UK's noisiest amphibians making ‘remarkable comeback' in South Downs
The UK's loudest amphibian – the natterjack toad – has made a 'remarkable comeback' in the South Downs National Park following a conservation project to provide suitable habitats for the noisy creature.
A total of 28 toadlets have been counted at Blackmoor, Hampshire, following the reintroduction programme which started in 2021.
This is the first time that natterjack toads have been recorded breeding at the site in 50 years.
Prior to this, the toad, whose distinctive rasping call can be heard up to a mile away, had only been found on a single site in the national park at Woolmer Forest, Hampshire.
In neighbouring Sussex, the toad is considered locally extinct.
Work to provide new suitable territory, led by the Amphibian and Reptile Conservation (ARC), has included creating shallow ponds and restoring heathlands for the introduction of cattle-grazing to create 'perfect conditions' for the toads to return.
Jack Harper, from ARC, said: 'We are delighted that everyone's hard work is beginning to pay off and that the future of this fascinating species is looking brighter in the region.
'This is a great first step to recovering the species within the National Park and a good blueprint for future reintroduction efforts. Thank you to all those involved!'
Olivia French, heathlands project team leader for the South Downs National Park, said: 'This is a wonderful success story for nature recovery and shows that wildlife can thrive if given half a chance.
'With a breeding population at Woolmer and now Blackmoor as well, the future for natterjack toads is certainly looking brighter than it was. This area is the last heathland bastion for this iconic species and extending their habitat range is a big step forward in stopping the species becoming locally extinct.'
She said that 75% of breeding sites in Great Britain had disappeared in the past century with the toads almost exclusively confined to coastal sand dune systems and grazing marshes in north-west England and the Solway Firth in Scotland.
Ms French added: 'They are one of the most at-risk species from climate change because of rising sea levels, so this makes the comeback in Hampshire all the more significant. It's wonderful to share this good news for nature.'
Visitors to the Woolmer Forest area are asked to keep their dogs on the lead during breeding season from April to August to stop any disturbance of the shallow ponds, which are not much bigger than large puddles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘A billionaire will pay a lot of money to shoot a recreated being': historian Sadiah Qureshi on extinction and empire
Would you bring an extinct species back to life if you could? If so, which species would you pick? Prof Sadiah Qureshi has taken to asking her friends, students and complete strangers this question because, she says, their answers reveal a lot about how we understand extinction. Some choose a dinosaur, others pick a species like the dodo, killed off by humans. Almost no one chooses a plant or insect. The very idea of de-extinction, Qureshi says, raises profound questions about the meaning of extinction and how we treat life, whether living, endangered, dead or extinct. How, she asks, did human beings come to think of ourselves as survivors in a world where species can vanish forever? This is the subject of her new book, Vanished: An Unnatural History of Extinction, which traces the entanglements of race, empire and colonialism to better understand extinction. 'Every time we save a way of being or mourn the passing of a natural kind, whether a species or otherwise, we make decisions rooted in our emotional attachments, or our perceptions of that natural kind's value – whether commercial, aesthetic, or ecological,' she writes. Extinction is not simply a scientific puzzle, Qureshi argues – it is political and philosophical. Qureshi grew up in Handsworth, Birmingham, and was taught by her father to respect all living beings – a conviction that underpins the book and that we keep coming back to during our conversation, which takes place as we perch on one of the large rocks that line the garden of the Natural History Museum in London. Qureshi studied natural sciences at Cambridge – a place she initially hated as an undergraduate, she says, feeling she was among the 'most entrenched, ossified forms of whiteness'. She also didn't enjoy her subject: she didn't like lab work, her experiments often went wrong, and she realised quickly that she wasn't going to be a research scientist. She decided to study the history and philosophy of science, found her people and stayed at the university for her PhD. Now based at the University of Manchester she is, she thinks, the first woman of Pakistani heritage in the country to become a history professor. Before seeing me, Qureshi squeezed in a visit to Hope, the famous whale skeleton suspended over the museum's main hall. 'As Hope hovers above the museum's visitors', she writes in Vanished, 'she shows what is possible when we forgo valuing species for their economic significance and instead consider them as ways of being worthy of life'. Whales, pushed nearly to extinction by the profitable commercial whaling industry, were brought back from this cliff edge thanks to mass campaigning. But we don't care for all life this way. The Earth is going through a sixth mass extinction of wildlife, with more than 500 species of land animals found by scientists in 2020 to be on the brink of extinction and likely to be lost within 20 years. In the previous five mass extinction periods, rates of loss were higher than normal, with at least 75% of species going extinct over a geologically short period of time. These extinctions were unavoidable, caused by rapid and significant changes in the climate, among other factors, and driven by natural processes. But the current crisis is an unnatural extinction that human beings have produced through an economy focused on resource extraction, intensive land use and pollution, among other things. Yet many of our stories about extinction focus less on the political nature of the issue and more on heroic scientists discovering lost species and formulating new theories about why they went extinct, she explains in the book. In Vanished, which is both highly readable and academically rigorous, she gives us a new story. According to Qureshi, animal extinction should not be treated as a separate historical development from human extermination, as it often is. Long before social Darwinism's theory of natural selection, colonialists across North America predicted that Indigenous peoples were going extinct and that this was evidence of God's natural law, leaving the spoils of the land for white Europeans. Such reasoning rationalised genocide and persecution because, the argument went, as empires expanded, these peoples would die out anyway. 