logo
Leaked files raise fears over safety of Shell oil production fleet, years after devastating spill

Leaked files raise fears over safety of Shell oil production fleet, years after devastating spill

Yahoo03-04-2025

Off the coast of Nigeria, one of the world's largest oil production ships, called the Bonga, was taking oil from a field on the ocean floor and transferring it to a tanker ship. Such transfers are routine in the offshore oil industry, but something went wrong on the Bonga, owned by energy giant Shell.
A major leak began in one of the lines that connected the two vessels. Over the next three hours, the crew detected that more oil was being pumped from the ship than the tanker was receiving. Another hour passed before an oily sheen was spotted on the water. An hour after that, the crew member in charge of the fueling shut off the flow.
By then, about 40,000 barrels of oil had escaped into the Atlantic Ocean, according to an English High Court evaluation, making the December 2011 incident one of Nigeria's worst spills in a decade. At the height of the spill, an oil slick spread over 685 square miles (1,776 square kilometers), twice the size of New York City. Nigerian regulators later fined the subsidiary Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company (SNEPCo) $3.6 billion, an amount being appealed today.
Now a confidential review of Shell's fleet of production ships, obtained by The Associated Press, plus internal company safety surveys and interviews with two whistleblowers, show that as recently as three years ago — almost 11 years after the Bonga spill — there were safety issues with the fleet, including the Bonga. The 2022 review found fault with the same systems involved in the Bonga spill. The whistleblowers said the problems risk another Bonga-type disaster.
Problems flagged with the Bonga
Oil production ships like the Bonga are a critical part of the offshore oil industry. Often permanently moored in one location, they take oil from wells on the ocean floor and transfer it to tankers.
The 2022 review of the Bonga was an attempt to address maintenance and safety problems in Shell's oil production ship flotilla. It was authored by Shell senior maritime auditor Zubair Ali Khan. It found issues on several ships, ranging from corrosion to bad upkeep and poor firefighting systems, and cited a 'lack of clear and established standards and processes.'
For example, the report noted 'continuously deficient" systems for oil transfer and firefighting and lifesaving equipment. Oil transfer systems are what had failed in the massive 2011 spill, and in 2022, the problems on the Bonga with oil transfer systems were deemed 'high risk.' Replying to a LinkedIn message, Khan declined to comment.
Tony Cox, an accident investigator with decades of experience in the offshore oil industry, said it was concerning that transfer problems persisted on the Bonga 11 years after the giant spill given that transfers are a 'recognized hazard' and 'well known to be a potential point of spillage.'
A Shell spokesman said by email that the company's safety record was continuously improving. Serious accidents aboard this ship have gone down from one per year on average to zero since 2018, Shell said, with less serious incidents reduced by 70% and spills by 90% since 2020. A total of 369 pieces of critical safety equipment were not in satisfactory condition in 2014, the spokesman said, dropping to two last year.
Shell did not respond when asked if all the recommendations in the report were adopted.
The review cited problems with other ships
Beyond the Bonga ship, the 2022 internal safety report said there were other 'recurring incidents.'
The report described 'severe corrosion' in pipes and protective barriers around oil tanks in the vessel Fluminense, off Brazil.
Two workers were left 'with moderate to severe burns' after an incident on a vessel off the U.S. coast in 2016.
There were 'degraded facilities' on the gas-producing ship Prelude anchored off Australia, where fire broke out in 2021. In 2023, more than a year after the safety report, problems on the Prelude persisted, according to Australian regulators who found health and safety violations related to 'exposure to chemicals and risk of an explosion.' They ordered improvements.
In the case of the Prelude, Shell said a dedicated local team of safety engineers and experts looked after the vessel but didn't provide more details.
Other incidents have been reported by regulators or in the press. For example, another Shell ship off Nigeria, the Sea Eagle, began to take on seawater in 2022 and needed urgent repairs, something Cox said was highly unusual for floating production vessels.
The company is currently in the midst of a wrongful dismissal lawsuit with a former employee, a safety engineer from London, whom Shell said was fired for poor performance. An interim court ruling leaned toward Shell's argument and a Shell spokesman said the company is 'clear about the merits of our case."
