
Palestine activist Mahmoud Khalil to be released on bail, judge rules
Palestine activist and Columbia graduate Mahmoud Khalil must be released on bail, a US judge ruled on Friday.
The major court decision comes after back-and-forth legal challenges over the past few months.
'[The] petitioner is not a flight risk,' Judge Michael Farbiarz told litigators, according to Courthouse News. 'He's also not a danger to the community.'
The same judge ruled last week that the White House could not use US foreign policy interests to justify its detention of Mr Khalil. But President Donald Trump's administration said it had no plans to release him.
'The court did not order respondents to release petitioner Mahmoud Khalil,' US Department of Justice lawyers wrote in a last-minute appeal, implying they could detain Mr Khalil on other grounds.
'An alien like Khalil may be detained during the pendency of removal proceedings regardless of the charge of removability.' The government explained that Mr Khalil had to convince the Department of Homeland Security to release him, and that he had failed to do so.
The DOJ also asked that if Mr Farbiarz insisted on releasing Mr Khalil, they could pursue other legal options to keep him detained. The judge acquiesced.
'The respondents have now represented that the petitioner is being detained on another, second charge,' he wrote, adding that Mr Khalil retains the option of requesting bail through an application to an immigration judge presiding over his case.
On Wednesday, Judge Farbiarz said Mr Khalil's legal team had shown that his continued detention was causing irreparable harm to his career, his family and his right to free speech.
Mr Khalil, a legal US resident who played a prominent role in pro-Palestine campus protests last year, has been held in Louisiana since his March arrest.
The State Department revoked his green card under a little-used provision of immigration law granting the Secretary of State the power to seek the deportation of any non-citizen whose presence in the country is considered adverse to US foreign policy interests.
The White House has accused Mr Khalil of spreading Hamas propaganda during the protests.
A judge in Louisiana previously ruled that the US government could proceed with efforts to deport him. He was denied leave in late April to attend the birth of his first child.
His arrest was part of a Trump administration crackdown on so-called anti-Semitism on university campuses. The administration has deemed pro-Palestine protests to fall under this umbrella.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UAE Moments
an hour ago
- UAE Moments
US President Trump Extends TikTok Sale Deadline by 90 Days
In a significant move, U.S. President Donald Trump has extended the deadline for ByteDance, TikTok's parent company, to sell the popular video-sharing app's U.S. operations by 90 days. The US President posted on Social Truth, "I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025)." The TikTok ban took effect on January 19, one day before President Trump's inauguration. Upon taking office, President Trump gave TikTok 75 days to divest its U.S. business, but a second extension pushed the deadline to Thursday, June 19, but now the deadline is September 17. "We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users," TikTok said in a statement. This article was previously published on saudimoments. To see the original article, click here

The National
an hour ago
- The National
Harvard gets victory in court on Trump's ban on international student enrollment
In a major victory for Harvard University, a judge upheld a decision on Friday that blocks US President Donald Trump's order barring international students from enrolling. The Trump administration in May attempted to block Harvard's ability to enrol international students following a series of disagreements revolving around university autonomy. If the move by Mr Trump were successful, it would have been a significant blow to Harvard, with most estimates showing that about 25 per cent of the university's students coming from outside the US. Harvard has become a major target for Mr Trump, who has accused several universities of promoting liberal bias and anti-Semitism, with much of the tension between the administration and institutions rooted in the widespread pro-Palestine campus protests that erupted in the spring of last year. The White House has sought in particular to crack down on foreign students demonstrating in support of Palestine, and has also demanded that universities make changes to various policies that would bring them more in line with the administration's agenda. At the request of Mr Trump, later in May, the State Department rolled out a pilot programme directing US consulates and embassies to engage in " additional vetting" of social media accounts of international Harvard applicants seeking visas. The new policy targets students, professors and employees, as well as guest speakers at Harvard. Harvard has repeatedly objected to the various moves aimed at controlling university policy, but the Trump administration has shown no signs of backing down. The White House has also previously said that it intends on revoking Harvard's tax-exempt status. 'The government has long exempted universities from taxes in order to support their educational mission," a Harvard representative said in May. "The tax exemption means that more of every dollar can go towards scholarships for students, life-saving and life-enhancing medical research, and technological advancements that drive economic growth."


