Bondi ends Biden-era policy to smoke out leaks to journalists
Journalists can be subject to court orders and search warrants for their phone records, notes and testimony as Donald Trump's administration tries to hunt down 'unauthorised disclosures' to reporters, according to a new memo from Attorney General Pam Bondi. The measure reverses Department of Justice policy under Joe Biden's administration, which intended to protect freedom of the press from government interference and unlawful intimidation.
But an internal Justice Department memo from Bondi's office claims that dropping the policy is necessary to prevent the release of not just 'classified' information but 'privileged and other sensitive information' — a much broader set of information that civil rights advocates fear could open reporters to law enforcement scrutiny for typical newsgathering, including revealing sources.
'Some of the most consequential reporting in US history — from Watergate to warrantless wiretapping after 911 — was and continues to be made possible because reporters have been able to protect the identities of confidential sources and uncover and report stories that matter to people across the political spectrum,' Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press president Bruce D. Brown said in a statement. 'We'll wait to see what the policy looks like, but we know reporters will still do their jobs, and there is no shortage of legal support to back them up,' he added.
Prosecutors can use court orders and search warrants to 'compel production of information and testimony by and relating to the news media,' according to the memo. The policy also states that members of the press are 'presumptively entitled to advance notice of such investigative activities,' and subpoenas are to be 'narrowly drawn.' Warrants must also include 'protocols designed to limit the scope of intrusion into potentially protected materials or newsgathering activities.' Before deciding whether to subpoena news organisations, prosecutors must determine whether there's a reasonable basis to believe that a crime has been committed and that the information the government is seeking is needed for prosecution, according to the memo. But 'the Justice Department will not tolerate unauthorised disclosures that undermine President Trump's policies, victimise government agencies, and cause harm to the American people,' Bondi wrote.
The policy advances Trump's antagonistic relationship with the press after he spent three campaigns and his time in office raging against journalists and publishers he labels 'fake news' and the 'enemy of the people.' Last year, he demanded congressional Republicans block the bipartisan Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying Act, or PRESS Act, which intended to enshrine that Biden-era Justice Department policy protecting journalists' information.
'REPUBLICANS MUST KILL THIS BILL!' Trump wrote on Truth Social last year. During his first term in office, Trump's attorney general William Barr had secretly pursued records from reporters at CNN, The New York Times and The Washington Post. Attorney General Merrick Garland later issued a rule that banned prosecutors from trying to seize records and notes from reporters.
The PRESS Act was ultimately shelved. 'Every Democrat who put the PRESS Act on the back burner when they had the opportunity to pass a bipartisan bill codifying journalist-source confidentiality should be ashamed,' Freedom of the Press Foundation director of advocacy Seth Stern said in a statement. Trump has threatened to revoke broadcast licenses for news networks over critical coverage and is currently suing CBS for $10 billion over a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. Trump's Federal Communications Commission's chair Brendan Carr has launched probes into public broadcasters and revived complaints against network news outlets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dubai Eye
an hour ago
- Dubai Eye
El Salvador deportee brought back to US to face charges
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the man mistakenly deported from Maryland to El Salvador by the Trump administration, was flown back to the United States to face criminal charges of transporting illegal immigrants within the US, Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Friday. Abrego Garcia's return marked an inflection point in a case seized on by critics of President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown as a sign that the administration was disregarding civil liberties in its push to step up deportations. Abrego Garcia - a 29-year-old Salvadoran whose wife and young child in Maryland are US citizens - appeared in federal court in Nashville on Friday evening. His arraignment was set for June 13, when he will enter a plea, according to local media reports. Until then, he will remain in federal custody. If convicted, he would be deported to El Salvador after serving his sentence, Bondi said. The Trump administration has said Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, an accusation that his lawyers deny. Officials on Friday portrayed the indictment of Abrego Garcia by a federal grand jury in Tennessee as vindication of their approach to immigration enforcement. "The man has a horrible past, and I could see a decision being made, bring him back, show everybody how horrible this guy is," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, adding that it was the Justice Department that decided to bring Abrego Garcia back. According to the indictment, Abrego Garcia worked with at least five co-conspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the United States illegally, then transport them from the US-Mexico border to destinations in the country. Abrego Garcia often picked up migrants in Houston, making more than 100 trips between Texas and Maryland between 2016 and 2025, the indictment alleges. It also accuses Abrego Garcia of transporting firearms and drugs. According to the indictment, one of Abrego Garcia's co-conspirators belonging to the same ring was involved in the transportation of migrants whose tractor trailer overturned in Mexico in 2021, resulting in 50 deaths. Abrego Garcia's lawyer, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, called the criminal charges "fantastical" and a "kitchen sink" of allegations. "This is all based on the statements of individuals who are currently either facing prosecution or in federal prison," he said. "I want to know what they offered those people." The indictment also led to a high-level resignation in the federal prosecutor's office in Nashville, with news that Ben Schrader, chief of the criminal division for the Middle District of Tennessee, had resigned in protest. A 15-year veteran of the US Attorney's Office, Schrader had grown increasingly uncomfortable with the administration's actions, and the indictment of Abrego Garcia was "the final straw," a person familiar with the situation told Reuters. Schrader declined comment. Schrader had posted notice of his resignation on LinkedIn last month, around the time the indictment was filed under seal, but he did not give a reason. Abrego Garcia was