Political polls would have to disclose sponsors under a GOP senator's bill
SB 528 would require pollsters to disclose their sponsors. (Stock photo by)
Miami-Dade Republican Sen. Bryan Avila filed a bill Thursday requiring political pollsters to inform people who sponsored the poll before collecting responses.
The bill, SB 528, would punish pollsters who don't disclose who is paying for the poll with a fine of up to $1,000 or up to a year in jail. Pollsters must include the disclosure at the beginning of polls conducted over text, at the beginning of a phone call, and in bold font of at least 12 points in emails.
Polling operations out Florida Atlantic University and the University of North Florida wouldn't see much of a change if the bill passed, their directors told the Florida Phoenix.
'[The bill] didn't faze me too much,' Kevin Wagner, co-director of the Florida Atlantic University Political Communication and Public Opinion Research Lab, said in a phone interview. 'As a matter of course, in both our intro and our outro, which is when we introduce a poll and when we leave, we always say Main Street research on behalf of Florida Atlantic University, so we do this anyway.'
Michael Binder, who leads UNF's Public Opinion Research Lab, said the proposal wasn't likely to increase transparency.
'If you're trying to root out nefarious actors, I'm not sure how much this is going to help because they're just going say, 'This poll is paid for by the Democracy Fund or America Fund,' or whatever made-up name that given organization sticks on itself, so it's not gonna necessarily be super transparent about who is actually doing it anyway,' Binder said.
Both polling experts said it could be harder for political parties and some candidates with fewer resources to conduct polls if the bill passed.
'Let's say you're polling for a political party and if you say, 'I'm doing this for the Republicans or the Democrats.' It may bias the people who are likely to respond to it or they may respond differently, and that could affect the kind of data that you could collect,' Wagner said.
Avila's office did not respond to the Phoenix's requests for comment.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
37 minutes ago
- Washington Post
What is next for American universities?
In his May 30 Friday Opinion column, 'Republicans want to tax the Ivy League into submission,' Perry Bacon Jr. fretted that increasing the current 1.4 percent tax on the net investment income of the largest private endowments in the nation would somehow 'hurt not only students and faculty at those schools but the country overall.' This is like worrying that closing the carried interest loophole would mean the end of Wall Street.
The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
Homan warns California officials can be arrested if they disrupt ICE raids
Border czar Tom Homan on Sunday warned California officials could face arrest and prosecution if they 'cross the line' following President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles to quell ongoing immigration protests. Trump ordered at least 2,000 National Guard members to assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents after two days of clashes with demonstrators, despite state and city leaders saying they had not asked for assistance. Homan said Trump's order was not only to protect law enforcement officers but also to 'protect this community.' 'The rhetoric is so high against ICE officers in this city that it's a matter of time before someone gets seriously hurt,' Homan told NBC News's Jacob Soboroff in an interview slated for broadcast Sunday night. 'We've got help coming, and we're going to do our job, and we're going to continue doing that job.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats, have criticized Trump's decision to call in the National Guard, warning it only risks escalating tensions. Both also pointed out on Sunday that Trump had posted about the National Guard's 'great job' before any troops had arrived in L.A. When Soboroff asked if Homan's past threats to arrest anyone who stood in the way of Trump's enforcement operations were directed at Newsom and Bass, Homan clarified he would 'say that about anybody.' 'It's a felony to knowingly conceal and harbor an illegal alien,' Homan said. 'It's a felony to impede law enforcement from doing their job.' Homan said he didn't think Bass had 'crossed the line yet,' but added 'we will ask DOJ to prosecute' if needed. 'What we're saying is we're not going to tolerate people attacking our officers,' he added. On Sunday morning, Newsom, in a post on X, claimed the federal government is 'taking over the California National Guard' because 'they want a spectacle.' 'Don't give them one. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully,' he added. In the NBC News interview, Homan bashed Newsom's comments and called him 'an embarrassment for the state.' 'I have absolutely no respect for this governor,' Homan said. 'Criminal aliens are walking in this state every day because of his government policy. I don't care what the governor thinks of me. I'm not running a popularity contest.'
