Galway hospital apologies over care of baby who died an hour after birth
University Hospital Galway has apologised for 'shortcomings in the obstetric care' provided during the delivery of a baby girl who died just one hour after her birth.
The loss of Baby Ailbhe Gilligan five years ago, the High Court heard has left a deep gap in the Gilligan household.
Advertisement
Her parents, Anna and Gerard Gilligan of Oranmore, Co Galway had sued the HSE over the death of their baby girl on October 27th 2020.
The family's counsel Doireann O'Mahony Bl with John O'Mahony SC told the court it was a very tragic and devastating case.
Counsel said it was their case that CTG monitoring of the baby's heart rate was deficient and at times there was no monitoring of the baby's heart rate and the little girl allegedly suffered a hypoxic ischaemic insult which is a brain injury caused by a lack of oxygen.
Baby Ailbhe, Counsel said died an hour after her birth when attempts to resuscitate her failed.
Advertisement
A letter from University Hospital Galway was read out as the Gilligan family settled their action against the HSE over Baby Ailbhe's death.
In the letter the general manager of the hospital Chris Kane expressed sincere condolences to the Gilligan family on his behalf and that of the hospital on the death of Ailbhe.
'The hospital acknowledges the shortcoming in the obstetric care provided during Ailbhe's delivery and we sincerely apologise in this regard,' it said.
It added: 'We understand that this statement cannot change or negate your loss, but wish to convey our deepest sympathies to you and to Ailbhe's extended family.'
Advertisement
In the proceedings it was claimed that the CTG monitoring was allegedly grossly inadequate and it was alleged that at times there was no monitoring of the foetal heart.
It was further claimed that as a result of the alleged delay in reacting to ongoing abnormal CTG readings and an alleged failure properly to monitor CTG, the baby suffered a hypoxic ischaemic insult.
Baby Ailbhe could not be resuscitated and she was pronounced dead about one hour after her birth.
It was contended if she had been delivered earlier resuscitation would have been successful and she would not have died but would have survived.
Advertisement
It was claimed there was an alleged failure to have in place proper continuous CTG monitoring and that lapses in the CTG monitoring had been allegedly caused so that at times there was no foetal heart monitoring.
Ireland
Funeral hears Leaving Cert student (18) who died i...
Read More
Early warning signs of foetal distress , it was claimed had been allegedly overlooked.
The HSE admitted a breach of duty in the management of the mother's labour and delivery of Baby Ailbhe in failing to repeat a foetal scalp blood sample on three occasions or to expedite delivery based on the CTG tracing.
However, the HSE denied that the death of Baby Ailbhe was caused solely and entirely by the admitted breach of duty.
Approving the settlement Mr Justice Paul Coffey said it was very sad and tragic case and he conveyed his deepest sympathy to Ailbhe's parents and the extended family.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
8 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
HSE must specify when services will be provided to children with disabilities, Supreme Court says
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment concerning the obligations of the HSE towards children with disabilities, including a need to specify when services will be provided to them. Compliance by the HSE with its obligations under the Disability Act 2005 involves setting out and implementing 'measurable' actions, the court said. Advertisement Although there is 'nothing objectionable' about the HSE's Individual Family Support Plan (IFSP) model for delivering services to children with disabilities, the court said the HSE must ensure it complies with its obligations and with the legislature's intention to give 'enforceable rights' to individuals. The five-judge court on Wednesday rejected the HSE's appeal against the High Court's finding that it failed to comply with its legal obligations in relation to an eight-year-old girl assessed as having autism spectrum disorder and global developmental delay. Giving the judgment, Ms Justice Iseult O'Malley said the statutory process obliges the HSE to specify what services will be provided to children with disabilities and when they will be provided. Delays in assessments of need are a 'recurring' theme in cases before the courts, she noted. There was a delay of more than 18 months in assessing the girl and further delays in providing her with therapy services identified as being her health needs. Advertisement The High Court, in finding the statutory requirements were not complied with, said the only service for the girl where the HSE specified a time frame for delivery was the development of an IFSP, but that was not a 'clinical service'. The core issues in the HSE's appeal were whether the 2005 Act required that each health service identified in an assessment report should be specified in a service statement; and whether the statutory requirements regarding the content of service statements were breached by identifying the development of the IFSP as a 'specified' health service. Ms Justice O'Malley found, while not every service recommended in an assessment report must be included in the service statement, there must be 'a rational