Why Tesla's robotaxi launch was the easy part
HighlightsTesla has deployed its first-ever driverless taxis in Austin, Texas, marking a small-scale test of its Model Y vehicles, while facing significant challenges in expanding its autonomous driving software rapidly across millions of vehicles within a year. Despite Tesla's advantages in mass manufacturing and remote software updates, experts caution that the company may struggle to refine its technology to handle complex traffic scenarios, potentially undermining public trust in autonomous vehicles. The company's recent robotaxi test revealed safety concerns, as one passenger documented a vehicle entering the wrong lane at an intersection, highlighting the ongoing challenges Tesla faces in achieving fully autonomous driving capabilities.
Tesla
finally has a
robotaxi
. Now comes the hard part. The electric-vehicle maker deployed its first-ever driverless cabs in Austin, Texas, on Sunday in a small-scale test of carefully monitored Model Y vehicles. Next, the company faces the steep challenge of executing on CEO Elon Musk's ambition to refine the software and upload it to millions of Teslas within a year or so.
Such a rapid expansion will prove extremely difficult, about a dozen industry analysts and autonomous-vehicle technology experts told Reuters. These observers expressed a range of views about Tesla's prospects but all cautioned against assuming a light-speed robotaxi rollout.
Some pointed to advantages Tesla might exploit to overtake rivals including Alphabet's Waymo and a host of Chinese auto and tech companies. Tesla has mass-manufacturing capacity, and it pioneered remote software updates it can use for self-driving upgrades. The automaker also does not use sensors such as radar and lidar like Waymo and most rivals; instead, it depends solely on cameras and artificial intelligence.
'A rollout could be really quick. If the software works, Tesla robotaxi could drive any road in the world,' said Seth Goldstein, a
Morningstar
senior equity analyst, while cautioning that Tesla is still 'testing the product.' In Austin, Tesla launched a choreographed experiment involving maybe a dozen cars, operating in limited geography, with safety monitors in the front passenger seat; remote 'teleoperators'; plans to avoid bad weather; and hand-picked pro-Tesla influencers as passengers.
For years, Musk has said Tesla would soon operate its own autonomous ride-hailing service and also turn any Tesla, new or used, into a cash-generating robotaxi for its customers. That will be 'orders of magnitude' more difficult than testing in Austin, said Bryant Walker
Smith
, a
University of South Carolina
law professor focused on autonomous-driving regulation.
'It's like announcing that, 'I'm going to Mars' and then, you know, going to Cleveland,' Smith said. Musk has said Tesla will reach Mars, in that metaphor, quite quickly: "I predict that there will be millions of Teslas operating fully autonomously in the second half of next year," he said in April.
Musk and Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla shares ended 8.2% higher at $348.68 on Monday on investor enthusiasm over the robotaxi launch.
Given Tesla's AI-dependent approach, its challenge will be machine-training robotaxis to handle complex traffic 'edge cases,' said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University computer-engineering professor and autonomous-technology expert. That could take many years.
'Look, how long has it taken Waymo?' Koopman asked. 'There's no reason to believe Tesla will be any faster.'
LONG SLOG Waymo's self-driving efforts date back to 2009, when
Google
started its self-driving car project. An egg-shaped prototype took its first ride on public streets in 2015 – also in Austin.
Waymo has taken since then to build a 1,500-robotaxi fleet in select cities. A Waymo spokesperson said it plans to add 2,000 more vehicles by the end of 2026.
Some analysts believe Tesla can expand faster, in part because Waymo has helped pave the way by overcoming regulatory and technical challenges.
'Waymo and other pioneers have helped to drive regulatory change and have made riders, pedestrians and other road users aware of autonomous vehicles,' said Paul Miller, an analyst at market-research firm Forrester.
Being a mass-manufacturer also helps Tesla, Miller said. Waymo buys
Jaguar
I-PACE SUVs and outfits them with more expensive sensors and technology than Tesla integrates into its vehicles.
Waymo declined to comment on Tesla's robotaxi-expansion potential. The company's former CEO, John
Krafcik
, remains skeptical. The precautions Tesla employed in Austin reveal it does not have confidence its technology is safe at scale, Krafcik said.
'And they shouldn't,' he said. 'It's not as safe as it needs to be, and falls well short of the robust approach and well-documented safety that Waymo has demonstrated.'
