logo
Farmers' protest live: Protesters say ‘no pancakes without us' on tractor tax march in London

Farmers' protest live: Protesters say ‘no pancakes without us' on tractor tax march in London

Yahoo04-03-2025

Thousands of farmers have vowed there will be 'no pancakes without us' on a protest from Whitehall towards Parliament over inheritance tax changes.
Protesters, with tractors and combine harvesters, arrived in London this morning for the 'Pancake Day rally' after police banned tractors from the capital.
Seven machines present at the start of the protest were pre-agreed with police under the conditions of the Public Order Act, police said.
The Met banned all other 'mechanically propelled vehicles' from the capital following protests last month that saw hundreds of tractors disrupt traffic across the city.
The march is the latest action being taken by farmers who are unhappy over Labour's plan to bring in a 20 per cent inheritance tax rate on agricultural land and businesses worth more than £1m.
Farmer Olly Harrison, one of the organisers, has said the protesters will aim to explain to MPs 'the levels of investment needed in agriculture just to produce something simple like a pancake'.
Thousands of farmers turn up to Whitehall: 'No pancakes without us'
Farmers turn up in combine harvesters ahead of London protest
Farmers could be arrested if they drive tractors at rally, police warn
Third Labour MP speaks out against inheritance tax plans
13:57 , Alexander Butler
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said the Met Police banning tractors from today's protest was 'heavy-handed'.
Speaking at the protest, Mr Farage said: 'It looks on the face of it to be overly heavy-handed with what is an incredibly peaceful and law-abiding group of people.'
Mr Farage urged farmers to pressure Labour MPs in rural constituencies whose majorities are "cigarette paper-thin".
13:37 , Alexander Butler
13:26 , Alex Croft
Emma, 48, says she has heard of elderly farmers who would rather die now than wait until inheritance tax changes come into force in April 2026.
'We're already hearing of people that have taken their own life because of the situation,' the farmer from Staffordshire said.
Her father passed away five years ago, leaving the farm to her mother. 'When anything happens to her, the money's going have to be found for this tax,' she adds.
13:10 , Alexander Butler
13:06 , Alex Croft
Nigel Watson, a 58-year-old farmer from East Yorkshire says he is here for his son's benefit - not his own.
'The inheritance tax will give my son a bill of circa half a million pounds,' he said.
'Their attitude towards rural people is quite negative at the moment, and we'd just like them to engage with us.'
12:38 , Alexander Butler
Farmers are handing out pancakes from the top of a combine harvester to dozens of protesters in Whitehall, Alex Croft reports.
They are flipping the batter and cooking the pancakes from a pan before throwing them down to supporters.
Disco music also blasts from a large nearby sound system on a beautiful sunny day in London.
12:33 , Alex Croft
Protesting farmers will not stop until the government listens, the National Farmers Union (NFU) president Tom Bradshaw warned.
Speaking from the top of a combined harvester, Mr Bradshaw said: 'This is a marathon, not a sprint.
'If we have to, we'll have to keep on turning up, we'll have to keep on campaigning.'
'We have to make sure they understand we cannot go away and we will not go away,' he added, drawing loud cheers from the crowd.
12:10 , Alexander Butler
Hundreds of protestors gathered on Whitehall to protest the government's controversial inheritance tax changes are in a generally upbeat and positive mood, Alex Croft reports.
But there is clear frustration towards the government's refusal to U-turn on the plans.
And pancakes are the clear theme of the Shrove Tuesday protest.
'Farmers matter if we want batter,' reads one sign.
Multiple farmers have raised a key point for pancake day: there are no pancakes without flour and eggs.
12:08
Labour's inheritance tax plans are 'absolutely devastating' for farming families, shadow farming minister Robbie Moore said.
'It is absolutely devastating. The elderly generation are having to make some really tough decisions.
'They know they will have to pay inheritance tax after April 2026,' Mr Moore said.
11:51 , Alexander Butler
Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins slammed Labour's inheritance tax plans as 'vindictive' and claimed it was forcing families to consider elderly relatives living beyond April 2026.
