
Police Scotland ‘dithering' over trans strip search guidance
Police Scotland has been accused of 'dithering' over adopting a 'common sense' policy that sees suspects searched by officers of the same sex.
Following the Supreme Court ruling that 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 is defined as 'biological sex, not gender identity', the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) issued clear guidance on how to conduct body searches.
In cases that involve a transgender person, the new guidance states that they should be searched by a police officer of the same biological sex and not their self-identified gender.
Scotland's national force, however, has yet to adopt the policy.
It said it is being considered and advice has been sought from an independent human rights adviser.
Tess White, the Scottish Conservative shadow minister for equalities, said the way the force was dragging its feet over implementing the policy was 'troubling'.
'Basic common sense'
Calling on the SNP Government to ensure that all public bodies, including Police Scotland, follow the law, she added: 'It's basic common sense that a body search of a suspect ought to be carried out by an officer of the same biological sex and, given the unequivocal ruling of the Supreme Court in April, this issue shouldn't be up for debate.
'The Supreme Court ruling was very clear and the public will expect the police to be among the very first to uphold it.'
The NPCC, which brings together police leaders to set direction for policing across the country, circulated updated guidance to every force in the country last month.
It followed a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court which came about after the Scottish Government included transgender women in quotas to ensure gender balance on public sector boards.
Campaign group For Women Scotland (FWS) argued that sex-based protections should only apply to people born female.
The NPCC said its guidance is based on 'legal advice' and has been developed after seeking views across policing as well as those of other agencies.
'It reflects working practice which already happens every day across policing, where officers and detainees make requests about searches for a multitude of reasons,' the organisation stated.
'It makes clear that thorough police searches, such as those which expose intimate body parts, should be carried out by police officers and staff of the same biological sex as the detained person.'
The guidance also states that a trans person who requests that a search be conducted by an officer of their stated gender may be considered.
According to the guidance, it is 'explicit' that any search not conducted in line with biological sex must have the 'written consent of the detainee, the officer carrying out the search as well as the authorising officer'.
Review is 'complex'
Catriona Paton, Police Scotland's Assistant Chief Constable, said an ongoing review into sex and gender was 'complex, sensitive work, and the wellbeing of our people and communities is a priority'.
'We are operating within a dynamic and evolving landscape and it is critical that we take time to consider all the views, legislation, guidance and legal advice to ensure our proposals are well-informed and evidence-based,' she added.
The force has been criticised for embracing gender self-identification and faced a backlash for allowing rapists to 'self-declare' their gender identity.
A spokesman for FWS said: 'Like many public bodies, the police were quick to dance to the tune of trans lobbyists, going far beyond the law and adopting policies of self-ID.
'Now that the Supreme Court has ruled that equality law refers to biological sex, they are dragging their heels. The police, of all bodies, should follow the law – it really isn't complicated.'
Kenny MacAskill, the former Alba Party leader and former Scottish justice secretary, called on Police Scotland and the Scottish Police Authority to act quickly to end the current practice of female officers conducting body searches of biological men who self-identify as women.
'Officers have to carry out stop and searches, but it is preposterous to expect a female police officer to carry out a body search of an obviously male person self-identifying as female,' he said. 'The Supreme Court [ruling] should be the clarion call for an end to the idiocy.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
As Rachel Reeves prepares to splurge billions on NHS and tech... will she stick to her promise NOT to raise taxes?
