Beijing hails improving Vatican ties after Pope Leo names first Chinese bishop
BEIJING: Beijing hailed on Thursday improving ties with the Vatican after the first appointment of a Chinese bishop under Pope Leo XIV, signaling the new pontiff's support for a controversial accord on nominations struck by his predecessor.
The Holy See expressed 'satisfaction' on Wednesday at the recognition by China of the appointment of Joseph Lin Yuntuan as auxiliary bishop of Fuzhou, capital of eastern Fujian province. The pope made the nomination on June 5.
Beijing's foreign ministry said the naming of the first Chinese bishop under the new pope had 'enhanced understanding and mutual trust through constructive dialogue' with the Vatican.
'China is willing to work together with the Vatican to promote the continuous improvement of China-Vatican relations,' foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian said at a regular news briefing.
The Vatican and China do not have formal diplomatic relations because the Holy See recognizes Taiwan, the self-ruled island that Beijing claims as its own territory.
However, they agreed in a historic deal in 2018 to let both sides have a say in the naming of bishops in China, home to about 12 million Catholics.
The deal – the text of which has never been made public – has drawn criticism within the Church, with some seeing it as allowing the Communist Party government a stranglehold over China's Catholics.
The deal was renewed several times as Pope Francis sought to make inroads for the Church in China, most recently in October 2024 for four years.
'With the joint efforts of both sides, the provisional agreement on the appointment of bishops has been smoothly implemented,' Lin Jian said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
ICAN: Nuclear States Spent $100 Billion on Weapons in 2024
Nuclear-armed states spent more than $100 billion on their atomic arsenals last year, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons said Friday, lamenting the lack of democratic oversight of such spending. ICAN said Britain, China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia and the United States together spent nearly $10 billion more than in 2023. The United States spent $56.8 billion in 2024, followed by China at $12.5 billion and Britain at $10.4 billion, ICAN said in its flagship annual report, according to AFP. Geneva-based ICAN won the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize for its key role in drafting the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which took effect in 2021. Some 69 countries have ratified it to date, four more have directly acceded to the treaty and another 25 have signed it, although none of the nuclear weapons states have come on board. This year's report looked at the costs incurred by the countries that host other states' nuclear weapons. It said such costs are largely unknown to citizens and legislators alike, thereby avoiding democratic scrutiny. Although not officially confirmed, the report said Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Türkiye were hosting US nuclear weapons, citing experts. Meanwhile Russia claims it has nuclear weapons stationed in Belarus, but some experts are unsure, it added. The report said there was "little public information" about the costs associated with hosting US nuclear weapons in NATO European countries, citing the cost of facility security, nuclear-capable aircraft and preparation to use such weapons. "Each NATO nuclear-sharing arrangement is governed by secret agreements," the report said. "It's an affront to democracy that citizens and lawmakers are not allowed to know that nuclear weapons from other countries are based on their soil or how much of their taxes is being spent on them," said the report's co-author Alicia Sanders-Zakre. Eight countries openly possess nuclear weapons: the United States, Russia, Britain, France, China, India, Pakistan and North Korea. Israel is widely assumed to have nuclear weapons, although it has never officially acknowledged this. ICAN said the level of nuclear weapons spending in 2024 by these nine nations could have paid the UN budget almost 28 times over. "The problem of nuclear weapons is one that can be solved, and doing so means understanding the vested interests fiercely defending the option for nine countries to indiscriminately murder civilians," said ICAN's program coordinator Susi Snyder. The private sector earned at least $42.5 billion from their nuclear weapons contracts in 2024 alone, the report said. There are at least $463 billion in ongoing nuclear weapons contracts, some of which do not expire for decades, and last year, at least $20 billion in new nuclear weapon contracts were awarded, it added.
ArabGT
16 hours ago
- ArabGT
Are Chinese EVs Being Used for Espionage?
