
Kill Your Business - Before It Kills You
In the realm of entrepreneurship, success often breeds complacency. The very strategies that propel a company to prominence can, if left unexamined, become the catalysts for its decline. This phenomenon, known as the 'Icarus Paradox,' illustrates how businesses can fail by clinging to past triumphs without adapting to evolving markets. Understanding the keys of this trap, might lead you to the obvous answer that to really grown, you might have to kill your business.
Danny Miller coined the Icarus Paradox, which describes how a company's strengths can become its weaknesses. As businesses achieve success, they may become overconfident and resist change and innovation. This resistance can create a 'success trap.' In this trap, companies stick to what they know. They focus on using current skills instead of seeking new opportunities.
Depending on your company's structure and culture, you can simplify discussing the Icarus Paradox. Try asking this question: 'Why don't trees grow to the moon?''
Trees Don't Grow To The Moon
Erik Logan
This question comes from an old German saying: 'Trees don't grow to the sky.' No matter how you bring it up with your company, the answer is clear: Success has stalled. What are you going to do about it?
The first step is to acknowledge, then begin the understanding: Are you in a success trap? Are you a tree that has stopped growing? Maybe this can help.
Nokia went from being a top mobile phone brand to a warning sign for businesses. This shows how dangerous it is to be complacent and not adjust to fast-changing markets.
Nokia once held over a third of the global mobile phone market. But it failed to see the smartphone revolution coming. Its heavy reliance on old operating systems like Symbian caused a big drop in market share. Internal conflicts, a strict structure, and slow reactions to tech trends made things worse.
When Nokia tried to shift to the Windows Phone, Apple and Samsung had already taken control of the market. This left Nokia fighting to find its place again.
Stay alert for warning signs to keep your successful business from struggling. But as the old saying goes, 'You can't read the label from inside the jar.' You need to have some objective metrics and market data to help clear the fog and think clearly. Here are a few key areas you may start:
• Stagnant Growth: Plateauing sales or market share can indicate a need for a strategic reset. Be honest with yourself; if sales are slow, ask yourself if you are making excuses for the flattening. Are you trying to find the good in your numbers? You might think those answers are good enough. But push your team and yourself to find the real truth.
• Resistance to Change: A clear sign of stagnation is a culture that ignores new ideas or technologies. This can slow down progress. A subtext here is also the amount of turnover you may be having with your company. Unless you have initiated layoffs, the turnover could signal internal dissatisfaction .
• Loss of Market Share and/or Profit Margins: This is where you actually see the decline year over year, not just slowing growth. A common mistake is attributing the downturn to market headwinds. The temptation at this point is to find ways to justify the downturn. A common theme or variation is, 'The market was down 10%, and we were down 2%, which means we were up 2% against the market.' While technically true, it builds in a mentality that growth isn't there. And by definition, maybe it's time to grab that saw!
The first thing you should do is pat yourself on the back for having the courage to look at the reality of where you are. It's something that isn't as easy as many think. After reflection, you may determine that you are not ready to kill the business but rather use it as motivation to delve deeper into the core issues.
Two very quick and easy ways to push the culture and the company forward are:
1. Test New Ideas with Your Leadership Team: Observe who is open to innovation and who is stuck in old ways. This will help clue you in on who is ready for larger conversations.
2. Fire Yourself: Imagine that you are not the leader or CEO. Next Monday is your first day. Go through the process of walking in on your 'first day.' Ask questions as if you are the new person. Why do we do it that way? Even if you understand, does your team? Ask for clarity on how what they are doing maps to the goals and overall strategy of the company.
Success isn't just a one-time goal. It's an ongoing journey that needs constant review and adjustment. Businesses can avoid mistakes made by others by recognizing past strategies' limits and embracing change. The key lies in balancing the confidence of past successes with the humility to evolve.
Don't just watch a company's failure. Dig deeper to find where their strategy went wrong. Learn from others and form your own opinion. Take those lessons and apply them to your company.
