April Jobs Report: Black Women Lost 106,000 Extra Jobs, Most Among All Workers
New eye-popping data shows what is not often cited in the nation's labor force. Fresh numbers reveal that unemployment for Black workers this year is steadily rising, especially for Black women.
A disturbing trend was identified in the latest information from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Among other findings, the report disclosed that the jobless rate for Black women rose to 6.1% in April, a full percentage point surge from 5.1% in March.
In contrast, the unemployment rate for White women in April was 3.3%, unchanged from March, and 4.6% for Hispanic women, the same as in March; women in other groups generally do not face racial and gender discrimination like Black women, a factor in the jobless rate discrepancy.
For perspective, the jump for Black women was among the highest of any group and much greater than the unchanged overall 4.2% nationwide unemployment rate last month. Black women saw their unemployment climb by 106,000 in April.
According to the digital platform HBCU Money, the number of Black women employed is at a five-month low, and the number of unemployed is at a five-month high.
Concurrently, the overall Black unemployment rate rose to 6.3% in April from 6.2% in March, reflecting the third straight monthly rise and the highest surge since January. For Black men, unemployment in April was 5.6%, down from 6.1% in March. The BLS reported that the overall economy added 177,000 jobs in April.
William Michael Cunningham, an economist and owner of Creative Investment Research, told BLACK ENTERPRISE that the number of unemployed Blacks increased by 29,000, reaching nearly 1.4 million, while the total labor force fell by 7,000.
'The unusual nature of this increase in Black women's unemployment is a testament to and a direct result of the anti-DEI and anti-Black focus of the new administration's policies,' he says. ' This is demonstrably damaging to the Black community, something we have not seen before.'
For Black women, Cunningham says the latest numbers show those seeking work are not finding jobs, making gaining employment more difficult for them.
He added that Black women losing DEI roles and federal government jobs, fueled by Trump-led policies, impact them because their joblessness is growing. Those women are also purportedly to account for a larger share of federal employee roles that have fallen in the last three months as the Trump regime has acted to cut the workforce. The BLS report disclosed that federal government employment fell by 9,000 in April and is down by 26,000 since January.
Based on another report, minorities are frequently discharged first from jobs when the economy declines. Andre Perry, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, has stated, 'The layoffs at the federal level where Black people are more represented, the impacts of the tariffs, particularly on small businesses that hire Black women, and just the overall use of DEI as a slur, which may be contributing to a lack of hiring of Black women, all of these factors are probably at play.'
Further, Cunningham says less work in sectors like retail and hospitality that generally employ a high number of Black women could also be fueling more joblessness for that group.
'This creates a double whammy for the Black community because the localized economic impact in major cities results in a decline in hotel stays, meals eaten at restaurants, and less business activity in industries heavily populated by Black workers.'
In recent years, scores of Black women have started their own businesses at a brisk pace, with unemployment cited as one of the reasons why. Also, possibly facing larger unemployment rates, Black women have shifted to entrepreneurship to generate their own income, anchor their livelihoods, and use business ownership to gain more career control.
RELATED CONTENT:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
Should AI And Robots Be Taxed To Protect Workers?
HAI'AN, CHINA - JUNE 29, 2020 - Tax officials in the robot industrial park to understand the ... More production status of enterprises. Hai'an City, Jiangsu Province, China, June 29, 2020.- (Photo credit should read Costfoto/Future Publishing via Getty Images) Detroit used to be the richest city in America, some said it was the wealthiest in the world (in the early 1950's). Within a period of fifty years, it became the USA's poorest city, ignominiously falling victim to the largest municipal bond default in 2013. I visited the city some eight years ago, to witness the kick-off of an ambitious plan to revive the city, led by Mayor Mike Duggan, with the support of local business leaders. For instance, Dan Gilbert, an insurance firm owner bought and then gave away inner-city apartments to encourage people to move back into the city. Having spent a couple of days in Detroit last week I am pleased to report that the renewal of the city centre is bearing fruit – it is a hive of construction activity, iconic buildings have been impressively scrubbed up and there are plenty of stylish restaurants and shops. My initial visit to Detroit sticks in my mind for two reasons. The first is that I did a speech there alongside JD Vance – my topic was how small European countries managed to achieve high growth rates and social cohesion (as an example to Detroit), and his emphasis was on the need to focus resources and policy on 'forgotten' parts of America like Michigan. Our double act was good enough that we were invited to do another event in the new World Trade Centre in New York. At the time, I recall he was anti-Trump, pro-innovation and very much an advocate of third level education. A lot has changed since, but his book 'Hillbilly Elegy' is still worth a read. My second memorable Detroit experience was a visit to the Ford factory in Dearborn, to witness the full power of a robot-based manufacturing line, which at times was quite intimidating. I am tempted to say that in the next ten years, robots will have a bigger impact on America's society and economy than JD. The rise and fall of Detroit, and its wide hinterland out to Michigan towns like Flint has been undercut by many factors – immigration, the exit of the wealthy to other America cities, a failure to renew skill sets and an industrial base, and the economic side-effect of the rise of China as a manufacturing zone. The issue worrying people in states like Michigan is whether AI and robotics will have the same effect on the local economy, as the model of globalization was perceived to do (by the likes of JD Vance) in recent years. Indeed, there has been a flurry of articles in the US press in recent days warning that AI will wipe out swathes of jobs (for example a pwc report on Agentic AI promises cost cuts of up to 40% in the software and legal sectors). My instinct is that new technologies do not necessarily 'kill' jobs but shift them to other sectors and value chains, a process that is