The former employee, Irina Woodhead, advised on safety standards aboard the Prelude. She said that in the 2021 fire incident off Australia, safety systems didn't activate. Seven people had to seek medical treatment for heat exhaustion, Shell said. Woodhead said she blew the whistle on safety failings and was fired for doing so.
'One mistake can cost a lot of lives,' Woodhead said, and a future disaster is 'absolutely' possible. 'If you don't maintain that equipment, that's when the fires happen, that's when the explosions happen.'
Regarding the Fluminense, off Brazil, a Shell spokesman said it identified problems, shut down production and took the vessel out of service. In the case of the Sea Eagle, off Nigeria, the spokesman said Nigerian regulators were promptly informed of the leak and it was swiftly repaired. The incident that left two workers with burns off the coast of the U.S. in 2016 isn't reflective of the company's overall safety culture, he said.
Internal surveys show concern about safety at Shell
Similar issues were raised in safety surveys carried out by statistician Caroline Dennett, a former Shell consultant. Beginning in 2012, she surveyed thousands of Shell workers on the company's safety culture. She quit in 2022 over Shell's climate policies and became an activist.
The surveys measured employees' perception of performance in 10 areas, including maintenance, communication and safety awareness. Surveys obtained by AP of 97, 159 and 128 workers on the Bonga, done in 2012, 2014 and 2021 respectively, show that employees' views of company performance overall dropped in nine categories.
The Bonga was problematic 'from day one," said Dennett, citing a lack of manpower, difficulty getting spare parts and falling standards.
'The fear was getting more severe over time as skilled personnel were not replaced,' she added.
The surveys also invited workers aboard the vessel to make their own comments. Based on these, in 2014, Dennett was concerned enough to write to a Shell manager, flagging worker fears that Bonga was a 'keg of gunpowder' and in 'impending peril,' with everyone on it 'at risk.' The manager promised to act.
The next year, a leaked memo by the operational safety team for Nigeria said the need for 'drastic improvements' was shown by the 2012 survey. They were also 'worried' by the 'thought provoking' 2014 survey, which had worse results.
In an email, Shell said safety has improved on the Bonga since the 2012 and 2014 surveys, when a worker described it as a powder keg.
Still, as recently as 2021, some 59% of workers on the Bonga thought maintenance needed either a lot of or some improvement. Another 3% said it was failing outright. Only 28% of team leaders felt positively about the levels of maintenance the company performed on its equipment. A majority, 57%, were concerned about the level of resources and expertise on the vessel.
In response, the company noted that more than 90% of those surveyed in 2021 felt positive about another category measured, the Bonga's safety processes, and the overwhelming majority felt comfortable speaking out about problems.
Internal emails seen by AP show Shell safety experts and lawyers had agreed that if 10% of workers thought a safety category was failing or needed considerable improvement, it would be considered 'legally critical.' The issue would then need to be resolved within 18 months. If that figure hit 20%, it would be urgent with a one-year deadline. The negative responses about the Bonga more than passed these thresholds.
But the company later eliminated these commitments, according to an email seen by AP. 'This steer comes from legal,' Shell health and safety advisor Bradd McCaslin wrote to another Shell safety manager in 2018. After that date, the thresholds disappeared from surveys reviewed by AP.
Safety reviews don't work if people don't make the suggested improvements, said safety expert Cox.
McCaslin did not respond to LinkedIn messages from AP seeking comment.
In internal correspondence from 2012, also seen by AP, Shell's U.S. operations chose not to use the surveys at all after a lawyer raised 'legal liability concerns.' The company said its common practice for legal teams to advise on processes, and it doesn't fall to just one team to direct how risk is managed.
Rich Howe, Shell's vice president for deep water operations, said a 'relentless focus on safety' was 'deeply ingrained in the Shell culture,' and its standards are 'widely recognized across the sector.'
'These documents are evidence of that culture," said Howe, speaking of the surveys and safety report. 'A company which is continually looking to strengthen safety performance by proactively seeking out problems or concerns that can then be addressed.'
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EWIA launches funding offering on Conda to drive solar business in Africa
EWIA launches funding offering on Conda to drive solar business in Africa

