Grenfell-linked firms awarded £355m in public contracts since fire
Companies being investigated over the Grenfell Tower fire have been awarded £355 million of public contracts since the deadly inferno, an analysis has revealed.
Rydon, Saint-Gobain Construction Products UK, Kingspan and Exova have won 81 contracts advertised on the Government's public sector tender portals since 2017, according to research by procurement monitor Tussell.
The revelation comes after Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, told MPs that they were among seven 'mercenary' firms to be investigated and potentially banned from winning any future public contracts over their role in the fire.
Ms Rayner claimed the companies had 'put profit before people' and 'shown little remorse' since the fire, which killed 72 people.
Rydon, which oversaw the tower's renovation with flammable cladding between 2012 and 2016, has won 13 contracts worth £227 million since the blaze. They included a £99 million tender, awarded by Ealing borough council in October 2019, to regenerate the 1970s-era High Lane Estate in west London.
The firm also won a £38 million contract from Sutton council in September 2022 to build 92 new homes.
Sir Martin Moore-Bick, chairman of the Grenfell inquiry, found in his final report last year that Rydon had taken 'a casual approach' to fire safety during the project.
Saint-Gobain Construction Products UK, the parent company of insulation supplier Celotex, has won 61 contracts worth a total of £127 million since 2017.
They included a £70 million contract from Milton Keynes council to regenerate the 1970s-era Lakes Estate and £35 million from Sheffield city council to re-roof local authority properties in the South Yorkshire city.
The inquiry's report found that Celotex had engaged in 'systematic dishonesty' when selling the insulation for the refurbishment.
Kingspan, which has won nine contracts worth £886,000 in total, provided an insulation product used in the refurbishment which the inquiry found had been marketed with 'dishonesty'.
Exova, a firm that has since won one £516,000 contract from a housing association advertised on public sector portals, was commissioned to prepare a fire safety strategy for the Grenfell refurbishment but never completed the task.
The announcement by Ms Rayner on Wednesday came as the Government formally responded to the recommendations set out in the inquiry's final report last September.
The MP, who is also the Housing, Communities and Local Government Secretary, said: 'Companies must be held to account'.
The seven organisations being investigated are: Arconic Architectural Products SAS; Saint-Gobain Construction Products UK Limited, which previously owned Celotex Limited; Exova (UK) Limited; Harley Facades Limited; Kingspan Insulation Limited; Rydon Maintenance Limited; and Studio E Architects Limited.
In a written statement, Georgia Gould, the Cabinet Office parliamentary secretary, said the firms would be investigated under new debarment powers in the Procurement Act 2023.
The Cabinet Office, Rydon, Saint-Gobain Construction Products UK and Kingspan were approached for comment.
Exova UK declined to comment.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Unions pile pressure on Reeves to avoid cuts and impose wealth taxes
Labour's biggest financial backers are piling pressure on Rachel Reeves to avoid making cuts at next week's spending review and instead pursue wealth taxes to fund Britain's public services. Polling commissioned by the Trades Union Congress (TUC) reveals a majority the public (54 per cent) back taxes on big corporations and the most wealthy individuals as an alternative means of raising revenue. Just 28 per cent oppose the move. TUC general secretary Paul Nowak urged the government to 'stay on track' and build on the 'positive start it made at last year's budget by providing sustained funding for our public services and infrastructure' – warning that people are 'fed up with a system where those with the broadest shoulders don't pull their weight'. It comes after deputy prime minister Angela Rayner pressed Ms Reeves to consider eight wealth taxes rather than try to impose cuts on departments. The civil war within the government over next Wednesday's spending review has seen holdouts from Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government as well as Yvette Cooper's Home Office. The chancellor is expected to unveil a swathe of spending cuts as she attempts to walk the tightrope between delivering on the party's election promises and sticking within the bounds of her self-imposed fiscal rules. The TUC has also joined criticism of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) over whether its flawed predictions are having a negative impact on spending plans. The OBR produces forecasts twice a year alongside the autumn budget and spring statement, which are used by the government to make fiscal policy decisions. But Mr Nowak said it is now 'time to review the role of the OBR and its fiscal assumptions to give the UK greater flexibility to invest in our future', with the TUC arguing that short-term changes in forecasts should not be driving long-term government decision making. Mr Nowak said next week's spending review 'can be the next key step in the government's plan to rebuild Britain and deliver industrial renewal' as 'communities are still crying out for meaningful change after more than a decade of Tory austerity and neglect'. 'The global outlook is challenging, but leaving our decimated public services without sufficient investment would risk both future growth and public trust,' he added. 'The message from voters is clear. They want the government to protect and rebuild our public services,' he said. 