Contractors, business owners raise alarm over city's new wetlands ordinance
WESTFIELD — A group of area contractors, developers and business owners, alerted by Rob Levesque, owner of R. Levesque Associates, urged the Westfield City Council to revisit the changes made recently to the city's wetlands ordinance by the Conservation Commission that they claim will take thousands of acres of developable land off the map.
The requests were made during public participation at the June 5 City Council meeting when Levesque and several other business owners came to the podium to ask for the review.
'As a land consultant and owner of property and as a business that represents properties, we are very concerned with the new wetlands protection ordinance,' said Levesque. He said more than 125 people signed a petition, and several others wrote letters to the mayor and City Council on the issue.
John Raymaakers, a local business owner of J.L. Raymaakers & Sons, said as a taxpayer, the new ordinance would stop one of the larger projects that is in the final stages that would bring hundreds of thousands of dollars of revenue into the city. 'The problem for our city, for all of you, has been tax income and deficit. Our schools are being hurt. This is just another step to hurt us as a town. I'm all for protecting the environment, all for that. I don't see how this change affects anything but hurting our town,' he said.
'As a contractor, this hurts my business tremendously, and stops projects that I've spent countless hours of time on with Rob, with the owner, with clients. I just fully disagree with this and I'd like you to take that into consideration,' Raymaakers added.
Also speaking was Robert Goyette, owner of Heritage Homes and Charles Pignatare, owner of Liberty Manor.
Goyette said he was there about the overreach of the wetlands protection ordinance. 'We as a company own a significant amount of land in town. As stakeholders, we had zero say in this — I was made aware of it by Rob — it impacts us significantly, to the millions. Thank you for hearing us, and I appreciate you revisiting it,' he said.
'I'm definitely begging you guys to review this. I'm in the construction business with the Scarfo family for 54 years. This is one of the worst,' said Pignatare. 'This is one of the worst situations I've seen us getting into, but hopefully we're able to do it correctly.'
Councilor Dan Allie asked a question of Levesque through the chair of which specific portion of the ordinance they would like to see changed.
Levesque said there are a number of items that have changed, some of major concern. 'I believe a list of the items that have changed would be very eye opening for the City Council. I know it's hard when you get a document and frankly, if you're not reading wetlands protections documents every day like we do, you don't realize what it necessarily impacts or doesn't impact. We all want to protect the wetlands in a proper way and there's science based performance standards that are in place to do that under the Wetlands Protection Act and under the previous ordinance, which we've never had a problem with,' he said.
'We understand this is a very significant overreach and it's not just what we spoke about in the petition, but there are other aspects related to enforcement and control that this gives to the Conservation Commission that are pretty aggressive,' Levesque added.
Councilor Rick Sullivan raised a point of order saying since the item was not on the agenda, he would make a motion to add it to the agenda at the next meeting and refer it to the proper committees.
After the meeting, Levesque explained what he considers the problems with the new ordinance. He said the biggest thing is jurisdictional overreach. He said the council drastically increased the jurisdiction of the Conservation Commission by thousands of acres in the city by passing the ordinance, which gives the power to the commission to create regulations that the City Council won't have a vote on.
'The ordinance gives Conservation a blank check so essentially they can write whatever they want for regulations,' Levesque said.
He referred to the last paragraph of the petition signed by more than 125 business owners which reads, 'Our community deserves thoughtful, science-based environmental protections that do not come at the cost of property rights, due process, and fairness. The current course of action by the Conservation Commission and specifically the Director of Conservation threatens to undermine all three.'
Levesque also referred to a letter given to the City Council from Green Miles Lipton Attorney Michael Pill, which he said claims the ordinance was done erroneously.
'This new ordinance, which amends the City's Code of Ordinances related to the protection of wetlands, imposes extensive new jurisdictional and procedural requirements that raise serious questions about its legality, practicality, and equity. Ordinance No. 1773 exposes the Conservation Commission and the city to potential litigation that would be a waste of time and money for everyone,' according to the letter.
Another letter from Ryan Ratledge, CEO of the Pioneer Valley Railroad Company, an 18-mile short-line railroad, headquartered in the city of Westfield, referred to their significant concerns about the expanded authority now being applied to intermittent streams.
Ratledge said the PVRR provides a real service for several Westfield customers, such as Lowe's, James Hardie, ProAmpac and A. Duie Pyle, among others; and owns property slated for industrial development projects that he said will bring jobs and grow the local tax base.
