logo
From support to scrutiny: Gaza catastrophe sparks EU shift

From support to scrutiny: Gaza catastrophe sparks EU shift

Shafaq News27-05-2025

Shafaq News/ Europe's stance on the war in Gaza is undergoing a major transformation. What began as firm support for Israel has shifted into growing demands for an immediate ceasefire, as the humanitarian catastrophe worsens and civilian casualties climb at an alarming pace.
The war erupted on October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched a sudden and deadly assault on southern Israel, killing 1,139 people and taking more than 200 hostages. Israel's response was swift and overwhelming, unleashing a wide-scale military campaign across the Gaza Strip.
In the months since the toll has been staggering. According to Gaza's Health Ministry, more than 53,939 Palestinians have been killed and over 122,000 injured. Airstrikes have flattened entire neighborhoods, and critical infrastructure has been devastated. Hospitals, schools, and refugee shelters have been repeatedly targeted, leaving much of Gaza in ruins.
The press has suffered heavy losses as well. The Committee to Protect Journalists has recorded over 130 journalists killed since the start of the war, most of them Palestinian. Among the latest casualties is Hassan Abu Warda, whose death brings the number of journalists killed in Gaza to 220.
The humanitarian picture is just as bleak. The United Nations and several aid organizations warn that Gaza is teetering on the brink of famine. Only 4.6% of the territory's farmland remains usable. More than 14,000 infants are now at risk of starvation. The World Health Organization has described the collapse of the healthcare system as 'catastrophic.'
These grim realities have forced a dramatic shift in Europe's response. What was once defined by political caution and unwavering alignment with Israel has entered a new phase—one characterized by sharper language, diplomatic recalibration, and policy moves that would have seemed unthinkable just months ago.
Recognition Momentum
French President Emmanuel Macron has positioned himself at the forefront of Europe's evolving response to the war in Gaza, calling the situation a 'humanitarian catastrophe' and urging an 'immediate ceasefire.' But beyond rhetoric, Macron is moving toward a landmark shift in policy. He announced that France will formally recognize the State of Palestine by June 2025. 'We must move toward recognition, and so, in the coming months, we will move toward that,' he declared, framing the move as part of a broader diplomatic strategy.
Macron envisions a dual-track approach, pushing for international recognition of Palestine while also encouraging Arab nations to acknowledge Israel, offering what he described as a 'balanced' path toward peace.
That balance, however, is being tested across Europe, where traditional alliances are giving way to new pressures. In Berlin, discomfort is growing louder. Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, long cautious in her language, directly challenged the humanitarian blockade, insisting that 'humanitarian access must be guaranteed at all times.'
Chancellor Friedrich Merz went further, denouncing Israeli airstrikes that targeted civilians as 'unjustifiable.' Though Germany has yet to take concrete steps toward recognizing Palestinian statehood, the rhetorical shift is unmistakable—a signal that even Europe's most loyal backers of Israel are beginning to reassess their positions.
London, meanwhile, has already taken a decisive step away from its previous posture. Prime Minister Keir Starmer halted free trade negotiations with Israel and imposed sanctions on extremist settlers in the West Bank. Calling Israeli policies 'cruel and indefensible,' Starmer drew a sharp moral line. Foreign Secretary David Lammy later confirmed that Britain is now engaged in high-level talks with France and Saudi Arabia on the prospect of recognizing Palestine.
Further south, Spain is pushing for an even broader response. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has urged the European Union to 'act decisively to stop the war,' advocating for a comprehensive reassessment of all EU agreements with Israel. He is also calling for bloc-wide sanctions.
Spain's support for Palestinian rights is neither new nor symbolic. In 1979, Madrid broke precedent by hosting PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat, becoming the first Western European country to do so. That legacy continued in May 2024, when Spain formally recognized the State of Palestine, alongside Ireland and Norway.