deported on March 15, more than two months before the charges were filed. He was briefly held in a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, despite a US immigration judge's 2019 order barring him from being sent to El Salvador because he would likely be persecuted by gangs. Bondi said Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele had agreed to return Abrego Garcia after US officials presented his government with an arrest warrant. "The grand jury found that over the past nine years, Abrego Garcia has played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring," she told a press conference. In a court filing on Friday, federal prosecutors asked a judge to keep Abrego Garcia detained pending trial. Citing an unnamed co-conspirator, prosecutors said Abrego Garcia joined MS-13 in El Salvador by murdering a rival gang member's mother. The indictment does not charge Abrego Garcia with murder. Abrego Garcia could face 10 years in prison for each migrant he is convicted of transporting, prosecutors said, a punishment that potentially could keep him incarcerated for the rest of his life. TENSIONS WITH THE COURTS The case has become a symbol of escalating tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary, which has blocked a number of the president's signature policies. More recently, the US Supreme Court has backed Trump's hardline approach to immigration in other cases. After Abrego Garcia's lawyers challenged the basis for his deportation, the US Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to facilitate his return, with liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying the government had cited no basis for what she called his "warrantless arrest." US District Judge Paula Xinis has opened a probe into what, if anything, the Trump administration had done to secure his return, after Abrego Garcia's lawyers accused officials of stonewalling their requests for information. That led to concerns among Trump's critics that his administration would openly defy court orders. In a court filing on Friday, Justice Department lawyers told Xinis that Abrego Garcia's return meant they were in compliance with the order to facilitate bringing him back to the US. Sandoval-Moshenberg said Abrego Garcia's return did not mean the government was in compliance, asserting that his client must be placed in immigration proceedings before the same judge who handled his 2019 case. Chris Van Hollen, a Democratic US senator from Maryland who visited Abrego Garcia in El Salvador, said in a statement on Friday that the Trump administration has "finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States." "The administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along," Van Hollen said.
Arabian Post
3 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Trump-Linked Crypto Project Distributes $47 in USD1 to WLFI Holders
World Liberty Financial , a cryptocurrency initiative associated with U.S. President Donald Trump, has executed an airdrop, distributing 47 units of its USD1 stablecoin to each holder of its WLFI token. The distribution, conducted on the Ethereum blockchain, was automatic and required no action from recipients. The figure of 47 USD1 tokens per wallet is widely interpreted as a symbolic reference to Trump's position as the 47th President of the United States. The airdrop was approved through a community governance vote on May 7, 2025, which saw 99.96% of 12,000 participants in favour of the initiative. The primary objectives were to reward early backers, enhance liquidity for USD1, and test the project's token distribution mechanism under real market conditions. Despite the airdrop, WLFI tokens remain non-transferable and cannot be traded on any exchange. This restriction has drawn criticism from some quarters, with concerns about the token's liquidity and the centralisation of control. Approximately 70% of WLFI tokens are held by insiders, including founders and team members, raising questions about the project's decentralisation. ADVERTISEMENT USD1, the stablecoin distributed in the airdrop, is pegged to the U.S. dollar and backed by U.S. Treasuries, dollars, and other cash equivalents. It is intended to maintain a stable value of $1 and is managed by World Liberty Financial. The stablecoin has been minted on both the Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain blockchains, with plans to expand to other protocols. The airdrop has sparked renewed debate about the intersection of politics and cryptocurrency. Trump and his affiliates are reported to own a significant portion of WLFI tokens and are set to reap a substantial share of the project's revenues. Critics argue that this raises ethical concerns, particularly given Trump's current political position.
Arabian Post
3 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Trade Envoys from US and China to Convene in London Amid Renewed Optimism
Top trade officials from the United States and China are set to meet in London on Monday, 9 June, in a bid to ease escalating tensions over tariffs, technology transfers, and critical mineral exports. The announcement follows a 90-minute phone call between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping, during which both leaders agreed to resume dialogue and expressed cautious optimism about resolving key disputes. Leading the US delegation will be Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The Chinese side has not officially confirmed its delegation, but past rounds have included Vice Premier He Lifeng, Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang, and Vice Finance Minister Liao Min. Li, who was appointed as China's International Trade Negotiator in April, has been instrumental in shaping Beijing's response to the ongoing trade conflict. The upcoming talks follow a temporary truce brokered in Geneva on 12 May, where both nations agreed to reduce retaliatory tariffs—previously as high as 145%—to more manageable levels. However, the ceasefire is set to expire on 12 August, adding urgency to the London negotiations. ADVERTISEMENT A central issue on the agenda is the flow of rare earth minerals, which are essential for advanced manufacturing and defence technologies. China's earlier suspension of some rare earth exports to the US had heightened concerns about supply chain vulnerabilities. During their phone call, President Trump stated that President Xi agreed to resume these exports, a move that could alleviate pressure on US manufacturers. However, Beijing has yet to publicly confirm this commitment. The trade dispute has had significant economic repercussions. American businesses have faced increased costs due to tariffs, and a pending lawsuit challenges the legality of these tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The outcome of both the negotiations and the legal case could significantly influence future US trade policy and economic relations with China. President Trump has expressed optimism about the upcoming talks, stating, 'The meeting should go very well.' However, the complexity of the issues at hand suggests that reaching a comprehensive agreement may require sustained effort and compromise from both sides.