Ratledge requested a balanced review of the recent amendments to the Westfield wetlands protection ordinance, and said the current course of action by the Conservation Commission would impact their ability to recruit industry and have adverse effects for their business and the community as a whole.
After the meeting, Levesque said he normally doesn't get involved in this way. 'You've never really seen me get involved, but this is so egregious — thousands of acres and millions of dollars in future revenue. The last ten projects that I've done, if those regulations were in place, they probably would have killed them,' he said.
'All of our projects in Westfield are on hold until this gets resolved,' Levesque added.
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
More than 30 arrested at immigration protest in Spokane sparked by arrest of 2 immigrants
Jun. 12—Immigration protests erupted in Spokane on Wednesday, sparking a massive police response and 30 arrests. Mayor Lisa Brown issued a 9:30 p.m. curfew for perhaps 1,000 protestors who flooded Riverfront Park and surrounding downtown streets. It's the first such measure since the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests in the wake of George Floyd's murder. The curfew and police presence had the desired effect as most of the crowd dispersed. By 11 p.m. about 20 protesters remained. "We want everybody to be safe and we thought this was the best path forward in order to achieve that," Brown said. "I made the decision that the safest course of action was by Spokane Police, not ICE, to try to safely disperse the crowd." She made the call in response to hundreds of demonstrators who blocked federal immigration enforcement agents in Spokane on Wednesday evening from leaving a downtown immigration office reportedly with refugees who were detained at court hearings earlier in the day. Spokane Police Chief Kevin Hall said at a late-night news conference that while it appeared that officers deployed tear gas, it was actually smoke grenades. He also said Spokane police officers used pepper balls but did not fire rubber bullets. He said about 185 city officers responded to both incidents. Hall said that he not heard that any other law enforcement agency used rubber bullets. "Certainly there were peaceful folks demonstrating and utilizing their First Amendment rights, and there were also people in the crowd who were committing crimes," Hall said. The protest is arguably the most extreme local showing of resistance, among others in Los Angeles and across the country, to President Donald Trump's sweeping immigration crackdowns since he took office for the second time in January. The day of unrest began on Cataldo Avenue after former City Council President Ben Stuckart sent a social media post at about 1 p.m. asking "that if you care at all about these illegal detainers you meet me at 411 West Cataldo by 2 p.m. I am going to set in front of the bus. Feel free to join me .... "The Latino community needs the rest of our community. Not tonight, not Saturday but right now!!!!" Stuckart was responding to the arrest of 21-year-old Cesar Alexander Alvarez Perez, who is seeking asylum from Venezuela, and Joswar Slater Rodriguez Torres, a Colombian national also in his early twenties. Stuckart said he officially became the Venezuelan's legal guardian three weeks ago, and arrived with him and the man from Colombia for a scheduled "check-in" appointment at the Spokane facility this morning. The two were in the United States on work visas and had full-time employment at the Walmart in Airway Heights until Friday, when their "work permits were revoked," he said. Both young men are hard workers who have been diligent about following the legal process and building better lives, Stuckart said. "You can't help spend time with them and not understand just what great young men they are," Stuckart said. "They've done everything right, and they're escaping horrible situations, and then to have them come in for a checkup and be detained illegally is morally reprehensible." For the first few hours, most of the demonstration remained peaceful, aside from a masked person who covered the driver's side of the bus windshield with a layer of white spray paint about a half hour into the demonstration. More than a dozen protestors joined Stuckart despite warnings from a pair of uniformed federal agents who came out of the building to warn the crowd that obstructing their pathway could lead to arrests and charges. Protesters responded by parking their vehicles in front and behind the bus. "I don't want this bus to leave with my friends," Stuckart said. "And I told everybody I was down here, and if people wanted to join me, they could. It's not right. It's not morally right, what's happening." The Cataldo crowd included several prominent politicians, activists and community leaders, including Spokane County Democratic Party Chair Naida Spencer; state Rep. Timm Orsmby; Spokane City Council candidate Sarah Dixit; union advocate and a former Democratic candidate for local, state and federal offices Ted Cummings; Thrive International Director Mark Finney and Latinos en Spokane Director Jennyfer Mesa. While the protestors share a desire to see the young men let go, and frustrations with federal immigration enforcement, they disagreed as to how. Some were a silent presence, others carried signs and chanted, while others were