was last night urged to keep her promise not to hike taxes again amid fears more raids are on the way. The Chancellor will unveil big spending cuts to some departments on Wednesday as she looks to plug a black hole in the public finances of as much as £60 billion. But there are growing fears that the cuts, part of her spending review, won't be enough and she will be forced into another round of tax hikes this autumn. Ms Reeves has already come under fire for hiking employers' National Insurance in last year's autumn Budget as part of a wider £40 billion tax raid. It came as she was still locked in talks with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper about planned cuts. Ms Cooper's department is among those expected to take the brunt of this week's cuts despite police chiefs warning of 'far-reaching consequences' on their ability to fight crime. Last night Housing Secretary Angela Rayner resolved a similar clash with the Chancellor, reaching an agreement over the settlement for her department. However, Ms Cooper was still holding out against police cuts, with negotiations expected to go down to the wire ahead of Wednesday's spending review. While some departments are facing cuts, others are in line for cash injections, with an extra £30 billion earmarked for the NHS and £4.5 billion for schools. Separately, there is expected to be £86 billion of spending announced for infrastructure investment. This includes Britain's fastest-growing sectors, such as technology and sciences. Alongside demands from Nato bosses to spend more on defence, and following a U-turn over the winter fuel allowance and hints the two-child benefit cap will be lifted, there are growing fears Ms Reeves will have no choice but to hike taxes again later in the year to balance the books. This is despite her repeatedly promising after last year's Budget that 'we're not going to be coming back with more tax increases '. Sir Mel Stride, the Tory Shadow Chancellor, said: 'Rachel Reeves has maxed out the country's credit card, hiked taxes to record levels and sent borrowing sky-rocketing. It now seems inevitable she will do what Labour Chancellors always do and raise taxes the first chance she gets.' Sam Miley, an economist at forecasters the Centre for Economics and Business Research, said: 'Borrowing is running higher than expected and the growth outlook remains poor. 'I'd expect there to be a focus on stealth taxes, such as maintaining the freeze on allowances. This would raise revenue from —employees, without breaking commitments regarding rates of income tax.' The thresholds around National Insurance and income tax are frozen until 2027-28. It means millions more are being dragged into paying higher rates of income tax as inflation – currently around 3.5 per cent – fuels wage increases. It is understood Ms Reeves is being urged by Treasury officials to look at extending this by two years to 2030 this autumn. A Treasury spokesman said: 'This Government inherited the previous government's policy of frozen tax thresholds. The Chancellor has announced that we would not extend that freeze. 'We are also protecting payslips for working people by keeping our promise to not raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee National Insurance or VAT.'


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Family of Nottingham attack victims complain about ‘offensive' watchdog meeting
The family of a student killed in the Nottingham attacks has described their meeting with the police watchdog leading the public inquiry into her death as 'offensive'. Valdo Calocane killed students Barnaby Webber and Grace O'Malley-Kumar, both 19, and caretaker Ian Coates, 65, before attempting to kill three other people in the city in June 2023. It was announced in February that prosecutors, police and medical professionals would be scrutinised in the two-year inquiry, including the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). Grace's father, Dr Sanjoy Kumar, said that an IOPC regional director had behaved inappropriately when the bereaved families met the watchdog nine months after the attacks in March 2024, including by starting the meeting with a prayer. Dr Kumar told The Sunday Times: 'I found it patronising and offensive. 'I didn't want a prayer, I wanted answers. I've lost my daughter and it was his job to give me the truth, not a prayer. 'There are plenty of places to pray and the IOPC isn't one of them.' The regional director at the meeting, Derrick Campbell, is now the watchdog's director of engagement, the newspaper reported. An IOPC spokesperson said: 'We can confirm we've received a complaint about one of our directors and we are dealing with it in line with our complaints and feedback procedure.' The IOPC previously prepared a report which concluded that police failed to properly investigate an assault on warehouse workers by Calocane, which could have stopped his murder spree a month later, leading to the watchdog reopening its investigation into the incidents in March. In a statement at that time, Mr Campbell said: 'Those who are closely impacted by our decision, including the bereaved families and the officers involved, have been notified and we will complete this work as quickly as possible.' Calocane was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order in January 2024 after admitting manslaughter by diminished responsibility and attempted murder, something which has been widely criticised by the victims' families. Barnaby's mother Emma Webber said in February last year that the families had a lot of concerns 'that were in the most part wholly ignored' by the Crown Prosecution Service. Senior retired judge Deborah Taylor will chair the inquiry, which aims to report back within two years, with recommendations to prevent similar incidents.