'This dreadful vindictive farm tax will break family farming as we know it,' Ms Atkins said on the protest in London this morning.
'Across kitchens tables up and down the country, families are having conversations about whether they can afford for an elderly relative to live beyond April 2026.
'Because if they live beyond this date, they will be hit with an enormous inheritance tax bill.'
11:28 , Alexander Butler
Labour is pressing ahead with a 20 per cent inheritance tax rate on agricultural land and businesses worth more than £1m, essentially scrapping an exemption which meant no tax was paid to pass down family farms.
Farmers say that it will force land sales, stall investment, and hurt families lacking succession plans.
But the Government has stood firm, calling the move a 'fair and balanced approach'.
The Lib Dems and the Conservatives urged Labour to scrap the changes, which are due to come into force from April 2026.
11:08 , Alexander Butler
11:00 , Alexander Butler
10:52 , Alexander Butler
Dozens of tractors and harvesters have started driving onto Parliament Street, Alex Croft reports.
The huge vehicles were parked off the main thoroughfare this morning. It is not clear if they have permission to be there or not.
The Met Police banned all 'mechanically propelled vehicles' from London following protests last month that saw hundreds of tractors disrupt traffic across the city.
However, a small number of farming vehicles have been allowed into London with prior permission from the police.
10:39
A third Labour MP has broke ranks with the party to oppose the government's plans for inheritance tax.
Henry Tufnell, MP for South and Mid-Pembrokeshire, warned it was not only wealthy landowners who would be affected by the decision to levy inheritance tax on farms worth more than £1m.
"It's affecting the fabric of the society within those rural communities and that's why we were elected," Mr Tufnell told Sky News.
09:57 , Alexander Butler
Protesting farmers have turned up to London in combine harvesters.
A four-metre tall Grimme sugar beat harvester towered over two other farming vehicles outside Whitehall this morning.
A self-propelled Claas Jaguar 970 forage harvester was parked next to it, alongside a Claas combine harvester.
The Met Police has banned all 'mechanically propelled vehicles' from London following protests last month that saw hundreds of tractors descend on the capital.
A small number of farming vehicles have been allowed into London with prior permission from the police.
09:40 , Alexander Butler
Farmer Olly Harrison, one of the organisers, said: 'We don't need any tractors, this is on foot.
'We are going to have some kit to show to the MPs to explain the levels of investment.
'We've sorted all that out, you just get yourself there on foot,' he told those taking part.
'Let's explain the levels of investment needed in agriculture just to produce something simple like a pancake.'
09:27 , Alexander Butler
A Government spokesperson said: 'Our commitment to farmers remains steadfast.
'This Government are investing £5 billion into farming, the largest budget for sustainable food production in our country's history.
'We are going further with reforms to boost profits for farmers by backing British produce and reforming planning rules on farms to support food production.
'Our reform to agricultural and business property reliefs will mean three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free.
'This is a fair and balanced approach which helps fix the public services we all rely on.'
09:20 , Alexander Butler
Labour is pressing ahead with a 20 per cent inheritance tax rate on agricultural land and businesses worth more than £1 million.
The move essentially scraps an exemption that meant no tax was paid to pass down family farms.
The plans are due to come into force from April 2026.
08:39 , Alexander Butler
Deputy Assistant Commissioner Ben Russell, who is commanding the policing operation, said: 'Two previous protests have taken place in the same area, with the same organisers, in recent months.
'The second protest saw a significant number of people attend with tractors and other large farming vehicles. Whitehall was blocked for much of the day and there were lengthy significant delays on surrounding roads.
'It is our responsibility to ensure that protests don't cause serious disruption to the life of the community and we've used our powers under the Public Order Act to ensure that does not happen on Tuesday.