more direct in showing their displeasure by shouting at the law enforcement officers. The disconnect became evident as barriers were formed in front of the gated parking lot using benches, cones and Lime scooters, taken down by others and then reformed in front of the line of Spokane police and Spokane County Sheriff's deputy cars next to the building. Mesa said both of the young men are clients of Latinos en Spokane. But her presence Wednesday was meant as a gesture for her friends, not just her clients. "They're good kids," she said, choking back tears. "They have been volunteering, they're doing the process and everything legally. I just don't understand why they're being detained." Stuckart said the federal employees in the ICE office would not allow him to accompanying Alvarez Perez during his appointment and they did not disclose why either young men were being detained. Stuckart estimated it took around seven minutes from when they went back for their appointment for federal officials to come out and inform him they were being detained. "And each of them has a stack of legal paperwork at least 2 inches thick, with all their asylum paperwork and their guardianship paperwork, and they clearly didn't look at it," Stuckart said. "They just said, 'We're detaining them.'" Stuckart said he started the legal guardianship process earlier this year after a call from Latinos en Spokane for local residents to assist local "vulnerable juveniles." He volunteers with the organization regularly and said he has greatly enjoyed getting to know Alvarez Perez, who's lived in Spokane for six months. Alvarez Perez came to Spokane by way of Miami, after walking through nine countries on his way from Venezuela and meeting Rodriguez Torres along the way. Stuckart said his main responsibility as a guardian is to provide mentorship. "He's not living with us, and I'm not in charge of his finances or anything," Stuckart said. The gathering grew to about 100 people at about 5 p.m., including about 15 blocking the bus. Stuckart was not in front of the bus at the time, but he remained at the protest. Among the protestors was Alicea Gonzalez, 27, who brought her 5-year-old son Javell and father, Adam Betancort, 46. She wore a Mexico T-shirt to the protest, and the pair brought flags, one of Mexico, the other half-Mexican, half-American. The latter flag is representative of Betancourt and his identity, he said while holding the flapping fabric towards passing cars on the corner of Cataldo Ave and Washington Street, right outside the ICE facility. "I'm American and I'm a Mexican," he said. Though they don't know either of the men detained by ICE, they're familiar with their story; Gonzalez's maternal grandmother crossed the U.S.-Mexico border in the 1950s, floating across the river in a car tire, she said. Betancort's parents are also immigrants from Mexico. "I appreciate that; I wouldn't have the life that I live without her," Gonzalez said. "So I'm just showing my support, letting people know that they have people out here that will stand behind them, and use their voices to speak up for them." Around 5:25 p.m., a group of roughly 150 protesters ran around the back of the building to obstruct three unmarked law enforcement vehicles from leaving a fenced-in parking area abutting the public parking area for Riverfront Park. Protesters shouted "Shame" repeatedly and about 10 of them linked arms in a line in front of the parking lot gate. A handful of agents, faces covered by ski masks and sunglasses, began to push the human chain of demonstrators, knocking their glasses and handmade signs scattering on the ground. Protestors and officers shoved each other in a mass of yelling and chanting for about a minute before the agents retreated into their parking lot and the gate closed. Not long after the agents retreated back inside, a handful of protesters hauled Lime scooters and park benches as a barricade to block vehicles from leaving from the gate. Spokane Police officers arrived shortly before 6:30 p.m., followed by Spokane County sheriff's deputies. The local law enforcement response grew to dozens outside the building by about 6:45 p.m. The group then formed a sort of protective barrier for an exit on the Washington Street side of the building. They carried weapons to shoot less-lethal munitions, with what appeared to be tear gas canisters and large hip bags with unidentified materials inside. As the officers widened their perimeter to encompass much of the yard abutting the Washington Street side of the building, another group of deputies and officers began forcibly removing protestors from around the small bus. A Spokane Police Department officer spoke over the regional SWAT car speaker system at 7:13 p.m. and ordered everyone present to disperse. The officer gave the demonstrators five minutes to do so. Few left the scene when police warned at 7:22 p.m. that they would use force if the crowd did not leave. Stuckart, Spencer and at least a dozen others were arrested just after 7:30 p.m. Brown said she talked with Stuckart earlier in the day and it was clear he was prepared to get arrested in an attempt to prevent the bus from leaving. She also consulted with Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and connected Stuckart to Nick Brown. "Ben did inform me that members of his group intended to peacefully protest, and they intended to stay at the facility