China leads exodus from Israel and Iran as nations rush to evacuate citizens over conflict
China has begun evacuating its citizens from Iran and Israel as tensions grow in the region over the escalating bombardments in both nations.
The Chinese foreign ministry called on its citizens to board chartered flights out of Iran and Israel on Tuesday following President Xi Jinping's call for a cease-fire between the warring states.
'Military conflict is not a way to solve problems, and the escalation of regional tensions is not in the common interests of the international community,' Xi said in his first public comment since the conflict broke out on Friday.
Advertisement
4 Xi Jinping called for a cease-fire between Israel and Iran as Chinese citizens were flown out of both nations on Tuesday.
KAZAKHSTAN'S PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE/AFP via Getty Images
4 A boy walks by the wreckage of an Iranian missile strike in Israel.
Matan Golan/SOPA Images/Shutterstock
China's evacuation order coincided with flights out of Israel for 139 people from the Czech Republic and Slovakia, with the Tourism Ministry offering to help any foreigners coordinate flights out of the Jewish state.
Czech Defense Minister Jana Černochová confirmed that a plane carrying 66 Czech nationals landed in Prague on Tuesday morning after they were transported by bus to an Egyptian airport.
Advertisement
'It was not possible to send the army plane straight to Israel,' the ministry said, due to the airspace closure around the Jewish state over Iran's retaliatory attacks.
A Slovakia-bound plane carrying 73 passengers — mostly Slovaks, but also Poles, Czechs, Austrians, Slovenians and others — landed in Bratislava overnight, said Foreign Minister Juraj Blanar.
4 Slovakia charted a flight with 73 passengers out of Israel as many nations call for their citizens to evacuate.
AP
Advertisement
4 A man watches smoke billow over Tehran following an Israeli airstrike.
BERNO/SIPA/Shutterstock
Among the Slovak evacuees were five family members of diplomats working in Tel Aviv, officials added.
Poland said Tuesday that evacuation flights for its citizens were in the works and set to take off on Wednesday and Thursday.
Israel's Tourism Ministry said that there are about 38,000 tourists currently in Israel, with the agency working with the National Security Council and Transportation Ministry to coordinate flights out of the Jewish state.
Advertisement
Birthright Israel, a nonprofit that was overseeing 2,800 young adults visiting Israel, also facilitated the evacuation of 1,500 people — including hundreds of Americans — aboard a cruise ship bound for Cyprus on Tuesday.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis chartered four jets to pick up the Americans and fly them to Tampa, where they can return home.
With Post wires
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
The Memo: Risks loom as Trump moves toward direct participation in Israel's attack on Iran
President Trump is becoming ever more emphatic in his backing of Israel's attack on Iran, with the chances rising by the hour that he will green-light direct U.S. involvement. The president discussed the crisis in the White House Situation Room with his closest advisors on Tuesday afternoon. Afterward, according to the Israeli news organization Haaretz, he spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The road ahead is complicated, not least because there are stark differences within Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) support base over the merits of getting involved in foreign conflicts in Iran or anywhere else. Then there is the vexing question of what, precisely, the goal would be if the U.S. joined military operations – and how it would be achieved. Would it be limited to destroying the Iranian uranium enrichment facility at Fordow, which is literally built inside a mountain? Or would it be regime change in Tehran? Then there are questions of economics and logistics, such as the effect of an all-out war on oil prices and on crucial mercantile traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. On Tuesday, Trump adopted his most belligerent stance yet on Iran in a series of social media posts. Most blatant of all was an all-caps posting that demanded 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' It was not clear what exactly Trump meant by surrender. The message from the president came shortly after one that had warned, 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but he is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!) at least not for now.' Trump's words were directed at Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and it was notable in part because of media reports in recent days that Trump had kiboshed an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei at the start of the latest phase of the conflict. Trump's use of the word 'we' in seeming reference to a direct alliance between the U.S. and Israel when it comes to the attack on Iran, was not lost on anyone either. He had written on social media about an hour before, 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran.' It's a far cry from the beginning of the Israeli strikes on Iran, just five days previously, which were met by a quick statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio seeking to maintain at least some distance between the U.S. and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government. 'Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Rubio said. But as Trump seems to be moving closer to a joint U.S.