Israel used long-planned subterfuge in attack on Iranian nuclear targets, Israeli sources say
Rescuers work at the site of a damaged building, in the aftermath of Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, June 13, 2025. Iranian Red Crescent Society/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS
A building stands damaged in the aftermath of Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, June 13, 2025. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
Rescuers work at the site of a damaged building, in the aftermath of Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, June 13, 2025. Iranian Red Crescent Society/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS
People gather near a damaged building, in the aftermath of Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, June 13, 2025. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
People gather on a street, in the aftermath of Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, June 13, 2025. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
JERUSALEM - Israel sent Mossad commandos deep into Iran to destroy Iranian weapons systems during Israel's attack on nuclear and military targets, an Israeli security source said, while another official said Israel used a ploy to suggest the strike was not imminent.
The Israeli officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the clandestine nature of the operations, described secret and lengthy preparations that went into an attack that sent oil prices sharply higher on fears of regional escalation.
Reuters could not independently verify the accounts.
Iranian officials who spoke to Reuters shortly before the attack had been dismissive about any imminent action and repeatedly said talk of strikes was just "psychological pressure" to influence U.S.-Iranian nuclear negotiations that were due on Sunday.
Iran has not given a detailed account of what its Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called "unlawful and cowardly attacks", but it has promised a harsh response. Iran's mission at the United Nations did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Israel's covert operation and other subterfuge related to the attacks.
Ahead of the strike, Israel gave the impression its focus was still on U.S. diplomacy towards a nuclear deal with Iran, briefing journalists that its spy chief would go to Washington before the next negotiations.
Instead, Israel said it sent 200 warplanes to conduct a wave of air strikes across Iran before dawn on Friday, hitting nuclear facilities and missile factories, and killing military commanders and nuclear scientists, in a culmination of its efforts to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
Iran says its nuclear programme is purely civilian.
The Israeli security source said Israel's military and Mossad had worked for years on the intelligence needed for the strikes, which killed the commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps among others.
The security source said Mossad commandos had covertly deployed weapons across Iran, including explosive drones that were launched at a surface-to-surface missile base near Tehran.
The Mossad commandos also fired precision-guided weapons systems at Iranian surface-to-air missile systems as the Israeli attack got underway, reducing the threat to Israeli warplanes.
A grainy black and white video distributed by Mossad showed what it said were the organization's operational force - two camouflaged figures crouched in what looks like desert terrain, deploying the precision weapons system meant to destroy Iran's air defence systems.
Some of the operation's components would have taken years to be put together, said Sima Shine, a former chief Mossad analyst and now a researcher at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies (INSS).
The decision to strike Iran was made on Monday, the same day Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump spoke by phone, when Netanyahu, Defence Minister Israel Katz and military chief Eyal Zamir decided the operation would begin on Friday, said a second source, an Israeli defence official.
Their discussion was held after the conversation between Trump and Netanyahu, a third official, close to Netanyahu, said.
PRESS BRIEFINGS
The final green light was given by Netanyahu's security cabinet, which convened on Thursday night.
In the days leading up to the strikes, Israel played out a ploy to create the impression an attack was not imminent, according to a fourth source, also an Israeli official.
False reports suggesting that a rift between Israel and the United States had emerged during Netanyahu and Trump's phone call on Monday were not denied, the fourth source said.
A press release about a visit by Katz, Zamir and the head of Israel's Air Force Tomer Bar to an air force base mentioned Gaza, Yemen and Lebanon - but not Iran.
The fourth source said that the ruse included misleading information given in press briefings. As the attack unfolded in the early hours of Friday, some Israeli journalists pointed to one such briefing, according to which Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and Mossad Head David Barnea were to be sent to Washington ahead of the next round of nuclear talks on Sunday.
Dermer later appeared seated with Netanyahu at Israel's defence headquarters bunker in Tel Aviv, in a video distributed by the prime minister's office.
A fifth, military source said that Israel had been able to surprise Iran but since the operation was not over, there could be "difficult days" ahead.
