The Washington Post plans an influx of outside opinion writers
The Washington Post plans an influx of outside opinion writers in a new programme, known internally as Ripple. PHOTO: ERIC LEE/NYTIMES
WASHINGTON - The Washington Post has published some of the world's most influential voices for more than a century, including columnists such as George Will and newsmakers such as the Dalai Lama and President Donald Trump.
A new initiative aims to sharply expand that lineup, opening the Post to many published opinion articles from other newspapers across America, writers on Substack and eventually nonprofessional writers, according to four people familiar with the plan.
Executives hope that the programme, known internally as Ripple, will appeal to readers who want more breadth than the Post's current opinion section and more quality than social platforms such as Reddit and X.
The project will host and promote the outside opinion columns on the Post's website and app but outside its paywall, according to the people, who would speak only anonymously to discuss a confidential project. It will operate outside the paper's opinion section.
The Post aims to strike some of the initial partnership deals this summer, two of the people said, and the company recently hired an editor to oversee writing for Ripple. A final phase, allowing nonprofessionals to submit columns with help from an AI writing coach called Ember, could begin testing this fall. Human editors would review submissions before publication.
A spokesperson for the Post declined to comment.
Mr Jeff Bezos, the Amazon.com founder and owner of the Post, has been trying to turn around the news organisation's struggling business. He has told confidants that he wants to broaden the publication's reach beyond its traditional audience of coastal elites. For years, Mr Bezos has also urged leaders at the Post to embrace aggregation, the practice of summarising and linking to journalism published by other outlets, to attract additional readers.
Ripple would be a big step in that direction. Executives involved with the project believe that it could reach a potential audience of 38 million US adults, based on internal research, and that some of them would join a 'talent network' to submit their own writing, two of the people said. The company is also planning to explore subscription bundles with partner publishers, one of the people said.
The Washington Post's traditional opinion section has undergone a significant shift in recent months. Mr Bezos decided shortly before the November election that the Post would no longer endorse a presidential candidate. That decision stopped the publication of the section's endorsement of Vice-President Kamala Harris.
In February, Mr Bezos ordered the Post's opinion section to embrace 'personal liberties and free markets', prompting the section's editor, Mr David Shipley, to resign. Both decisions have drawn scrutiny from readers and inside the company.
Ripple is the result of a research and development process that began more than a year ago. The Post's opinion section experimented in 2024 with local content from Kansas City, Missouri, and began brainstorming sessions to expand the idea that spring. Executives approved the plan for Ripple in January, and the Post started the project in April.
Mr Will Lewis, the Post's CEO, has been looking for new ways to reduce costs at the company while finding new sources of revenue. In 2024, the Post created a road map to guide its efforts, with focus areas including artificial intelligence, new products and personalisation.
Executives have already considered a list of potential partners that includes The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Salt Lake Tribune, popular Substack writer Matt Yglesias and The Dispatch, a right-of-centre politics site, two of the people said.
Ms Lauren Gustus, CEO of The Salt Lake Tribune, said the nonprofit publication had declined to participate in the programme, preferring to focus on 'building relationships and trust here in Utah'.
Mr Andrew Morse, the publisher of the Journal-Constitution, said the Post had not contacted him about the project, adding that the plan was not in line with his company's strategy.
'We are laser-focused on growing direct relationships with customers,' he said. 'We think scale is yesterday's war.'
Ember, the AI writing coach being developed by the Post, could automate several functions normally provided by human editors, the people said. Early mock-ups of the tool feature a 'story strength' tracker that tells writers how their piece is shaping up, with a sidebar that lays out basic parts of story structure: 'early thesis', 'supporting points' and 'memorable ending'. A live AI assistant would provide developmental questions, with writing prompts inviting authors to add 'solid supporting points', one of the people said.
The Post's plan to publish content by contributors is a familiar tactic in digital media. Forbes and HuffPost became online destinations for opinion writing submitted by users, leading to a boom in their digital audiences. But that approach has fallen out of favor in recent years as news organisations have placed a greater emphasis on building deeper engagement with users to create paid subscription businesses.
Ripple is being developed by Mr Lippe Oosterhof, a strategic adviser at the Post who previously worked for Reuters and Yahoo. According to his LinkedIn profile, Mr Oosterhof is also a strategic adviser to Symbolic.ai, a tool that uses artificial intelligence to assist professional journalists and corporate communications executives.
One publication initially under consideration as a potential partner for Ripple was The Contrarian, an online publication co-founded by Ms Jennifer Rubin, one of the people said. Ms Rubin resigned from the Post after Mr Bezos stopped the endorsement of Ms Harris, saying the company's leaders had abandoned values central to the Post's mission.
The Post has since removed The Contrarian from consideration. When told that she had been under consideration at all, Ms Rubin burst out in laughter.