Remember, trees don't grow to the moon, and neither do businesses. Recognize when you need to kill your business. Be honest, time to plant a new seed, nurture it, and allow it to flourish in new soil.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Black America Web
11 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Elon Musk Claims Trump's Name Is On The Epstein List, Taco Trump Threatens To End Phony Stark's Government Contracts
Source: The Washington Post / Getty / Elon Musk / Donald Trump It should come as no surprise that the bromance between these two ego maniacs would have come to a fiery end. We knew this day would come, but no one had Musk and Trump beefing with each other so soon on their bingo cards. The alleged ketamine abuser couldn't keep his disdain for Trump's 'one big beautiful bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk began. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Trump was uncharacteristically quiet following Musk's initial comments about his legislative centerpiece of his second presidency, the 'one big beautiful bill.' That all changed when Trump finally 'clapped back' at Musk while taking questions during his meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Trump said he was 'very surprised' and 'disappointed' by his former financier's comments about his stupid bill, claiming the Tesla chief saw the bill and understood its inner workings better than anybody, while suggesting that Musk was mad because of the removal of subsidies and mandates for electric vehicles. Elon Musk Had Time For Donald Trump Musk responded in real time via his 'former platform,' X, formerly Twitter, with a flurry of posts on X accusing Trump of 'ingratitude' and 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' while refuting the orange menace's claims. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' Musk wrote. Oh, and he wasn't done. Musk then hit the president with a low blow, writing, 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Donald Trump Claps Back Trump finally fired back on his platform, Truth Social, by threatening to cut Musk's government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it.' Felon 47 wrote. Musk replied by threatening to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which could be detrimental to the International Space Station and NASA, as it is described as 'the only spacecraft currently flying that is capable of returning significant amounts of cargo to Earth' and can seat seven passengers. Musk also agreed with a post stating that Trump should be impeached and replaced by JD Vance. Oh, this is getting spicy. While all of this was going on, CNN reports that Tesla stocks took a hit and Musk's net worth shrank. Per CNN : Tesla shares plummeted 15% this afternoon as Elon Musk's battle with President Donald Trump intensified. Trump threatened in a social media post to target Musk's business empire. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. The Tesla selloff has wiped off more than $150 billion off the market value of Telsa, which started the day worth nearly $1.1 trillion. It has also erased a chunk off the net worth of Musk, the world's richest person. Social media has pulled up all the seats, grabbed some popcorn and are currently watching Musk go at with Trump and his supporters, you can see those reactions in the gallery below. Elon Musk Claims Trump's Name Is On The Epstein List, Taco Trump Threatens To End Phony Stark's Government Contracts was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple's two biggest problem areas ahead of its WWDC 2025
Ahead of Apple's (AAPL) 2025 Worldwide Developers Conference kicking off this Monday, June 9, Needham analysts downgraded the iPhone maker from a Buy rating to Hold while removing its price target on the tech stock. Needham & Company senior media and internet analyst Laura Martin — the analyst behind the call — examines several of Apple's biggest problems as it faces pressures in China's consumer market and the team-up between OpenAI and former Apple designer Jony Ive. Here's a look at what to expect from the 2025 WWDC event. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief here. Let's take a look at Apple here. It's down 19% year to date, the lowest performing member of the magnificent seven and trailing the S&P 500, which is now up for the year. Ahead of Apple's company, uh, Worldwide Developers Conference, Needham and company cut its Apple rating from buy to hold and removed its $225 price target for the stock. We've got the person behind that call, Laura Martin, Needham and Company senior media and internet analyst joining us now. Really appreciate you making the time to break this down for us, Laura. What was the single biggest driver behind this call on Apple? So I think, I think we're focusing on two things. There's like an urgent problem for Apple and then an important problem for Apple. The urgent problem is, a, it's really expensive today at 26 times next year's earnings, which is twice its normal multiple over the last 10 years, and about a 25% premium to the S&P 500. So it's too expensive. Second, there are real risks to their fundamentals over the next 12 months. Not only tariffs, but, um, but also like the Chinese demand, which used to be 19% of their total iPhone sales, went to 17% last year. We expect it to go to 15% of total sales this year. So there, um, there really is issues with the rising nationalism in China and Chinese, uh, consumers buying competitive products and not Apple products. Um, also, we have risk of fundamentals services revenue because you may have seen that epic, uh, the epic court decision, which allows all these apps to actually get direct payment and not pay the Apple 30% tithe on, on these app payments. So that actually threatens services revenue. Anyway, lots of fundamental risks, um, coming from the outside world in the near term, again, to their fundamental earnings per share, a risk in addition to just tariffs. And the important problem here that isn't as urgent, but it is really important is competition. So what's happening is generative AI is opening up the possibility of replacing the smartphone with, if you think meta and Google are right, glasses, like these Ray-Ban glasses that Meta's already sold a million units of. Or, more importantly, um, Jony Ive, who used to was actually the designer behind every major Apple product on the market today, he was at Apple for 27 years, has recently, his company's been bought by Sam Altman's OpenAI, and they're talking about a new form factor that isn't a smartphone and it isn't glasses, but it's going to compete and replace, I mean, I think over the long term replace the iPhone because Jony Ive, who invented the iPhone as a design fact, uh, hardware, said he doesn't like screens. He wants to move consumers away from screens, which would be lovely if you could have a conversation with a 15-year-old where they weren't looking at their screens. So I'm completely supportive, but all of this is a competitive is a competitive threat to the largest iPhone maker, you know, the largest smartphone maker in the world. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Memo: Uneasy truce descends in Trump-Musk war
