logo
Inuit-led cruise sets a new standard for Arctic tourism

Inuit-led cruise sets a new standard for Arctic tourism

Mariah Erkloo remembers as a child watching massive, gleaming vessels glide into her hamlet of Pond Inlet, Nunavut, bringing strangers to her Arctic home for a few hours before vanishing over the horizon. It wasn't an altogether positive experience, she recalls.
'You just feel their presence and that's it,' she said. 'It never felt like there would be any benefit or like a mutual relationship in that.'
Arctic cruise tourism has grown rapidly in recent years. In Nunavut, just a few ships used to visit, but now places like Pond Inlet can see up to 30 cruise ships in one short season between July and September.
International cruise operators typically sell and finalize their itineraries, then reach out to communities afterwards, asking them to organize events and tours for the visitors — sometimes at the last minute.
'There are examples in the past where companies are literally like, 'We're coming to your community on this day and we want you to do this for us,' which is insane to me,' said Alex McNeil, chief expedition officer at HX, a UK-based cruise operator.
This summer, Erkloo is helping McNeil and HX flip the script. Inuit communities are not just greeting tourists, but leading how the local experience is planned from the start.
'The majority of the industry, including us, are far from achieving what's possible through expedition travel,' said Alex McNeil, CXO at HX. 'We're trying to be further along on that journey than others, but it's still a work in progress.'
'We want more people involved and we want to impact more people and make sure we are a part of the conversation,' said Erkloo, who joined the HX team last summer to co-develop the project. She is a sociology student at UBC who returns home in the spring.
HX, formerly known as Hurtigruten Expeditions after its parent company, the Norwegian national ferry operator, is the first major international cruise operator to hand over control of shore excursions to the communities themselves.
McNeil, who has worked in tourism for a long time, recalls visiting Grise Fiord as a junior expedition guide in the late 2000s, when the mayor and residents welcomed the cruise guests with traditional food, games and performances.
'It wasn't a business transaction,' McNeil said. 'It was like, 'You're coming to our home, our shores and we're going to open our doors and just welcome you.''
But when the mayor asked the expedition leader where to send the invoice for their hospitality, he was told there was no budget. The community, not the cruise line, was left to cover the costs.
'I had never been so embarrassed and ashamed in my life,' McNeil said. 'There was such a disparity in resources and no compromise.'
More than a decade later, McNeil is overseeing HX's effort to do things differently.
Flipping the script
Traditionally, Arctic cruises visiting Nunavut communities operated the same way — cruise operators typically paid a base fee to the local hamlet. In exchange, visitors were offered a walking tour and a cultural performance at the community hall. The economic impact was minimal and the experience, though genuine, was not shaped by local priorities, McNeil said.
Under the new model, activities will look a little different: guided hikes, Arctic char fishing, community bingo, art workshops or a small-group conversation with community members will be offered instead.
From the outset, the company is co-creating itineraries with communities, including Pond Inlet, Gjøa Haven and Cambridge Bay.
'The majority of the industry, including us, are far from achieving what's possible through expedition travel,' McNeil said. 'We're trying to be further along on that journey than others, but it's still a work in progress.'
Last summer, HX ran pilot projects in Pond Inlet to test what it would look like if elders and residents shaped the cruise excursions — choosing the activities, setting the pace and deciding who would be involved.
'It feels like now the communities are like, 'Okay, these are things we want to do,'' Erkloo said.
Communities established their own limits on visitor numbers, duration of the excursion and the types of experiences they felt were both authentic and sustainable to share.
The company organized open community meetings where anyone could attend, not just community leaders or business owners.