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
DNC chair, almost crying, claims David Hogg is making it impossible to lead party: ‘No one knows who the hell I am'
DNC Chair Ken Martin vented about party Vice Chairman and Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg to the point of near tears in a recent call with top Dem brass, saying, 'No one knows who the hell I am. 'I'll be very honest with you: For the first time in my 100 days on this job, the other night I said to myself for the first time, 'I don't know if I wanna do this anymore,' ' Martin bluntly admitted in leaked audio of the May 15 Zoom meeting, which was obtained by Politico, Martin, who was elected boss of the Democratic National Committee in February, bemoaned the shadow that Hogg cast over him by igniting a firestorm within the party over his plans to fund primary challenges against incumbent Dems. Advertisement 'No one knows who the hell I am, right?' Martin said during the call, in which he singled out Hogg, who was in the meeting. 'I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to put ourselves in a position to win,' the chairman said. 'I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to,' he said, directly addressing Hogg. 'So it's really frustrating.' Advertisement 3 Ken Martin didn't mince words about his frustrations with DNC Vice Chair David Hogg in leaked audio. AP 3 Hogg has been working to fund Democratic primaries against safe DEM incumbents despite his role as a party's vice chair. Getty Images for Fast Company Toward the end of the leaked audio, Martin's voice grew softer, and he paused at least twice, appearing to be on the verge of choking up. The DNC boss told Hogg, 'I deeply respect you' and 'was looking forward to working with you' while griping about the dilemma that the 25-year-old school mass-shooting survivor created. Advertisement Martin, referring to the state of the DNC, said, 'It has plenty of warts, and we're all trying to change those, for sure, but the longer we continue this fight, the harder it is for us to actually do what we all want to do, which is make a difference in this country again.' About 10 people were reportedly on the call. The Post reached out to the DNC and Hogg for comment. Hogg later posted text messages with the Politico reporter who broke the story as evidence that he didn't leak the audio. Advertisement Martin was meanwhile adamant that 'I'm not going anywhere' after the leaked audio surfaced. 'I took this job to fight Republicans, not Democrats,' he said in a statement obtained by Politico. 'As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda. 'That's the work that I will continue to do every day.' Hogg announced in April that his 'Leaders We Deserve' group would shell out about $20 million to meddle in Democratic primaries located in safe districts to edge out what it considers complacent incumbents in favor of ones who are more feisty. 3 Hogg has argued that the party needs to become more combative. Getty Images Last month, Hogg's group made its first endorsement, backing Illinois state Sen. Robert Peters (D) for the seat held by US Rep. Robin Kelly (D-Ill.), in Illinois' 2nd Congressional District. Kelly is running to replace retiring Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) in 2026. Many Democrats are incensed that Hogg is attempting to retain his role as a vice chair at the DNC and intervene in primaries at the same time. Hogg is one of three vice chairs. As with the Republican National Committee, the DNC provides candidates with resources and strategic assistance and is generally expected to be neutral in party primaries. Advertisement 'Our job is to be neutral arbiters,' Martin previously said in another leaked April call. 'We can't be both the referee and also the player at the same time.' Martin had pressured Hogg to either sign a neutrality pledge or step down from his highly coveted perch. Last month, around the time of the leaked Martin Zoom call, the DNC Credentials Committee heard complaints that Hogg and fellow Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta were improperly elected to their positions in February. The complaint was furnished by Oklahoma DNC member Kalyn Free, who pointed to committee rules calling for the party to have as close to gender parity as possible. She argued that the election of Hogg and Kenyatta flouted those rules. Advertisement The DNC subpanel recommended that the party hold new elections for the vice chair positions to rectify that issue. All of that controversy has clouded the DNC's efforts to go on the offensive against Republicans and President Trump amid deep soul-searching within the party over what went awry during the 2024 presidential election.
