logo
Tunisia Jewish pilgrimage sees low turn out amid security concerns

Tunisia Jewish pilgrimage sees low turn out amid security concerns

Yahoo15-05-2025

Only about 30 people turned up Thursday at this year's Jewish pilgrimage on Tunisia's island of Djerba amid safety concerns following a deadly 2023 attack and as the war in Gaza rages on.
The pilgrimage to the Ghriba synagogue, Africa's oldest, has in the past drawn thousands of pilgrims from Europe, Israel and beyond, attracting international and local tourists as well.
But after a 2023 deadly attack on the synagogue that killed two worshippers and three police officers, fewer pilgrims have been turning out to make the pilgrimage.
"It has been difficult for people to come, given what's happening in the world," Rene Trabelsi, the event organiser, told AFP.
"The pilgrimage has gone through many difficult periods in its history," he said.
This year's activities were restricted to indoor events at the place of worship.
"In 30 years, I have never seen the Ghriba synagogue so empty," said Khoudhir Hanya, the synagogue's manager.
"Usually even a week beforehand, pilgrims begin to arrive -- sometimes up to 1,000 people."
Earlier this month, a knife attack injured a local Jewish jeweller, but Trabelsi said it was unclear whether it was motivated by anti-Semitism, as authorities have not provided further details.
The pilgrimage is at the heart of Jewish tradition in Tunisia, where only about 1,500 members of the faith still live -- mainly on Djerba. Many have left for Israel and France.
Organisers say more than 5,000 people, mostly from abroad, attended the pilgrimage in 2023, whereas up to 8,000 pilgrims had attended in previous years.
Security at the synagogue had already been tightened after previous attacks.
A suicide truck bombing in 2002, claimed by Al-Qaeda, killed 21 at the synagogue, and another attack in 1985 killed four worshippers and a police officer.
vid-fka/bou/ysm

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump travel ban includes 12 nations, partially restricts entry from seven others
Trump travel ban includes 12 nations, partially restricts entry from seven others

USA Today

timea day ago

  • USA Today

Trump travel ban includes 12 nations, partially restricts entry from seven others

Trump travel ban includes 12 nations, partially restricts entry from seven others Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump bans travel from several countries around the world President Donald Trump signed a proclamation that bans travel from 12 countries and restricts seven others. WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump has issued a full travel ban blocking the entry of foreign nationals from 12 countries into the United States, reviving a controversial policy from his first term that is likely to be challenged in court. Trump cited "national security risks" posed by citizens of the targeted nations, which include several Middle Eastern and African countries, in a June 4 proclamation he signed imposing the ban. He also partially restricted the entry of foreign nationals from seven other nations. The restrictions are scheduled to go into effect on June 9. The ban prohibits entry into the U.S. of foreign nationals from Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Trump issued partial travel suspensions for foreign nationals from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Trump presidency: Marco Rubio says US will revoke visas from Chinese students, add new restrictions In videotaped remarks from the Oval Office, Trump pointed to last weekend's fiery assault on pro-Jewish demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado, carried out by suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman, a native of Egypt who came to the U.S. on a tourist visa in late 2022 and stayed after the visa expired. "The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstayed their visas," Trump said. "We don't want them." Egypt is not among the countries facing new restrictions despite Trump invoking the attack, which the White House has blamed on the Biden administration's immigration policies. Trump's travel ban: A timeline look throughout his first presidency Who faces a travel ban? The move comes after the Trump administration has worked aggressively to deport immigrants who are in the United States unlawfully, halted the government's refugee resettlement program, and last week announced plans to "aggressively" revoke visas of Chinese students. The ban resembles similar actions Trump took during his first term to bar the entry of foreign nationals from several predominantly Muslim countries. The restrictions do not apply to visas that have already been granted, lawful permanent residents, certain athletes, immediate family members of current visa holders, and other classes of individuals for whom the administration granted exceptions. Travelers react to the latest travel ban from President Trump "Pros and cons." Travelers in Los Angeles responded to the news of President Donald Trump's travel ban impacting nearly 20 countries. "In the 21st century, we've seen one terror attack after another carried out by foreign-visa overstayers from dangerous places. They should not be in our country," Trump said. "We will not let what happened in Europe happen to America." Council on American-Islamic Relations Executive Director Nihad Awad said the government already vets visa applicants extensively. The new order risks separating families, depriving students of educational opportunities and blocking patients from unique medical treatment, he said. "President Trump's new travel ban targeting mostly Muslim and African nations and raising the specter of more vague free speech restrictions is overbroad, unnecessary and ideologically motivated,' Awad said. "Automatically banning students, workers, tourists, and other citizens of these targeted nations from coming to the United States will not make our nation safer." Amy Spitalnick, CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, said in a post on social media that the antisemitic attack in Boulder shouldn't be used to justify a ban on travel from primarily Muslim-majority countries. 'We'll keep saying it: the Jewish community's legitimate fears and concerns should not (be) exploited to undermine core democratic norms, or otherwise advance discriminatory & unconstitutional policies,' Spitalnick said. 'Doing so only makes Jews – and all communities – less safe.' Rep. Judy Chu, a California Democrat who introduced legislation in February that sought to prevent the Trump administration from banning travel to the U.S. by people of any religious group, lashed out at Trump on X. "Just now, Trump has re-issued his disgusting, bigoted, and Islamophobic travel ban. This goes against our core American values while doing nothing to make us safer. We can do better, we must do better," she said. What travelers need to know: Trump issues new travel ban affecting nearly 20 countries Trump revisits travel bans Trump's first-term travel bans were overturned repeatedly in the courts for apparent religious or racial motivations before being upheld by the Supreme Court. Within hours of the new ban, the International Refugee Assistance Project, a group that sued Trump in 2017, slammed the ban as arbitrary for making exceptions for athletes traveling to the United States for sporting events such as the Olympics and the FIFA World Cup, "while closing the door to ordinary people who've gone through extensive legal processes to enter the United States." "It is yet another shameful attempt by the Trump administration to sow division, fear, and chaos," Stephanie Gee, senior director of U.S. Legal Services, said in a statement. Trump's latest ban follows through on a day-one executive order directing his administration to identify countries throughout the world "for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a full or partial suspension on the entry or admission of nationals from those countries." Trump said he evaluated recommendations from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Attorney General Pam Bondi based on foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism goals and largely accepted their recommendations. Factors included whether a county "has a significant terrorist presence within its territory" or a high rate of people overstaying their visas, Trump's order said. The president said the administration also considered a country's "cooperation with accepting back its removable nationals." At one point, the administration looked at slapping as many as 43 countries with restrictions. Egypt was not on either of the draft lists that circulated in March. The president said in the order that Rubio and Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller provided him a list on April 9 of countries to consider. The White House did not immediately explain why it took Trump nearly two months after he received the report to take action. The State Department did not respond to a request for comment. "Very simply," Trump said, "we cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States." Contributing: Bart Jansen, USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