-Israeli assault on Iran, he is encountering pushback even from within his own base. A range of prominent figures in MAGA World have expressed skepticism, and sometimes outright indignation, at the idea of the U.S. entangling itself in another conflict in the Middle East. Figures like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), former Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon, commentator Tucker Carlson and several online influencers are part of a populist conservative movement that has grown far more dubious of military involvements in the two decades since President George W. Bush and his coterie of neoconservative advisors launched wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. On Monday, Greene took aim on social media at 'fakes' who were 'slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war.' On Tuesday, she emphasized the need to cater to Americans who want their leaders to work on kitchen-table issues, like 'cheap gas, groceries, bills, and housing,' rather than having the government's energy and resources 'going into another foreign war.' Carlson has become one of the main right-wing media voices expressing opposition to foreign military adventuring, and skepticism about the assumption that the U.S. should back Israel in almost any endeavor. On Monday, he published a long on-camera interview with Bannon in which the erstwhile strategist began by saying that one of the main pillars of the MAGA coalition from the start of Trump's rise was to 'stop the forever wars.' 'I'm a big supporter of Israel,' Bannon said, 'and I'm telling people, hey, if we get sucked into this war…it's going to not just blow up the [MAGA] coalition, it's also going to thwart what we're doing' on the domestic front — specifically in terms of Trump's hardline policies on immigration. It bears emphasizing that the risks for Trump in directly joining the Israeli assault are not limited to the split in his political base. For a start, there is the perennial problem with military operations that the late secretary of State Colin Powell dubbed 'mission creep.' Powell was referring to the tendency for objectives to become more and more expansive over time, to a point where it becomes politically difficult to either withdraw troops or declare victory At the same time, there are voices within the GOP coalition loudly insisting that Trump should give Israel the utmost backing. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has said that the U.S. should go 'all-in' behind Israel if Iran does not come to an agreement over its uranium enrichment program. If Trump were to confound current expectations, he would keep the U.S. out of the direct conflict. But he would also be open to criticism from the most vehement supporters of Israel, within his own party and beyond, that he had blinked at a crucial time, passing up on what they see as a potentially transformative moment. Either way, the risks and rewards are profound — especially for a president who has previously expressed pride in his ability to keep the U.S. out of new wars. The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage.
Politico
40 minutes ago
- Politico
Cities sue DHS over frozen anti-terrorism funds
Five major U.S. cities are suing the Trump administration over funding to prevent nuclear attacks and terrorism that they argue has been illegally withheld by the Department of Homeland Security. The lawsuit filed by Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle, Denver and Boston alleges that the administration has not reimbursed cities for relevant security expenses since February and has failed to award funding for 2025. 'Even by Trump standards, this action is astonishing,' Denver Mayor Mike Johnston told POLITICO on Tuesday. 'You are willfully putting Americans at risk of terror attacks.' The Securing the Cities program was created to help cities prepare for the possibility of nuclear or terrorist attacks. It began first as a pilot program in the New York City region in 2006 and expanded over time to 13 cities. In 2018, the program was formally authorized by Congress. 'DHS cannot override Congress's judgment by freezing congressionally appropriated funding,' the lawsuit argues. The lawsuit was initially filed by Chicago in May; the other four cities signed on Tuesday. DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the lawsuit. 'There's a pretty big irony between the rhetoric we're hearing from D.C. on the need to have safe and secure cities,' Seattle Deputy Mayor Greg Wong told POLITICO Tuesday, 'and what's happening here — where the actual dollars that go to support that at the city level are being held up.' It's the latest in a series of lawsuits brought against the Trump administration by cities and states since January over the withholding or freezing of federal funds. Some of those lawsuits have already found success: A federal judge in Boston on Monday ruled that the elimination of certain NIH grants was illegal — calling their termination 'government racial discrimination.' The lawsuit alleges that, since February, DHS has not reimbursed cities, even for security expenses that were already approved. Denver, for example, is still waiting on more than $300,000, according to Johnston's office. Securing the Cities funds in Denver have been used in the past for security for visits by both President Donald Trump and former President Joe Biden, as well as for major sporting and music events that could be targets. 'It's one thing to say you're going to disagree about the use of FEMA funds for migrant services, or to say you disagree about transportation contracting with DEI priorities,' Johnston said. 