Iran, which fired ballistic missiles at Israel when they traded blows last year, has promised "harsh punishment" in response to the attack. Israel said it had intercepted many of the 100 drones launched towards Israeli territory in retaliation. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Iran says talks with US ‘meaningless' after Israel attack, but yet to decide on attending
Iran earlier accused the US of being complicit in Israel's attacks, but Washington denied the allegation. PHOTO ILLUSTRATION: REUTERS Iran says talks with US 'meaningless' after Israel attack, but yet to decide on attending CAIRO - Iran said the dialogue with the US over Tehran's nuclear programme is 'meaningless' after Israel's biggest-ever military strike against its longstanding enemy, but said it is yet to decide on whether to attend planned talks on June 15. 'The other side (the US) acted in a way that makes dialogue meaningless. You cannot claim to negotiate and at the same time divide work by allowing the Zionist regime (Israel) to target Iran's territory,' state media on June 13 quoted foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei as saying. 'It is still unclear what decision we will make on Sunday in this regard,' he was quoted as saying. He said Israel 'succeeded in influencing' the diplomatic process and the Israeli attack would not have happened without Washington's permission, accusing Washington of supporting the attack. Iran earlier accused the US of being complicit in Israel's attacks, but Washington denied the allegation and told Tehran at the United Nations Security Council that it would be 'wise' to negotiate over its nuclear programme. The sixth round of US-Iran nuclear talks was set to be held on June 15 in Muscat, but it was unclear whether it would go ahead after the Israeli strikes. Iran denies that its uranium enrichment programme is for anything other than civilian purposes, rejecting Israeli allegations that it is secretly developing nuclear weapons. US President Donald Trump told Reuters that he and his team had known the Israeli attacks were coming but they still saw room for an accord. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Iran says talks with US 'meaningless' after Israel attack, but yet to decide on attending
Iran's and U.S.' flags are seen printed on paper in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Iran says talks with US 'meaningless' after Israel attack, but yet to decide on attending CAIRO - Iran said the dialogue with the U.S. over Tehran's nuclear programme is "meaningless" after Israel's biggest-ever military strike against its longstanding enemy, but said it is yet to decide on whether to attend planned talks on Sunday. "The other side (the U.S.) acted in a way that makes dialogue meaningless. You cannot claim to negotiate and at the same time divide work by allowing the Zionist regime (Israel) to target Iran's territory," state media on Saturday quoted foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei as saying. "It is still unclear what decision we will make on Sunday in this regard," Baghaei was quoted as saying. He said Israel "succeeded in influencing" the diplomatic process and the Israeli attack would not have happened without Washington's permission, accusing Washington of supporting the attack. Iran earlier accused the U.S. of being complicit in Israel's attacks, but Washington denied the allegation and told Tehran at the United Nations Security Council that it would be "wise" to negotiate over its nuclear programme. The sixth round of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks was set to be held on Sunday in Muscat, but it was unclear whether it would go ahead after the Israeli strikes. Iran denies that its uranium enrichment programme is for anything other than civilian purposes, rejecting Israeli allegations that it is secretly developing nuclear weapons. U.S. President Donald Trump told Reuters that he and his team had known the Israeli attacks were coming but they still saw room for an accord. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Sydney is racing to build more homes as housing prices soar. But where is the land?