until they were arrested," she said at the conference. The mayor said she told Stuckart that Spokane police would comply with the Keep Washington Working Act, strive to keep the peace and "enforce Spokane laws." The Keep Washington Working Act restricts state and local law enforcement in Washington from assisting federal immigration enforcement. She said that arresting protesters blocking immigration detainees from being jailed is not a violation of the state law because protestors were violating other city laws, like blocking the public right-of-way. She said protesters were warned repeatedly if they were violating laws before arrests were made. "The vast majority were peaceful, expressing their viewpoints as they have every right to do and compliant with officers," Brown said. "There's serious concerns about federal policies. We want people to feel free to express those concerns and we want to keep everyone safe." Police began detaining the 15 or so demonstrators who enveloped an unmarked red van with two ICE officers in the front seat. The windows of the van were tinted, but protestors thought it may soon carry the two men ICE detained. Police warned the demonstrators if they didn't move, they'd be arrested for obstruction. The 15, including Stuckart, had prepared to be arrested, writing phone numbers up their arms and leaving belongings with other protesters. Some went willingly, quietly putting their own hands behind their back as officers led them one by one to a SWAT car parked nearby. One protestor resisted their detainment, wriggling and contorting themselves while yelling as multiple officers pinned them to the group and tied their hands and feet. Eventually, each person who enveloped the red van was detained. Someone deflated one of the van's tires and it was towed off hours later after police had dispersed the crowd in that area. A second, planned protest at Riverfront Park escalated hours after the Stuckart-led event and riot-clad officers began shooting tear gas and making arrests, with the two eventually merging. Harris Kahler, a 23-year-old protestor said he was standing in the front lines when officers pulled out paint guns and shot the ground in front of the line around 8:40 p.m. After that, smoke canisters were thrown and Kahler kicked one back in response. Kahler then went to grab another, turned around and believed he was shot in the lower back with a rubber bullet. "I'm in a lot of pain, but if I physically have to be here, I'll be the shield I got to be," Kahler said. In a telephone interview, City Council President Betsy Wilkerson said she acknowledged the right of everyone to protest. "If I wasn't somewhere else, I might be there myself to support our sisters and brothers," she said. "I'm just hoping for the best outcome, elevating the issue and getting people involved in the way they feel they best can, and that's a protest. "With that being said, we're not trying to throw more wood on this fire, to elevate it to more than a peaceful protest." Reached by phone, City Councilman Jonathan Bingle said he fully supports the right of every American to peacefully protest. "It's one of the rights that makes our country so great! But, the moment a protest turns into small vandalism, threats, or lawlessness, it is no longer protected speech. It becomes a crime, and should be dealt with as such," Bingle said. "I am stunned by the position of some of our current and former elected officials in our city. Instead of standing for the rule of law and the officers who keep our streets safe, they seem more interested in scoring points or justifying bad behavior. That is not leadership." City Councilman Paul Dillon in an interview that he supported those who were willing to stand up for their beliefs. "No human being is illegal," he said. "This is a direct result of the escalation and fears the Trump administration inflicts on communities which create chaos." Reporters Elena Perry, Thomas Clouse, Emry Dinman and Corbin Vanderby contributed to this report. Elena Perry's work is funded in part by members of the Spokane community via the Community Journalism and Civic Engagement Fund. This story can be republished by other organizations for free under a Creative Commons license. For more information on this, please contact our newspaper's managing editor.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Northport candidates have deadline to file in time for August election
For Northport's Aug. 26 municipal election, in which the mayor's and all five council seats are open, the window for the municipal elections manager to accept statements of candidacy opened June 10 and closes 5 p.m. June 24. Incumbent Mayor John Hinton has announced he won't be seeking re-election. One of the first to state his intent to run was Dale Phillips, a retired law enforcement officer. Phillips is running for mayor, an office he'd previously sought in 2020. Of the incumbents, District 3's Karl Wiggins and District 4's Jamie Dykes have announced re-election plans. Other incumbent councilors include Christy Bobo, District 1, also the council president; Woodrow Washington, District 2; and Anwar Aiken, District 5. More: Northport Mayor John Hinton says he won't seek re-election Those announcing intent to run for those offices include Turnley Smith for District 1; Zach Stone for District 2; Jamie Conger for District 3; Holt Clark for District 4; and Danny