'We have been in regular contact with the organisers to explain our decision making and I'm grateful for the positive and collaborative approach they have taken.'
08:37 , Alexander Butler
Why are Britain's farmers protesting?
07:59 , Tara Cobham
Farmer Olly Harrison, one of the organisers, said: 'We don't need any tractors, this is on foot.
'We are going to have some kit to show to the MPs to explain the levels of investment.
'We've sorted all that out, you just get yourself there on foot,' he told those taking part.
'Let's explain the levels of investment needed in agriculture just to produce something simple like a pancake.'
07:51 , Tara Cobham
Farmers could be arrested if they drive their tractors at a march in central London, police have said.
Conditions have been imposed under the Public Order Act preventing demonstrators from bringing tractors, other than a limited number already agreed by the organisers to demonstrate the costs of such specialist equipment, the Metropolitan Police said.
Deputy assistant commissioner Ben Russell, who is leading the policing operation, said last month's protest saw a 'significant number of people attend with tractors and other large farming vehicles'.
He said there were lengthy road delays, adding: 'It is our responsibility to ensure that protests don't cause serious disruption to the life of the community.'
Scotland Yard warned that it is a criminal offence to breach the conditions or to incite others to do so, and that anyone doing so may face arrest.
07:45
Farmers say that it will force land sales, stall investment, and hurt families lacking succession plans.
But the government has stood firm, calling the move a 'fair and balanced approach'.
07:41 , Tara Cobham
The government has stood firm in the face of strong opposition to the move, insisting its approach is 'fair and balanced'.
A government spokesperson said: 'Our commitment to farmers remains steadfast.
'This Government are investing £5 billion into farming, the largest budget for sustainable food production in our country's history.
'We are going further with reforms to boost profits for farmers by backing British produce and reforming planning rules on farms to support food production.
'Our reform to agricultural and business property reliefs will mean three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free.
'This is a fair and balanced approach which helps fix the public services we all rely on.'
07:39 , Tara Cobham
The Lib Dems and the Conservatives urged Labour to scrap the changes.
Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins called the move 'vindictive'.
'Once again, rural communities will gather in Westminster to show their united opposition to Labour's vindictive family farms tax.
'Our rural communities have warned repeatedly that Labour's tax hike is stopping investment, inflicting an enormous emotional toll on farming families and will break family farms,' she said.
She also argued that introducing this tax puts domestic food production and security at risk.
Tim Farron, the Lib Dem environment spokesman, said: 'British farmers are the best in the world. We need them now more than ever to restore nature, provide food security, tackle climate change and support the rural economy.
'The Government must reverse this disastrous family farm tax and instead provide farmers with the support and funding they need to do what is best for the country and for future generations.'
07:37 , Tara Cobham
Labour is pressing ahead with a 20 per cent inheritance tax rate on agricultural land and businesses worth more than £1 million.
The move essentially scraps an exemption that meant no tax was paid to pass down family farms.
The plans are due to come into force from April 2026.
07:34 , Tara Cobham
Farmers will return to central London to protest inheritance tax changes with a 'Pancake Day rally' on Tuesday.
Attendees will march from Whitehall at around midday towards Parliament, with the demonstration due to end at 3pm.
The protest will be largely on foot as police are allowing only a limited number of tractors after last month's demonstration caused traffic delays.
Farmers who bring tractors in breach of the conditions could face arrest.
Farmer Olly Harrison, one of the organisers, has said the protesters will aim to explain to MPs 'the levels of investment needed in agriculture just to produce something simple like a pancake'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK ministers delay AI regulation amid plans for more ‘comprehensive' bill
UK ministers delay AI regulation amid plans for more ‘comprehensive' bill