'If that means asking the wealthiest to pay more, the public are behind it. People are fed up with a system where those with the broadest shoulders don't pull their weight.' The warning from the TUC – which represents 5.3 million people in 47 member unions – will pile pressure on Labour, a party which has historically been heavily dependent on the funding it receives from trade unions. In 2024, Labour declared £2.4m from union backers – significantly less than the £5m it declared from unions in 2019 after Unite refused to endorse the party's manifesto. The poll of more than 2,000 adults, conducted by Hold Sway for the TUC, shows there is widespread frustration at the current amount of tax paid by the wealthiest in Britain. Nearly 6 in 10 (59 per cent) think the wealthiest do not pay their fair share – including 74 per cent of Conservative-to-Labour switchers and 72 per cent of those strongly considering switching from Labour to Reform. More than half (56 per cent) think big businesses do not pay their fair share of tax, while just 31 per cent think they do. The polling showed that two-thirds (67 per cent) of voters back an annual wealth tax for estates above £10m, including 88 per cent of Tory-to-Labour switchers; and 81 per cent of Labour voters now strongly considering Reform. Meanwhile, more than six in 10 (63 per cent) back a windfall tax on banks – including 85 per cent of Tory-to-Labour switchers, and 78 per cent of those Labour voters now strongly considering Reform. Some 50 per cent back raising capital gains tax, including 75 per cent of Tory to Labour switchers, and 67 per cent of those Labour voters that are now strongly considering Reform. Just 26 per cent oppose a capital gains tax hike. The Hold Sway poll surveyed 2,000 adults in Great Britain online between 30 May and 2 June. A HM Treasury spokesperson said: 'At the Budget, the chancellor increased investment in Britain's security, health and economy. We did that at the same time as protecting taxes on working people. This week, the chancellor will announce further plans to invest in Britain's renewal.'
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Rayner's workers' rights bill will damage growth, warn bosses
Angela Rayner's radical shake-up of workers' rights will hurt economic growth, bosses have warned, as companies prepare to slash hiring and curb investment. More than seven in 10 business leaders believe the Government's Employment Rights Bill will have a negative impact on the country's economy, according to a survey carried out by the Institute of Directors (IoD). Nearly half said they would be less likely to hire new staff as a result of the reforms to workers' rights. The warning will raise alarm bells for the Chancellor who has said that restoring economic growth is her priority. It threatens to deepen tensions between Ms Reeves and the Deputy Prime Minister, who is overseeing the workers' rights reforms. The pair have already clashed over the direction of economic policy, with a leaked memo recently revealing Ms Rayner was pressing the Chancellor to pursue tax rises instead of spending cuts. Under the workers' rights reforms, employees will be able to claim sick pay from the first day of their illness, instead of the fourth. The Bill will also extend the powers of unions in the workplace, making it easier for trade groups to organise strikes by weakening the thresholds currently needed to trigger a walkout. Sir Keir Starmer previously made the shake-up, dubbed Labour's 'new deal for working people', as a core part of his manifesto in the lead-up to his victory in the general election. However, it has sparked concern from business chiefs. The survey by the IoD found that more than half (52pc) of company bosses said they would be more likely to invest in automation as a result of the Bill. A quarter of business leaders polled said the Bill made it likely that they would make redundancies in a further blow to the labour market. The IoD, the so-called 'bosses' union', represents 20,000 business leaders across the country, ranging from entrepreneurial small ventures to major corporations. Already, many of those businesses have reported a slowdown in hiring since the Chancellor announced an increase in employers' National Insurance contributions and the minimum wage in the autumn Budget. The rise in labour costs has caused many businesses to cut jobs or scrap hiring plans. Alex Hall-Chen, a principal policy adviser for employment at the IoD, said: 'Government has yet to show that it is listening to the concerns of business about the potential unintended consequences of the Bill as it is currently drafted. 'If there is a silver lining, it is that more employers will invest in automation and other measures which may improve the UK's stagnating productivity levels.' The IoD has called on the Government to make targeted changes to the Bill, which it believes would soften the negative impact of the reforms on hiring. One of its proposed changes includes keeping the existing thresholds for statutory recognition of trade unions. Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said: 'If Labour ministers had worked in business they would know their choices mean that British workers will lose their jobs to robots and foreign workers. 