Supreme Court allows DHS to remove protection status for half-million migrants
1 of 3 | Legal status in the United States can be lawfully revoked for more than a combined 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday. File Photo by Jemal Countess/UPI | License Photo
May 30 (UPI) -- Legal status in the United States can be lawfully revoked for more than a combined 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday.
The court only issued an unsigned dissenting opinion acknowledging the federal government can move ahead with its Termination of Parole Process for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans, commonly referred to as CHNV.
In March, President Donald Trump directed the Department of Homeland Security to revoke the legal status of 532,000 migrants under sponsorship programs, primarily from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
The migrants were granted legal protected status under former President Joe Biden's administration, a program Trump has attempted to wind down amid legal challenges.
A federal judge in Massachusetts last month granted a temporary order blocking Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem from revoking previously-granted parole to the protected migrants.
Earlier this month, Trump asked the Supreme Court to intervene and allow the government to remove protected status.
On Thursday, Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani ordered the Trump administration to restart processing applications under the migrant program.
Friday's Supreme Court ruling returns the issue to the lower courts, giving the Department of Homeland Security the ability to stop processing extension requests from migrants with current legal protections under CHNV while the legal process plays out.
"The Court has plainly botched this assessment today. It requires next to nothing from the Government with respect to irreparable harm. And it undervalues the devastating consequences of allowing the Government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending," the unsigned dissenting opinion states.
Two of the high court's liberal judges, Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor, dissented from the majority.
"Even if the Government is likely to win on the merits, in our legal system, success takes time and the stay standards require more than anticipated victory. I would have denied the Government's application because its harm-related showing is patently insufficient. The balance of the equities also weighs heavily in respondents' favor. While it is apparent that the Government seeks a stay to enable it to inflict maximum predecision damage, court-ordered stays exist to minimize-not maximize-harm to litigating parties," the dissenting opinion states.
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court ruled in a similar fashion when it allowed the Trump administration to revoke special legal protections for nearly 350,000 Venezuelan nationals living in the United States temporarily.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
32 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Stock market whipsaws on latest tariff tirade, triggers TACO trade
Investors may not be fans of stock market volatility, but that doesn't bother President Trump. His back-and-forth trade and tariff war updates have sent stocks on a roller coaster ride since he announced tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China in February. The stock market's nerve-racking swings include a 19% tumble from mid-February through early April, and a 20% rally since April 9, when Trump paused many reciprocal tariffs that rocked stocks after they were announced on April 2. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Investors have oscillated between pessimism that tariffs would send the U.S. into economic stagnation or recession, and optimism that negotiations would tame the worst of tariffs' bite. The seesaw pattern continued this week. Stocks tumbled on Friday, May 23, when Trump threatened 50% tariffs on the European Union, only to rally on Tuesday after Trump said he'd delay implementing them on the EU until July. The volatility continued on Friday, May 30. The S&P 500 lost over 1% at session lows after Trump made a bold accusation on China trade, only to recover most of the day's losses on hopes that cooler heads would again prevail over the weekend. Image source:The on-and-off again nature of Trump's trade war and the stock market's reaction to it has led to investors buying dips to profit from potential easing of rhetoric amid negotiations. Profitable dip buying has led to the coining of the "TACO" trade, where TACO stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out." The phrase is credited to Financial Times writer Robert Armstrong, who noticed the phenomenon. Related: Jamie Dimon sends terse message on stocks, economy The sell-off and rally from last Friday and Tuesday are perfect examples of the TACO trade in action. Trump made a huge, eye-popping threat, only to back away from it, claiming positive trade talk developments. Those who bought low on the S&P 500 last Friday and sold high on Tuesday pocketed a quick 2.7%. The returns were even better for those risk-tolerant enough to try their hands at technology stocks. Buying the dip in the Nasdaq 100 or high-flying artificial intelligence stock Palantir delivered 3.2% and 6%, respectively. Stocks' action on May 30 suggests many think that Trump's latest tough talk toward China may be similarly walked back, resulting in gains. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq finished May 30th up 1.3% and 1.5% from their intraday low. Palantir gained 6.1% from its low. President Trump kicked off a major trade war with China in April when he set reciprocal tariffs at 34%, bringing total tariffs to 54%, including the 'fentanyl' tariff. China responded in kind, and the tit-for-tat eventually left China's tariffs at 145% and China's US tariffs at 125%. Those rates were high enough to effectively shutter trade between the two economic giants, which caused ripples in supply chains, sending retailers heavily reliant on low-cost apparel and electronics scrambling. Related: Secretary Bessent sends message on Walmart price increases due to tariffs Absent relief, most began to assume a recession driven by tariff-driven inflation was inevitable. Those fears were mitigated when Trump surprised everyone, announcing he would roll back China tariffs to 30% on May 14 for 90 days in a sign of good faith after what appeared to be positive initial trade talks. Unfortunately, that optimism faded quickly after Trump delivered a stark