California avocado growers say Mexican imports have helped their sales
SOMIS, Calif. (AP) — Andreas Tompros lost his home and at least a third of his avocado orchard to a wildfire last year, but the 47-year-old grower is not worried about his farm making a comeback.
While California farmers often rattle off a list of challenges they face including high labor costs, water restrictions and overseas competition, many avocado growers say they have a good thing going. A key reason may come as a surprise to some — Mexican imports.
When the United States lifted its ban on Mexican avocados in 1997, California growers worried at first that the imported fruit would displace their production.
But the steady flow of avocados has wound up helping, not hurting, their sales by allowing for a year-round supply to markets and restaurants that has fomented demand, farmers say. Before the influx, most American consumers considered avocados to be specialty items — and when they came into season in California, industry officials had to work to rev up widespread interest in order to sell them.
But not anymore.
Avocado consumption has been booming in the United States over the past two decades. The amount of fruit available per person tripled to more than 8 pounds (3.6 kilograms) between 2000 and 2021, federal statistics show. Avocado toast and guacamole are regular offerings not just in culinary hubs like NYC but at cafes around the Midwest and the South.
Avocados are in demand
On a steep, sun-soaked hillside northwest of Los Angeles, Tompros is replanting nearly 300 avocado trees with the belief that Americans' hunger for the fruit — and his orchard — will continue to grow.
'It will come back, and I believe it will become better than it was,' Tompros, who previously ran a software company in Hollywood, said of the orchard he took over five years ago in the tiny community of Somis.
Avocado demand has also been buoyed by consumers' growing interest in healthy fats, said Emiliano Escobedo, executive director of the Hass Avocado Board.
A 2000 U.S. law created the board that collected 2.5 cents for every pound (0.5 kilograms) of avocados imported or produced in the United States. The board used the money to market avocados and conduct nutritional research, an effort that has been widely credited with making the fruit ubiquitous in supermarkets and on restaurant menus.
'It's been really wildly successful. It generates way more money than most of these other industry boards do,' said Richard Sexton, distinguished professor of agricultural and resource economics at the University of California, Davis. 'When you look at the growth rate in avocado consumption relative to all fruits, the difference in growth rate is dramatic.'
A successful crop
Escobedo said about 60% of U.S. households currently buy avocados, and about half of these are responsible for the overwhelming majority of consumption, which means there's still room for the market to grow — especially in the Northeast, where the fruit is less common.
'There is a lot of opportunity for certain groups of people to increase their purchasing of avocados,' Escobedo said.
While the Trump administration has threatened tariffs on a spate of Mexican goods, avocados have so far been spared. California growers said they want Mexican avocados to keep flowing into the country, though they also want robust U.S. inspections of the imports to keep out pests to protect their crop.
'If you are going to farm in California, avocados are about the best deal right now,' said Ken Melban, president of the California Avocado Commission.
California farmers grow about 10% of the avocados eaten in the United States, Melban said, and account for nearly all of the country's domestic avocado production. The fruit is largely grown in California from April through September, and Mexican imports arrive year-round to meet nationwide demand, which exceeds what the state's farmers grow, he said.
In Southern California's Ventura County, many growers have shifted to avocados since lemon prices were walloped by cheaper imports from Argentina. As recently planted trees start bearing fruit in a few years, the region's avocado production is likely to rise, said Korinne Bell, agricultural commissioner for the county northwest of Los Angeles.
A booming market, despite wildfires
Avocado trees do not come without risks in a region prone to wildfires.
Still, demand for the trees has jumped due to interest from lemon growers — and since the November 2024 fire charred Ventura County avocado orchards, said Rob Brokaw, whose family-owned nursery has supplied avocado trees to California growers for 70 years.
'Right now we are sold out essentially for this year,' Brokaw said. 'And we're mostly sold out for 2026.'
Tompros debated whether to plant the more fire-resistant lemon trees or another crop after the fire ripped through Somis, but he decided to replant due to the soaring demand for Super Bowl guacamole and avocado toast.
'It's the super food, and it's still growing in popularity,' Tompros said.
He's taking precautions to not plant the trees too close to what will eventually be his rebuilt home, because the dried-out leaves that help nourish the orchard's soil can also fuel blazes.