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

EWIA launches funding offering on Conda to drive solar business in Africa

Raising capital for growth, expansion, and diversification Tokenized participation certificate issuance Geschäftsmodell mit dreifachem Impact Munich/Accra, 10 June, 2025 – EWIA Green Investments launched a new financing round today on the digital financing platform Conda ( In order to raise additional equity capital for its growth strategy, the company is issuing tokenized participation certificates worth up to €2 million through a specially established special purpose vehicle (SPV). Since its founding in 2020, EWIA has become a major player in the commercial renewable energy segment in West Africa. Following the successful launch of solar financing and operation for commercial and industrial customers in Ghana, EWIA is now pushing ahead with expansion in Nigeria and Cameroon, as well as diversification into new business areas. 'Power generation is too expensive and dirty in large parts of Africa, and blackouts are a daily occurrence,' says co-founder and managing director Ralph Schneider. 'EWIA is helping to meet Africa's growing energy needs with clean, affordable, and reliable solar power.' In 2020, EWIA Green Investments launched in Ghana as a dedicated solar financier, helping medium-sized businesses transition from diesel generators to clean, cost-effective solar energy. By analyzing electricity demand and refinancing potential across various industries, EWIA designs tailored solar solutions that meet the specific needs of each EWIA also installs PV systems in-house, acting as an EPC project developer responsible for engineering, procurement, and construction. A subsidiary builds solar-powered telecom towers for mobile network operators Triple Impact Investment "By transferring capital and know-how to sub-Saharan Africa, we help local businesses operate more successfully, become more competitive, and create jobs — all crucial factors for both the economic and social development of a continent with the youngest and fastest-growing population in the world," says co-founder and managing director Timo Schäfer. "At the same time, we offer investors in Europe the opportunity to participate in the growth potential of this dynamic market." With subsidiaries currently operating in three African countries, EWIA itself already employs 76 staff — including 31 women — in highly skilled roles with long-term career prospects. Financing growth With the acquisition of SunErgy GmbH in April, EWIA expanded into Cameroon, where it is electrifying entire villages. SunErgy has been licensed by the Republic of Cameroon to establish solar power supplies for 92 villages with approximately 600,000 people, as well as schools, health centers, and private and public companies in the southwestern region of the country. As part of the transaction, investment and asset manager KGAL acquired a stake in EWIA. At the same time, EWIA is pressing ahead with its expansion into the Nigerian market – the continent's largest economy. Over the next five years, EWIA aims to expand its project portfolio to over €63 million and significantly increase its footprint in West Africa. Under the current offering, investors can subscribe to participation certificates in a special purpose vehicle that holds an interest in EWIA Green Investments GmbH for a minimum amount of €250 per share. The investment has no fixed term and is based on a company valuation of approximately €12.3 million. As with equity, investors participate in profits and in the development of the company's value in proportion to their share equivalent. Detailed information is available athttps:// With the funds from the newly launched offering, EWIA aims to solidify its market position through scalable operations, a stronger team of skilled professionals, and the continued development of the platform About EWIA Green Investments EWIA provides small and medium-sized businesses in Africa with access to clean solar energy and serves as a bridge builder to investors in Europe as well as for the transfer of technology know-how. Based in Munich, Germany, with operating entities in Ghana, Cameroon, and Nigeria, EWIA offers private and institutional investors access to attractive impact investments in the fight against climate change and for sustainable economic growth in Africa. Private investors can also invest specifically in solar projects via With EWIA's flexible full-service financing solution, companies in Africa have the opportunity to obtain solar power, financing, security and service from a single source. In the infrastructure sector, EWIA funds and constructs mobile phone communication masts and traffic monitoring systems and equips them with PV systems. Contact for queries: EWIA Green Investments GmbHRalph Schneider, 162 1366 984 Schwarz Financial CommunicationFrank Schwarzschwarz@ 611 58029290 Disclaimer: Not for publication in the United States, Australia, Canada, Japan, South Africa, or any other jurisdiction outside the EU, and in particular in jurisdictions that prohibit the offering or sale of these instruments. Risk warning: The purchase of this investment involves significant risks, including the possibility of total loss. Please inform yourself thoroughly before investing and seek professional advice. Detailed explanations can be found at Conda Capital in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Nigeria loses $4m in World Bank funding over audit failures at key agencies
Nigeria loses $4m in World Bank funding over audit failures at key agencies

Business Insider

time8 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Nigeria loses $4m in World Bank funding over audit failures at key agencies

Nigeria is set to lose $4 million in financial support from the World Bank after failing to meet international auditing standards tied to a key fiscal reform program. Nigeria will lose $4 million in World Bank support for failing international auditing standards. The loss is connected to incomplete revenue assurance audits for fiscal years 2018-2021. Despite challenges, reforms improved fiscal transparency through initiatives such as an Electronic Register of Beneficial Owners. The loss comes amid inadequacies in the revenue assurance audit reports submitted by two major government agencies, which include the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and the Nigeria Customs Service, covering financial years 2018 to 2021. This penalty is part of the broader $103 million Fiscal Governance and Institutions Project, a public financial management initiative financed through a credit facility from the World Bank 's International Development Association (IDA). The program was designed to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency in Nigeria's public sector, with specific reforms tied to performance-based disbursements. Among them was a target to conduct revenue assurance audits of FIRS and Customs in compliance with international best practices. However, a restructuring paper released by the World Bank in June 2025 revealed that this milestone was 'not achieved.' According to the report, the audit submissions did not meet the required international auditing standards, thereby disqualifying Nigeria from accessing the $4 million linked to that particular result. Progress recorded amid audit lapses The failure is a blow to the federal government's broader economic reform agenda, especially at a time when Nigeria is grappling with revenue shortfalls, high debt service costs, and an urgent need to improve fiscal governance. Nigeria's failure to meet key auditing standards has also hindered its economic reform agenda, particularly amid revenue shortfalls and high debt obligations. However, the report noted that progress has been made in non-oil revenue, exceeding targets with a 153% outturn in 2024, up from 64.9% in 2018. The Nigerian government also published 10 validated economic data sets, surpassing expectations. Despite challenges in capital expenditure and project monitoring, reforms have enhanced transparency, including the launch of an Electronic Register of Beneficial Owners and a National Asset Registry.