Ireland's stance is rooted in something deeper than policy: a national ethos shaped by its own historical experience with occupation and resistance. Dublin first endorsed Palestinian statehood in 1980, becoming the earliest EU member to do so. That commitment was reaffirmed in May 2024, when Ireland granted official recognition to the State of Palestine, a move widely embraced by the Irish public as a moral necessity rather than a diplomatic gesture.
Across the continent, momentum is steadily building. Malta has announced its intention to recognize Palestine, stating that "the circumstances are right," while Slovenia has voiced similar readiness. Sweden and Norway—longstanding champions of human rights—are now urging the international community to take a firmer stand. Both governments have called for targeted sanctions on Israel in response to the escalating crisis in Gaza, signaling a shift from moral concern to concrete political action.
Even inside EU institutions, the tone is shifting. Foreign ministers have launched a review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, with a particular focus on human rights violations. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stressed the urgency of the moment, renewing calls for a ceasefire and the release of hostages. 'The only solution remains a negotiated two-state outcome,' she stated, reaffirming Brussels' alignment with international law—and perhaps acknowledging a reality that is becoming harder to ignore.
Cracks are widening internally as well. More than 2,000 EU officials have signed an open letter condemning the bloc's initial response as insufficient and demanding an immediate end to arms exports to Israel. Their message is stark: policy must catch up with principle.
Yet while the diplomatic front evolves, the ground reality in Gaza grows increasingly grim. Israeli military media quoted sources claiming that 75% of the territory will be under their control 'within two months.' The bombardment shows no sign of slowing. Humanitarian conditions are deteriorating rapidly. And as European capitals engage in backroom diplomacy and public positioning, the people of Gaza face a catastrophe unfolding in real time—one that diplomacy may be struggling to catch up with.
Economic Ties Under Review
The economic relationship between the European Union and Israel has long been extensive and deeply interwoven. In 2023, trade between the two reached €46.7 billion (roughly $50.7 billion), with EU exports to Israel totaling €29.2 billion and imports amounting to €17.5 billion—a surplus that favored Europe. But the outbreak of war in Gaza in October 2023 has begun to unsettle this foundation.
By the end of that year, the impact was evident. Israeli exports to Europe dropped by nearly 10%, while European imports declined by almost 13%. Yet the implications go beyond economics.
Across Europe, the conflict has reignited debate over the ethics of continued trade with Israel. In Ireland, lawmakers have introduced legislation to ban imports from Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories. Although the volume of such trade is relatively limited, the political message is significant: a growing push to align EU trade policy with international law and human rights commitments.
That sentiment is gaining ground elsewhere. Spain and Ireland are spearheading efforts to revisit the EU-Israel Association Agreement, particularly its human rights clause. Both governments have called on Brussels to consider suspending the accord in light of Israel's ongoing military campaign in Gaza. The initiative reflects rising discomfort within the EU and a willingness to leverage economic tools to signal disapproval and drive accountability.
Attention has also turned to the EU's funding of Israeli research and innovation. Since October 7, Europe has allocated more than €238 million (about $250 million) to support Israeli R&D programs. While these funds are intended for civilian technologies, critics warn they may be indirectly supporting sectors tied to defense. This has fueled calls for increased scrutiny—or even a temporary freeze—to ensure that EU resources uphold the bloc's principles of peace, human rights, and humanitarian responsibility.
The war in Gaza has thus revealed more than just a political dilemma—it has brought the EU's economic engagement with Israel into the spotlight. With the humanitarian toll rising and political pressure increasing, Europe is now facing a deeper reckoning—not merely over the cost of inaction, but over the ethics of maintaining business ties that no longer align with its values. What lies ahead may not be simply a policy adjustment, but a potential redefinition of the EU's long-standing economic relationship with Israel.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tehran claims spy operation targeting Israeli nuclear sites
Tehran claims spy operation targeting Israeli nuclear sites

