Appeals court lets Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to LA
LOS ANGELES: An appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles following protests over immigration raids.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally when he activated the soldiers over opposition from California Gov Gavin Newsom.
The deployment was the first by a president of a state National Guard without the governor's permission since 1965.
In its decision, a three-judge panel on the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded it was likely Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalising control of the guard.
It said that while presidents don't have unfettered power to seize control of a state's guard, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters.
"The undisputed facts demonstrate that before the deployment of the National Guard, protesters pinned down' several federal officers and threw concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects' at the officers.
Protesters also damaged federal buildings and caused the closure of at least one federal building. And a federal van was attacked by protesters who smashed in the van's windows," the court wrote.
"The federal government's interest in preventing incidents like these is significant."
It also found that even if the federal government failed to notify the governor of California before federalising the National Guard as required by law, Newsom had no power to veto the president's order.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The California governor's office and the White House didn't immediately respond to emails seeking comment.
The court case could have wider implications on the president's power to deploy soldiers within the United States after Trump directed immigration officials to prioritise deportations from other Democratic-run cities.
Trump, a Republican, argued that the troops were necessary to restore order. Newsom, a Democrat, said the move inflamed tensions, usurped local authority and wasted resources.
The protests have since appeared to be winding down.
Two judges on the appeals panel were appointed by Trump during his first term.
During oral arguments Tuesday, all three judges suggested that presidents have wide latitude under the federal law at issue and that courts should be reluctant to step in.
The case started when Newsom sued to block Trump's command, and he won an early victory from US District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco.
Breyer found that Trump had overstepped his legal authority, which he said only allows presidents can take control during times of "rebellion or danger of a rebellion".
"The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of rebellion,'" wrote Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton and is brother to retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.
The Trump administration, though, argued that courts can't second guess the president's decisions and quickly secured a temporary halt from the appeals court.
The ruling means control of the California National Guard will stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Europeans see a 'window of opportunity' for diplomacy as they meet Iran's top diplomat
Iran's Foreign Minister plans to meet in Geneva on Friday (June 20, 2025) with leading European counterparts, who hope to open a window for a diplomatic solution to the week-old military conflict that has seen Israeli airstrikes target Iranian nuclear and military sites and Tehran firing back. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who will meet Iran's Abbas Araghchi together with his French and German counterparts and the European Union's foreign policy chief, said that 'a window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution.' Follow the updates on Israel-Iran conflict LIVE The talks will be the first face-to-face meeting between Western and Iranian officials since the start of the conflict. Mr. Lammy is travelling to Geneva after meeting in Washington with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff. Mr. Trump has been weighing whether to attack Iran by striking its well-defended Fordo uranium enrichment facility, which is buried under a mountain and widely considered to be out of reach of all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. He said Wednesday that he'll decide within two weeks whether the U.S. military will get directly involved in the war, given the 'substantial chance' for renewed negotiations over Tehran's nuclear programme. 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one,' Mr. Lammy said. Israel says it launched its airstrike campaign last week to stop Iran from getting closer to being able to build a nuclear weapon. Iran and the United States had been negotiating over the possibility of a new diplomatic deal over Tehran's programme, though Trump has said Israel's campaign came after a 60-day window he set for the talks. Iran's supreme leader rejected US calls for surrender Wednesday and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause 'irreparable damage to them.' Iran has long insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, though it was the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60 per cent, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. The three European countries, commonly referred to as the E3, played an important role in the negotiations over the original 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers. But they have repeatedly threatened to reinstate sanctions that were lifted under the deal if Iran does not improve its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. Germany's foreign minister acknowledged that years of efforts to relieve concerns about the possibility of Iran developing a nuclear weapon haven't succeeded, but said it's worth talking now. 'It is our commitment once again to undertake a very intensive attempt to dissuade Iran permanently from pursuing such plans,' Johann Wadephul said in a podcast released by broadcaster MDR on Friday. 'If there is serious and transparent readiness by Iran to refrain from this, then there is a real chance of preventing a further escalation of this conflict, and for that, every conversation makes sense.' Mr. Wadephul said U.S. officials 'not only know that we are conducting these talks but are very much in agreement with us doing so — so I think Iran should now know that it should conduct these talks with a new seriousness and reliability.' French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot spoke by phone with Rubio on Thursday evening. A French diplomatic official, who was not allowed to speak publicly on the issue, said Barrot detailed the purposes of the Geneva meeting and Rubio 'stressed that the US was ready for direct contact with the Iranians at any time.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
19 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's countdown: Will diplomacy trump Israel-Iran war in 2 weeks?