connection' between the content of both. On the second issue, she ruled an IFSP is a 'health service' within the meaning of section seven of the 2005 Act. Advertisement She said the commencement of an IFSP is the starting point for delivery of services and the plan continues as the evolving basis for development of further goals. The legislature had intended a process through which particular services and dates would be 'clearly identified' in the service statements, with a legal right to seek implementation through the courts if necessary. If each service statement only specifies a start date for the IFSP process, the right may appear reduced as the only complaint apparently possible would be the failure to commence that process, she said. The HSE can, within the IFSP model, comply with its obligations to set out and implement measurable actions, she said. Advertisement The first service statement should 'spell out' what will be involved in the IFSP process. Reviews of the service statement also required greater detail, including an overall assessment of the goals set out, whether those have been achieved, identification of overall goals for the near future and the work to achieve those, the judge said. That might mean 'relatively frequent' reviews. If the only service specified in the first service statement is an IFSP, the HSE should record that the needs specified in the assessment of need have not been included. This was necessary under the HSE's obligation to assist in measuring aggregate needs. In the case of the girl, represented by Derek Shortall SC and Colin Smith SC, instructed by solicitor Wendy Lyon, she said the original service statement and the first review statement did not meet these criteria. The original statement had been superseded and it seemed likely there would have been further reviews, she noted.
STV News
16 hours ago
- STV News
Former children's home manager convicted of historical abuse of ten children
A former children's home manager has been convicted of historical abuse of young people. Edward Stanton preyed on a total of ten victims including raping one girl. Jurors heard how at least one boy tried to raise the alarm what was happening, but that the accusations were 'brushed under the carpet'. The abuse occurred at three different children's homes in Lanarkshire. Stanton, now 73, had been the manager at one and a carer at the other two between 1985 and 1994. He had denied the accusations during a trial at the High Court in Glasgow. But, he was found guilty of 11 charges after the jury heard distressing accounts of how the victims had suffered over the years. Following the verdicts, it emerged he was previously jailed for 13 years in 1996 for historical abuse of boys at a children's home in Merseyside. In 2021, he was convicted of attacks on two other youngsters at the same establishment around that time. Stanton has also been jailed for possessing indecent images of children and breaching a Sexual Offences Prevention Order. He remains in custody and will be sentenced for these latest crimes at a later date. The trial was told how Stanton was physically abusive to a boy and carried out sex attacks on a teenage girl including at a campsite in Dumfries. Stanton preyed on another victim while she was initially asleep. A victim recalled how he was only young at the time, but knew what was happening was 'not right'. He was left feeling 'scared' of Stanton. One resident was molested while in a tent. This boy had alerted a member of staff at the time, but he was 'not believed'. He said he and others were 'vulnerable children…meant to be in a place of safety'. But, he added reports of such matters appeared to be 'brushed under the carpet'. Another boy was also left terrified of Stanton who gave him money to effectively buy his silence. A further victim remembered speaking to staff, but 'nothing was done'. In his closing speech to jurors, prosecutor Scott McKenzie said one then resident recalled Stanton as initially being 'nice' and that he had never previously had anyone show him any attention. But, the violent bully soon showed his 'true colours' by repeatedly punching and kicking him. One girl was aged around seven when Stanton targeted her and went on to rape her. The final victim on the indictment had only been at the children's home where Stanton was then based for two nights, but he was still able to take advantage of her. She has been left suffering from 'flashbacks'. Stanton was convicted of charges of rape, numerous indecent assaults, lewd and libidinous behaviour as well as physical attacks. Judge Andrew Miller deferred sentencing for reports. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
BreakingNews.ie
16 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Leona Macken encourages women to get smear tests and says her daughters will get HPV vaccine
