logo
In some Jewish families, speaking up for Palestine stirs discontent

In some Jewish families, speaking up for Palestine stirs discontent

Al Jazeera14-05-2025

On a cold December day during the Christmas holidays, Dalia Sarig's 80-year-old father arrived at her home in Vienna after she had returned from a skiing trip.
He was there to pick up her stepsister, who had joined Sarig's family on vacation.
She was convinced it would be her last meeting with her father, as their political differences were about to come to a head.
'I said goodbye. I hugged him,' she told Al Jazeera. 'When I said goodbye, I said goodbye knowing that maybe I will not see him any more.'
Tensions with her Jewish family had been building for years. At 56, Sarig, a pro-Palestine activist, is at odds with most of her relatives.
Her parents adhere to Zionism, the nationalist political ideology that called for the creation of a Jewish state and is seen by Palestinians and their supporters as the system that underpins their suffering.
Sarig knew during that December meeting with her father that she intended to stage a pro-Palestine demonstration outside parliament in January that would be filmed by a local television station. The activist group she was a part of had put her forward for a broadcast interview. Appalled by Israel's genocide against Palestinians in Gaza and determined to speak up, she went ahead with it.
'The interview was broadcast and it immediately went to my family.'
She later heard that her father, who also lives in the Austrian capital, had told friends that 'to him, I died'.
'But he never talked about it with me, he never reached out to me to tell me something like this. [He] just cut the relation.'
Her 77-year-old mother, who lives in Germany, messaged her a week later.
'I still have it here in my phone, saying, you know, 'I will not accept your political activism. You're a traitor, you are dirtying the nest … and should you change your political views, we can return to normal. Stay healthy.''
She has not spoken with her parents since.
Family divides are not uncommon among Jewish families from the United States to Israel, but have become more entrenched since October 7, 2023.
On that day, Hamas, the group that governs the Gaza Strip, led an incursion into southern Israel during which 1,139 people were killed and more than 200 were taken captive. Since then, Israeli bombardments have killed more than 61,700 people in the enclave.
'I think one of the most interesting phenomena among the liberal Zionists is the fact, while the majority moved to the right because of October 7, a minority became even more disenchanted with Israel and Zionism,' the author and academic Ilan Pappe, a prominent critic of Zionism, told Al Jazeera.
Sarig's ancestors fled Austria in 1938, the year of annexation by Nazi Germany, for Serbia. They later settled in Palestine under the British Mandate in what is now present-day Israel. But by the 1950s, most of her relatives had returned to Austria, where she was born.
As a child, she celebrated Jewish holidays while learning about Zionism from elders.
She was also told that Palestinians 'are the enemies, they want to kill all the Jews … that the Jews living there [in Israel] wanted peace, but the Arabs did not'.
At 18, she moved to Israel, where, at her parents' encouragement, she joined a leftist Zionist youth movement.
Over 13 years in Israel, she joined a kibbutz, served in the Israeli army in an office role, and married. But it was as she studied politics and Middle East history at Haifa University that her worldview began to change.
That's where she met a Palestinian professor and later became an activist for Palestinian rights.
'It began on a lawn in an evening together with my Palestinian teacher, when he told me the story of his family that was displaced from a small village.
'I understood that what I have been told, the Zionist narrative, is wrong,' she said. 'I started to think how he might feel, how he's feeling, or how I might feel as a Palestinian living in a Jewish state where my ancestors were expelled.'
Back in Austria, her family would argue with her at gatherings, agree never to speak again on Palestine and Israeli politics, break their promises, and clash once again.
In 2015, she renounced her Israeli citizenship as a gesture against Zionism.
'It makes my activism easier,' Sarig said, on being disowned by some of her family. 'I lost my Jewish community because I was considered at best, strange and weird, and at worst, a traitor.'
But being cut off from one's family can take a toll on mental health, say experts.
