logo
US Justice Department ends post-George Floyd police reform settlements

US Justice Department ends post-George Floyd police reform settlements

Al Jazeera21-05-2025

The administration of President Donald Trump has begun the process of ending the federal government's involvement in reforming local police departments, a civil rights effort that gained steam after the deaths of unarmed Black people like George Floyd and Breonna Taylor.
On Wednesday, the United States Department of Justice announced it would cancel two proposed settlements that would have seen the cities of Louisville, Kentucky, and Minneapolis, Minnesota, agree to federal oversight of their police departments.
Generally, those settlements — called consent decrees — involve a series of steps and goals that the two parties negotiate and that a federal court helps enforce.
In addition, the Justice Department said it would withdraw reports on six other local police departments which found patterns of discrimination and excessive violence.
The Trump administration framed the announcement as part of its efforts to transfer greater responsibility towards individual cities and states — and away from the federal government.
'It's our view at the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division under the Trump administration that federal micromanagement of local police should be a rare exception, and not the norm,' said Harmeet Dhillon, an assistant attorney general at the Justice Department, said.
She argued that such federal oversight was a waste of taxpayer funds.
'There is a lack of accountability. There is a lack of local control. And there is an industry here that is, I think, ripping off the taxpayers and making citizens less safe,' Dhillon said.
But civil rights leaders and police reform advocates reacted with outrage over the news, which arrived just days before the fifth anniversary of Floyd's murder.
Reverend Al Sharpton was among the leaders who called for police departments to take meaningful action after a viral video captured Floyd's final moments. On May 25, 2020, a white police officer, Derek Chauvin, leaned his knee on Floyd's neck for more than nine minutes, causing him to asphyxiate and die.
'This move isn't just a policy reversal,' Sharpton said. 'It's a moral retreat that sends a chilling message that accountability is optional when it comes to Black and Brown victims.'
He warned that the Trump administration's move sent a signal to police departments that they were 'above scrutiny'.
The year of Floyd's murder was also marked by a number of other high-profile deaths, including Taylor's.
The 26-year-old medical worker was in bed late at night on March 13, 2020, when police used a battering ram to break into her apartment. Her boyfriend feared they were being attacked and fired his gun once. The police responded with a volley of bullets, killing Taylor, who was struck six times.
Her death and others stirred a period of nationwide unrest in the US, with millions of people protesting in the streets as part of social justice movements like Black Lives Matter. It is thought that the 2020 'racial reckoning' was one of the biggest mass demonstrations in US history.
Those protests unfolded in the waning months of Trump's first term, and when Democrat Joe Biden succeeded him as president in 2021, the Justice Department embarked on a series of 12 investigations looking into allegations of police overreach and excessive violence on the local level.
Those investigations were called 'pattern-or-practice' probes, designed to look into whether incidents of police brutality were one-offs or part of a larger trend in a given police department.
Floyd's murder took place in Minneapolis and Taylor's in Louisville — the two cities where the Trump Justice Department decided to drop its settlements on Wednesday. In both cities, under Biden, the Justice Department had found patterns of discriminatory policing.
'Police officers must often make split-second decisions and risk their lives to keep their communities safe,' the report on Minneapolis reads.
But, it adds, the local police department 'used dangerous techniques and weapons against people who committed at most a petty offence and sometimes no offense at all'.
Other police departments scrutinised during this period included ones in Phoenix, Arizona; Memphis, Tennessee; Trenton, New Jersey; Mount Vernon, New York; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and the Louisiana State Police.
Dhillon, who now runs the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, positioned the retractions of those Biden-era findings as a policy pivot. She also condemned the consent decrees as an overused tool and indicated she would look into rescinding some agreements that were already in place.
That process would likely involve a judge's approval, however.
And while some community advocates have expressed concerns that consent decrees could place a burden on already over-stretched law enforcement departments, others disagree with the Justice Department's latest move, arguing that a retreat could strip resources and momentum from police reform.
At the Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD), Chief Paul Humphrey said the commitment to better policing went beyond any settlement. He indicated he would look for an independent monitor to oversee reforms.
'It's not about these words on this paper,' he said. 'It's about the work that the men and women of LMPD, the men and women of metro government and the community will do together in order to make us a safer, better place.'
And in Minneapolis, Mayor Jacob Frey doubled down, saying he could keep pushing forward with the police reform plan his city had agreed to.
'We will comply with every sentence of every paragraph of the 169-page consent decree that we signed this year,' he said at a news conference.
'We will make sure that we are moving forward with every sentence of every paragraph of both the settlement around the Minnesota Department of Human Rights, as well as the consent decree.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chinese man in US pleads guilty to exporting guns, ammo to North Korea
Chinese man in US pleads guilty to exporting guns, ammo to North Korea

