsidiaries, as well as Lockheed Martin and Dassault Aviation. Stock prices are compared from the day Operation Sindoor began through to the closing figures on Thursday, with all values converted to INR using the prevailing exchange rates at the time of reporting. Also read: Defence stocks surge continues amid escalating India-Pakistan tensions since Pahalgam attack Pakistan's propaganda of multiple Rafale jets being shot fuelled Chinese defence stocks China's state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), particularly its Chengdu Aircraft division, saw one of the sharpest stock moves. AVIC Chengdu, which designs and manufactures the JF-17 and J-10C fighter jets used by the Pakistan Air Force, surged from Rs 828 on 7 May to Rs 1,145 by 12 May, witnessing a massive 38 percent jump in five days. Although the stock had cooled to Rs 939 by Thursday, it retained a net gain of 13 percent since the launch of Op Sindoor. Furthermore, another subsidiary of the state-owned AVIC group—AVIC Airborne Systems—which supplies precision avionics and weapons for the J-series jets operated by Pakistan, also saw a modest rise. Its stock climbed from Rs 136 to Rs 144 between 7 May and 12 May, marking a 5.9% increase that reflected growing investor confidence in China's deepening role in Pakistan's defence supply chain. By Thursday, however, the stock had eased slightly to Rs 138. Other than the speculation of these Chinese origin fighters performing exceedingly well, these spikes are also driven by investor belief that Pakistan might accelerate fighter acquisitions to strengthen its aerial capabilities following Operation Sindoor. Reports indicate that Pakistan could take delivery of the fifth generation FC-31 stealth fighter, the export version of China's J-35A, later this year. According to the latest Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) report, Chinese equipment accounted for 81 percent of Pakistan's major arms imports over the past five years. Subsequently, during last month's hostilities, Pakistan fielded a range of Chinese-origin platforms, including JF-17 and J-10C fighter jets, HQ-9B long range air defence systems, HQ-16 medium range air defence systems, PL-15E beyond visual range air-to-air missiles (BVRAAM) and Chinese unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Beyond the loss of a couple of PAF aircrafts, several Chinese-supplied HQ-9B long-range and HQ-16 medium-range air defence systems were taken out by Harpy and Harop loitering munitions sourced from Israel. Additionally, the recovery of debris of a PL-15E beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM) was confirmed by DG Air Operations (DGAO) Air Marshal A.K. Bharti in a press briefing. It was learnt that the much-discussed Chinese PL-15E missile failed to register a single hit during the conflict. Also read: Pakistan to go in for J-31 Chinese stealth fighters. What this could mean for balance of air power Western defence giants and market sentiment Western defence companies, from France's Dassault Aviation to the U.S.-based Lockheed Martin, experienced divergent market responses, shaped as much by battlefield developments, speculative reports and domestic developments. Dassault Aviation, the manufacturer of India's Rafale jets, recorded a 6.4 percent decline between 7 and 12 May, with its stock falling from Rs 31,406 to a low of Rs 29,405. However, it had rebounded back to Rs 31,367 on Thursday, nearly regaining its pre-drop value. Incidentally, while Dassault Aviation hit its lowest point on 12 May, China's AVIC Chengdu registered its highest stock price during the same period, highlighting the contrasting market sentiments around the two defence suppliers amid the conflict. The initial dip may have been driven by concerns over possible losses, as the Indian Air Force did suffer setbacks during the operation, first hinted at by Air Marshal A.K. Bharti during the tri-services briefing held on 11 May and later confirmed by Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan in a Saturday interview with Bloomberg TV. Yet the Rafale jets, armed with SCALP cruise missiles and AASM Hammer glide bombs, carried out precision strikes on multiple targets across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The subsequent rebound in Dassault's stock suggests renewed investor confidence in the aircraft's combat effectiveness and strategic value. Furthermore, on Thursday, it was announced that the Rafale fighter aircraft fuselage will now be manufactured domestically by Tata Advanced Systems, strengthening its position as a strong contender for the Multi-role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) programme. In contrast, Lockheed Martin, whose F-16 fighters once formed the backbone of the Pakistan Air Force, registered only a modest 1.34 percent gain during the same period, with its stock rising from Rs 40,449 on the day Operation Sindoor was launched to Rs 40,990 by Thursday. The limited uptick can be attributed to heightened interest in the American aerospace giant's F-21, an advanced 4.5-generation fighter pitched as a potential contender for India, especially after unverified reports of Rafale being downed during Operation Sindoor drew the attention of investors and defence analysts. Lockheed Martin's uptick movement in stocks may also be linked to U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement on 15 May for the development of an upgraded 'F-22 Super' and a twin-engine variant of the F-35, provisionally dubbed the F-55. How speculation, politics and perception shape market swings Analysts also point out that stock movements observed since 7 May were driven not just by battlefield results but by narrative, politics and investor psychology. 'From a market perspective, defence procurement is a massive business. During events like Operation Sindoor, exaggerated speculation and misinformation are to be expected, especially when they serve the interests of those looking to profit,' Dr Vikas Gupta, CEO and smallcase manager at OmniScience Capital, told ThePrint. Big-ticket defence exports such as fighter jets are typically sealed through government-to-government agreements that generate employment and strategic influence for the given party, he added. 'At times, even governments may quietly encourage certain narratives if they align with their economic interests.' Dr Gupta also pointed out how China's market mechanics differ from the West. 'In China's case, there's an added layer of complexity. Beijing can directly intervene in markets, banning short selling, for instance, to stabilise or boost the performance of AVIC subsidiaries. That kind of intervention isn't feasible in countries like France, where the government usually avoids market interference.' Ultimately, the swings observed in the wake of Operation Sindoor reinforce a perceived reality of defence stocks remaining highly reactive to geopolitical flashpoints, with prices shaped as much by perception, speculation, politics and investor psychology as by actual battlefield performance. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: Operation Sindoor signals a real paradigm shift, says ex-IAF chief. 'We hit where it hurts the most'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Azad Engineering block deal: Nomura picks stake worth Rs 66 crore in this smallcap defence stock