It may take a few years, but Tompros hopes it won't be too long before his newly planted trees bear fruit that he can sell to a local packinghouse or in seasonal gift boxes with citrus and passionfruit that he ships directly to customers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Philippines defense boss throws cold water on large F-16 buy from US
SINGAPORE — The Philippines' defense secretary cast doubt on a $5.6 billion purchase of American F-16 fighter jets approved in April, saying Manila hasn't yet decided whether to move forward with the sale. Speaking on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue, a defense summit held in Singapore, Gilberto Teodoro said the Philippines hadn't yet received a formal offer to purchase the fourth-generation fighters. Even if it had, he said, his department doesn't know whether it wants them. 'As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing on the table for me to consider,' he said in an interview. In April, the U.S. State Department approved the potential sale of 20 F-16 fighter jets to the Philippines, as part of a package that also included missiles, bombs and other ammunition. The total was valued at just under $5.6 billion, which would have commanded a massive share of the Philippines' defense budget. Manila spends about $6 billion, or 1.3% of its GDP, on its military each year, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, a think tank. Teodoro referred to the purported sale as 'media hype,' without explaining why the State Department initially approved it. 'We have not even decided, number one, when we will acquire a multi-role fighter and what model,' he said. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited the Philippines in March as the U.S. upgrades its alliance with the country in an effort to better compete with China. The two met again over the weekend in Singapore, where Hegseth warned that the military threat Beijing poses 'could be imminent' and urged allies to spend more on defense. To some Philippine officials, the sale of fighter jets was a sign of long-term U.S. commitment and a show of trust that their military could handle such advanced equipment. But soon after the announcement other officials from the country began to question how they could afford such a large purchase without American assistance. The U.S. sent the Philippines $500 million in long-term security aid last year but would need Congress to pass more in order to continue such support. During the Biden administration, the U.S. and Philippines agreed on a 'roadmap' of weapons to purchase in the years ahead as Manila upgrades its military. That plan largely consists of equipment to help survey and protect the Philippines' vast coastlines, not high-end fighter jets. At the conference here, Teodoro had a testy exchange with Chinese delegates in attendance, who asked critical questions about the Philippines' alliance with the United States. Chinese coast guard vessels routinely harass Philippine ships in the South China Sea, which Beijing claims as its own despite a contrary ruling in 2016 from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. 'China has a lot of trust building to do to be an effective negotiating partner,' Teodoro said during remarks on stage. 'We have to call a spade a spade.'
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sweden tightens monitoring of Russian tankers
Sweden's government has announced tougher checks on insurers of foreign vessels to combat what is known as Russia's "shadow fleet". Source: AP news Details: Starting 1 July, the Swedish Coast Guard and Maritime Administration will collect insurance data not only on ships entering Swedish ports but also on those sailing through Sweden's territorial waters and exclusive economic zone. "This underlines Sweden's clear presence in the Baltic Sea, which in itself has a deterrent effect," said Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson. He added that the measures would also provide Sweden and its allies with valuable information about vessels, which could serve as a basis for expanding sanctions lists with more ships. Russia uses its shadow fleet to transport oil and gas, as well as stolen Ukrainian grain. The European Union has imposed sanctions on nearly 350 vessels, with the latest additions introduced on 20 May, the publication says. The average age of these vessels is around 18 years, meaning they are nearing the end of their service life and are more vulnerable to accidents, particularly if they are poorly maintained. "We are seeing more and more problematic events in the Baltic Sea and this requires us not only to hope for the best, but also to plan for the worst," the Swedish prime minister said. Background: As reported earlier, in May, the Estonian Navy attempted to stop the tanker Jaguar, which was passing through international waters in the Gulf of Finland en route to the port of Primorsk. In response to the actions of the Estonian forces, Russia sent a fighter jet which, according to Estonia's military, violated the country's airspace. Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal stated that his country would continue inspecting ships belonging to Russia's "shadow fleet" despite the recent airspace violation by a Russian fighter jet. On 18 May, Russian authorities detained a tanker in Russian territorial waters after it had left the port of Sillamäe, Estonia, carrying shale oil. The vessel was released on 19 May. Following Russia's seizure of the Green Admire oil tanker, Estonia decided to avoid the route passing through Russian territorial waters. Russia later began using warships to escort its shadow fleet tankers in the Gulf of Finland. Finland's Navy reported increased military activity in the region. It was also reported that Russia's crude oil export revenues have dropped to a two-year low amid falling prices. The average volume of Russian oil shipments was 3.39 million barrels per day over the four weeks leading up to 25 May. This was only 10,000 barrels per day less than the previous period ending 18 May, but the gross value of these shipments was the lowest since April 2023. Russia's oil export revenues fell by US$20 million, or 1%, to US$1.26 billion in the week ending 25 May. In April, Russia earned US$13.2 billion from crude oil and oil product exports – the lowest figure in nearly two years. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!