'WRONG SIDE' OF THE ROAD
Tesla's go-fast strategy could actually slow its progress and that of the autonomous-vehicle industry if it undermines public trust, some analysts said. Tesla has historically faced legal and regulatory trouble involving its Full Self-Driving (FSD) driver-assistance system, which is not fully autonomous. In one recent federal safety probe into Tesla, investigators are examining FSD's role in crashes – some fatal – involving rain or other inclement weather that interferes with the system's cameras. Before the Austin test, Musk posted on his social-media platform, X, that the robotaxis' technology would differ little from any Tesla, aside from a software update: 'These are unmodified Tesla cars coming straight from the factory, meaning that every Tesla,' he wrote, 'is capable of unsupervised self-driving!'
The automaker invited Tesla-friendly influencers to take its first robotaxi rides, and they generally cheered the experience. One social-media video posted by a robotaxi passenger, however, showed the vehicle proceeding through a four-lane intersection with a traffic light – and into the wrong lane, for about six seconds. No oncoming traffic was in the lane at the time. 'Obviously we're on the wrong side of the double-yellow line here,' said the passenger, Rob Maurer, in a video narration of the experience he posted on X, noting that he felt safe but that the car behind him honked at the 'confusing maneuver."
Maurer did not respond to requests for comment. Reuters verified the location of the video by matching the surrounding buildings, business and street signs to the intersection of West Riverside Drive and Barton Springs Road in Austin.
Separately, a Reuters witness followed another Tesla robotaxi and measured its speed as it traveled at between 40 and 45 mph in a 35 mph zone on First Street, adjacent to the
Texas School for the Deaf
. A sign warned to watch for deaf pedestrians.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
China's top official has an 'inflation warning' for Americans, says US will likely see inflation pick up starting ...
Representative Image (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon) China is poised to unleash a wave of artificial intelligence innovation, with over 100 breakthroughs akin to DeepSeek expected in the next 18 months, according to Zhu Min, former deputy governor of the People's Bank of China. Speaking at the World Economic Forum's annual meeting in Tianjin, Zhu said these advancements 'will fundamentally change the nature and the tech nature of the whole Chinese economy,' as reported by Bloomberg. Zhu, also a former deputy managing director at the International Monetary Fund, attributed China's AI potential to its vast pool of engineers, massive consumer base, and supportive government policies. However, he warned that global trade faces headwinds, telling reporters, 'The uncertainty brought by U.S. tariff policy is an important factor that may lead to negative growth in global trade this year.' As per the report, Zhu noted that the global trade industrial chain is slowing, with investments stalling, amplifying the impact beyond tariff rates alone. Zhu predicted U.S. inflation could rise starting in August as companies deplete pre-tariff stockpiles. "China saw strong GDP growth, highest since December 2023" Despite external pressures, China's economy shows resilience. Huang Yiping, a member of the People's Bank of China's monetary policy committee, estimated second-quarter GDP growth exceeded 5%, citing strong April and May performance and positive June indicators. Speaking at the Tianjin forum, Huang, who is also dean of Peking University's National School of Development, highlighted robust retail sales in May, which grew at the fastest pace since December 2023. However, Huang emphasized that boosting consumption remains a challenge, particularly as global markets become less accessible. 'For a large country, you can't continuously export your excess capacity,' he said, advocating a focus on domestic circulation as a policy priority. Reflecting on past stimulus measures, Huang acknowledged criticisms of China's aggressive response during the global financial crisis, which led to asset bubbles and local government debt. Still, he supported decisive action today, stating, 'I personally would still support decisive policy action today, and then quickly turn around to deal with the problems later.'
