Experts sound alarm over concerning trend among the world's migratory birds: 'A noticeable impact'
The changing climate is reducing the number of birds that migrate to India's wetlands and how long they stay there.
As the world gets warmer and the weather becomes more extreme, habitats are changing for wildlife across the globe. In India, this is resulting in a major shift in the migratory patterns of dozens of bird species.
Birds typically migrate to the warm Indian wetlands from colder locations such as Siberia and Kazakhstan. But as The New Indian Express reported, not only are fewer birds making the trek than in the past, but those that do are staying a shorter amount of time.
Take, for example, Harike Wildlife Sanctuary, which is the largest wetland in North India. In 2018, more than 120,000 birds were spotted in the sanctuary. This year, that number dropped to just over 55,000.
"The change in climatic conditions across the globe and late winters … might be the reasons migratory birds from those parts of the world are choosing other destinations or shuffling their migration patterns," Dharminder Sharma, Punjab's chief conservator of forests, told the publication. "Thus, the bird count has decreased here."
Gitanjali Kanwar of the World Wildlife Fund-India also noted that the migratory season now lasts just two months when it used to be five or six.
"The shrinking winter window has had a noticeable impact on their migration patterns," she said.
Birds are vital to ecosystems, as they help control pest populations and spread seeds. When changes to the climate threaten their habitats or change their migratory patterns, the effects can ripple to other plants and wildlife.
Sadly, these changes have been seen not just in India but all over the world. In Spain, researchers fear that warmer temperatures will impact the moustached warbler's ability to reproduce. In the Caribbean, fewer healthy plants have meant a higher mortality rate on birds' migratory journeys.
Conservationists in India are hopeful that this latest data will spur action to help preserve these migratory birds' habitats. And they are encouraged that, even as overall numbers decline, they have spotted some rare bird species in their native wetlands.
Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty?
Definitely
Only in some areas
No way
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Sharma told the Express that funding has been earmarked for cleaning and developing wetlands, which he hopes will benefit the country's bird populations.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Why did Air India plane crash? The theories explained
Credit: X/ShivAroor It could take weeks, if not months, for the exact cause of the plane crash to become clear. But experts have already outlined a number of possible reasons why flight AI171 crashed in a ball of fire after less than a minute in the air. Prof John McDermid, Lloyd's Register chair of safety at the University of York, said: 'Take-off and landing are the most dangerous phases of flight – accidents from cruise are very unusual. 'However, that said, it's surprising that the accident occurred before the aircraft had even got to 200-metres altitude. 'Pilots can abort take-off until quite late in the take-off roll, so it seems like the problem occurred very suddenly in the final part of the take-off roll, or shortly after take-off, and was sufficiently serious to be unmanageable. 'Given the levels of redundancy in systems, the fact that aircraft are designed to climb out on only one engine, etc. on initial sight this seems a very surprising accident.' Experts have suggested that video footage of the flight's final seconds showed that its wing flaps were incorrectly set for a standard take-off climb. Flaps affect an aircraft's aerodynamics by changing the shape of the wing and play a crucial role in getting it airborne. Yet based on some interpretations of the video evidence they were fully retracted, a position in which they would provide minimal lift. The aircraft's landing gear also remained deployed throughout the short flight, when on a 787 the wheels are normally withdrawn as soon as they leave the runway. Credit: X One possibility is that the landing gear became stuck and that the pilots responded by partially retracting the flaps to reduce drag and maintain the climb. If the adjustment was overdone the plane would lose lift and begin to descend. At some point the 787's wing would have stalled – the term for when the airflow is separated from the wing's surface – through the combination of insufficient lift and excessive drag. A more straightforward explanation may be that the flaps themselves malfunctioned, failing to respond to inputs from the cockpit. The Boeing 787 has experienced flap issues in the past, with an American Airlines plane forced to return to Amsterdam in January after a problem was detected shortly after take-off for Philadelphia. The aircraft dumped fuel over the North Sea before landing at Schiphol airport at a higher than normal speed attributed to the flaps problem. That flight was rescheduled to depart the following day but the flight was cancelled after the crew discovered a hydraulics issue. In the following three weeks, the same plane was forced to abort flights to Philadelphia from Dublin, Barcelona and Zurich, with the diversions punctuated by cancellations and at other times by successful flights. The aircraft concerned was almost eight years old and had completed more than 4,000 flights. A bird strike which took out both the General Electric engines is another possibility behind the crash. In January 2021, a 787-8 Dreamliner had to abort a take-off in Mexico after birds flew into one of its engines as it readied to leave the tarmac. And in March 2024 a Saudi Airlines flight on a similar plane model flying from Jeddah to Heathrow suffered significant damage to its left wing from a bird strike. Ahmedabad airport, the main city in Gujarat, is also notorious for having an issue with bird strikes due to being near an urban area. A study in 2018 found the airport has 'a high potential of bird-aircraft collision hazards'. Official data shows that in 2023 it had the second most bird strikes in India with its 81 reported instances behind only the 169 of Delhi. This is despite operating only a quarter the number of flights. Salil Colge, a lecturer in aviation management at University College Birmingham who was born in Mumbai, told The Telegraph: 'Historically there have been reports of several bird strikes in this area in the past and that could be one of the possibilities. 