Leona Macken, the 38-year-old woman with incurable cancer who received an apology in court on Tuesday from the HSE over the "failings" that occurred in two smear tests which led to her diagnosis, has said she would still encourage women to get a smear test and she would have her daughters vaccinated. However, she said she felt there was 'something wrong' with the cervical screening programme that needed to be identified and addressed. Advertisement Speaking on Newstalk Breakfast and then RTÉ radio's Today with Claire Byrne show, Ms Macken said she had been 'overwhelmed' by the support she has received from the community. Ms Macken said the HSE's apology in court meant 'a huge amount' to her. 'Just the acknowledgement alone from the failures and everything, and even the words that they used, it was a really good conclusion, I suppose, to everything for us. We kind of didn't know whether we were going to get it, and there's been a lot of women in my position that didn't get that, so it is something that I don't take for granted,' she told Newstalk Breakfast. The mother of two girls, aged five and eight, told Today with Claire Byrne that she had trusted the system, but just because it had failed her did not mean that it would not work for others. Advertisement 'I would never tell someone to not get a smear. It didn't work for me, it doesn't mean it's not going to work for you. 'I have two little girls, they'll be definitely getting the vaccinations. I don't want people to take from this that I'm saying smears don't work, it's just they need to be checked more, like. Something isn't working somewhere, and that's what we need to find out.' Receiving the apology in court had been very important to her and her husband Alan, as she had felt that she needed 'to stick up for myself.' She had done 'everything right' and had even paid for smears herself, having seen the experience of Jade Goody. 'I did everything I was meant to, and for them to then validate that was huge for me.' Advertisement Despite two clear smears, she knew something was wrong; she explained. Having gone through two pregnancies, she thought perhaps it was just her body changing or maybe polycystic ovaries, endometriosis or perimenopause. Blood tests and ultrasound scans were clear. 'I just did not think cancer at all because I knew I'd been so careful, and I also knew it was a slow-progressing cancer, so I knew, like, that if there was something there, I would have had abnormalities at some stage.' Ms Macken's current diagnosis of stage 4 cancer means 'it's treatable to a certain extent, but it's not curable. When I went in first, as you can imagine, being told you have stage 4 cancer, after being through everything else, and knowing this could have been avoided, it was gut-wrenching. I felt like, so hard done by, I'd done everything I could do. How did I get to this point?' Telling her family had been 'horrific'. Advertisement Ms Macken is now undergoing quadruple therapy. 'That's like two chemotherapies, one immunotherapy, or two immunotherapies. At this point, I'm just still not giving in. I want to be the one to do it. 'I have two little girls growing up now, and I'm worried about them. What's going to happen, you know? It's not good enough what's happening. I shouldn't be going through this today. I shouldn't be living this today.' Ms Macken welcomed the apology from the Minister for Health, Jennifer Carroll MacNeill and said she would love to meet with the Minister. 'I'm a very open person, and I'm very open to a chat. They need to see these people in real life and see what they're going through, that they're not just a cancer, there's stories behind these people, where it's affecting my mom, my dad, we're people's daughters, mothers, you know, and we shouldn't be going through it. That's the most frustrating part is it could have been avoided.' Advertisement Ms Macken said she would not give up. 'I have too much to live for. It's such a beautiful life. I have two beautiful children. I have an amazing family and a huge support behind me. In every other aspect of my life, I've always said I'm so lucky. I just have the most beautiful life, and I just don't want to leave it. 'But something needs to be changed. The auditing was stopped in 2018. It hasn't been picked up since. It was stopped weeks after Vicky Phelan's case. The Patient Safety Act of 2013 states that if this is even picked back up, it must remain anonymous. So the patients aren't necessarily being told the results. There's so many things in the system that need to be rectified, like it needs to be looked at. It's just not good enough. It's people's family, it' people's daughters, kids are losing their mommies,' she said on Newstalk Breakfast. On Morning Ireland, the Minister for Health offered her personal apology to Ms Macken and said that women should not have to fight for access to their medical history. 'There should be open disclosure, and that's very, very clear, and I want to offer my apology too in this case because what you have here is a 38-year-old woman who has been impacted in this way, and so have her family, and that is so, so important.' Ms Carroll MacNeill said that the screening programme would 'always have some limitations,' but what had happened to Ms Macken should not have happened. 'It shouldn't happen, what we want is people in medical negligence cases to have absolutely timely open disclosure, they need a resolution to their case, and they do not need additional stress going through the court process. 'Obviously the state needs to manage it to a certain extent in terms of the broader liability but these are very, very clear cases and it is really important that people are treated and not provided additional stress and additional hurt through a court process when some of the issues are so very very clear and that has to change. 'There is a very different way that we need to approach medical negligence cases and how they're treated, and that is one of the most important things that I will be trying to address during the period that I am Minister for Health.'