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Here's Why The Public Needs To Question The Good AI Myth Pushed By Tech Firms
London: While there's been much negative discussion about AI, including on the possibility that it will take over the world, the public is also being bombarded with positive messages about the technology, and what it can do. This 'good AI' myth is a key tool used by tech companies to promote their products. Yet there's evidence that consumers are wary of the presence of AI in some products. This means that positive promotion of AI may be putting unwanted pressure on people to accept the use of AI in their lives. AI is becoming so ubiquitous that people may be losing their ability to say no to using it. It's in smartphones, smart TVs, smart speakers like Alexa and virtual assistants like Siri. We're constantly told that our privacy will be protected. But with the personal nature of the data that AI has access to in these devices, can we afford to trust such assurances? Some politicians also propagate the 'good AI' promise with immense conviction, mirroring the messages coming from tech companies. My current research is partly explained in a new book called the The Myth of Good AI. This research shows that the data feeding our AI systems is biased, as it often over-represents privileged sections of the population and mainstream attitudes. This means that any AI products that don't include data from marginalised people, or minorities, might discriminate against them. This explains why AI systems continue to be riddled with racism, ageism and various forms of gender discrimination, for instance. The speed with which this technology is impinging on our everyday life, makes it very hard to properly assess the consequences. And an approach to AI that is more critical of how it works does not make for good marketing for the tech companies. Power Structures Positive ideas about AI and its abilities are currently dominating all aspects of AI innovation. This is partly determined by state interests and by the profit margins of the tech companies. These are tied into the power structures held up by tech multi-billionaires, and, in some places, their influence on governments. The relationship between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, despite its recent souring, is a vivid manifestation of this. And so, the public is at the receiving end of a distinctly hierarchical top-down system, from the big tech companies and their governmental enablers to users. In this way, we are made to consume, with little to no influence over how the technology is used. This positive AI ideology is therefore primarily about money and power. As it stands, there is no global movement with a unifying manifesto that would bring together societies to leverage AI for the benefit of communities of people, or to safeguard our right to privacy. This 'right to be left alone', codified in the US constitution and international human rights law, is a central pillar of my argument. It is also something that is almost entirely absent from the assurances about AI made by the big tech companies. Yet, some of the risks of the technology are already evident. A database compiling cases in which lawyers around the world used AI, identified 157 cases in which false AI-generated information – so called hallucinations – skewed legal rulings. Some forms of AI can also be manipulated to blackmail and extort, or create blueprints for murder and terrorism. Tech companies need to programme the algorithms with data that represents everyone, not just the privileged, in order to reduce discrimination. In this way, the public are not forced to give into the consensus that AI will solve many of our problems, without proper supervision by society. This distinction between the ability to think creatively, ethically and intuitively may be the most fundamental faultline between human and machine. It's up to ordinary people to question the good AI myth. A critical approach to AI should contribute to the creation of more socially relevant and responsible technology, a technology that is already trialled in torture scenarios, as the book discusses, too. The point at which AI systems would outdo us in every task is expected to be a decade or so away. In the meantime there needs to be resistance to this attack on our right to privacy, and more awareness of just how AI works. (Author: Arshin Adib-Moghaddam, Professor in Global Thought and Comparative Philosophies, Director of Centre for AI Futures, SOAS, University of London) (Disclosure Statement: Arshin Adib-Moghaddam does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.)
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
UK Government Says Chinese Spying On The Rise, Pledges $818 Million To Intelligence
Chinese spying and attempts by Beijing to undermine Britain's democracy and economy have risen in recent years, the UK government said Tuesday in a report on the Asian giant. Foreign minister David Lammy told parliament the Labour administration would invest £600 million ($818 million) in its intelligence services as a result of the findings. Prime Minister Keir Starmer commissioned an "audit" of Britain's relations with Beijing after he swept to power in landslide general election win last July. The report, published on Tuesday, recommended high-level engagement with China for a "trade and investment relationship" but also building "resilience" against threats posed by Beijing. "We understand that China is a sophisticated and persistent threat," but "not engaging with China is therefore no choice at all", Lammy told MPs. "Like our closest allies, we will co-operate where we can and we will challenge where we must," he said, vowing that meant "never compromising on our national security". Starmer has vowed to pursue a "consistent" relationship after the previous Conservative government first trumpeted a "golden era" of close diplomatic ties before relations became increasingly strained. The British PM hopes Chinese investment can help him achieve his main mission of firing up Britain's economy. But differences over Russia's war in Ukraine, Beijing's treatment of Uyghurs and Hong Kong -- including the imprisonment of media mogul Jimmy Lai -- pose hurdles to repairing relations. In a joint letter coordinated by Reporters Without Borders, 33 organisations around the globe wrote to Starmer on Tuesday asking him to meet Lai's son Sebastian. "As a British citizen facing an unthinkable ordeal, Sebastien Lai deserves to hear first-hand from the Prime Minister what the UK is doing to secure his father's release," said the letter, which was signed by groups including Amnesty International UK and Human Rights Foundation. Espionage allegations have also blighted the relationship in recent years, including claims that a Chinese businessman used his links with Britain's Prince Andrew to spy for the Communist Party. The report noted that "instances of China's espionage, interference in our democracy and the undermining of our economic security have increased in recent years". "Our national security response will therefore continue to be threat-driven, bolstering our defences and responding with strong counter-measures," the government said. Starmer's administration is due to rule on whether to approve Beijing's controversial plans to open the biggest embassy in Britain at a new London location. Residents, rights groups and China hawks oppose the development, fearing it could be used for the surveillance and harassment of dissidents.