rebuke of China on May 30. "Two weeks ago, China was in grave economic danger! The very high Tariffs I set made it virtually impossible for China to TRADE into the United States marketplace," wrote Trump on Truth Social. "I was what was happening and didn't like it, for them, not for us. I made a FAST DEAL with China... Everybody was happy!... The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!" More Economic Analysis: Hedge-fund manager sees U.S. becoming GreeceA critical industry is slamming the economyReports may show whether the economy is toughing out the tariffs Trump's frustration with China is evident, and the implications for markets aren't great. China may be negotiating tough, like Trump, so it may take longer to seal a deal, or the final agreement may not include much more in tariff relief. If so, recession worry will escalate. Stock market participants, however, don't seem concerned, embracing the TACO trade fully on Friday. Will that bet pay off? We'll have to wait and see if Trump's rhetoric eases over the coming days. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge blocks Trump administration from revoking protected status for thousands of Venezuelans
A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration from revoking the temporary protected status of roughly 5,000 Venezuelans who are in the U.S., despite Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's February decision to terminate a Biden-era extension of the program. U.S. District Judge Edward E. Chen in San Francisco ruled Friday that thousands of Venezuelans who received paperwork extending their protected status during a brief period earlier this year could keep it. That period began when then-Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas extended protected status for Venezuelans in January and ended when Noem terminated it in February. Chen wrote that if their paperwork has their protected status ending in October 2026, those Venezuelans should not be eligible for deportation while the case is ongoing. The National TPS Alliance and the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to NBC News' request for comment on Friday's order. It's the latest decision in a legal saga that could affect around 350,000 Venezuelans who in 2023 were granted the right to temporarily live and work in the U.S. The National TPS Alliance and seven Venezuelan TPS holders sued the Department of Homeland Security after Noem and the Trump administration stripped Venezuelans of their protected status shortly after the new president was inaugurated. In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs in the case alleged that Noem's decision was racially discriminatory and violated legal procedures. They also cited Mayorkas' decision in the waning days of the Biden administration to extend temporary protected status for Venezuelans through October 2026. After a federal judge overseeing the case blocked President Donald Trump and his administration from terminating protected status for Venezuelans while the court case played out, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene. And earlier this month, in a two-paragraph order, the United States' highest court allowed the Trump administration to revoke TPS for Venezuelans despite the ongoing case. The Trump administration's move to terminate legal status for Venezuelans under TPS comes amid a broader push for mass deportations. Since the start of the second Trump administration in January, the government has detained and deported tens of thousands of undocumented immigrants. And other deportation attempts have also drawn legal challenges, like the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man whom the administration admitted was mistakenly deported to El Salvador. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As Trump cuts FEMA, Florida says it will take care of residents
On the eve of hurricane season, Florida's top disaster official promised Floridians that they will see no changes to the state's hurricane response despite the turmoil at FEMA over staff cuts and proposed slashes to state disaster aid. Kevin Guthrie, the executive director of Florida's Division of Emergency Management, said it's not about money. Even if FEMA cuts the amount of cash it pays out to a state after a disaster, he stressed that state leaders 'have never, ever made decisions based on whether we're going to get reimbursed by the federal government.' 'You go out to protect life, safety. You go out to stabilize scenes. You go out to protect the environment. That is what we have been doing for decades inside Florida,' he said. 'That's what we're going to continue to do for the coming decades ahead.' READ MORE: Florida says it's ready for hurricane season, with or without FEMA's help Florida was smacked with two devastating storms last year, and forecasters say the upcoming hurricane season, which starts June 1, is set to be another active season. Greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, raising global temperatures that in turn lead to stronger, wetter and more deadly hurricanes. At a press conference Saturday in Fort Lauderdale, Guthrie said the state was fully prepared for the season — even if FEMA might not be. The agency is down more than 2,000 employees and a dozen senior leaders this year, as President Donald Trump pushes his new vision for the beleaguered agency. Part of that change involves shifting more responsibility — and costs — for disaster cleanup to the states. Already, FEMA has begun to act on that mission. Last week, the agency denied North Carolina's request to keep covering the entire tab for Hurricane Helene recovery. Instead, FEMA will continue helping with 75% of the costs, the bare minimum required. And yet, Guthrie said, Florida is prepared to accept the president's new vision for the agency, with the federal government still picking up the tab. It's unclear if Florida's annual budget includes more cash for storm recovery, as the legislature and governor have not yet agreed on one. Gov. Ron DeSantis asked Guthrie, as a member of the federal FEMA review council, to push FEMA to shift more of its state assistance to block grants that states like Florida can spend directly. Guthrie said the state is even considering preparing for the 'challenge' of directly giving cash to survivors after a disaster, a FEMA program known as individual assistance. 'We are already having these conversations about if the federal government allows us to run an individual assistance program, we're ready to get that done,' he said. 'We believe we can do it just as fast, if not faster than the federal government.'