According to Faissal Sharif, a neuroscientist and doctoral student at the University of Oxford, brain imaging studies have shown that 'the experience of social isolation triggers activity in areas that would otherwise light up in response to physical pain'.
'In other words, social pain is not metaphorical – it is biologically real,' he told Al Jazeera.
Families, he said, often form 'microcultures' with their own rules and positions on political issues.
'The betrayal felt when love and acceptance are made conditional upon silence or complicity in the genocide can be deeply wounding. In the context of Gaza, it adds an additional layer of trauma: not only is one bearing witness to mass suffering, but also paying a personal price for refusing to look away,' he said. 'This leads to long-lasting stress and anxiety, which can reach clinical levels.'
To preserve relationships, he said families need to lead with 'curiosity, not confrontation'.
'Especially when the topic is something as painful as war or genocide, facts alone won't move people – naming the emotions underneath, like fear, guilt, or grief, often opens more space for real dialogue.'
Having such conversations isn't easy.
Jonathan Ofir, a musician who was born in an Israeli kibbutz and emigrated to Denmark in the late 1990s, said that it was in 2009 that he realised he had 'actually been indoctrinated into a propaganda that omitted a whole Palestinian viewpoint'. He read Pappe's book, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, describing that experience as a 'turning point' for him.
Around the same time, he read other Jewish and Palestinian writers who 'challenged the Zionist narrative'.
'[But] I didn't share this publicly and I didn't share it with my family either.'
In 2014, though, during Israel's war on Gaza – the third within seven years – he said he felt confident enough to express his critical views 'outwards and publicly'.
More than 2,000 Palestinians – including 551 children – were killed during the 50-day conflict.
He took to Facebook to post an image of Israelis gathered on a hilltop near Sderot watching on as Gaza burned, a photograph that was featured in The New York Times.
A relative soon wrote him an email that concluded by recommending that Ofir 'stop posting on the internet'.
'It became this heated debate, but it very, very quickly stopped.'
Years later, he learned that his family in Israel had decided to avoid talking about politics around him 'so as to not legitimise my political views', he said.
After the October 7 attack, he checked on his extended family who lived near the site of the assault. But the incursion did not alter his position.
'My outlook hasn't significantly changed. But something changed in the Israeli society. And in that sense, you could say we might be more distant politically.'
Netherlands-based Daniel Friedman, 44, was raised in South Africa by his father, Steven, an academic and vocal critic of Zionism, and his mother, who was part of a circle of anti-Apartheid activists.
While his father remains an anti-Zionist, Friedman said that he and his mother have increasingly been clashing over Israel's genocide in Gaza since late 2023.
'This is really the only issue nowadays' affecting the conversations and bonds within some Jewish communities, he said.
One of their earlier arguments regarded the debunked claims that Palestinian fighters raped women during the October 7 incursion. After several uneasy disputes, often battled out by ping-ponging various newspaper links to support their arguments on WhatsApp, they have agreed to stop talking about politics.
'I love her, but what I struggle with is that I've lost a lot of trust for her,' said Friedman.
During a previous Israeli war on Gaza, his mother had signed a petition calling for a ceasefire, a move which saw her rejected by some family members. 'I think that had quite a big effect,' he said. 'She kind of went to the right.'
He said that he understands that for some, taking a stand means risking losing the support of a close community. He, however, chose to 'cut a lot of people out of my life on purpose' after October 7, he said.
Back in Vienna, Sarig is busy organising a conference of Jewish anti-Zionists in June, featuring speakers such as Stephen Kapos, a UK-based Holocaust survivor, the American podcaster and commentator Katie Halper and Ronnie Barkan, a Jewish Israeli activist. Pappe too is expected to attend.
As the killings in Gaza continue, her focus, she said, is on the Palestinians trying to survive Israeli fire.
'I'm not the victim,' Sarig said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge rules Trump cannot use foreign policy claim to deport Mahmoud Khalil
Judge rules Trump cannot use foreign policy claim to deport Mahmoud Khalil

