Landmark UK report on Hamas massacre exposes worst attack on Jews since Holocaust
A Holocaust survivor murdered at age 91 and a baby killed just 14 hours after birth are among the victims named in the U.K.'s October 7 Parliamentary Commission Report, the most detailed Western investigation to date into the Hamas-led attack on Israel.
The 318-page report, chaired by British historian and peer Lord Andrew Roberts, documents the deaths of 1,182 people in a 48-hour period and provides extensive evidence of atrocities committed against civilians.
The report describes the assault as "a meticulously planned operation designed not only to kill but to terrorize through extreme brutality, looting and humiliation." It includes testimonies of group rapes of women and girls, some of whom were murdered, as well as evidence of sexual violence committed against corpses. It details the targeting of children, including infants shot in strollers or burned alive.
Roberts, one of Britain's leading historians and a member of the House of Lords, said that meeting Mandy Damari, the mother of hostage Emily Damari, "reduced me to tears." Speaking in an interview with Fox News Digital, Lord Roberts recalled visiting Kibbutz Kfar Aza and hearing from families of victims while the fate of their loved ones was still unknown.
"At that time, of course, she didn't know whether her 27-year-old daughter, Emily, was going to be released or not, or whether she was going to die in Gaza," he said. "And I have a 25-year-old daughter, and so it was brought home incredibly powerfully to me."
Despite the graphic nature of the material, Roberts emphasized that the report was deliberately limited to verified facts. "We actually made the report much less than it could have been, because we insisted on only putting things in that could be double-checked," he said. "If we had put in things that we truly believe happened but couldn't prove happened, we kept them out."
When asked what motivated him to take on the project, Roberts said, "The denialism that has already cropped up," including attempts to downplay or question the events of October 7. "It's quite ironic that as well as celebrating and indulging in their most sort of disgusting fantasies by wearing GoPro cameras, they also seek to deny that the whole thing ever happened," he said of Hamas.
"October 7 denial," as the report refers to it, emerged almost immediately after the attacks and mirrors historical patterns of atrocity denial, despite the overwhelming evidence.
"I thought it was really important to get a big, thick, well-documented, irrefutable, fully footnoted document out there that will stand the test of time," Roberts said.
The report includes accounts of mass looting, arson and mutilation. It states that terrorists used victims' phones to send images to their families, booby-trapped corpses with grenades, and dragged bodies through Gaza. It confirms that "acts of sexual violence" occurred "across all sites" during the attack, and references forensic findings of partially or fully naked bodies.
Roberts said the attack was "not just spontaneous — it was a premeditated bloodlust." He compared it to historical atrocities like the Rape of Nanjing in 1937. "Once Hamas got into a bloodlust, they were going out of their way to murder and kill absolutely anybody who came anywhere near them," he said.
Despite the horrors, Roberts said the report also includes examples of heroism. For example, of Netta Epstein — a young man who "threw himself on a grenade to save his fiancée's life" — Roberts said such acts "stand up with the great acts of heroism of any age."
"We have the names in it of everybody who was killed ... mostly with the circumstances of their deaths as well," Roberts added: "Speaking as a historian, there are moments when one thinks of 9/11, or Pearl Harbor, various other attacks like this. They become part of history very quickly, but the actual individuals involved tend to get forgotten."
Asked what role democracies should play in countering denialism, Roberts answered, "The first is properly to memorialize the victims," he said. "The second ... is to see this appalling act of barbarism for what it is, which is a complete denial of democracy, a blow struck deliberately against civilization, and ... the most appalling act of racism."
"Britain should be doing everything in its power to help Israel protect itself forever against such another attack," Roberts clarified that he was expressing a personal view: "At the moment, it seems [the British government] is not doing that at all."