'Did they read my public resignation letter?' she said. NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Buildup to a meltdown: How the Trump-Musk alliance collapsed
The long-awaited breakup between President Donald Trump and Mr Elon Musk was as personal and petty as anticipated, and yet it's a sign of something much more than a conflict between two of the world's most powerful and mercurial men. PHOTO: ERIC LEE/NYTIMES WASHINGTON – US President Donald Trump was peeved. Just minutes before he walked into the Oval Office for a televised send-off for Mr Elon Musk last week, an aide had handed him a file. The papers showed that Mr Trump's nominee to run Nasa - a close associate of Mr Musk's - had donated to prominent Democrats in recent years, including some who Mr Trump was learning about for the first time. The president set his outrage aside and mustered through a cordial public farewell. But as soon as the cameras left the Oval Office, the president confronted Mr Musk. He started to read some of the donations out loud, shaking his head. This was not good, Mr Trump said. Mr Musk, who was sporting a black eye that he blamed on a punch from his young son, tried to explain. He said Mr Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur who was set to become the next Nasa administrator, cared about getting things done. Yes, he had donated to Democrats, but so had a lot of people. Maybe it's a good thing, Mr Musk told the president - it shows that you're willing to hire people of all stripes. But Mr Trump was unmoved. He said that people don't change. These are the types of people who will turn, he said, and it won't end up being good for us. The moment of pique was a signal of the simmering tensions between the two men that would explode into the open less than a week later, upending what had been one of the most extraordinary alliances in American politics. This account of the crumbling ties between the president and Mr Musk is based on interviews with 13 people with direct knowledge of the events, all of whom asked for anonymity to describe private discussions. While the relationship had been losing steam over the past several months as Mr Musk clashed with Trump officials, people close to both men said the disagreement over Mr Isaacman accelerated the breakup. Mr Musk had been planning to exit the White House relatively quietly - before Mr Isaacman's ouster left him feeling humiliated. Now the two men, who seemed inseparable at one point, are on opposite sides. Mr Musk suggested Mr Trump should be impeached. Mr Trump has threatened to cancel government contracts with Mr Musk's companies. And in recent days, Mr Trump has been telling people close to him that he believes Mr Musk is acting 'crazy' and must be doing drugs. A tanked nomination For Mr Musk, there were few positions across the thousands in the federal government that mattered more to him than the head of Nasa, because of its critical importance to SpaceX, his rocket business. So it was of great personal benefit to Mr Musk when Mr Trump chose Mr Isaacman, who has flown to space twice with SpaceX, to oversee the agency. Mr Isaacman's donations to Democrats had not always been a problem. While Mr Trump privately told advisers that he was surprised to learn of them, he and his team had been briefed about them during the presidential transition, before Mr Isaacman's nomination, according to two people with knowledge of the events. But by May 30, when Mr Trump went through the file containing details of the donations, he clearly had changed his mind. Mr Musk barely mounted a defence of his friend. He was anxious about doing so with other people around, including Mr Sergio Gor, director of the presidential personnel office, who had clashed with Mr Musk over other staffing matters. Mr Musk believed that he would be able to talk to the president at some point after the gathering, privately. But Mr Musk never got a chance to make his case. In the hours after the Oval Office farewell, Mr Trump decided he would withdraw Mr Isaacman from consideration. Mr Musk was stunned by how fast it all happened. Mr Musk's allies have argued privately that Mr Isaacman's recent donations to Democrats were nonideological and made at the encouragement of Senator Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., a former astronaut. A spokesperson for Mr Kelly declined to comment. As Mr Musk dealt with the fallout from the tanked nomination, he spent part of the weekend outside Missoula, Montana, as a guest at 'Symposium', an event for tech executives, investors and startup founders thrown by Founders Fund, the venture capital firm founded by Peter Thiel. After spending a day in Montana, he turned his attention in earnest to assailing the top domestic priority of Mr Trump: the Republican Bill making its way through Congress that would slash taxes and steer more money to the military and immigration enforcement. Privately and publicly, Mr Musk stewed over the Bill, believing that its spending would erase the supposed savings of his Department of Government Efficiency and add to the federal deficit. Some Republican lawmakers had tried to assuage Mr Musk's fears. On June 2, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., walked the billionaire through the Bill and said that Congress would try to codify the work done by Doge. After the call, Mr Johnson told associates that he felt Mr Musk was uninformed about the legislation and the congressional process, but that he had been able to reason with the world's richest man, according to a person familiar with the conversation. On June 2 evening, Mr Musk still had concerns. He hinted at them on his social platform X, reposting a chart apparently showing the yearly increase in the national debt. 'Scary,' Mr Musk wrote as a caption. Mr Trump did not respond to Mr Musk's criticisms of the Bill and maintained a light public schedule. Meltdown The Trump-Musk alliance fully ruptured on June 5, six days after the two men put on the collegial display in the Oval Office. Mr Musk, who had largely focused his attacks on Republicans in Congress, had started directing more ire at the president. So when Mr Trump was asked about Mr Musk's comments during a meeting with Mr Friedrich Merz, the new German chancellor, the president finally let loose. He said he was 'disappointed' in Mr Musk, downplayed the billionaire's financial support for his presidential campaign and posited that Mr Musk developed 'Trump derangement syndrome' after leaving the White House. Mr Musk fired back in real time. Using X, he unleashed a torrent of attacks. He claimed there were references to the president in government documents about Jeffrey Epstein, the sex offender, and indicated his support for the president's impeachment. He also said Mr Trump's tariffs would cause a recession by the end of the year. Later, Mr Trump, using his own social media platform, threatened to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts with Mr Musk's companies. By June 5 evening, Mr Musk signalled he would be open to de-escalating the fight, while the president seemed to have little interest in an immediate reconciliation. White House officials said Mr Trump had no plans to call Mr Musk. 