logo

Canadian crab, lobster industry officials look for answers in Boston

CBC15-03-2025

Goal at trade expo is to settle on best prices, explore new markets as tariffs approach
Image | Geoff Irvine of the Lobster Council of Canada says harvesters must decide whether to increase the m
Caption: Geoff Irvine is with the Lobster Council of Canada. (Mark Crosby/CBC)
Canadian crab and lobster industry representatives, including some from New Brunswick, will be looking for answers and opportunities at a seafood exhibition in Boston.
The goal is to develop relations with other industry players as Canada faces tariff troubles with both the U.S. and China.
The U.S. has postponed 25 per cent tariffs on most Canadian goods until April 2, but China's tariffs that target Canadian crab and lobster will come into effect March 20, according to a previous CBC report.
"It's going to be very difficult to settle on prices given that we have to build in that the tariffs are happening," said Geoff Irvine, executive director of the Lobster Council of Canada.
"Most of our live lobster is sold, so we're coming into the spring with a fairly blank slate knowing that we're going to have a significant amount of lobster in April and May and June."
Image | Lobster fishing, Anse-Bleue, NB
Caption: The Lobster Council of Canada aims to sort out the best price that would work through the supply chain, as tariffs approach. (CBC/Radio-Canada)
Open Image in New Tab
The expo attracts many countries. Major seafood exporters set up booths at the show.
"I'll be looking to see what they do, how they do it, how they pay for it, and try to bring that home, and once again attempt to come up with a marketing strategy for all Canadian seafood," said Irvine.
He said there is another seafood expo in Spain this May to discuss the European market. Irvine said he is also in talks with customers in China, Southeast Asia and the Middle East.
"I fully expect that a lot of our exporters will switch as much of their sales to other markets as they can," he said. "But keeping in mind that the United States is by far our biggest market and we must sell a significant amount of our products here, and we will."
Gilles Theriault, the executive director of the New Brunswick Crab Processors Association, will also be in Boston.
He said his goal is to return with an understanding about who — the buyer or the seller — would bear the extra cost of tariffs.
It would either mean an expensive product for the customer or a loss for the fisher, he said.
He said inflated prices in the U.S. could lead consumers to avoid expensive lobsters and crabs until the off-season.
He said if that happens, it may complicate how the fishers get paid as the product would have to be stored and rates would likely change.
Theriault is also looking to develop new markets possibly in Europe and Asia.
"People have to understand that you don't develop these markets overnight, it takes time, it takes years sometimes," he said.
Irvine said there certainly is a high demand in the American market for Canadian seafood, regardless of tariffs, and it is just a question of sorting out the best price that would work through the supply chain.
He said he met a number of Americans on Friday night and their reaction fascinated him.
"They were apologetic," he said. "They were empathetic. I think we have a real opportunity in America to appeal to Americans who support us."
He said he is optimistic about the outcome. He said anything else could lead to "a meltdown" for the Canadian lobster industry.
"It has to go as I expect it to go. This is … our biggest market by far."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court rules Trump's tariffs can stay in effect while appeal proceeds
Court rules Trump's tariffs can stay in effect while appeal proceeds

Vancouver Sun

timean hour ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Court rules Trump's tariffs can stay in effect while appeal proceeds

WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court agreed on Tuesday that U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs will remain in place while a case is heard — extending an emergency stay granted after a lower court found the devastating duties unlawful. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found 'a stay is warranted under the circumstances.' It provides a temporary victory for the Trump administration as it hits its first legal barriers for realigning global trade. The U.S. Court of International Trade last month said Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, is a national security statute that gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. The ruling from the three-judge panel at the New York-based federal court in May said 'any interpretation of IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional.' It said 'the challenged tariff orders will be vacated,' representing a nationwide injunction against any further imposition of the duties. Trump administration quickly was granted an emergency motion, essentially freezing the decision by the trade court that blocked the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs. The appeals court upheld that stay but noted the need for an expedited hearing, saying 'these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration.' A proposed schedule says arguments are expected in court by July 31. That means that countries will continue to be hit by those duties, for now. Stock markets have been in turmoil and supply chains have been upended as Trump used unprecedented presidential power to enact his tariffs. Up until Trump's return to the White House, IEEPA had never been used by a president to impose tariffs. Trump hit Canada with economywide duties in March after he declared an emergency at the northern border related to the flow of fentanyl. He partially paused levies a few days later for imports that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. Trump took his trade war to the world in April with duties on nearly every country saying America's trade deficits amounted to a national emergency. The president walked back the most devastating duties a few hours later but left a 10 per cent universal tariff in place for most countries. Trump said the 90-day pause would give countries time to negotiate a deal. The president said if countries didn't comply he would simply set tariff rates himself. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said that the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this' and called the lower court's decision 'judicial overreach.' The appeal ruling will consider two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One included five American small businesses against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other stemmed from 12 states arguing against both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. At least seven lawsuits are challenging the tariffs. Lawyers for the businesses say IEEPA does not mention tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. They say Trump is misusing the statute. Lawyers for Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont argued that tariffs make U.S. trade policy dependent on Trump's whims. Thirty-three senators also filed an amicus brief — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — in the case, saying the duties would cause harm to small- and medium-sized businesses while also grabbing powers that should be assigned to Congress. 'Small businesses do not have cash-on-hand or capital reserves to pay the increased tariffs, nor can they quickly adapt to them by modifying supply chains,' it said. 'If they cannot pass on the tariff costs to consumers — which would create additional harms for… constituents — many face letting employees go or filing for bankruptcy. Even a few weeks of additional tariffs means small businesses will suffer irreparable harm.' Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store