Axios
26 minutes ago
- Axios
Behind the Curtain: Trump's America-First AI risk
The two most durable and decisive geopolitical topics of the 2020s are fully merging into one existential threat: China and AI supremacy. Put simply, America either maintains its economic and early AI advantages, or faces the possibility of a world dominated by communist China. Why it matters: This is the rare belief shared by both President Trump and former President Biden — oh, and virtually every person studying the geopolitical chessboard. David Sacks, Trump's AI czar, said this weekend on his podcast, "All-In": "There's no question that the armies of the future are gonna be drones and robots, and they're gonna be AI-powered. ... I would define winning as the whole world consolidates around the American tech stack." The big picture: That explains why the federal government has scant interest in regulating AI, why both parties are silent on AI's job threat, and why Washington and Silicon Valley are merging into one superstructure. It can all be traced to China. Trump is squarely in this camp. Yet his short-term policies on global trade and treatment of traditional U.S. allies are putting long-term U.S. victory over China — economically and technologically — at high risk. To understand the stakes, wrap your head around the theory of the case for beating China to superhuman intelligence. It goes like this: China is a bad actor, the theory goes, using its authoritarian power to steal U.S. technology secrets — both covertly, and through its mandate that American companies doing business in China form partnerships with government-backed Chinese companies. China has a lethal combination of talent + political will + long-term investments. What they don't have, right now, are the world's best chips. If China gains a decisive advantage in AI, America's economic and military dominance will evaporate. Some think Western liberal democracy could, too. China then uses this technology know-how and manipulates its own markets to supercharge emerging, vital technologies, including driverless cars, drones, solar, batteries, and other AI-adjacent categories. Chinese firms are exporting those products around the world, squashing U.S. and global competitors and gathering valuable data. It then floods markets with cheap Chinese products that help gather additional data — or potentially surveillance of U.S. companies or citizens. The Trump response, similar to Biden's, is to try to punish China with higher targeted tariffs and strict controls on U.S. tech products — such as Nvidia's high-performing computer chips — sold there. The downside risk is slowing U.S. sales for companies like Nvidia, losing any American control over the supply chain that ultimately produces superhuman intelligence in China, and cutting off access to AI components that China produces better or more cheaply than the U.S. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently called the export controls " a failure" that merely gave China more incentive to develop its industry. You mitigate this risk by opening up new markets for American companies to sell into ... fostering alternatives to Chinese goods and raw materials (Middle East) ... and creating an overall market as big or bigger than China's (America + Canada + Europe + Middle East + India). But Trump isn't mitigating the risk elsewhere while confronting China. He's often escalating the risk, without any obvious upside. Consider: Canada, rich in minerals and energy, is looking to Europe, not us, for protection and partnership after Trump insulted America's former closest ally. Trump continues to taunt Canada about becoming an American state. Europe, once solidly pro-American, has been ridiculed by Trump and Vice President Vance as too weak and too cumbersome to warrant special relations with America. Zoom in: Trump's tariffs spooked these two allies and many others who could legitimately form a massive, united counterweight to China. That has slowed discussions of a united front in case America and China fully decouple. In fact, Europe and China are now talking more actively, in a sort of "the trade enemy of my trade enemy is my friend" dialogue. Trump has tightened relationships with rich nations in the Middle East, and sees the Saudis and others as displacing European nations as part of the global American coalition. But those same nations are close to China, too, and have little incentive to pick sides so decisively. The Trump-Biden export controls rely on countries involved in the cutting-edge chip supply chain — Japan, the Netherlands, South Korea and Taiwan — agreeing to harm their own companies' business in China to form a united front with the U.S. Trump has given them reason to reconsider. Zoom out: Trump, in public, has been all over the place on China, much like he has on trade policy. He talked tough early, slapped on 145% tariffs — then sent Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent out to argue the broader trade strategy was a chess move to isolate China. But then Trump reduced the tariffs, suggested peaceful competition was possible, and reignited trade talks. Now, he's back to talking tough and firing off social media warnings about calling them off again. Meanwhile, China keeps racing ahead on drones, cars, quantum computing and batteries. At the same time, Beijing holds all the leverage on the rare earth minerals the U.S. so desperately needs. And JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, just back from China, warned last week that America's internal issues leave the nation unprepared for war abroad. "If you put a team on the field and the team's torn apart, they're gonna lose," he told the Reagan National Economic Forum. "And that's kind of us right now." The other side: Administration advisers tell us there's more coherence to the Trump strategy than meets the eye. Trump believes he'll ultimately create a coalition of willing trading partners, with more favorable terms for America, to rival China. He also believes his tactics will nudge Canada, Greenland, Ukraine and others to share essential minerals and AI ingredients — and that U.S. workers will benefit from better-paying jobs in this new economy. Understanding that countries need AI and just choose between the U.S. and China, Trump sees the opportunity to leverage the U.S. AI lead to both bring countries onto U.S. systems — and to get investment back into the U.S. to fund critical AI infrastructure, including OpenAI's Stargate. An OpenAI official who has worked closely with Trump officials told us the administration excels at AI diplomacy and is executing a sophisticated strategy. "They get it," the official said, "particularly when it comes to making sure the world is going to build out on U.S.-led AI rails, while also using the interest in U.S. AI to get reciprocal investment into U.S.-based infrastructure."