'Whilst all Labour governments leave unemployment higher than they found it, this time they are actually passing laws to guarantee it.' The warning over the worker rights reforms comes after MPs warned that Britain's high energy bills and poorly coordinated efforts to fund business growth was hitting growth and prosperity. MPs on the business and trade committee said: 'The UK's high electricity prices are damaging the ability of UK businesses to compete, attract investment and decarbonise.' It pointed to evidence from Nissan that the company's Sunderland plant has higher energy bills than any of its other car factories in the world. Liam Byrne, chairman of the committee, said: 'The evidence we've heard from the nation's leading industrialists, scientists, economists and trade unionists is that this moment of history will be lost if the Chancellor's new investment is not matched by a re-making of the British state for a new economic era.' The MPs also called on the Chancellor to act to stop many of the best entrepreneurs from leaving the country for lack of funding to support their rapidly growing businesses. A government spokesman said: 'We've consulted extensively with business on our proposals, and we will continue to work closely with employers to ensure new laws work for them while putting money back into the pockets of working people.' Responding to the select committee report, a government spokesman said ministers were working on 'creating the best possible conditions for the private sector to thrive.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Rayner's workers' rights bill will damage growth, warn bosses
Angela Rayner's radical shake-up of workers' rights will hurt economic growth, bosses have warned, as companies prepare to slash hiring and curb investment. More than seven in 10 business leaders believe the Government's Employment Rights Bill will have a negative impact on the country's economy, according to a survey carried out by the Institute of Directors (IoD). Nearly half said they would be less likely to hire new staff as a result of the reforms to workers' rights. The warning will raise alarm bells for the Chancellor who has said that restoring economic growth is her priority. It threatens to deepen tensions between Ms Reeves and the Deputy Prime Minister, who is overseeing the workers' rights reforms. The pair have already clashed over the direction of economic policy, with a leaked memo recently revealing Ms Rayner was pressing the Chancellor to pursue tax rises instead of spending cuts. Under the workers' rights reforms, employees will be able to claim sick pay from the first day of their illness, instead of the fourth. The Bill will also extend the powers of unions in the workplace, making it easier for trade groups to organise strikes by weakening the thresholds currently needed to trigger a walkout. Sir Keir Starmer previously made the shake-up, dubbed Labour's 'new deal for working people', as a core part of his manifesto in the lead-up to his victory in the general election. However, it has sparked concern from business chiefs. The survey by the IoD found that more than half (52pc) of company bosses said they would be more likely to invest in automation as a result of the Bill. A quarter of business leaders polled said the Bill made it likely that they would make redundancies in a further blow to the labour market. The IoD, the so-called 'bosses' union', represents 20,000 business leaders across the country, ranging from entrepreneurial small ventures to major corporations. Already, many of those businesses have reported a slowdown in hiring since the Chancellor announced an increase in employers' National Insurance contributions and the minimum wage in the autumn Budget. The rise in labour costs has caused many businesses to cut jobs or scrap hiring plans. Alex Hall-Chen, a principal policy adviser for employment at the IoD, said: 'Government has yet to show that it is listening to the concerns of business about the potential unintended consequences of the Bill as it is currently drafted. 'If there is a silver lining, it is that more employers will invest in automation and other measures which may improve the UK's stagnating productivity levels.' The IoD has called on the Government to make targeted changes to the Bill, which it believes would soften the negative impact of the reforms on hiring. One of its proposed changes includes keeping the existing thresholds for statutory recognition of trade unions. Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said: 'If Labour ministers had worked in business they would know their choices mean that British workers will lose their jobs to robots and foreign workers. 'Whilst all Labour governments leave unemployment higher than they found it, this time they are actually passing laws to guarantee it.' The warning over the worker rights reforms comes after MPs warned that Britain's high energy bills and poorly coordinated efforts to fund business growth was hitting growth and prosperity. MPs on the business and trade committee said: 'The UK's high electricity prices are damaging the ability of UK businesses to compete, attract investment and decarbonise.' It pointed to evidence from Nissan that the company's Sunderland plant has higher energy bills than any of its other car factories in the world. Liam Byrne, chairman of the committee, said: 'The evidence we've heard from the nation's leading industrialists, scientists, economists and trade unionists is that this moment of history will be lost if the Chancellor's new investment is not matched by a re-making of the British state for a new economic era.' The MPs also called on the Chancellor to act to stop many of the best entrepreneurs from leaving the country for lack of funding to support their rapidly growing businesses. A government spokesman said: 'We've consulted extensively with business on our proposals, and we will continue to work closely with employers to ensure new laws work for them while putting money back into the pockets of working people.' Responding to the select committee report, a government spokesman said ministers were working on 'creating the best possible conditions for the private sector to thrive.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