usually contingent on the quality of education systems and government policy. Much of the research on the potential impact of AI on work (from McKinsey for instance and most notably David Autor at MIT and Carl Benedikt-Frey at Oxford) points to a nuanced view that sees AI and robotics helping less able workers participate in the workforce, and emphasises reskilling. The risk to this enlightened outlook is that AI is unique in the sense that its take-up is rapid, especially so within large services firms, and this may give corporations greater power over labour (and downward pressure on wages). Equally there is not enough commentary on the fact that the critical AI projects are owned by a small, connected set of investors. In the emerging world, AI will likely have the greatest positive impact on public administration and on healthcare (through better and broader diagnoses), though employment in service sectors (especially where those services are exported) may take a hit. With professional and specialised workers in mind, I would also like to re-state my 'One Man and His Dog' hypothesis as a model for how professionals can use AI. 'One Man and His Dog' was a cult British tv show based on sheepdog trials. In this context the sheepdog is an intelligent, non-human actor helping the human to solve a complex problem – which is what AI does. Like a dog, if mistreated or provoked, AI can bite back but in general the idea is that like the sheepdog, AI can make the professional (doctor, commando or researcher) do their job in a more effective way. Those who worry about the labour market should instead focus on debt, and the perilous finances of the developed world. The global financial crisis demonstrated that debt can kill millions of jobs when it provokes a deep recession. To that end, the Trump budget will prove increasingly controversial, and arguably what America needs is a very different fiscal approach. The lesson from Hillbilly Elegy is that the spoils of globalization went to the few – bankers in New York, scientists in Boston and tech firms in California. Arguably they should have paid much higher taxes and this then used to bolster education, training and infrastructure across America. The same logic is true with AI – its commercial benefits will accrue to a very small number of people, but millions will need help readjusting to the side-effects it has on labour markets. The debt outlook makes this doubly the case and the Trump budget, which will add USD 2.4 trillion to the national debt by 20234 (according to the Congressional Budget Office) will not only break the bank but break the labour market.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What's the average hourly pay in Wisconsin? See how your paycheck compares to the average
Have you ever wondered how your salary compares to other Wisconsinites? New data may give you an answer. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released a series of state unemployment and employment data May 21, including the total private average hourly earnings in all 50 states and Washington, D.C. The data is current as of April 2025. So, how did Wisconsin stack up? Here's what to know: The average hourly pay in Wisconsin is $34.54, according to BLS data. The average weekly earnings in Wisconsin are $1,129.46, according to BLS data. Wisconsin's minimum wage is $7.25 an hour, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. It's the same as the federal minimum wage. More: Is Wisconsin getting a minimum wage increase in 2025? Wisconsinites work 32.7 hours per week on average, according to BLS data. Washington, D.C., has the highest average hourly pay. Residents make $52.52 on average in the nation's capital, according to BLS data. More: These 3 Wisconsin companies laid off 158 workers in May Mississippi has the lowest average hourly pay, at $27.88, according to BLS data. Minnesota: $39.54 Illinois: $34.71 Wisconsin: $34.54 North Dakota: $34.32 Michigan: $33.46 Ohio: $33.22 Nebraska: $32.53 Missouri: $32.52 Indiana: $32.27 Kansas: $31.59 South Dakota: $31.20 Iowa: $30.75 More: These Wisconsin cities are some of the best places to find jobs in the U.S., report says This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: What's the average hourly pay in Wisconsin? Compare your paycheck
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Supreme Court's decision could lead to a new era of ‘reverse discrimination' lawsuits
Good morning! A Supreme Court decision yesterday on a case of workplace discrimination could have major impacts on the employment landscape and will affect HR departments across the country. In a unanimous decision, the court sided with Marlean Ames, a former Ohio state government employee who sued her employer after she was passed over for two promotions that went to gay coworkers instead. Ames argued that she was discriminated against for work opportunities because of her heterosexuality. The case first appeared in the sixth circuit court, which ruled against Ames citing the higher standard of proof for discrimination that must be met by members of majority groups, such as men, white people, or heterosexual people. That higher standard is referred to as 'background circumstances,' and plaintiffs must show additional supporting evidence that they were the victims of discrimination. But the Supreme Court's ruled that the additional burden for people from majority groups is unconstitutional, and violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The decision wasn't a surprise, and had been anticipated by legal experts. But they tell Fortune that the ruling will likely lead to more reverse discrimination cases against employers in the near future. 'We should expect to see this trend continue, and see an uptick in these so-called reverse discrimination claims brought by men who are not members of historically disadvantaged groups,' Michael Steinberg, a labor and employment attorney at firm Seyfarth Shaw, tells Fortune. The case comes at a particularly fraught time when it comes to the legal landscape of the workplace in general. A combination of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn affirmative action and Trump's executive orders targeting affirmative action have made companies extra cautious about their programs and protocols around diversity initiatives. The Ames case was not centered on DEI policies, but two Supreme Court Justices, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, specifically referenced DEI in their opinions. David Glasgow, executive director of the Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging at New York University, says it's the first instance, since Trump took office, that justices have put their stances around DEI in writing. And he adds it could 'encourage potential plaintiffs to see shifts in the wind and then follow them right to bring future claims.' You can read more about yesterday's Supreme Court decision here. Brit This story was originally featured on