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
On World Refugee Day, scores of families approved for resettlement in US are stuck in limbo
Friday, 20 June, marks International Refugee Day, but celebrations across the US have been muted since the Trump administration's 20 January refugee ban remains firmly in place. Since the ban was implemented, around 12,000 refugees who had security screenings and were booked for travel to the US had their flights cancelled. Another approximately 108,000 remaining refugees who had been 'conditionally approved' to come to the US remain stranded in precarious situations overseas. Only a very small number of refugees are currently being resettled and allowed to access support services under exceptions to the refugee ban. The Biden administration had announced a target of 125,000 refugees for fiscal year 2025, and according to the United Nations, there were 42.7 million refugees worldwide at the end of 2024. Refugees currently being settled in the US include dozens of white South Africans and approximately 160 refugees protected by an injunction under a lawsuit known as Pacito vs Trump. While multiple lawsuits against the ban have been, and are being filed in courts, the Pacito vs Trump case, filed by International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) in February, is one of the most significant and high-profile challenges to the refugee ban. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The class action lawsuit filed by IRAP represents a group of nine individuals affected by the ban and several refugee resettlement agencies seeking to have the executive order and suspension of refugee-related funding declared illegal and their implementation halted. It also looks to restore vital funding to the United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP). On 5 May, the Western District Court of Washington issued a compliance order to the government to process and provide resettlement support to refugees who were conditionally approved and had travel scheduled before 20 January 2025. This order covers 160 individuals who had imminent travel plans as of 20 January and will retain protection under the ruling. On 15 May, the district court also affirmed that the government must immediately resume the processing of around 11,840 vulnerable refugees who were conditionally approved for resettlement with confirmed travel plans before the executive order. Laurie Ball Cooper, vice president for US legal programmes at IRAP, affirmed that some more people may be eligible to resume their plans to come to the US. 'In addition, among the remaining - approximately 12,000 people minus the 160 - there are surely people who can meet the standard set by the Ninth Circuit of showing that they have a strong reliance interest in the travel and therefore are still protected by the injunction,' she said. 'The district court has indicated that they will set up a process using a special neutral individual [special master] to adjudicate disputes around who meets that standard and who does not. But that process hasn't started yet,' Ball Cooper said. 'Bittersweet' From the approximate 108,000 refugees who were 'conditionally approved', Ball Cooper remains optimistic that the current litigation would also be able to find them some relief. 'Our underlying litigation continues to challenge the executive order as it applies to all refugees, and so over the long term, I hope that we will prevail on those arguments and see people able to proceed to safety.' USRAP was created in 1980 by the Refugee Act of 1980 to provide a safe and legal pathway for people fleeing persecution, war, or conflict to come to the United States to either join with family or to meet foreign and humanitarian policy priorities of the US government. Despite political rhetoric that often scapegoats refugees as a burden, refugees are a fiscal success for the United States. Based on a study commissioned by the Trump administration during his first term, refugees were shown to contribute $63 billion more in federal, state, and local taxes than they had taken in services and assistance between 2005 and 2014. US grants dozens of white South Africans refugee status Read More » 'Every refugee who enters is someone who is able to pursue the life that they are meant to be able to pursue here: in many cases, to reunite with family members, to join communities that are ready to welcome them. So every single arrival is something worth celebrating, and more should be coming!' Ball Cooper added. Despite the statistical net positive that refugees bring to the US, celebrations on World Refugee Day have been bittersweet. 'I would describe observances of International Refugee Day today as mixed,' Ball Cooper said. She said that everyone in refugee communities or refugee-serving communities was continuing to take time today to celebrate the many ways refugees 'enrich our communities in the US, and the great joy it is for those of us who get to know, work with and live with refugees'. 'At the same time, it is certainly bittersweet, because there are so many tens of thousands of refugees who should be here already, and they're not because of the refugee ban,' she said. 'This is deeply sad, extremely frustrating, heartbreaking and life-threatening for many of the refugees themselves.'