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UK ministers delay AI regulation amid plans for more ‘comprehensive' bill

Proposals to regulate artificial intelligence have been delayed by at least a year as UK ministers plan a bumper bill to regulate the technology and its use of copyrighted material. Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, intends to introduce a 'comprehensive' AI bill in the next parliamentary session to address concerns about issues including safety and copyright. This will not be ready before the next king's speech, and is likely to trigger concerns about delays to regulating the technology. The date for the next king's speech has not been set but several sources said it could take place in May 2026. Labour had originally planned to introduce a short, narrowly drafted AI bill within months of entering office that would have been focused on large language models, such as ChatGPT. The legislation would have required companies to hand over their models for testing by the UK's AI Security Institute. It was intended to address concerns that AI models could become so advanced that they posed a risk to humanity. This bill was delayed, with ministers choosing to wait and align with Donald Trump's administration in the US because of concerns that any regulation might weaken the UK's attractiveness to AI companies. Ministers now want to include copyright rules for AI companies as part of the AI bill. 'We feel we can use that vehicle to find a solution on copyright,' a government source said. 'We've been having meetings with both creators and tech people and there are interesting ideas on moving forward. That work will begin in earnest once the data bill passes.' The government is already locked in a standoff with the House of Lords over copyright rules in a separate data bill. It would allow AI companies to train their models using copyrighted material unless the rights holder opts out. It has caused a fierce backlash from the creative sector, with artists including Elton John, Paul McCartney and Kate Bush throwing their weight behind a campaign to oppose the changes. This week, peers backed an amendment to the data bill that would require AI companies to disclose if they were using copyrighted material to train their models, in an attempt to enforce current copyright law. Ministers have refused to back down, however, even though Kyle has expressed regret about the way the government has gone about the changes. The government insists the data bill is not the right vehicle for the copyright issue and has promised to publish an economic impact assessment and series of technical reports on copyright and AI issues. In a letter to MPs on Saturday, Kyle made a further commitment to establish a cross-party working group of parliamentarians on AI and copyright. Beeban Kidron, the film director and cross-bench peer who has been campaigning on behalf of the creative sector, said on Friday that ministers 'have shafted the creative industries, and they have proved willing to decimate the UK's second-biggest industrial sector'. Kyle told the Commons last month that AI and copyright should be dealt with as part of a separate 'comprehensive' bill. Most of the UK public (88%) believe the government should have the power to stop the use of an AI product if it is deemed to pose a serious risk, according to a survey published by the Ada Lovelace Institute and the Alan Turing Institute in March. More than 75% said the government or regulators should oversee AI safety rather than private companies alone. Scott Singer, an AI expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said: 'The UK is strategically positioning itself between the US and EU. Like the US, Britain is attempting to avoid overly aggressive regulation that could harm innovation while exploring ways to meaningfully protect consumers. That's the balancing act here.'