Higdon for District 5. To qualify as candidates, Northport citizens must be residents for 90 days or more preceding Aug. 26, fill out paperwork and pay fees. Those seats have been hot ones since summer 2023, when loud opposition arose to the council's plan for selling the 70-year-old Northport Community Center Park, to developers hoping to build a mixed residential and retail site. After six months' due diligence period, the proposal was dropped that December. That fall, the Kentuck Art Center, struggling with the council's proposed contract for 2024 and beyond, announced they were seeking a new home for its annual centerpiece festival. For the first time in its more than fived-decade existence, the Kentuck Festival of the Arts moved out of Northport's Kentuck Park, and into Tuscaloosa's recently renovated Snow Hinton Park. The 2025 54th Kentuck Festival of the Arts will return to Snow Hinton Park, Oct. 11-12. Residents also vociferously objected to what some termed a "bait-and-switch," when the council evolved its University Beach plan from a relatively modest 11-acre water park to a 76.2-acre mutli-use site, planned at a cost of about $350 million. In May, the council voted 3-2 to approve a rezoning request and special district plan, despite again heated objections. Texas-based developer Kent Donahue has offered images and information projecting a 10-acre lagoon, water park, hotel, dining, retail, residential facilities, and spaces for performance, rental events and a conference center. In March 2024, Jeff Hogg, former city council president, announced he was stepping down, due to ongoing threats and harassment. The controversies drew overflow council meetings, at Northport's City Hall, and spurred creation of the Northport Political Action Committee, whose platforms include strengthening community engagement, ensuring transparent and accountable government, fiscal stability, infrastructure investments, economic development, sustainable growth, enhanced community spaces, and competitive and fair-step raises for city employees. NPAC has endorsed in all the races: Phillips, Smith, Stone, Conger, Dykes and Higdon. On Tuesday Aug. 26, the polls will be open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. CDT at each of the district polling locations: District 1: Northport City Hall, 3500 McFarland Blvd. District 2: New Zion Missionary Baptist Church, 1317 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. District 3: Daystar Family Church, 3975 Watermelon Road District 4: Northport Fire and Rescue Station No. 2, Union Chapel Road District 5: Flatwoods Baptist Church, 4520 70th Ave. If runoffs are necessary, they will be held Sept. 23. Reach Mark Hughes Cobb at This article originally appeared on The Tuscaloosa News: June 24 deadline set for Northport council, mayor candidates
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former Topeka city councilman Brendan Jensen wants to represent District 1
A former Topeka City Council member could make a comeback, this time in a different district. Former District 6 councilman and business owner Brendan Jensen has since moved to downtown Topeka and wants to run for District 1 because he's not happy with how the city is being run. "I'm getting in the race to try and you know, help solve some of these things," Jensen said. "One of the misnomers about the city council is everybody assumes if you get elected, you can instantly solve problems, and that's not the case. You are one of nine of the council people, plus the mayor is 10 on the governing body, and you have to work with that team to accomplish things." Jensen said he wants to focus on everything public safety — like addressing homelessness and ensuring the police department being fully staffed will be the No. 1 priority for the city. "Our ability to to protect our own citizens and help the people who need help, that's always job one," Jensen said. "Public safety is the most important thing we do." He also said a big issue is that Topeka isn't growing its population, which means residents are taking the brunt of the property tax weight as costs inflate. "When your population doesn't increase, that means when you take all the costs and split them out by your existing population. Everybody has to pay more if you want to maintain the same level of city services," Jensen said. "And that's getting to the point where it's just not sustainable for a lot of people in town, and I'm afraid that that's only going to make our population situation worse." To resolve this issue, Jensen would like to take a serious look at and possibly start initiatives that focus on increasing the population of Topeka. He said with more residents comes more tax revenue — or at least better divided taxes — and with that comes funding for things like roads and other public infrastructure needs. "We need to grow the community," Jensen said. "That'll allow us to fix the balance of our infrastructure problems. If we can, there's a lot of that. It boils down to do we have the money to pay to fix the roads, to pay to fix the water, lights and that sort of thing." The District 1 race will require a primary vote on Aug. 5. Jensen will face five other candidates: Eli Bohannan, Jolie Lippitt, incumbent Karen Hiller, Tyler Jaggers and William Naeger. This article originally appeared on Topeka Capital-Journal: Why is Brendan Jensen is running for Topeka City Council District 1?