Electric vehicles (EVs) have rapidly transformed from niche technology into a dominant global trend. In 2024 alone, over 17 million EVs and plug-in hybrids were sold worldwide — with China accounting for a staggering 11 million of those units. Brands like BYD, NIO, and XPeng are now household names, offering everything from budget compacts like the Dolphin (also known as Seagull) to luxury SUVs bristling with smart features. Chinese EVs are no longer rare sightings on Western roads — they're front and center in showrooms from Berlin to Los Angeles. BYD recently overtook Tesla as the world's top EV manufacturer, and its ambitions are crystal clear: dominate the global EV landscape within the decade. This explosive rise hasn't gone unnoticed in Western capitals. Alarmed by China's low production costs, state-backed subsidies, and expanding market share, governments across the U.S. and Europe have begun pushing back. In 2024, the U.S. raised tariffs on Chinese EVs from 25% to 100%, effectively locking them out of the American market. The European Commission followed with anti-subsidy investigations and provisional duties reaching 35% or more, aiming to curb what it sees as unfair competition. While the UK has yet to impose similar national measures, quiet restrictions have emerged around sensitive military sites. But trade protection is only part of the picture. A darker question looms beneath the surface: could these Chinese EVs serve as tools of espionage? Western intelligence agencies and lawmakers have expressed growing concern. Modern EVs are, quite literally, computers on wheels — and some believe they might be the perfect Trojan horse. These vehicles are equipped with GPS tracking, high-resolution cameras, microphones, and over-the-air software update systems. Officials in the U.S., EU, UK, and Australia have all warned that this connectivity — especially when manufactured by firms under Chinese jurisdiction — creates real national security risks. U.S. senators have publicly speculated that such cars could map roads, track government movements, or even be remotely disabled in a cyber conflict. Is such a threat technically possible? On a purely theoretical level, yes. A single modern EV can generate more than 1,000 GB of data per hour. This includes GPS logs, driver behavior, video feeds, microphone input, and even synced smartphone data. Chinese EVs like the NIO ES8 have been observed transmitting up to 90% of their data traffic to servers in China. Given China's 2017 National Intelligence Law — which compels domestic firms to cooperate with state authorities — critics fear that this data could be accessed by Beijing. Modern EVs introduce cybersecurity risks because of their connected architecture. Components like modems, processors, and infotainment systems — essential for internet access, vehicle control, and smartphone integration — can also create vulnerabilities. Cellular modules in particular could be exploited to intercept data or link to internal systems. Over-the-air (OTA) updates add another layer of risk, as compromised software could enable surveillance or remote interference. With their built-in radios, cameras, microphones, and sensors, EVs are already powerful data collectors. Experts warn that if misused, they could operate as passive surveillance platforms, transmitting sensitive information without driver awareness. Yet for all the speculation, direct proof of espionage remains elusive. No major public incident has confirmed that a Chinese EV has been used to spy on Western governments or citizens. Even high-level officials acknowledge the risk is hypothetical — not proven. As some analysts point out, China has far more efficient means of surveillance, such as mobile apps, telecom infrastructure, and smart devices. Moreover, any misuse of EV platforms could backfire disastrously, damaging China's global economic interests. Beijing, for its part, has flatly denied the accusations. In response to British and American concerns, Chinese officials have called the claims 'baseless' and 'irrational.' The Chinese embassy in London emphasized its support for open supply chains and noted that no credible evidence has shown Chinese cars pose an actual security threat. And here lies the contradiction: if EVs are a threat, what about smartphones? Or routers? Or smart speakers and wearables? Chinese technology is already embedded deeply in Western lifestyles — from the phones we carry to the cameras on our streets. Even vehicles made by German or American brands often contain Chinese-made components. The truth is, data risks are everywhere in a hyper-connected world. So, are Chinese EVs espionage tools? The answer lies in a gray zone. The potential exists, but the danger — at least so far — is more symbolic than operational. What we're witnessing is not just a security debate, but a geopolitical clash over technology, influence, and control. In that context, EVs are just the latest frontier.
Asharq Al-Awsat
a day ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Japan, China Trade Barbs over Fighter Jet Maneuvers
Beijing condemned on Thursday what it called "dangerous behavior" by a Japanese military plane over the Pacific after Tokyo said Chinese fighter jets flew unusually close to its aircraft at the weekend. The Japanese government had complained to China over the incident, in which no Japanese military personnel were reported injured. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet from the Shandong aircraft carrier followed a Japanese P-3C patrol plane for 40 minutes on Saturday, according to the Japanese defense ministry. Two J-15 jets then did the same for 80 minutes on Sunday. "During these long periods, the jets flew unusually close to the P-3C, and they flew within 45 meters" of the patrol plane on both days, an official from the Japanese ministry told AFP. Also on Sunday, Chinese jets cut across airspace around 900 meters (3,000 feet) ahead of a P-3C Japanese patrol plane at the same altitude -- a distance a P-3C can reach within a few seconds at cruising speed, Tokyo said. "We do not believe that this approach was made by mistake," the Japanese military's chief of staff Yoshihide Yoshida told reporters on Thursday. "Given it happened for 40 minutes and 80 minutes, for two days in a row, our understanding is that it was done on purpose," he said. Beijing's foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian hit back at the Japanese description of the events. "The root cause of the risk to maritime and air security was the close reconnaissance of China's normal military activities by a Japanese warplane," he said. "The Chinese side urges the Japanese side to stop this kind of dangerous behavior." 'Abnormal approaches' The incident followed the sighting in recent days of two Chinese aircraft carriers sailing in the Pacific simultaneously for the first time. Japan said this week the aircraft carriers' activity -- described by China as "routine training" -- showed the expanding geographic scope of Beijing's military. Yoshida said on Thursday loosening Japan's surveillance, information-gathering or countermeasures against intrusion "would encourage attempts to change the status quo by force". Tokyo's top government spokesman Yoshimasa Hayashi earlier told reporters in regard to the fighter jet incident that "such abnormal approaches can lead to an accidental collision, so we have expressed serious concerns" to the Chinese side. US ambassador to Japan George Glass said on social media platform X that the maneuvers by a Chinese fighter "put Japanese crewmembers' lives in peril". "Whether it's harassing Philippine ships, attacking Vietnamese fishermen, or firing flares at Australian aircraft, Beijing knows only reckless aggression. Not so much a charm offensive as offensive harm," Glass said. Similar incidents were last reported in May and June 2014, when Chinese Su-27 fighter jets flew within 30 meters (100 feet) of Japanese military planes in the East China Sea. Japan summoned the Chinese ambassador at the time, while the two sides traded accusations of blame. Daisuke Kawai, director of the University of Tokyo's economic security and policy innovation program, told AFP this week that the timing of the aircraft carrier movements could be linked to US-China economic tensions. "Beijing calculated that the United States would be less willing or able to respond militarily at this precise moment, seeing it as an opportune time to demonstrate its expanding military capabilities," he said.