'That's a very, very different justification for imperialism than saying 'we want resources', [though] obviously, all of those things are linked,' she says. These arguments about extinction helped produce the exceptional violence of settler colonialism, Qureshi says, and they are relevant for thinking about species loss today. 'Who we think are worthy subjects of conservation [is] deeply rooted in past political projects,' she says. The very concept of the national park, for example, was at least partly related to the expectation that Indigenous peoples would soon be extinct. Campaigners imagined the parks as pristine, unpeopled wildernesses. Yosemite, the first US national park, established in 1864, was home to Miwok groups, but their villages were razed and former inhabitants starved or frozen. They were depicted as 'historic ghosts', Qureshi writes, not the 'presently dispossessed'. Too often, conservation efforts write Indigenous people out of the story once again, she argues. And while de-extinction, bringing a species back to life, might sound exciting, for Qureshi it's a form of avoidance that doesn't require we change our current relationships with the natural world. It would be awe-inspiring if the woolly mammoth roamed the earth in the not-so-distant future (which is the aim of one biotech company), but it is never going to come back as it was. It would be 'a new form of life that is genetically engineered and would be intellectual property', Qureshi says. 'What kind of life will that being be able to lead? … And, you know, at some point, some billionaire is going to pay a lot of money to shoot one of these recreated beings.' Science alone doesn't offer the way forward, she argues. It isn't inherently objective, even though that's how it's regularly imagined, especially now, in what Qureshi calls 'a moment of resurging biological tyranny' – referencing the biological essentialism of the fight over trans rights and the re-emergence of eugenics. But she acknowledges that scientific research must be defended when it is under attack, as it is now, because it can still provide us with valuable knowledge. 'Historians and philosophers and sociologists of science have long interrogated attempts to seek authority in science,' she explains. 'That doesn't mean to say that there's not some material reality out there, but … the way that we engage with that world is culturally and historically specific.' We need to respect, not try to control, nature, she argues. For Qureshi, rewilding is one option, as are smaller-scale changes, such as nurturing gardens to make them as welcoming as possible to insects. 'If you really, deeply care about the people around you, about life around you, you will treat it differently to the way than we're doing,' she says, 'and get away from the exploitative ways of living in the modern world that are damaging to the planet … Paying attention to the life around us and recalibrating how we value that life is just as powerful as having more scientific research'.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
The therapy that could help prevent food-related liver cancer
New research has identified a pathway involving the genes p53 and TIGAR that may prevent fatty liver disease from progressing to liver cancer, a condition for which there are currently no effective treatments. Researchers from Glasgow Caledonian University, the Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute, and The Francis Crick Institute discovered that p53 protects the liver from high-fat, high-sugar diets through the gene TIGAR, which acts as an antioxidant and detoxifies lipids in a fatty liver. The breakthrough suggests that antioxidant therapy could be developed to mimic the protective response of p53 and TIGAR, potentially preventing the development of key features of fatty liver disease. Dr. Timothy Humpton noted that the research establishes a key role for p53 and TIGAR in protecting against the progression from liver disease to liver cancer, suggesting that targeting this pathway through antioxidants is of great interest for future therapies. He also highlighted that fatty liver disease, often caused by poor diet and lack of exercise, is hard to diagnose due to its asymptomatic nature.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Menstrual tracking app users cautioned by Cambridge researchers
Women who tracked their menstrual cycle using smartphone apps have been warned about the privacy and safety risks of doing so.A report from the University of Cambridge's Minderoo Centre said the apps were a "gold mine" for consumer profiling and collecting cautioned that in the wrong hands, the data could result in health insurance "discrimination" and risks to job Gina Neff, executive director at the Minderoo Centre, said: "Women deserve better than to have their menstrual tracking data treated as consumer data, but there is a different possible future." The apps collect information on everything from exercise, diet and medication to sexual preferences, hormone levels and contraception at the Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy, an independent team of researchers at the university, said this data could give insights into people's health and their reproductive report added that many women used the apps when they were trying to get said data on who is pregnant, and who wants to be, was some of the "most sought-after information in digital advertising" as it led to a shift in shopping patterns."Cycle tracking apps (CTA) are a lucrative business because they provide the companies behind the apps with access to extremely valuable and fine-grained user data," they said."CTA data is not only commercially valuable and shared with an inextricable net of third parties (thereby making intimate user information exploitable for targeted advertising), but it also poses severe security risks for users."The research team called for better governance of the "femtech" industry, improved data security of these apps and the introduction of "meaningful consent options".They also wanted bodies like the NHS to launch alternatives to commercial tracking apps with permission for the data to be used in valid medical Stefanie Felsberger, lead author of the report, said: "Menstrual cycle tracking apps are presented as empowering women and addressing the gender health gap."Yet the business model behind their services rests on commercial use, selling user data and insights to third parties for profit."There are real and frightening privacy and safety risks to women as a result of the commodification of the data collected by cycle tracking app companies."The report said work published by Privacy International showed major CTA companies had updated their approach to data sharing, but device information was still collected with "no meaningful consent".Additional reporting by PA Media. Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
