Letters to the Editor: With silencer regulations, public safety needs to come before the gun industry
To the editor: Oh, please. Republican legislators are whining about the accessibility of firearm silencers under the guise of hearing protection ('GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns,' June 23). Rather than using personal ear protection when shooting, they would prefer more silencers in our communities, thereby putting their fellow citizens at risk of being injured or killed during a shooting because they didn't hear gunfire or were unable to discern the direction from which it was coming.
It is galling that Georgia Rep. Andrew Clyde, the owner of two gun stores, is shilling for the gun industry to reduce silencer regulation. Making silencers more accessible would increase sales and line his pockets. Legislators should concern themselves with public safety rather than doing the bidding of the gun industry.
Firearms are the leading cause of death of American children and teens. Can't Republicans think of anything productive they might do to help solve that problem?
Loren Lieb, Northridge
..
To the editor: So Republicans in Congress want potential mass shooters, school shooters and presidential assassins to have ready access to silencers and sawed-off shotguns without being subject to a background check or paying a tax.
Tell me this: How is a good guy with a gun supposed to stop a bad guy with a gun if he doesn't know where the shots are coming from?
If only Senate Republicans had thought to pass similar legislation back in 2022 before 19 elementary school kids and two teachers were slaughtered in Uvalde, Texas. Instead of being ridiculed for failing to immediately confront the 18-year-old school shooter, the Uvalde police and Texas Rangers could have said, 'Well, we didn't go in because we didn't know the whereabouts of the shooter.'
Patricia Holloway, San Clemente
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
16 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Centrifuges at Fordo ‘no longer operational,' UN nuclear watchdog head says
He said, however, that it would be 'too much' to assert that Iran's nuclear program had been 'wiped out' after the Israeli and American bombing campaign. Grossi noted that not all of Iran's nuclear sites had been struck and said Iranian officials had told him that they would take 'protective measures' for the uranium they had already enriched. Advertisement Still, he said, the nuclear program has definitely suffered 'enormous damage.' He declined to say how far Iran's nuclear program had been set back. 'Perhaps decades, depending on the type of activity or objective,' Grossi said, echoing comments made by President Trump this week at a NATO summit in the Netherlands. Advertisement 'It's true that with these reduced capacities,' he added, 'it will be much more difficult for Iran to continue at the same pace as before.' The comments from Grossi, director-general of the atomic agency, came amid questions over the effectiveness of the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. Trump has insisted that the bombing 'obliterated' the Fordo site, a position that some in his administration have On Thursday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and General Dan Caine, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, gave more details about the planning and execution of the strikes. But they offered no new assessments of the damage inflicted on the sites or on the state of Iran's nuclear program. One of the main purposes of the UN watchdog is to monitor nuclear activity in Iran and other countries, including those who have signed on to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. But the agency's relations with Iran were at a low point even before Israel attacked the country June 13. UN inspectors remained in Iran throughout the war but were not able to gain access to the nuclear sites amid the fighting. And it was not clear when or even if they would be allowed to do so again now that a cease-fire has taken hold. On Thursday, Iran's Guardian Council, which has veto power over legislation in the country, approved a bill passed by parliament that suspends cooperation with the UN watchdog and bars its inspectors from the country. Advertisement But the fate of the new law — which would effectively block the international community from having oversight of Iran's nuclear program — was still unclear. The decision to enact it lies with Iran's moderate president, Masoud Pezeshkian, who was elected on campaign promises to engage with the West and who has publicly signaled his willingness to return to the negotiating table. As a signatory of the nonproliferation treaty, Iran is 'required to have an inspection system,' Grossi noted in the interview. He urged Iranian authorities not to 'unilaterally' reject inspections 'because otherwise we'd be on the brink of another major crisis.' Grossi, who said Iran's cooperation with the UN watchdog before the war was 'limited,' said that he had reached out to Iran's foreign minister to discuss a potential return of agency inspectors to Iranian nuclear sites but had yet to receive a response. This article originally appeared in .