Could Merthyr Tydfil be set for an electoral revolution?
Could Merthyr Tydfil be set for an electoral revolution?

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Could Merthyr Tydfil be set for an electoral revolution?

"Come check the streets where normal people live. "Kids are smoking, drugs available 24/7. "When you got time check my area condition. "My invitation to the politician." Daljit Singh is the owner of Gurnos sports and social club and also a part-time songwriter - that one is destined for YouTube. "I want to express the situation from here to any leader out there. Please come and have a look," he said. Spend new defence billions in Wales, companies say Miners' strike designs help Welsh fashion find voice Senedd election could be seismic, expert says Last year he put words into action and brought Nigel Farage to Merthyr Tydfil to launch Reform's general election manifesto. Mr Singh wanted to get politicians out of their bubble and speak to people who felt left behind and neglected. The club is the sort of place Nigel Farage would have had in mind, albeit not geographically, when he recently challenged Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to a debate in a northern working men's club. When we visited, Mr Singh and his colleagues were preparing the venue for actual, not verbal, fisticuffs - a 300-seat sell out white collar boxing night. While Reform did not win any Welsh seats in last year's general election, it did come second in 13 of the 32 constituencies. Mr Singh thinks Reform will do well at next year's Senedd election because "people have had enough of being let down on so many things. Why not try something new?" He added people who were struggling to get by found it "unfair" to see money being spent on migrants who had crossed the English Channel. Outside the club, in front of a parade of shops, we met Steve Collins, a builder from Troedyrhiw, who had been at the Farage speech. He said he wanted change. "We've had too many promises and nothing coming forward - Labour and the Conservatives are both the same in my opinion," he said. "This has always been a Labour town, but people are getting fed up now... the state of Merthyr," he added. Another woman told us Farage was "straight", that she had voted for him in the past, but that she would probably stick with Labour next year. Recent polling suggests Reform has a chance of becoming the biggest party in the Senedd, although it might struggle to find someone willing to do a post-election deal to form a government. It still does not have a Welsh leader and has not named any candidates. Polling also suggests that Plaid Cymru could be the party to end 27 years of Labour dominance in Cardiff Bay. A local Labour source admitted the party faced a fight but said it needed to shout more loudly about its achievements, mentioning the completed Heads of the Valleys road, the new Metro and improvements at Prince Charles Hospital. Merthyr has long been one of Labour's heartlands and has had a long history of political change and controversy. It returned the first Labour MP in a Welsh constituency, Keir Hardie, in 1900. It was scene of a Jeremy Corbyn leadership rally in 2016, a Yes Cymru pro-independence March in 2019 and has had its share of recent controversies, including delays over armoured vehicles for the Army which are built in the town and issues with an opencast coal mine. It is also one of the areas with the highest benefits claimant rate so is likely to be disproportionately hit by UK Labour government welfare reforms. Most famously Merthyr was where workers rose up against appalling conditions and poor pay in 1831 - a rebellion which became known as the Merthyr Rising. As next May approaches are we looking at another revolution at the ballot box? Across town at Merthyr Tydfil College, a lively politics and governance class left you in little doubt that more political upheaval could be on the way. "We are seeing the overturn of that sort of Labour Welsh order of this guarantee that Wales will always be Labour until the cows come home," said 17-year-old Zack. "I do think Labour takes it for granted with their traditional safe seats. These aren't iron strongholds anymore of Labour," he added. Aaron, also 17, agreed. "We've seen the start of Labour's downfall," he said. "They've become too comfortable with the fact that they've always been voted in in Wales and we're now getting to the point where we're seeing other parties gain support like Plaid Cymru." He added: "I'm seeing a lot of people who have been lifelong Labour supporters and they've now decided that they're going to vote Reform or Plaid because Labour's not in the best interests for people anymore in Wales." While not necessarily supporting Farage, 16-year-old Isobelle and 17-year-old Amber-Rose recognised the Reform leader's appeal. "Whatever Reform say people might gravitate towards them because it is so new and Nigel Farage is so 'in his own way' that it will appeal to people. "We do have strong Labour and Conservative leaders but Nigel Farage does seem to be more prominent," they said. Other topics that cropped up included the "betrayal" of the working class over benefits reform, and the question of fairness. Why did Scotland have powers over the Crown Estate, justice and policing when Wales did not? For these young voters the principle rather than the policy area appeared to count for more. Wales had moved with the times, they argued, and politicians needed to move too. They also thought that Plaid Cymru and Reform were better at getting through to younger voters on social media than Labour. The students agreed that you could sum up next year's election with one word - change. The slogan that propelled UK Labour to a landslide win at the general election last year could be exactly what costs its Welsh colleagues at the Senedd in 2026. In two very different parts of town, predictions for next year were very much the same. What's your Senedd constituency? What does the Senedd do? How do you vote in the Senedd election?