Japanese financial holding company Nomura has picked up a stake worth Rs 66 crore in Azad Engineering via a block deal. It bought over 4.10 lakh shares at a price of Rs 1,616.85 per equity share which was at an 8% discount over the Thursday closing price of Rs 1,753.60. The block deal was executed on Friday and shares of Azad Engineering were bought through Nomura's investment vehicle Nomura India Investment Fund . by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like New Container Houses Vietnam (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo Company's shares fell by over 5% or Rs 97 to settle at Rs 1,656.80. There were other buy and sell block deals as well involving F3 Advisors Private Limited, Graviton Research Capital and Mansi Share and Stock Advisors Pvt Ltd. Azad Engineering manufactures life-critical components and product lines in the aerospace and defence, energy and oil and gas industries. Its products include 3D rotating airfoil portions of turbine engines and other products. Live Events The stock has been a market laggard and has seen its price erode by 10% this year when Nifty has delivered 5.3% returns in the same period. Stock's returns over a one year period is just over 7% which is at par with the returns given by the 50-stock index. The stock is currently trading above its 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages (SMAs) of Rs 1,591 and Rs 1,556, respectively according to Trendlyne data. It has traded with high volatility with a 1-year beta at 1.4. It reported a consolidated net profit of Rs 25.3 crore in Q4FY25 versus Rs 14.9 crore reported in the year ago period. The total revenue stood at Rs 130.3 crore versus Rs 95.6 crore posed by the company in the corresponding quarter of the last financial year. Also Read: Choice International block deal: BNP Paribas sells shares worth Rs 78 crore in multibagger stock ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Critical minerals will remain a problem in US-China talks. These industries are at risk.
Critical minerals will likely remain a source of leverage for Beijing in trade talks with the U.S., even if President Donald Trump's Thursday call with Xi Jinping speeds up the flow of rare earths to feed auto, industrial and other supply chains. The issue dates back to early April, when China imposed restrictions on exports of the metals as part of its retaliation against Trump's imposition of tariffs of up to 145% on its exports to the U.S. In mid May, after negotiators met in Geneva, the U.S. said China had agreed to lift the restrictions as the countries agreed to a 90-day pause on levies that were choking off trade between them. The problem is that while China is allowing exports of rare earths, used in magnets that go into automobiles, for example, companies that want to export them need licenses. Companies say they aren't easy to get, though Reuters reported on Friday that Beijing had granted temporary licenses to suppliers of the big three U.S. auto makers. Its report cited people familiar with the matter. A spokesperson from the Chinese embassy said he wasn't aware of the situation specifically related to the licensing, reiterating that the export control measures are in line with international common practices, nondiscriminatory, and not targeted at specific countries. While only a fraction of the members of the American Chamber of Commerce in China—mostly technology and industrial companies—were affected by rare-earth export restrictions, three-quarters of those said their supplies would run out within three months, according to a survey from the trade group. While the survey found that Chinese suppliers to U.S. companies had recently been granted six-month export licenses, they noted continued uncertainty because there is a large backlog of license applications. Gracelin Baskaran, a mining economist and director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said about 25% of licenses applied for have been given out, but that they aren't being processed fast enough. Part of that is due to the administrative task. China is the source of 100% of the rare-earth processing capability in the world, so it is issuing licenses for exports not just to the U.S., but for many other countries. But it could also be part of the negotiations. 'China has made it very clear it's not satisfied with the 90-day tariff pause and looking for a more durable solution to the tariff conundrum," said Baskaran, noting the deflationary impact of the tariffs on China's economy. 'It's not in their incentive to give out licenses quickly as their economy is in a downward spiral. These licenses are their leverage." The U.S. had been the dominant rare-earth producer until the 1990s, but China steadily took market share, ramping up production to levels that made it unprofitable for others, forcing them out, Baskaran said. A similar phenomenon is currently under way in nickel, she U.S. has been producing rare earths in California and is building out separation and processing capabilities, with companies like MP Materials boosting their refining abilities. 'It's a perfectly solvable problem and one the U.S. is working at warp speed to address," Baskaran said. 'It's not a forever problem." That said, it could continue be a source of pain, leaving the U.S. vulnerable in talks with China. An array of industries reliant on these critical minerals, from autos to electronics, semiconductors, and defense, are likely to suffer. Write to Reshma Kapadia at