In the report's conclusion, Roberts and his colleagues wrote: "Our report will hopefully permit people to see such denials and justifications for what they really are: a perversion of and rejection of human decency. We owe it to the victims and their grieving families to set down the ghastly unvarnished truth about the sheer barbarism that Hamas and its terrorist allies unleashed on October 7, 2023."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
39 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Companies Warned On Iranian Cyberattacks
The escalating conflict between Iran and Israel has cyber experts concerned that cyberattacks could spill over into places conventional weapons never would. Iran has been a significant cyber threat for years. The U.S. has said hackers linked to the country have broken into critical infrastructure systems in Israel and other Middle Eastern and Western nations. It is considered one of the major cyber adversaries of the U.S., alongside Russia, China and North Korea. Targets have included sensitive companies such as a water utility in Aliquippa, Pa., in 2023. Late last year, a joint advisory from U.S., British, Israeli and Canadian intelligence agencies warned that Iran-linked hackers were targeting industrial systems and outlined their tactics.
Fox News
41 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump says Iran would 'like to talk' about dialing down Israel-Iran conflict
President Donald Trump said Monday that Iran would "like to talk" about dialing down the Israel-Iran conflict during a quick appearance in front of reporters alongside Canada's prime minister at this week's G7 conference. The president made the comment after a reporter asked if Trump had seen or heard "any signals or seen any messages from intermediaries that Iran wishes to de-escalate the conflict." "They'd like to talk, but they should have done that before," Trump responded. "But I'd say Iran is not winning this war. And they should talk, and they should talk immediately before it's too late." Trump's comments come amid an ongoing exchange of missile barrages between Israel and Iran. The battle began last week when Israel launched attacks from inside Iran targeting many of Iran's top military commanders and the country's nuclear facilities. Trump reiterated during his Monday comments from the G7 that he had provided Iran 60 days to strike a deal on a new nuclear deal that the president has suggested could have prevented the current fighting. "They had 60 days, and on the 61st day, I said, 'We don't have a deal,'" Trump said while standing next to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. "They have to make a deal. And it's painful for both parties." When asked what it would take for the U.S. to get involved in the conflict militarily, Trump said, "I don't want to talk about that." "We've always supported Israel," Trump added when asked what material support the United States was providing Israel amid the attacks. "We have, for a long period of time, strongly, and Israel is doing very well right now." On Monday, the Wall Street Journal reported that, according to Middle Eastern and European officials, Iran has been sending messages to Israel and the U.S. – via Arab intermediaries – signaling they are open to returning to the negotiating table under the condition the U.S. does not join Israel in its attacks. Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment on this story.
Boston Globe
42 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Mahmoud Khalil requests transfer from Louisiana jail after judge blocks his release
Advertisement In their filing, lawyers for Khalil said the government's move to keep him detained on those grounds was 'exceedingly rare and extremely unusual,' reflecting the retaliatory nature of their case. Khalil has strongly disputed that he was not forthcoming on the application. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up If the release is not granted, Khalil's attorneys urged the judge to at least transfer him to a detention facility in New Jersey so he could be closer to his wife and newborn son. Their request cited an internal U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement directive that says detained parents should be held 'as close as practicable' to their children. Emailed inquiries to the Justice Department and ICE were not returned. An ICE official previously denied the transfer request. Last month, the government sought to block Khalil from holding his 1-month-old son, arguing that their first meeting should be 'non-contact.' Advertisement Khalil, a former Columbia University graduate student, was detained at his Manhattan apartment on March 8, becoming the first target of President Donald Trump's crackdown on those who joined protests against the war in Gaza. He has not been accused of a crime. Rather, the Trump administration has argued that Khalil should be expelled from the country for beliefs that could undermine their foreign policy goals around fighting anti-semitism. The allegations that Khalil lied on his green card application were added after his arrest, and have been strongly contested by Khalil and his lawyers. While the government claimed he served as an 'officer' of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, Khalil has denied that, claiming he completed an internship at the agency that was approved by Columbia University. He said the government also overstated the length of time he had worked for the British Embassy. In a previous ruling, the federal judge said it was 'overwhelmingly unlikely' that the government would seek to detain Khalil solely on charges that he misrepresented himself on the application. Still, the judge said Khalil's lawyers had not presented sufficient evidence countering the claims and proving that he was being held illegally. 'The government is making desperate, last-ditch attempts to keep my husband unjustly imprisoned,' said Noor Abdalla, Khalil's wife, in a statement Monday. 'We are not afraid and will not be intimidated, because we know, and the government knows, it is only a matter of time before Mahmoud is free.'