The Sun
27 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘It's not Hull anymore' – locals say overwhelming migrant influx has changed city as vital services at breaking point
THE historic port of Hull has been welcoming migrants for centuries — but angry locals fear the recent influx is so overwhelming it has changed their city for ever. They reckon vital services are now at breaking point and the Labour Government is putting their needs 'at the bottom of the pile'. And they are not alone. 7 7 7 Today we start a major investigation examining the asylum-seeker impact on communities across Britain. On the East Coast, the symbolic heart of Hull's migrant controversy is the Royal Hotel, where happy families would gather to celebrate weddings and christenings. Queen Victoria once stayed there and it was popular with tourists. However, for the past five years it has put up migrants and last summer became the flashpoint for riots. Former factory worker Stuart Whittaker — made homeless in February when his landlord suddenly sold up — said: 'I'm sleeping in cheap hotels when I can afford it, and I'm having to rely on mates to bail me out. 'Meanwhile, asylum seekers are being put up in the Royal for free, with three meals a day thrown in. 'The council and the Government are more interested in putting them up than helping me. 'There's just no help for people like me. It's like the local people have been shoved to the back of the queue.' Stuart, 37, added: 'I'm losing everything bit by bit. I just don't see a way out.' Stuart's friend Kevin Thompson, 67, has had to rack up credit card debts to keep his pal off the streets. 13 migrants jumped from the back of a lorry at a Sainsbury's distribution centre in South East London He said: 'Stuart's been told there's no help, no housing — but somehow they've got hundreds of migrants living in a hotel fit for a queen. 'The Royal was a landmark building. Something needs to be done.' The cost of filling up so many UK hotels with asylum seekers and caring for them is now believed to be running at an annual £4.7billion — more than ten times the ten-year estimate when deals started being signed in 2019. 'Intimidating' At the Royal Hotel, a stone's throw from the main rail station, around 70 per cent of the migrants are men. Many gather outside to smoke. Local mechanic Laura Maundrill, 33, said: 'I do find it intimidating walking past there. You walk past and you can feel them all looking at you. It's quite degrading as a woman. 'Young men just look you up and down and make kissing noises. They'll whistle, like you would if you were calling a dog over. It makes me feel really awkward.' Pub worker Tara Clappison, also 33, added: 'I find it quite uncomfortable to be honest. 'You walk past and you can feel them all looking at you. It's quite degrading as a woman. 'Especially when it is in the centre of your own city.' The UK's foreign-born population doubled in the first two decades of this century to nine million. In Hull, the 2021 Census revealed that 34,962 residents were born outside the UK, a 60 per cent increase in ten years. The number from Romania soared from 200 to 3,602 — but the migrants come from a host of countries. 7 7 7 The daily reality of such statistics is a massively increased strain on local services, according to those who use them. Gran-of-three Lisa Roberts, 43, said: 'My son and his girlfriend live in a tiny third-storey flat with their three children. "There's damp and mould and it's no place for kids to be living. 'They've struggled for years to get the council to find a more suitable property but they are always told there's nothing available. 'Other people seemed to be getting put first, ahead of the people who actually live here.' Lisa, a former Labour voter, said she had been stuck on a three-year waiting list to see an NHS dentist and struggles to access her GP. She added: 'I understand that many migrants have come from difficult situations but we need to start putting the people of this country first. 'We are looking after a lot of people but nobody is helping us. All we are asking for is fairness.' The Royal used to be smart. It looks good from the outside but it's gone to rack and ruin inside now. Paul Salisbury, local The depth of anger that local people feel — and the extent to which they feel abandoned by the mainstream parties — was shown at last month's mayoral elections. Olympic gold medallist boxer Luke Campbell won Hull and East Yorkshire for Reform UK, one of a series of victories for the party across the country. Sympathetic to migrants Yet despite the high tensions, some locals in the city are sympathetic to the migrants' plight. Paul Salisbury, 54, said: 'The Royal used to be smart. It looks good from the outside but it's gone to rack and ruin inside now. "A lot of people have issues with migrants being housed there but I want to give everyone a chance. 'All that hotel is good for now is housing asylum seekers. 'It's not like they're staying in suites at The Hilton. We have no idea what the people there have fled from or what their reasons are for coming across.' Anyone trying to book a room on The Royal's website is met with the message: 'Sorry, Royal Hotel Hull does not have rooms available for your selected dates. Why not try another arrival date?' The shock figures in today's Sun suggest that will not change any time soon.