'The airport had managed to control this significantly with a decrease in bird strike incidences in 2024. Did the aircraft have multiple bird strikes after take-off causing the engines to lose power?' Dr Jason Knight, senior lecturer in fluid mechanics, University of Portsmouth, added: 'The aircraft is designed to be able to fly on one engine, so the most likely cause of the crash is a double engine failure. 'Because the altitude was so low, the pilot would have had very little time to do an emergency landing. The most likely cause of a double engine failure is a bird strike which would take out the engine.' The 787-8 is a modern, highly sophisticated plane which one expert described as a 'powerplant on wheels'. Much of the processes are highly automated, with human pilots making only key decisions. However, at this stage human error cannot be ruled out. It is believed the co-pilot, Clive Kundar, had more than 1,000 hours of flying experience and made a mayday call shortly after take-off. He was flying with a trained instructor with more than 8,000 hours experience, captain Sumeet Sabharwal. Radar tracking of the plane suggests the pilots did not use the full length of the runway when taking off, instead joining at an intersection around half way. Estimates suggest the amount of runway utilised by the pilots was slightly less than 2,000 metres. Experts told The Telegraph that on a hot day, loaded almost to full capacity and with enough fuel on board for a nine-hour flight, the amount of recommended runway would likely be around 2,500 metres as a minimum. Some individuals on Pprune, a pilot's forum, suggested the shortened runway was on the lower threshold of what may have been advisable. This practice of not using the full runway is often used by pilots to avoid traffic jams and air-traffic control delays, and is permitted if deemed safe. Planes get less lift on a hot day due to lower air density, and therefore they need to go faster to get as much lift as on a cooler day. Flight AI171 took off in 40°C heat in the early afternoon sunshine of Gujarat. A plane struggling with insufficient speed or lift could hit a low obstacle or fail to overcome its inertia if lifting off early. There has never been a major incident with this model of plane, they are of modern design and build quality. However, catastrophic technical or engineering issues could occur which led to the disaster. With the plane being so complex and automated, the cause of the exact fault in the technical system is extremely difficult to extract without more detailed information. When considered alongside the spotless safety record of this specific type of plane, this seems unlikely. If it was found to have a fundamental underpinning in a technical or physical glitch, then it is likely the entire fleet of these planes could be grounded. It is possible the cause of the crash was that it was too heavy to take-off. The weather, again, is a factor in this as that dictates how much ground velocity a plane needs to generate enough lift to get airborne. However, this is checked by the airline ahead of take-off and experts say unless there was egregious oversight or error on this then it is improbable as a root cause. 'It is very unlikely the plane was overweight or carrying too much fuel – there are careful checks on this,' said Prof McDermid. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Commercial crew launch delayed while ISS air leak assessed
Concern about a small but persistent air leak in a Russian compartment of the International Space Station has prompted NASA and Axiom Space to indefinitely delay this week's launch of a commercial flight to the orbiting outpost, officials said Thursday. The privately-financed Axiom-4 crew — commander Peggy Whitson, Indian pilot Shubhanshu Shukla, Polish researcher Sławosz Uznański-Wiśniewski and Hungarian engineer Tibor Kapu — originally planned to take off Tuesday. But the flight was delayed to the end of the week, first by high winds in the off-shore emergency splashdown zone and then by an oxygen leak in their Falcon 9 rocket's first stage. SpaceX tentatively targeted Thursday and then Friday for launch, with Saturday and Sunday available if needed. But during SpaceX troubleshooting to find and fix the rocket's propellant leak, NASA engineers decided they needed more time to assess recent efforts to plug an air leak aboard the International Space Station in a Russian vestibule known as the PrK. The PrK serves as a passageway between the station's Zvezda module and spacecraft docked at its aft port. "Teams met today and we will not be launching Axiom-4 tomorrow," flight controllers in Houston radioed the ISS. "We are assessing a new launch date. This is due to the ongoing PrK investigation. So I don't have a new launch date right now, but we will not be launching tomorrow and docking Saturday." In a blog post, NASA said cosmonauts aboard the station "recently performed inspections of the