Al Jazeera

time3 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Chinese man in US pleads guilty to exporting guns, ammo to North Korea

A Chinese man living illegally in the United States has pleaded guilty to exporting guns, ammunition and other military items to North Korea at the direction of Pyongyang, the US Department of Justice has said. Shenghua Wen, of Ontario, California, admitted to one count of conspiracy to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act – a 1977 law that empowers the president to restrict commerce with countries on national security grounds – and one count of acting as an illegal agent of a foreign government, the Justice Department said on Monday. Wen, 42, shipped at least three containers of guns bound for North Korea in 2023, one of which arrived in Nampo, North Korea, via Hong Kong, according to prosecutors. To facilitate the scheme, Wen bought a firearms business in Houston, Texas, and used false paperwork to conceal the contents of his shipping containers, according to prosecutors. Wen, who was arrested in December, also allegedly bought approximately 60,000 rounds of 9mm ammunition and obtained 'sensitive technology', including a chemical threat identification device, for shipment to North Korea. Wen was allegedly directed to procure the weapons and sensitive goods by North Korean officials he met at the North Korean Embassy in China before entering the US on a student visa in 2012. Wen was allegedly transferred about $2m to carry out the scheme. 'Wen admitted that at all relevant times he knew that it was illegal to ship firearms, ammunition, and sensitive technology to North Korea. He also admitted to never having the required licenses to export ammunition, firearms, and the above-described devices to North Korea,' the US Attorney's Office for the Central District of California said in a press release. 'He further admitted to acting at the direction of North Korean government officials and that he had not provided notification to the Attorney General of the United States that he was acting in the United States at the direction and control of North Korea as required by law.' During questioning by the FBI, Wen said he believed the North Korean government wanted the weapons and ammunition to prepare for an attack against South Korea, according to a criminal complaint filed in September. Wen is due to face court for sentencing in August. He faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison for violating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and up to 10 years for acting as an illegal agent of a foreign government.

Robert Kennedy Jr expels all 17 members of CDC vaccine panel
Robert Kennedy Jr expels all 17 members of CDC vaccine panel

Al Jazeera

time6 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Robert Kennedy Jr expels all 17 members of CDC vaccine panel

United States Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr has purged a 17-member panel at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that provides expertise on vaccines. Kennedy, who before taking a position in the administration of President Donald Trump was a vocal anti-vaccine activist, has said he will replace the panel with his own picks. 'Today, we are prioritising the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda,' Kennedy said. 'The public must know that unbiased science – evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest – guides the recommendations of our health agencies.' Kennedy's reorganisation of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is the latest move by the Trump administration to shake up US health practices, sometimes by pushing ideas that depart strongly from the existing scientific consensus on issues such as vaccinations and fluoride. 'That's a tragedy,' a former chief scientist of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Jesse Goodman, said of the firings. 'This is a highly professional group of scientists and physicians and others … It's the kind of political meddling that will reduce confidence rather than increase confidence.' The HHS said that all 17 members of the panel were selected during the administration of former President Joe Biden, and that keeping them on would have prevented Trump from choosing the majority of the panel's members until 2028. The department said that the ACIP will convene its next meeting on June 25-27. While the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves vaccinations for public use, the ACIP reviews data in public meetings before voting on whether to recommend a vaccine.