'President Trump is the unequivocal leader of the Republican Party, and the vast majority of the country approves of his job performance as president,' Ms Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a statement. 'Inflation is down, consumer confidence and wages are up, the jobs report beat expectations for the third month in a row, the border is secure and America is hotter than ever before.' A spokesperson for Mr Musk did not respond to a request for comment. White House officials said on June 6 that Mr Trump was considering selling the bright red Tesla he got in March as a show of support for Mr Musk. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
14 hours ago
- Straits Times
Poland cancels acquisition process for 32 Black Hawk helicopters
WARSAW - Poland has cancelled the procurement procedure for the purchase of 32 more Lockheed Martin S-70i Black Hawk helicopters for the Polish Army, the Polish Armament Agency said on Friday. "Maybe it is necessary to acquire other equipment in its (helicopters') place such as drones, or tanks, or some kind of communication," agency spokesman Grzegorz Polak told Reuters. Polak added that "some correction" was needed when the geopolitical situation and state security interests required other tasks to be carried out. Poland launched negotiations for the acquisition of 32 S-70i Black Hawk helicopters, produced by Lockheed Martin's Polish arm PZL Mielec, in 2023 under the previous Law and Justice (PiS) government. PiS lawmaker Mariusz Blaszczak, who was defence minister in the previous government, labelled the decision a "disgrace" in a post on X, saying it would slow down the replacement of the helicopter fleet. In August 2024 Poland signed a contract with the U.S. to buy 96 AH-64E Apache attack helicopters. Under the deal with the U.S. government the helicopters would provide new combat capabilities in terms of target engagement and reconnaissance, and will replace Poland's post-Soviet Mi-24 helicopters. Polak said the Armament Agency obtained equipment in accordance with Polish army plans, which are classified. It was not the Armament Agency that set procurement priorities, he added. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Singapore operator of China's first foreign-owned hospital seeks more medical tourists
Perennial Holdings' US$139 million hospital opened earlier in 2025 in Tianjin, and is the first fully foreign-owned medical facility in mainland China. PERENNIAL HOLDINGS PTE LTD BEIJING – A Singapore hospital operator wants more international patients to seek treatment at its new medical centre in China, as foreign healthcare providers eye medical tourism as a new growth area in the world's second-largest economy. Perennial Holdings' US$139 million (S$179 million) hospital opened earlier in 2025 in the northern city of Tianjin, and is the first fully foreign-owned medical facility in the mainland. The hospital aims to derive 30 per cent of its revenue during its first year of operation from patients visiting from Russia to the Middle East and South-east Asia – hoping China will become an emerging destination for medical tourism that can compete with established regional rivals Singapore, Thailand and Japan. Perennial's focus on luring overseas patients to Tianjin came after China in 2024 moved to allow private hospitals to be fully owned by foreign entities, which had previously needed a Chinese business partner. China's health regulator has since encouraged the Tianjin facility to differentiate itself from the country's public hospitals, hospital president Daniel Liu said in an interview this week. 'Medical tourism has yet to become an industry in China, but it's showing promise. We hope to make the pie bigger,' he said. 'Some specialities in the Chinese healthcare system have grown in the past two decades, to a point that measures up to international standards.' Private healthcare providers have faced headwinds operating in China as the country's post-Covid economic slump weighed on their main clientele – expats and well-off domestic customers with commercial insurance coverage. Some private hospitals and clinics have closed shop in recent months, while others have had to lower their prices, according to local media. China can be appealing to medical tourists in part due to a speedier diagnosis and treatment process that can get slowed down by rigid referral systems and a lack of resources in other countries. Still, luring global patients to China for treatment – especially when it comes to entering the country – still faces hurdles. China doesn't currently have a visa option for medical tourism, and the visa-free programme it's rolled out to more than 40 countries sometimes only grants stays of under a month – too short for some patients needing to undergo surgery and subsequent recovery. Earlier in 2025, hospital chiefs and medical experts proposed creating a new visa for medical tourism at China's annual parliamentary session. The move to expand medical tourism also dovetails with Beijing's goal to encourage more inbound travel. Some northeast China hospitals are already frequented by patients from neighbouring Russia, while southern provinces are welcoming patients from South-east Asia as access to Chinese medical care becomes part of the government's tourism push, state agency Xinhua reported. Perennial's Tianjin hospital is even hoping to bring in patients from as far as the UK, where private care is pricey and long waiting lists for the National Health Service have delayed treatments and even diagnoses of certain conditions. To meet future demand from international clients, Perennial is working to recruit medical stuff from Singapore and finalize global medical insurance coverage, Mr Liu said. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