Why China Is Pursuing Domestic Shale Gas
Why China Is Pursuing Domestic Shale Gas

Forbes

time15 hours ago

  • Forbes

Why China Is Pursuing Domestic Shale Gas

Drilling operations for the first shale gas development demonstration project in Guangxi are ... More underway in Hedong Village, Liuzhou City, Guangxi Province, China, on June 2, 2023. (Photo by Costfoto/NurPhoto via Getty Images) China is today the world's leading importer of both oil and natural gas, and, by all accounts, it is not happy with the situation. If its demand for oil might be reduced by a surging electric vehicle industry, the natural gas side has a different possible solution. The U.S. Energy Information Administration published estimates in 2015 that show China with the largest shale gas resources of any nation. The figure of 1,115 trillion cubic feet is nearly twice the 623 tcf assessed for the U.S., where the 'shale revolution' began in the early 2000s, transforming America itself from a major importer to the world's biggest exporter in a single decade. Still, the scale of the resource has been confirmed and yearly production, though small by U.S. standards, has grown impressively by more than 20% each year over the past decade. Chinese leaders hoped for a similar transformation when the country's shale gas program began in the early 2010s. Geology and other factors have held this back, moderating Beijing's expectations. Shale got its start in China when companies like Shell, BP, and Chesapeake Energy helped introduce Western knowledge and technology. Through joint ventures, partnerships, and investments in companies active in U.S. drilling, Chinese national firms like Sinopec and PetroChina gained access to valuable expertise. Between 2010 and 2016, drilling established several gas fields and set the foundation for a larger exploration program. Research on individual shale zones and use of updated technology were key parts of this progress. If China is going to win the global race for economic dominance, then shale gas will likely play a crucial role in domestic energy markets. How Shale Gas Differs In China Vs. The U.S. Geology argues that no two shales are alike. This proved especially true in China's case when compared with such U.S. producers as the Bakken Shale in North Dakota and the Wolfcamp shales of the Permian Basin. The highest quality gas shales, found in the Sichuan Basin in the southern part of the country, are thinner, older, deeper, and more highly faulted and fractured. Wells therefore take more time and are more expensive to drill. The technologies used in the hydraulic fracturing process ('fracking') sometimes need to be modified. In some of China's geologic basins located in dry areas, moreover, there are water supply challenges due to the large volumes needed for fracking. Even when everything goes well and there are no 'surprises,' the total amount of gas recovered over time is less than for the average U.S. well. Such comparisons, though, aren't really fair or helpful, given the differences just noted. Moreover, it can't be denied that Chinese companies are still new to the business of drilling the more complex and demanding wells in the Sichuan Basin. Sinopec and PetroChina, the main companies involved in shale development, have taken a measured approach in the Sichuan and other basins as well. Technical reports indicate that around 3,000 shale gas wells were drilled between 2012 and 2022, an order of magnitude less than the dozens of U.S. companies who pioneered the first gas shale play, the Barnett, during its initial five years, 2000-2005. The Future of Shale Gas In China Beijing's plans are for shale gas production to grow from around 0.9 tcf in 2024 to as much as 3.5 tcf by 2040. That is far from making China an exporter, given that it consumed 15 tcf in 2024 and is predicted to increase this figure by 50% or more over the next decade-and-a-half. Yet the growth in shale gas has been more rapid than planned or expected. It now seems possible, given large new discoveries, that it could play a key role in reducing China's import burden going forward. Energy security is therefore a major reason why the government wants to continue expanding the shale gas program. Oil and gas are still strategic resources in today's world, and any powerful state deeply dependent on others for their supply will view this as a national security concern. A second reason for Beijing's commitment has to do with climate change: China's coal use and carbon emissions are both greater than those of North America and the European Union combined. In a manner of speaking, any decision China makes about its fossil fuel use translates as a global impact, positive or negative. Any such decision that significantly reduces coal consumption in particular will reduce emissions. Here is not the place to do a deep dive on the question of China's concern for the climate, but a recent survey by the European Investment Bank shows that 73% of Chinese people feel climate change defines the number one challenge facing society, compared with just 39% in the U.S. and only 47% in Europe. Finally, it can be argued that, from the Chinese point of view, success breeds itself. The shale gas resource is simply too vast to ignore, and concrete results have been better than anticipated. For more than two decades, a central goal of government five-year plans has been to develop China's domestic energy resources. Despite a tentative start, shale gas is now a growing part of the plan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store