Trump's back-and-forth between threats of military action and openness to diplomacy highlights a deepening rift within his MAGA campaign read more US President Donald Trump arrives to attend the G7 Leaders' Summit at the Rocky Mountain resort town of Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, June 15, 2025. File Image/Reuters In what appears to be a pivot away from immediate escalation, US President Donald Trump has set a two-week deadline to decide whether the United States will join Israel's military campaign against Iran or pursue a diplomatic resolution. Trump giving diplomacy last chance? White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt conveyed Trump's message: 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' This statement follows Israel's intense strikes on Iran, which began on June 13, targeting nuclear facilities, missile sites, and key military leaders, including top Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) officials. Talks on between US, Iran Washington and Tehran are engaged in both direct and indirect talks, with the US pressing Iran to halt its uranium enrichment programme. US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi have held multiple phone conversations since Israel's attacks started, marking the most substantive direct dialogue since April 2025 negotiations in Oman and Italy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to three diplomats cited by Reuters, who spoke anonymously due to the sensitivity of the issue, Araqchi insisted that Tehran would not resume negotiations unless Israel ceased its strikes. The discussions also touched on an American proposal from May 2025 to establish a regional consortium for uranium enrichment outside Iran, which Tehran has so far rejected. A regional diplomat close to Tehran noted that Araqchi hinted at potential 'flexibility' on the nuclear issue if Washington could pressure Israel to end the conflict. Europe-Iran talks In parallel, Britain, France, and Germany are stepping up diplomatic efforts to prevent further escalation. The three nations are holding high-level talks with Iran in Geneva, the first face-to-face diplomacy with Tehran since Israel's attacks began. The meeting follows Trump's remarks about the possibility of new talks, signalling a coordinated international push. Critical juncture Trump's back-and-forth between threats of military action and openness to diplomacy highlights a deepening rift within his MAGA campaign. The decision carries significant domestic political risk, as deeper US involvement in West Asia may end up alienating key voter bases while escalating tensions could bolster his strongman image. Strategically, the US has heightened its military presence in the region, with 40,000 troops deployed—up from the usual 30,000—and 27 military refuelling aircraft recently moved to Europe, suggesting preparations for potential long-range operations.
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's trade school idea is a $3 billion winner
The president recently expressed his support for a great idea: investing an additional $3 billion in trade schools. That he suggested taking the money from scientific and medical research grants allocated to Harvard University — a counterproductive move unlikely to survive a court challenge — should not detract from the idea's merit. Nor should it obscure the issue's strong bipartisan appeal. To be clear, the administration's fight with Harvard and its Ivy League peers is a bad idea. One can criticize those schools for many things — in particular, their thoroughgoing failure to combat anti-Semitism in recent years — without obliterating research budgets at some of America's most important academic institutions. One hopes the provocation was the point. That said: If ever the president had an opportunity to unite Republicans and Democrats, greater support for career and technical education should be it. More young Americans have been choosing such training in recent years — program enrollment is up about 20% since 2020 — and for good reason. High-quality programs can lead directly to well-paying jobs while allowing students to escape much of the debt that can come with attending a four-year college. As artificial intelligence intrudes on more areas of knowledge work, the appeal of these programs may quickly grow. Yet too many programs are stuck in the past or otherwise not aligned to today's job market, leading to wasted money for taxpayers and lost opportunities for students. That has been true at both community colleges and high schools. The country continues to need more mechanics, plumbers and welders, but increasingly, large numbers of vacancies are showing up in industries that technical schools haven't traditionally emphasised, including health care, advanced manufacturing, renewable energy, information technology and other STEM fields. Aligning education and training with job market trends could produce significant benefits for both companies and consumers, as well as for the American workforce, which could enjoy higher pay and greater mobility. Creating that alignment requires reform in four key areas. As a start, curriculums and programs need to be more closely tied to employers and their needs. This requires leadership and collaboration from both education and business leaders, with support from philanthropic organizations. (Disclaimer: Bloomberg Philanthropies has helped establish specialized high schools in partnership with businesses.) The goal should be to equip students with skills that qualify them for jobs immediately out of high school. Next, the federal government can do more to encourage state and local investment in such programs. A number of states and cities are leading the way, under both Democratic and Republican leadership. More federal funds should be available to support the creation and spread of programs that, based on data-driven studies, achieve the best outcomes for employment and earnings. Congress can also incentivise employers to develop more apprenticeship programs. That can be done through modest employer tax credits — as some states now offer, and as bipartisan bills in both the House and Senate would do — or through wage subsidies. Finally, a crucial challenge facing technical education is a shortage of qualified teachers, given that such professionals can earn much more outside the classroom. Governments can help increase the talent pool by loosening certificate requirements for teaching, allowing more experienced professionals (including older workers attracted to teaching) to enter the field; making it easier to teach part time, so that skilled professionals can maintain outside employment; and offering bonuses or higher wages to the best-performing teachers. As for the administration, Education Secretary Linda McMahon, who voiced support for vocational schools in her confirmation hearing, should insist that studies funded by her department — which can help identify the most effective program designs and avoid taxpayer waste — be spared from the chopping block. The more that governments support technical schools, the more crucial it is that they be guided by reliable data and evidence. Career and technical education offers a great opportunity to show that Republicans and Democrats — even now — can work together on a major domestic-policy issue. The administration shouldn't let its fight with Harvard get in the way of seizing it.