pressurized module's interior surfaces, sealed some additional areas of interest, and measured the current leak rate. Following this effort, the segment now is holding pressure." The post went on to say the Axiom-4 delay will provide "additional time for NASA and (the Russian space agency) Roscosmos to evaluate the situation and determine whether any additional troubleshooting is necessary." Launched in July 2000 atop a Russian Proton rocket, Zvezda was the third module to join the growing space station, providing a command center for Russian cosmonauts, crew quarters, the aft docking port and two additional ports now occupied by airlock and research modules. The leakage was first noticed in 2019, and has been openly discussed ever since by NASA during periodic reviews and space station news briefings. The leak rate has varied, but has stayed in the neighborhood of around 1-to-2 pounds per day. "The station is not young," astronaut Mike Barratt said last November during a post flight news conference. "It's been up there for quite a while, and you expect some wear and tear, and we're seeing that in the form of some cracks that have formed." The Russians have made a variety of attempts to patch a suspect crack and other possible sources of leakage, but air has continued to escape into space. In November, Bob Cabana, a former astronaut and NASA manager who chaired the agency's ISS Advisory Committee, said U.S. and Russian engineers "don't have a common understanding of what the likely root cause is, or the severity of the consequences of these leaks." "The Russian position is that the most probable cause of the PrK cracks is high cyclic fatigue caused by micro vibrations," Cabana said. "NASA believes the PrK cracks are likely multi-causal including pressure and mechanical stress, residual stress, material properties and environmental exposures. "The Russians believe that continued operations are safe, but they can't prove to our satisfaction that they are, and the US believes that it's not safe, but we can't prove that to the Russian satisfaction that that's the case." As an interim step, the hatch leading to the PrK and the station's aft docking compartment is closed during daily operations and only opened when the Russians need to unload a visiting Progress cargo ship. And as an added precaution on NASA's part, whenever the hatch to the PrK and docking compartment is open, a hatch between the Russian and U.S. segments of the station is closed. "We've taken a very conservative approach to close a hatch between the US side and the Russian side during those time periods," Barratt said. "It's not a comfortable thing, but it is the best agreement between all the smart people on both sides. And it's something that we crew live with and enact." Cabana said last year that the Russians do not believe "catastrophic disintegration of the PrK is realistic (but) NASA has expressed concerns about the structural integrity of the PrK and the possibility of a catastrophic failure." Video shows Air India plane crashing in Ahmedabad Air India plane crashes shortly after takeoff, carrying more than 240 people An accused woman skips her pedicure, kills her ex-husband
Entrepreneur
a day ago
- Entrepreneur
Iom Bioworks Raises INR 4 Crore in Seed Round to Advance Microbiome-Based Healthcare
Iom Bioworks aims to personalize health by analyzing and modulating key gut bacteria to support digestion, immunity, metabolism, and overall well-being You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Iom Bioworks, a science-driven healthtech startup focused on microbiome-centered wellness, has raised INR 4 crore in Seed Round funding, led by Inflection Point Ventures (IPV). According to a press release by the company, the capital will be used to ramp up marketing efforts, secure intellectual property, build infrastructure, and expand both scientific and commercial teams. Founded in 2022, Iom Bioworks aims to personalize health by analyzing and modulating key gut bacteria to support digestion, immunity, metabolism, and overall well-being. The company's approach integrates artificial intelligence with microbiome science to offer precise and actionable health recommendations. It claims two granted patents and two more nearing completion, with scientific findings published in peer-reviewed journals. Within its first year, the company crossed 500 customers and established logistics infrastructure and digital access across India for its microbiome services. "Iom Bioworks envisions a world where a healthy mind and body are achievable through informed choices that nurture the microbiome," said Bipin Pradeep Kumar, co-founder and CEO. "By empowering our inner ecosystem through prebiotics and a food and lifestyle centred around the bacteria, we aim to energize daily life while preserving the joy of living." Kumar credited the role of their investment partner in supporting the company's growth. "Partnering with IPV has been transformative; their supportive and diligent approach has set us firmly on the path toward this vision," he added. The startup's scientific leadership includes co-founder and chief of science & technology Dr. Samik Ghosh, who leverages computational biology to develop targeted wellness solutions, and Dr. Hiroaki Kitano, co-founder and chief of research & collaboration, an internationally recognized systems biologist and AI researcher. Vinay Bansal, founder of IPV, pointed to the growing relevance of gut health in addressing chronic conditions. "Lifestyle diseases have been on the rise due to multiple reasons like poor diet, stress, lack of sleep and are intimately linked to poor gut health and microbial composition," he said. "Iom Bioworks is making this cutting-edge science accessible, personalised and importantly, actionable."