The city of 5.6 million people has a growing population and spiralling property and rental prices that have made it one of the world's least affordable cities. PHOTO: REUTERS Sydney is racing to build more homes as housing prices soar. But where is the land? SYDNEY – Australia's most populous and least affordable city Sydney has a problem: It desperately needs more housing but is struggling to find a large parcel of empty land on which to build it. The city of 5.6 million people has a growing population and spiralling property and rental prices that have made it one of the world's least affordable cities. But the authorities want to end the urban expansion into undeveloped or greenfield sites in the outer fringes, which has resulted in remote suburbs that are as far as 80km from the city centre and that often lack adequate services. Instead, local and state governments have been looking for large, open or convertible spaces within existing urban areas. Like Singapore, which will develop new housing precincts at Bukit Timah Turf City and the former Keppel Golf Course, Sydney planners have been on the lookout for available parcels that could be redeveloped. Turf City is set to have 15,000 to 20,000 public and private homes over the next 20 to 30 years, while the Keppel site will have about 9,000 homes. But the authorities in Sydney are struggling to find similar sites. The New South Wales Government proposed converting a racecourse, called Rosehill Gardens, into a 'mini-city' of 25,000 new homes as well as a train station. The 140-year-old racecourse spans 57ha of prime real estate, about 25km west of the city centre. The government offered A$5 billion (S$4.2 billion) – about 128 times the value of the land – to buy the racecourse from the Australian Turf Club, which owns and operates it. But the club's members voted against the proposal on May 27 in a 56 to 44 per cent vote, due to a sentimental attachment to the racecourse and concerns its loss would damage the city's racing industry. The government is now searching for a 'Plan B' to try to meet its target of building 75,000 new homes a year, to keep up with population growth and improve affordability. Various proposals have emerged, including the site of the 2000 Olympics, an inner city port, and a dilapidated former main road. NSW Premier Chris Minns on June 10 warned that Sydney was losing younger residents who could not afford to live in the city. 'Housing persistently is our biggest challenge, not just in the economy but in terms of intergenerational fairness and equity and giving young people an opportunity,' he said in a speech to business leaders. 'A city without young people is a city without a future, and the leading reason for that is we're not building enough houses.' Sydney has the most 'impossibly unaffordable' housing in the world after Hong Kong, according to the most recent Demographia International Housing Affordability report in 2024. The average prices for houses and apartments in Sydney are A$1.5 million and A$860,000, respectively, while the average rental costs A$775 a week. Associate Professor Laurence Troy, an expert on urban renewal from Sydney University, told The Straits Times that the government should compulsorily acquire the racecourse, which was one of the few remaining brownfield – underused or abandoned -– sites that could be converted into large-scale housing. 'Clearly we still need to build more housing because the population is still growing,' he said. 'We are basically running out of brownfield sites. If Rosehill is of such strategic importance, why is the government letting the land holders hold them hostage?' But Mr Minns has so far ruled out compulsorily acquiring the racecourse. A potential option could be to expand housing at the site of the Sydney Olympics, a 430ha site about 19km west of the city centre. The site currently has a mix of sports and entertainment venues, parklands, commercial developments and housing. The government is planning to build 13,000 homes on the site by 2050, but is set to fall far short of its target of 10,700 homes by 2030. The lack of development at the site has been blamed on delays due to toxic waste contamination at the site, which was formerly an industrial area, as well as insufficient transport options. Another option could be to shut the last operating port in Sydney harbour at Glebe Island near the city centre and replace the site with housing. But business groups say the port is crucial for the transport of building materials, and its closure could add to construction costs. Another proposal is to develop housing along Parramatta Road, a main road that is being superseded by new underground roadways. But experts say an impediment will be pollution from the road traffic, which could pose health problems. Professor Nicole Gurran, an urban planning expert from Sydney University, said that adding to the housing supply in Sydney did not necessarily depend on findin g a 'sugar hit' such as a racecourse. 'We have abundant zoned sites that are appropriate for housing development,' she said. However, the authorities largely left it to market forces to instigate construction. In recent years, she said, high interest rates and construction cost s have discouraged developers. 'While prices are stagnant and people are struggling to get loans, and with affordability so poor and banks so cautious to lend, it is hard to get projects off the ground,' she said. Professor Troy also said the government should focus on the type of housing it wants to build, rather than depending on the creation of a quick-fix 'mini-city'. Instead of building high-rise towers, which are less popular with families and property buyers, or large houses in greenfield sites, Sydney should build more medium-density housing – such as terraces and low-rise apartments – which are popular and can increase the city's overall housing density. 'We need to look at the spaces we have and think about how we can do it better,' he said. Jonathan Pearlman writes about Australia and the Pacific for The Straits Times. Based in Sydney, he explains matters on Australia and the Pacific to readers outside the Oceania region. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