'We just kind of opened up the space,' McNeil said. 'We want to invite them to add input and know what pressure points are [there]? What are areas you think are beneficial? What works and what doesn't?'
Arctic's tourism boom
The concept " last chance tourism ' has become a significant driver of demand in the Arctic, with many visitors motivated by the desire to see melting sea ice, threatened wildlife and unique Indigenous cultures before they are irrevocably changed.
In recent years, Inuit communities near Pond Inlet have taken a stronger role in shaping tourism activity, particularly as they pushed for changes to protect narwhals in Eclipse Sound after hunters and trappers reported sharp declines linked to heavy ship traffic. In response, cruise operators under the Association of Arctic Expedition Cruise Operators have agreed to avoid Eclipse Sound during peak narwhal migration, opting for less sensitive routes instead.
Christopher Debicki, vice president of policy development and counsel at Oceans North, a Canadian charity for Arctic and Atlantic marine conservation said while cruise and expedition travel are increasing, he rejects the idea that the Arctic is already lost.
"It's not too late, these places are still very, very vibrant both from a human perspective and from a biological perspective,' Debicki said. 'We're working really, really hard with community partners to make sure that's not the case, to make sure they stay really productive.'
Debicki said historically, ship noise in the region was rare, but recent increases in mining and cruise traffic have led to more repetitive noise, which interrupts narwhal behavior and makes hunting more difficult for local communities.
Oceans North is working with the Arctic cruise association and the Scripps Institute of Oceanography to better understand how underwater noise affects marine animals in the eastern Canadian Arctic. By using acoustic monitoring and working in close collaboration with Inuit hunters in Pond Inlet, their team aims to shape policies that protect wildlife and the people who depend on them.
'If we make the right choices, they're going to stay vibrant for this generation and for future generations,' Debicki said.
All revenue from shore excursions will go directly to the communities.
'If the tour costs, say, $200, we leave $200 in Nunavut,' he said.
The company earns its profits by selling their premium-priced packages, often marketed as once-in-a-lifetime Arctic journeys.
'We're selling trips that are like $20,000. If we can get people to go on those trips, we're doing just fine,' McNeil said.
McNeil is quick to mention that not all companies are falling short of delivering responsible programs in the Arctic. He pointed to Adventure Canada, a Canadian-owned operator, as a company that has set a high standard for community-focused Arctic tourism. However, their scale is smaller than HX — they run a single, smaller ship seasonally.
Most expedition cruise ships in the Arctic carry between 100 and 200 guests. HX operates two vessels on the Northwest Passage that can each accommodate up to 500 passengers — more than double the industry standard, though they typically sail with 300 to 400 guests.
Larger ships, like the Crystal Serenity, have sailed the Northwest Passage in 2016 with about 1,000 passengers and more than 600 crew raising concerns about overwhelming small hamlets along the route.
To avoid swamping communities, HX worked with the communities to break large groups into much smaller, more personalized excursions. Each excursion is limited to about 10 to 12 guests.
'If we're just putting more people, we're probably contributing toward negative outcomes, rather than creating positive change,' McNeil said.
Their approach is intended to spread economic benefits more widely, ease the strain on local resources and foster more meaningful exchanges between visitors and hosts, McNeil said.
McNeil said as a major industry player, they feel a responsibility to invest in local development, skills training and mentorship. By proving the concept works, they hope communities can adopt the model to offer tours and experiences to any cruise line that arrives in Nunavut.
Beginning in summer 2025, the operator will offer the community-led excursions as part of its 25-day Northwest Passage cruises between Greenland and Alaska.
'I just feel like we were planting seeds and then we're going to see what comes out of that,' Erkloo said. 'Right now, we're at the perfect turning point and it's really exciting for me.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms

Winnipeg Free Press

time16 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership,' the two companies said. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' The Japan-based steelmaker had been offering nearly $15 billion to purchase the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in a merger that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, yet he expressed optimism in working out an arrangement once in office. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' said Trump, although it was unclear what he meant by suggesting that the federal government would determine what U.S. Steel does as a company. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' Still, Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday. ___ Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report.

Delivery services under legal scrutiny for alleged 'drip pricing'
Delivery services under legal scrutiny for alleged 'drip pricing'

Vancouver Sun

time18 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Delivery services under legal scrutiny for alleged 'drip pricing'

The practice known as 'drip pricing' is front and centre again in an action by the federal Competition Bureau against DoorDash and in a proposed class-action lawsuit brought by a Toronto law firm against Uber Eats. Drip pricing generally involves enticing customers by advertising low prices, but charging extra mandatory fees, usually when they are checking out. It continues to come under fire because 'disclosure around pricing and fees in various consumer transactions is, at times, less than thorough and transparent,' says Mike Robb, partner with London, Ontario-based law firm, Siskinds. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The Competition Bureau says w hen 'the represented price is inaccurate, it makes it more difficult for consumers to comparison shop and result(s) in unfair outcomes for honest competitors.' Canada's competition watchdog is hauling DoorDash Inc. and its Canadian subsidiary before the Competition Tribunal, accusing them of portraying the online cost of delivery as lower than the price consumers ultimately pay. The Competition Bureau says it investigated and is alleging DoorDash customers paid more, due to mandatory fees, added during checkout. The extra fees, the bureau says, include charges such as extra amounts for delivering items a further distance and for placing smaller orders. The bureau alleges the discretionary charges were sometimes framed as taxes. The bureau alleges DoorDash may have used drip pricing for close to a decade to make nearly $1 billion from mandatory fees, according to the Canadian Press . The bureau is asking the Competition Tribunal to order the company to stop the practice, cease portraying fees as taxes, pay a penalty and issue restitution to affected consumers. However, DoorDash is pushing back. 'This application is a misguided and excessive attempt to target one of Canada's leading local commerce platforms,' DoorDash spokesperson Trent Hodson told CP . 'It unfairly singles out DoorDash, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these claims.' Still, the bureau is standing its ground. 'Our litigation against DoorDash is another example of our efforts to ensure consumers are not misled and can trust the prices they see online. We urge all businesses to review their pricing practices and make sure they comply with the law,' said Matthew Boswell, commissioner of competition in a press release . The Competition Bureau has been more aggressive of late in battling drip pricing. Last fall, the bureau won a deceptive marketing case against Cineplex Inc. , noted Robb. It had been adding a mandatory $1.50 online booking fee. The company was ordered to pay a financial penalty of almost $39 million. Last summer, says Robb, the bureau reached an agreement with SiriusXM Canada . In that case, the company was ordered to pay a $3.3 million penalty over adding a fee on subscription plans that increased the monthly cost. Meanwhile, legal action against drip pricing is not exclusive to public regulators. Law firms that navigate class actions are getting in on the act too. Toronto firm, Koskie Minsky filed a statement of claim against Uber Eats with the Ontario Superior Court Justice last month. It alleges Uber Eats has been hiding an additional service fee within its overall delivery costs. The proposed class action alleges that Uber misrepresented the true cost of delivery by not disclosing the service fee until the final stage of the transaction, 'often obscured under a 'Taxes & Other Fees' line item, a practice known as drip pricing,' says the law firm on its website. The action has been brought on behalf of Canadian residents who on or after May 16, 2023, placed a delivery order using Uber Eats and paid a service fee. Further, the lawsuit alleges Uber One members, who are supposed to enjoy benefits such as no delivery fees on eligible orders, have been paying the service fee. It's 'really a delivery fee as it only applies to delivery orders' and it 'constitutes a breach of contract and negates the advertised benefit of the subscription.' Robb says 'the existence of parallel proceedings in these cases is not necessarily surprising or unusual.' He explains that the Competition Bureau has a statutory mandate to protect Canadian consumers and businesses from allegedly unfair business practices. In its case against DoorDash , it is asking the Competition Tribunal to provide restitution to consumers, though that's somewhat unusual, he says. 'It may or may not be equipped to negotiate and deliver remedies to consumers.' However, he points out that class actions always focus on recovery for consumers, 'even when the amounts are individually minimal. It is common in our cases that when they resolve, an administration mechanism is established to facilitate an accessible distribution of modest amount to individual consumers.' A recent example would be a payout website established for the bread-fixing class-action settlement. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store