Associated Press
17 minutes ago
- Associated Press
What to know about states blocking Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that states can bar Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider. The federal government and many states already block using Medicaid funds to cover abortion. But the state-federal health insurance program for lower-income people does pay for other services from Planned Parenthood, including birth control, cancer screenings and testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections. The ruling comes at a moment when Congress is considering blocking Planned Parenthood from receiving any federal Medicaid funding, a move that the group says would force hundreds of clinic closings — most of them in states where abortion remains legal. Here are things to know about the situation: Abortion opponents see it as a victory on principle This legal dispute goes back to a 2018 executive order from South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster that barred abortion providers from receiving Medicaid money in the state, even for services unrelated to abortion. In its 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court overruled lower courts and said that patients don't necessarily have the right to sue for Medicaid to cover their health care from specific providers. Abortion opponents hail it as a victory on principle. 'No one should be forced to subsidize abortion,' CatholicVote President Kelsey Reinhardt said in a statement. Abortion rights advocates say it will hurt health care access Supporters of Planned Parenthood see the ruling as an obstacle to health care aside from abortion. Planned Parenthood 'provides services for highly disadvantaged populations and this will mean not only that many women in the state will lose their right to choose providers, but it will also mean that many women will lose services altogether,' said Lawrence Gostin, who specializes in public health law at Georgetown Law. For many people with Medicaid, Gostin said, Planned Parenthood is a trusted service provider, and it's often the closest one. Others emphasize that the people who could be most impacted are women who already face the greatest obstacles to getting health care. 'People enrolled in Medicaid, including young people and people of color, already face too many barriers to getting health care,' Kimberly Inez McGuire, the executive director of Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equality, said in a statement. 'This decision makes a difficult situation worse.' The implications may be narrow in South Carolina, but broader elsewhere Planned Parenthood has two clinics in South Carolina, one in Charleston and one in Columbia. Combined, they've been receiving about $90,000 a year from Medicaid out of nearly $9 billion a year the program spends in the state. South Carolina has banned most abortions after six weeks gestational age, before many women realize they're pregnant. It's one of four states to bar abortion at that point. Another 12 are enforcing bans at all stages of pregnancy. The bans were implemented after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. The most recent high court ruling isn't a guarantee that other states will follow South Carolina's lead, but Republican attorneys general of 18 other states filed court papers supporting the state's position in the case. 'We can imagine that there's anti-abortion legislators in states who are looking to this case and may try to replicate what South Carolina has done,' said Amy Friedrich-Karnik, director of federal policy at the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports abortion rights. The federal government is also targeting Planned Parenthood The U.S. House last month passed a budget measure that would bar all federal payments for 10 years to nonprofit groups that provide abortion and received more than $1 million in federal funding in 2024. A Senate vote on the measure, which President Donald Trump supports, could happen in coming days. Planned Parenthood says that if the measure becomes law, it would force its affiliates to close up to 200 of their 600 facilities across the U.S. The hardest-hit places would be the states where abortion is legal. If the federal effort is successful, Friedrich-Karnik said states that support abortion rights could use their own tax revenue to keep clinics open. On a call with reporters this week, SBA Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser said it's a priority for her group to hobble Planned Parenthood. She said starving Planned Parenthood of Medicaid reimbursements would not have a major impact on patients, because other clinics offer similar services without providing abortion. 'Medicaid money is attached to the person, so she'll retain the same amount of money,' Dannenfelser said. 'She'll just take it to a different place.' Abortion funding is already battered The 2022 Supreme Court ruling that ended the nationwide right to abortion jolted the abortion system across the U.S. and left clinics struggling. Women in states with bans in place now use abortion pills or travel to states where it's legal. Surveys have found that the number of monthly abortions nationally has risen since the court ruling. But over the same time period, some clinics have closed and funds that help people obtain abortion have said it's hard to stretch their money to cover the added cost of travel. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Israel wanted to assassinate Ayatollah Khamenei, but never got the chance, defense minister said
Israel was targeting Tehran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei for assassination during the 12-day war with Iran, but the ideal opportunity never presented itself, its military chief said. The Jewish state's military had been actively hunting for Khamenei before President Trump helped broker the cease-fire that came into effect earlier this week, Defense Minister Israel Katz, who had vowed to kill the leader during the conflict, told Israeli TV. 'I estimate that if Khamenei had been in our sights, we would have taken him out,' he said. 3 The Israeli military hoped to assassinate Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during the 12-day war with Iran. AP 3 The ayatollah hid underground following Israel's initial bombardments in Tehran. BERNO/SIPA/Shutterstock 'But Khamenei understood this, went underground to very great depths and broke off contacts with the commanders who replaced those commanders who were eliminated, so it wasn't realistic in the end,' he added. Khamenei became a prime target for Israel last week after an Iranian ballistic missile hit a medical center in Beersheba, injuring about 80 people and completely destroying several wards. Following the attack, Katz vowed that 'Khamenei will pay for his crimes,' with the defense minister claiming that future Israeli attacks would 'shake' Iran's regime. The ayatollah went into hiding when the Israeli bombardments against Iran began on June 13, with Khamenei only surfacing on Thursday to absurdly claim victory over Israel and America. 3 Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz said that the opportunity to kill Khamenei never presented itself during the days-long conflict. REUTERS 'The Islamic Republic was victorious and, in retaliation, delivered a hand slap to America's face,' Khamenei said Thursday despite the heavy losses Iran suffered during the 12-day war. He also tried to downplay the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities following the American attack with 'bunker-busting' bombs, attempting to contradict reports from Washington and the United Nations. 'US hit nuclear sites but couldn't achieve much,' Khamenei said in a televised speech before calling out Trump. 'US President Trump needed to do showmanship,' he said in his first statements since the cease-fire began on Tuesday. The cease-fire agreement has held so far as the US and Qatar attempt to get Iran back to the negotiating table to discuss its nuclear energy program. With Post wires