Shafaq News

time24 minutes ago

  • Shafaq News

Tehran claims spy operation targeting Israeli nuclear sites

Shafaq News/ Iran's intelligence services have reportedly obtained a large cache of sensitive Israeli documents, including files allegedly linked to nuclear and defense infrastructure, according to state broadcaster IRIB on Saturday. The report claimed that thousands of documents—comprising written files, images, and videos—were extracted from Israeli territory during a covert operation carried out 'some time ago.' Iranian officials did not provide evidence to support the allegations, but emphasized that the volume of material was 'so extensive that the process of reviewing and verifying their contents is still ongoing.' IRIB attributed the operation to Iran's intelligence apparatus and linked it to the May arrest of two Israeli citizens, Roy Mizrahi and Almog Atias, both 24 and residents of Nesher near Haifa. According to Israeli authorities, the two were detained on suspicion of collecting intelligence on behalf of Iran following a joint investigation by the Shin Bet and Israel Police's Lahav 433 unit. Israeli officials have not directly responded to the Iranian claims regarding the intelligence haul. However, at the time of the arrests, security authorities described the case as part of 'a series of recent incidents' involving efforts by Iranian intelligence services to recruit Israeli citizens for espionage activities, the Times of Israel reported. Tensions between Israel and Iran have long been marked by mutual hostility, with both countries accusing each other of conducting covert operations ranging from cyberattacks to assassinations. In recent months, Israeli authorities have announced multiple arrests of citizens suspected of spying for Iranian intelligence, often in exchange for money—highlighting Tehran's expanding efforts to infiltrate Israeli society through espionage networks.

Last families depart Syria's major displacement camp
Last families depart Syria's major displacement camp

Shafaq News

time24 minutes ago

  • Shafaq News

Last families depart Syria's major displacement camp

Shafaq News/ The Rukban displacement camp near the Jordanian-Syrian border officially closed after the final group of residents departed for eastern rural Homs. Syria's Emergency and Disaster Management Minister Raed al-Saleh described the closure in a post on X as 'the end of one of the most severe humanitarian crises faced by displaced people.' اغلاق مخيم الركبان يمثل نهاية لواحدة من أقسى المآسي الإنسانية التي واجهها أهلنا النازحون، نأمل أن تشكل هذه الخطوة بداية لمسار ينهي معاناة بقية المخيمات، يعيد أهلها إلى ديارهم بكرامة وأمان. #الجمهورية_العربية_السورية #وزارة_الطوارئ_والكوارث #مخيم_الركبان #سوريا — Raed Al Saleh ( رائد الصالح ) (@RaedAlSaleh3) June 7, 2025 The closure comes as part of a broader trend of repatriation following the political transition in Syria. The UNHCR Representative of Syria Gonzalo Vargas Llosa noted in a post on X that approximately 500,000 Syrian refugees have returned home since the fall of the previous regime on December 8, 2024. 500,000 Syrian refugees have now returned home. I referred to this landmark moment in an interview with the Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA). Since the fall of the Assad regime, we have a historic opportunity to fulfill the hope of millions of refugees and internally displaced… — Gonzalo Vargas Llosa (@llosa_gonzalo) May 16, 2025 Established in 2014 amid widespread displacement from Homs and Hama, the Rukban in southeastern Syria, in Rif Dimashq province, became one of the largest camps for displaced civilians during the Syrian Civil War. It had faced years of severe humanitarian hardship and, at its peak between 2018 and 2019, hosted nearly 50,000 internally displaced persons, most of them women and children.

Russia-Ukraine prisoner exchange delayed
Russia-Ukraine prisoner exchange delayed

Shafaq News

time3 hours ago

  • Shafaq News

Russia-Ukraine prisoner exchange delayed

Shafaq News/ On Saturday, the largest prisoner swap between Russia and Ukraine collapsed, with both sides trading accusations over the sudden delay. Russia blamed Ukraine for postponing the exchange at the last minute, claiming it had already begun a large-scale humanitarian operation to repatriate the remains of more than 6,000 Ukrainian servicemen. Lieutenant General Aleksandr Zorin, a member of Russia's negotiation team, revealed that the exchange was arranged under an "everyone-for-everyone" formula, covering wounded and seriously ill prisoners as well as those under the age of 25, adding that Moscow had provided Kyiv with a list of 640 prisoners for return and was prepared to proceed 'in accordance with agreements reached in Istanbul on June 2.' The Russian Defense Ministry also released footage on Telegram showing sealed body bags inside refrigerated trucks, which officials said contained the remains of Ukrainian soldiers. However, Ukraine's Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War rejected Moscow's version of events, saying no date had been agreed for the handover of bodies and that the processes of prisoner exchange and repatriation were separate. The collapse of the planned prisoner exchange came amid a surge in Russian aerial attacks across Ukraine, including a massive overnight bombardment that killed at least six people and wounded over 60.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store