Al Jazeera

time7 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Judge rules Trump cannot use foreign policy claim to deport Mahmoud Khalil

A federal judge in New Jersey has ruled the administration of United States President Donald Trump cannot use an obscure law to detain Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil for his pro-Palestine advocacy. The ruling from US District Judge Michael Farbiarz on Wednesday cut to the core of the Trump administration's justification for deporting Khalil, a permanent US resident. But it came short of ordering Khalil's immediate release from detention. Instead, Judge Farbiarz gave the administration until 9:30am local (13:30 GMT) on Friday to appeal. After that point, Khalil would be eligible for release on a $1 bail. Nevertheless, the judge wrote that the administration was violating Khalil's right to free speech by detaining and trying to deport him under a provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. That provision allows the secretary of state to remove foreign nationals who bear 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States'. Judge Farbiarz has previously signalled he believes that provision to be unconstitutional, contradicting the right to free speech. 'The petitioner's career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled,' Farbiarz wrote on Wednesday. 'This adds up to irreparable harm.' Khalil was arrested on March 8 after immigration agents showed up at his student apartment building at Columbia University in New York City. After his arrest, the State Department revoked his green card. He has since been held at an immigration detention centre in Louisiana. The administration has accused Khalil, a student protest leader, of anti-Semitism and supporting Hamas, but officials have offered no evidence to support their claims, either publicly or in court files. Critics have instead argued that the administration is using such claims to silence all forms of pro-Palestine advocacy. Like other student protesters targeted for deportation, Khalil is challenging his deportation in immigration court, while simultaneously challenging his arrest and detention in federal proceedings. The latter is called a habeas corpus petition, and it asserts that the Trump administration has violated his civil liberties by unlawfully keeping him behind bars. While students in the other high-profile cases — including Mohsen Mahdawi, Rumeysa Ozturk and Badar Khan Suri — have all been released from detention as their legal proceedings move forward, a ruling in Khalil's case has been slower coming. In April, an immigration judge had ruled that Khalil was deportable based on the State Department's interpretation of the 1952 law, despite a written letter from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio providing no further evidence for the allegations made against him. Immigration judges fall under the executive branch of the US government and are generally considered less independent than judges in the judicial branch. Also that month, immigration authorities denied Khalil's request for temporary release for his son's birth. In the case before the New Jersey federal court, meanwhile, the Trump administration has argued that Khalil was not fully transparent in his green card application, something his lawyers deny. But Judge Farbiarz indicated on Wednesday that it was unusual and 'overwhelmingly unlikely' for permanent residents to be detained on such grounds.

UK MPs react to report alleging David Cameron ‘threatened' ICC withdrawal
UK MPs react to report alleging David Cameron ‘threatened' ICC withdrawal

Al Jazeera

time17 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

UK MPs react to report alleging David Cameron ‘threatened' ICC withdrawal

Several United Kingdom lawmakers have criticised the previous government over allegations in a recent media report that former Foreign Secretary David Cameron 'privately threatened' to defund and withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC) over its plans to issue arrest warrants for Israeli officials over alleged war crimes in Gaza. The report, published on Monday by the UK-based outlet Middle East Eye (MEE), cited sources with knowledge of a phone call Cameron allegedly made to ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan on April 23, 2024, after he had given advance notice of his intention to apply for the warrants targeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and then Defence Minister Yoav Gallant. MEE's report cited unnamed sources, including former staff in Khan's office, and had seen minutes of the conversation, claiming that Cameron warned the arrest warrants, which were issued in November that year, would be – in quotes reported by the sources – tantamount to 'dropping a hydrogen bomb', warning that if the ICC went ahead, the UK would 'defund the court and withdraw from the Rome Statute'. Khan reportedly stood his ground, with sources telling MEE that he said afterwards that he did not like 'being pressurised'. 'I won't say if it rises to blackmail – I don't like being threatened,' he reportedly said, adding that the government was 'debasing' the UK with its clear attack on the independence of the court and the rule of international law. Neither Khan nor Cameron, who was prime minister between 2010 and 2016, and now sits in the House of Lords as a life peer, has commented on the report. Following the report's publication, Labour Party MP Zarah Sultana said on X that Cameron 'and every UK minister complicit in arming and enabling Israel's genocide in Gaza' should be National Party MP Chris Law said the allegations were 'shocking', but added the country was 'not seeing much better under Labour'.Bell Ribeiro-Addy, a Labour MP, called for an 'independent inquiry into the UK's role in the Gaza genocide'.Zack Polanski, the deputy leader of the Green Party, was cited by MEE as saying: 'It's been clear for all to see that both the former and current government have stood with the oppressors, not the marginalised.' When the ICC applied for the arrest warrants in May last year, the previous Conservative Party government, a strong backer of Israel, decried the move as 'not helpful in relation to reaching a pause in the fighting, getting hostages out or getting humanitarian aid in'. In July, the new Labour government, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, dropped the previous Rishi Sunak-led government's bid to challenge the ICC's power to seek the warrants, which were issued for Netanyahu, Gallant and three Hamas leaders in November.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store