World's Highest Rail Bridge Opens to Reshape Nuclear Rivals' Power Map
World's Highest Rail Bridge Opens to Reshape Nuclear Rivals' Power Map

Newsweek

time2 days ago

  • Newsweek

World's Highest Rail Bridge Opens to Reshape Nuclear Rivals' Power Map

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. High in the Himalayas, where winds slice through conflict-hit Kashmir at 160 mph and temperatures swing from -20°F to 113°F, India has unveiled the world's highest rail bridge, remaking the power map of Asia. Why It Matters Prime Minister Narendra Modi's inauguration of the Chenab Rail Bridge, a 1,178-foot-tall steel construction that is nearly 100 feet taller than the Eiffel Tower, finally connects the Kashmir Valley to other railways in the world's most populous country. It underlines India's hold on Kashmir just weeks after an insurgent attack on tourists in Pahalgam killed 26 people and prompted the biggest confrontation in decades with Pakistan, which India blamed for the attack despite its denials. The railway also strengthens India's transport links to the disputed region where it is also at odds with China, which has strong links to Pakistan. All three countries are nuclear powers. What To Know The bridge completes the 200 mile Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla Rail Link (USBRL). "With the blessings of Mata Vaishno Devi, the Valley of Kashmir is now connected to India's vast railway network," declared PM Modi at the ceremony which was live-casted on X. "We have always invoked Maa Bharati (Mother India) with deep reverence, saying 'from Kashmir to Kanyakumari' – today, this has become a reality even in our railway network." A general view of Chenab bridge, the world's highest rail arch bridge in Reasi, Jammu and Kashmir on July 6, 2024 A general view of Chenab bridge, the world's highest rail arch bridge in Reasi, Jammu and Kashmir on July 6, 2024 Photo by TAUSEEF MUSTAFA / AFP The bridge is built with 28,000 tonnes of steel and 66,000 cubic meters of concrete to withstand earthquakes and blizzards, completing a railway that had proven beyond the reach of the British colonizers who established much of India's rail network. "Many people dreamt of this train service. What the British couldn't do, you made a reality. Now, the Kashmir Valley is finally connected to the rest of India by rail," posted Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah on X. The Tricolour flies high over the Chenab Rail Bridge! It's a feeling of immense pride that this bridge seamlessly blends ambition with execution, reflecting India's growing capability to build futuristic infrastructure in the most challenging terrains. — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) June 6, 2025 The bridge and railway have major geostrategic implications, linking Indian-controlled Kashmir, whose ownership is contested by Pakistan, with other parts of India. It slashes military deployment time to the Pakistan border from days to hours. Tension remains high between the two nuclear-armed neighbors following the Pahalgam attack. The railway also strengthens the economic links. Kashmir's ski slopes, apple orchards, and tech hubs are now accessible year-round. Modi's government calls the region "India's crown jewel." While India also has a border dispute with China in Kashmir, the bigger message of the new railway may be India's growing ability to carry out major infrastructure projects – showing China that it is not alone in this. As China builds the $60B China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, it is also a demonstration of Indian sovereignty in the Himalayas, where India's challenge to China also serves U.S. strategic interests. What People Are Saying Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha on his X post called June 6, 2025, a "momentous day" that would "go down in history," noting the simultaneous inauguration of India's first cable-stayed rail bridge at Anji. Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw hailed it as "a historic day," attributing the achievement to Prime Minister Modi's "steely determination," in his statement. What Happens Next India can be expected to continue to reinforce its economic, political and strategic links to Kashmir. While the latest round of conflict with Pakistan has died down since the ceasefire, there is every possibility that further confrontation could be triggered.