'But to say you're going to cut anti-terrorist protections in American cities, I think, is way beyond the pale of debates about social policy.' In the lawsuit, plaintiffs said they intend to use the money to help protect major sporting events taking place next year, like the Super Bowl in San Francisco and FIFA World Cup events in multiple cities. In Seattle, for example, the city planned to spend this year's grant on 1,000 radiation detection devices that can catch terrorism devices like dirty bombs which could be detonated in a crowd. The equipment is expected to be part of the city's preparation to host World Cup matches in 2026, Wong told POLITICO. 'The Trump administration ordered us to pause on that purchase of equipment,' Wong said. $300 million was distributed to cities in the program between 2007 and 2023, according to the Government Accountability Office, and annual funding for the program is estimated to be around $29 million. San Francisco and Chicago both said Tuesday they expected to receive about $1 million from the grant program. The program has received scrutiny from lawmakers in the past. A bipartisan bill introduced by Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.) in 2024 would have required the program to establish performance metrics and reach specific milestones. The bill passed the House in March 2024 and made it through one Senate committee but failed to make it over the finish line. The GAO in 2024 also made five recommendations for DHS to make the program more effective. GAO eventually found the Biden administration either partially or fully addressed all five. 'This is one where all of our regional leaders, Republican and Democrat alike, are shocked that this is where we are,' Johnston said. 'We think this is a perfect reason why you go to court.' Shia Kapos contributed to this report
New York Post
41 minutes ago
- New York Post
Honoring soldiers in the Flag Day Parade: Letters to the Editor — June 18, 2025
The Issue: The Flag Day parade in celebration of the US Army's 250th anniversary in DC on Saturday. The military parade that took place on Flag Day brought Americans together, displayed our country's rich history and strength and encouraged the younger generation to consider joining the US Army. (' 'Tanks' to the prez,' June 15). Thanks to President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for making this parade possible to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Army. There is an urgent need to bolster military recruitment — and to achieve that, the younger generation must be inspired to join the armed forces. The parade serves that purpose. Regardless of one's political views, we must all support and be proud of our military. I was happy to see patriotic Americans uniting to celebrate our Army. Tawsif Anam Madison, Wis. Now the Trump-haters are accusing him of wasting tax dollars on a military parade. As a veteran, I have no problem with our government celebrating the 250th birthday of the US Army. My grandparents, my stepfather and my biological father's family are all European immigrants who came to the United States and became legal immigrants by going through the proper protocol, as did many other citizens. The liberals are okay with funding illegal immigrants with tax dollars but take issue with Trump honoring the US Army on its birthday. It's another shameful exhibit by anti-Americans. Lou Bivona Belleville, NJ Our American soldiers spend most of their daily lives out of our sight in the background. They remain unnoticed in their daily routine of hard work and continuous training. The timely celebration and recognition of our soldiers' dedication, courage and commitment was long overdue. Any observer of the parade could readily see the soldiers' smiling faces and waving hands. The looney left stewing in their own boiling bile was too busy stirring up hate and discourse to enjoy the peaceful festivities, displays of strength, sense of purpose and recognition of those who serve and protect our freedom. Jack Condon Huntington Station On behalf of a grateful nation, this Flag Day, true patriots extended the greatest heartfelt appreciation for the unqualified devotion of soldiers who have, for the last 250 years, put themselves in harm's way defending our democracy against tyranny. Happy Flag Day, America, and happy birthday, US Army. No kings! Kirk Kelly, Alphabet City As a staunch supporter of Trump, I understand wanting a parade to honor the 250th anniversary of the US Army, and we all want to thank them for their service. However, I am concerned that the optics will not be beneficial to Trump, even though his leadership is stellar. In the end, we are mostly all proud Americans who support our men and women who serve to protect. Donna Skjeveland Holbrook In celebration of Flag Day, let us all remember what our beloved national symbol represents. Our flag represents freedom, justice and equality, which is what our colonists fought for before the birth of our nation. May our flag always wave proudly across America. Let us also remember all of the men and women in the various branches of our military for their service and dedication to protecting our country, as well as all of our past veterans who also served our country with dedication. God bless all of these brave men and women. Our country truly owes them an enormous debt of gratitude for all they've done and continue to do. John Amato Fresh Meadows Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