The forgotten story of India's brush with presidential rule
The forgotten story of India's brush with presidential rule

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The forgotten story of India's brush with presidential rule

During the mid-1970s, under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's imposition of the Emergency, India entered a period where civil liberties were suspended and much of the political opposition was jailed. Behind this authoritarian curtain, her Congress party government quietly began reimagining the country - not as a democracy rooted in checks and balances, but as a centralised state governed by command and control, historian Srinath Raghavan reveals in his new book. In Indira Gandhi and the Years That Transformed India, Prof Raghavan shows how Gandhi's top bureaucrats and party loyalists began pushing for a presidential system - one that would centralise executive power, sideline an "obstructionist" judiciary and reduce parliament to a symbolic chorus. Inspired in part by Charles de Gaulle's France, the push for a stronger presidency in India reflected a clear ambition to move beyond the constraints of parliamentary democracy - even if it never fully materialised. It all began, writes Prof Raghavan, in September 1975, when BK Nehru, a seasoned diplomat and a close aide of Gandhi, wrote a letter hailing the Emergency as a "tour de force of immense courage and power produced by popular support" and urged Gandhi to seize the moment. Parliamentary democracy had "not been able to provide the answer to our needs", Nehru wrote. In this system the executive was continuously dependent on the support of an elected legislature "which is looking for popularity and stops any unpleasant measure". What India needed, Nehru said, was a directly elected president - freed from parliamentary dependence and capable of taking "tough, unpleasant and unpopular decisions" in the national interest, Prof Raghavan writes. The model he pointed to was de Gaulle's France - concentrating power in a strong presidency. Nehru imagined a single, seven-year presidential term, proportional representation in Parliament and state legislatures, a judiciary with curtailed powers and a press reined in by strict libel laws. He even proposed stripping fundamental rights - right to equality or freedom of speech, for example - of their justiciability. Nehru urged Indira Gandhi to "make these fundamental changes in the Constitution now when you have two-thirds majority". His ideas were "received with rapture" by the prime minister's secretary PN Dhar. Gandhi then gave Nehru approval to discuss these ideas with her party leaders but said "very clearly and emphatically" that he should not convey the impression that they had the stamp of her approval. Prof Raghavan writes that the ideas met with enthusiastic support from senior Congress leaders like Jagjivan Ram and foreign minister Swaran Singh. The chief minister of Haryana state was blunt: "Get rid of this election nonsense. If you ask me just make our sister [Indira Gandhi] President for life and there's no need to do anything else". M Karunanidhi of Tamil Nadu – one of two non-Congress chief ministers consulted - was unimpressed. When Nehru reported back to Gandhi, she remained non-committal, Prof Raghavan writes. She instructed her closest aides to explore the proposals further. What emerged was a document titled "A Fresh Look at Our Constitution: Some suggestions", drafted in secrecy and circulated among trusted advisors. It proposed a president with powers greater than even their American counterpart, including control over judicial appointments and legislation. A new "Superior Council of Judiciary", chaired by the president, would interpret "laws and the Constitution" - effectively neutering the Supreme Court. Gandhi sent this document to Dhar, who recognised it "twisted the Constitution in an ambiguously authoritarian direction". Congress president DK Barooah tested the waters by publicly calling for a "thorough re-examination" of the Constitution at the party's 1975 annual session. The idea never fully crystallised into a formal proposal. But its shadow loomed over the Forty-second Amendment Act, passed in 1976, which expanded Parliament's powers, limited judicial review and further centralised executive authority. The amendment made striking down laws harder by requiring supermajorities of five or seven judges, and aimed to dilute the Constitution's 'basic structure doctrine' that limited parliament's power. It also handed the federal government sweeping authority to deploy armed forces in states, declare region-specific Emergencies, and extend President's Rule - direct federal rule - from six months to a year. It also put election disputes out of the judiciary's reach. This was not yet a presidential system, but it carried its genetic imprint - a powerful executive, marginalised judiciary and weakened checks and balances. The Statesman newspaper warned that "by one sure stroke, the amendment tilts the constitutional balance in favour of the parliament." Meanwhile, Gandhi's loyalists were going all in. Defence minister Bansi Lal urged "lifelong power" for her as prime minister, while Congress members in the northern states of Haryana, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh unanimously called for a new constituent assembly in October 1976. "The prime minister was taken aback. She decided to snub these moves and hasten the passage of the amendment bill in the parliament," writes Prof Raghavan. By December 1976, the bill had been passed by both houses of parliament and ratified by 13 state legislatures and signed into law by the president. After Gandhi's shock defeat in 1977, the short-lived Janata Party - a patchwork of anti-Gandhi forces - moved quickly to undo the damage. Through the Forty-third and Forty-fourth Amendments, it rolled back key parts of the Forty Second, scrapping authoritarian provisions and restoring democratic checks and balances. Gandhi was swept back to power in January 1980, after the Janata Party government collapsed due to internal divisions and leadership struggles. Curiously, two years later, prominent voices in the party again mooted the idea of a presidential system. In 1982, with President Sanjiva Reddy's term ending, Gandhi seriously considered stepping down as prime minister to become president of India. Her principal secretary later revealed she was "very serious" about the move. She was tired of carrying the Congress party on her back and saw the presidency as a way to deliver a "shock treatment to her party, thereby giving it a new stimulus". Ultimately, she backed down. Instead, she elevated Zail Singh, her loyal home minister, to the presidency. Despite serious flirtation, India never made the leap to a presidential system. Did Gandhi, a deeply tactical politician, hold herself back ? Or was there no national appetite for radical change and India's parliamentary system proved sticky? There was a hint of presidential drift in the early 1970s, as India's parliamentary democracy - especially after 1967 - grew more competitive and unstable, marked by fragile coalitions, according to Prof Raghavan. Around this time, voices began suggesting that a presidential system might suit India better. The Emergency became the moment when these ideas crystallised into serious political thinking. "The aim was to reshape the system in ways that immediately strengthened her hold on power. There was no grand long-term design - most of the lasting consequences of her [Gandhi's] rule were likely unintended," Prof Raghavan told the BBC. "During the Emergency, her primary goal was short-term: to shield her office from any challenge. The Forty Second Amendment was crafted to ensure that even the judiciary couldn't stand in her way." The itch for a presidential system within the Congress never quite faded. As late as April 1984, senior minister Vasant Sathe launched a nationwide debate advocating a shift to presidential governance - even while in power. But six months later, Indira Gandhi was assassinated by her Sikh bodyguards in Delhi, and with her, the conversation abruptly died. India stayed a parliamentary democracy. India media: Papers remember 1975 emergency Indira Gandhi: The Centre of Everything India's State of Emergency

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store