Tourist tax to be introduced in Norway after surge in visitors
Tourist tax to be introduced in Norway after surge in visitors

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Tourist tax to be introduced in Norway after surge in visitors

Norway is set to become the latest destination to introduce a tourist tax after a wave of travellers swap sun for cooler temperatures, leaving areas of country overwhelmed with new visitors. The country initially introduced a proposal for a tourist tax set at five per cent of the cost of an overnight stay, but a majority in parliament agreed to set the tax at three per cent. The law will allow local authorities to introduce the visitor fee at their discretion, with the funds used to pay for infrastructure projects that will benefit both tourists and residents. The tax will be added to accommodation charges, with authorities also allowed to adjust the fee depending on the season. Cecilie Myrseth, Norway's minister of trade and industry, told Norwegian public broadcaster NRK: 'It is not the case that we have year-round tourism throughout the country, but in some places, there are parts of the year that are particularly demanding, and the expenses that the residents have to pay for are particularly high.' Ms Mryseth said on social media on Tuesday that her party, Arbeiderpartiet, reached a 'historical agreement' with other parties to introduce visitor subsidies in Norway 'in line with what they have in the rest of Europe'. 'The scheme is voluntary [for local authorities], and it applies to areas that have a particularly large pressure of tourists.' 'The tourism industry is also the future of Norway,' she said. 'An industry that creates housing, happiness, good experiences, value creation and important jobs all over the country. 'If the industry wants to grow, we depend on trust locally. We ensure that with this agreement.' In recent years, the country has become an increasingly popular travel destination. In 2024, Norway saw a record-breaking 38 million visitors book accommodation. Some destinations have struggled with the newfound popularity, especially when it comes to the public facilities are available. Visitors to the famous Torghatten mountain trail often find themselves squatting in bushes to relieve themselves, while residents in more built-up areas like Tromsø have even found travellers using their back gardens as toilets. Ms Myrseth says she hopes the new tax will be able to be used by areas under pressure from this new wave of visitors, by ensuring 'trust between the local population and tourism'. The initial proposal was criticised for not including cruise passengers, as many say the worst-affected areas, such as the Lofoten archipelago, can get overwhelmed when thousands of tourists pour off the ships, as the infrastructure there is designed to only handle a smaller local population. However, the tax now appears to include charges to cruise ships, according to AFP, although it is unclear what form this will take. Not everyone in Norway has been onboard with the new visitor subsidy, with the travel and tourism branch of the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise warning it could put tourists off visiting and calling the tax 'madness,' Euronews reports. The proposal has also been criticised for focusing solely on overnight stays, leaving campervans and daytrippers exempt from the charge. Einar Arve Nordang, the mayor of Stranda, a mountainous area that attracts skiers and hikers, as well as visitors to its quaint towns, said earlier this year that the proposal did not work for every area of Norway. 'It seems to me that the government's proposal is primarily designed for Tromsø and other places where you are forced to stay overnight if you visit them,' she told NRK. While not opposed to the tourist tax, villages such as Gerianger in Stranda have been advocating for years for day visit fees. Now that the Norwegian parliament has settled on an agreement, the tax could be introduced as early as summer in 2026.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store