Trump to ‘activate' Marines to respond to LA protests in major escalation
Trump to ‘activate' Marines to respond to LA protests in major escalation

Al Jazeera

time6 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Trump to ‘activate' Marines to respond to LA protests in major escalation

The Pentagon will send a Marine battalion to Los Angeles in a major escalation of US President Donald Trump's response to anti-immigration enforcement protests, the United States military has said. The statement on Monday confirmed the 'activation' of 700 Marines to help protect federal personnel and property in the California city, where Trump had deployed the US National Guard a day earlier. The update came despite opposition from state officials, including California's Governor Gavin Newsom, who had earlier mounted a legal challenge to the deployment of the National Guard troops. In a statement, the military said the 'activation of the Marines' was meant to help 'provide continuous coverage of the area in support of the lead federal agency'. Speaking to the Reuters news agency, an unnamed Trump administration official said the soldiers would be acting only in support of the National Guard and other law enforcement. The official said that Trump was not yet invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807, which would suspend legal limitations that block the military from taking part in domestic law enforcement. Speaking shortly before the reports emerged, Trump said he was open to deploying Marines to Los Angeles, but said protests in the city were 'heading in the right direction'. 'We'll see what happens,' he said. Reporting from Los Angeles, Al Jazeera's Rob Reynolds said protests on Monday organised in the city centre by union groups were peaceful. He noted that the National Guard which Trump had deployed to the city on Sunday played a minimal role in responding to the protests, only guarding federal buildings. That raised questions over why the Trump administration would feel a Marine deployment was needed. '[The National Guard] didn't engage with the protesters. They didn't do much of anything other than stand there in their military uniforms,' Reynolds said. He added that there is an important distinction between the National Guard, a state-based military force usually composed of part-time reserves, and the more combat-forward Marines, which are the land force of the US Navy. 'Now the Marines, this is a whole different thing. The United States sends Marines overseas where US imperialist interests are at stake, but not to cities in the United States,' he said. California Governor Newsom's office, meanwhile, said that according to the information it had received, the Marines were only being transferred to a base closer to Los Angeles, and not technically being deployed onto the streets. Still, it said the 'level of escalation is completely unwarranted, uncalled for, and unprecedented – mobilising the best in class branch of the US military against its own citizens'. The updates on Monday came shortly after Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the state had filed a lawsuit challenging Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard to Los Angeles. Newsom has maintained that local law enforcement had the capacity to respond to protests over US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Los Angeles and the nearby city of Paramount that first broke out on Friday. The Democratic state leader accused Trump of escalating the situation, saying in a statement that the president was 'creating fear and terror by failing to adhere to the US Constitution and overstepping his authority'. 'This is a manufactured crisis to allow him to take over a state militia, damaging the very foundation of our republic,' Newsom said. The California lawsuit argues that the legal authority Trump invoked to deploy the National Guard requires the consent of the state's governor, which Newsom did not provide. For his part, Trump indicated he would support Newsom being arrested for impeding immigration enforcement, responding to an earlier threat from the president's border czar, Tom Homan. Trump's response to the protests represented the first time since 1965 that a president deployed the National Guard against the will of a state governor. At the time, President Lyndon B Johnson did so to protect civil rights demonstrators in Alabama. Protests against Trump's crackdown – as well as his overall immigration policy – continued on Monday. Standing in front of Ambiance Apparel in Los Angeles, one of the sites raided by ICE agents last week, Indigenous community leader Perla Rios spoke alongside family members of individuals detained by immigration agents. Rios called for due process and legal representation for those taken into detention. 'What our families are experiencing is simply a nightmare,' Rios said. Meanwhile, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) called for protests in cities across the country over the Trump administration's response to demonstrations, which included the arrest of the union's California president David Huerta. Huerta was detained on Friday during immigration raids and charged with conspiracy to impede an officer during immigration enforcement operations. 'From Massachusetts to California, we call for his immediate release and for an end to ICE raids that are tearing our communities apart,' the SEIU said in a statement. Protesters also gathered in New York and Los Angeles in response to Trump's latest ban on travellers from 12 countries, a policy critics have decried as racist. Speaking at a protest in New York City on Monday, Murad Awawdeh, president of the New York Immigration Coalition, said the policy was 'a continuation of the Muslim and travel ban under the first Trump administration, which separated families and harmed our communities'. The policy, he said, was creating 'an immense amount of fear'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store