President Trump and Elon Musk let an uneasy truce mostly take hold Friday, a day after their previous alliance imploded in spectacular fashion. On Thursday, Musk cast innuendo on Trump's decades-old association with deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein, implying that the 'Epstein files' had not been released because they contained incriminating information about the president. Musk also contended the president would not have won last year's election against then-Vice President Kamala Harris without his help. Those jabs followed comments from Trump, during an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, where he took aim at Musk. Trump asserted that Musk had grown critical of the massive budget bill making its way through Congress for selfish reasons — because it cut incentives to buy electrical vehicles such as Teslas. He also suggested the businessman was operating out of a sense of pique because the White House recently withdrew its nomination of a Musk ally, Jared Isaacman, to lead NASA. There was nothing nearly so spectacular during the day Friday — although that could change at any moment give both men's irascibility and penchant for verbal combat. Instead, Trump mostly confined himself to phone calls to TV anchors, where he expressed shoulder-shrugging lack of interest in speaking with Musk. Musk maintained his usual prolific social media posting, but mostly about topics unrelated to Trump. Still, it was hardly a full ceasefire. On his round of phone calls — none of which appeared to have been recorded for broadcast — Trump told Bret Baier of Fox News, 'Elon has totally lost it,' informed Jonathan Karl of ABC News that Musk had 'lost his mind,' and asserted to Dana Bash of CNN that 'the poor guy's got a problem.' The White House also let it be known that Trump intended to either sell or give away the Tesla he bought in March as a public display of support for Musk. Musk, among many other posts, approved of the idea advanced by another social media user that he had 'criticized Congress, not Trump. Trump then attacked Elon personally.' 'Exactly,' Musk responded. The businessman also called Trump's erstwhile chief strategist Steve Bannon 'a criminal.' Musk and Bannon have a long-running feud. But many Republicans will settle for hostilities between Trump and Musk at least not ramping up any further from their Thursday levels. Trump seems reluctant to get into an all-out verbal war with Musk, especially given the massive megaphone wielded by the world's richest man. Musk has more than 220 million followers on X, the social media platform he owns. Though unpopular with the general population, Musk has a strong hold over the younger, male-dominated online right. CBS News also reported that, despite the feud, 'there has been no effort to oust the over 100 administration officials who came from Musk's orbit.' The leveling-off of tensions will come as a relief to Republicans on Capitol Hill. Exasperation with Musk neared the boiling point Thursday, when he implied he might back the creation of an alternative party, while also lambasting Trump and congressional leaders — including Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) for how far they have moved from past statements bemoaning growing deficits. The current legislation, which Trump called the 'big beautiful bill,' would increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over a decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Republican leaders are already grappling with tight math as they try to get the bill through the Senate, where the GOP has a 53-47 majority. Republican senators have expressed misgivings from different perspectives, with Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.) and Ron Johnson (Wis.) dismayed that the legislation does not curb government spending, while others such as Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) are uneasy about changes to Medicaid that are projected to lead to millions of Americans losing health insurance. Democrats, meanwhile, are trying to turn some of the Trump-Musk chaos to their advantage. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee sent out a fundraising appeal telling supporters that the clash between the two men meant 'we knew our moment to get ahead had arrived.' Democratic Reps. Stephen Lynch (Mass.) and Robert Garcia (Calif.) wrote to Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel seeking more information about Musk's comments regarding Trump and Epstein. The move was first reported by Axios. The two congressmen — both of whom serve on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, with Lynch as its acting ranking member — cited Musk's contention that the 'real reason' the Epstein files had not been released was because Trump was mentioned in them. 'We ask that you immediately clarify whether this allegation is true,' the two Democrats wrote. They also requested a description of 'the role of President Donald Trump in reviewing documents pertaining to the investigation and prosecution of convicted sex offenders Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.' The White House has dismissed the request as a stunt, and many other Republicans will argue it is mischief-making. But the bigger question is whether the Trump-Musk feud will burst back into life anytime soon — and, if so, who will get caught in the blast zone. The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.