logo
The Greens want to be election kingmakers – but they are fighting on two fronts

The Greens want to be election kingmakers – but they are fighting on two fronts

The Guardian21-04-2025

A peculiar and comical sight greeted those passing by Melbourne's Luna Park on the morning of 4 April. A middle-aged man and three women, holding a novelty sized toothbrush, pretending to clean the large pearly whites that welcome visitors to the attraction on the St Kilda foreshore.
The man was the Greens leader, Adam Bandt; the women his candidates in Wills and Macnamara: Samantha Ratnam and Sonya Semmens, and Victorian senator Steph Hodgins-May.
The red toothbrush, which Bandt hauled into the local ABC studios earlier that morning, was a prop to promote the party's push to add dental treatment to Medicare.
Stunts have been a feature of the Greens' election campaign, a deliberate tactic to capture the attention of otherwise uninterested voters and the media.
Bandt has DJ'd a set alongside social media influencer Abbie Chatfield, paraded novelty cheques illustrating the sum of tax concessions to property investors and leant into countless trends on TikTok.
'Adam is down to clown,' a Greens insider said. That might be true.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
But Bandt is dead serious about not just consolidating the party's historic 2022 federal election result, where it picked up the seats of Griffith, Brisbane and Ryan in the Queensland capital. He is determined to build on it.
For months the Greens have been positioning themselves as the likely kingmaker in a potential hung parliament.
It's a position Bandt has promised to use to keep out the Coalition and force Labor to deliver its wishlist of progressive policies, including dental in Medicare, winding back negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions, banning native forest logging and making childcare free for all.
The Greens will almost certainly retain the balance of power in the Senate, meaning they will be a force in the 48th parliament regardless of what else occurs on 3 May.
But what power it has to shape the next government will hinge on how it performs in several lower house races that insiders across party lines agree are too close to call.
The success of 2022 – dubbed the 'Greenslide' – means the Greens are now fighting on two fronts.
They are on the defensive in Brisbane, while targeting the seats of Richmond in the New South Wales northern rivers, Sturt in Adelaide's eastern suburbs, Perth in the heart of the Western Australian capital, as well as Wills and Macnamara in Melbourne.
Should the party defend all its Brisbane seats and pick up others – most likely Wills and Macnamara – its numbers on the crossbench would prove hard to ignore if Anthony Albanese is scratching around for support to prop up a minority Labor government.
The prime minister has repeatedly and emphatically ruled out a power-sharing agreement with the Greens, avoiding a repeat of the 2010 Julia Gillard-Bob Brown deal that still haunts Labor.
'The Greens, I am not negotiating with the Greens. We make it very clear,' Albanese said on Thursday as he was peppered with questions about negative gearing.
Bandt has dismissed Albanese's denials as political posturing, saying he would be 'astounded' if the Labor leader refused to cooperate in a minority government.
The alternative election-night scenario involves the Greens losing ground, potentially sidelining them from the type of parliament they have been awaiting for more than a decade.
Max Chandler-Mather, the Greens' polarising housing spokesman, isn't one for concessions. But after the Queensland state election in October, where the Greens went backwards in seats despite lofty expectations, the 33-year-old Griffith MP had no choice.
'We're going to have to have a long honest look at our politics and strategy and make sure we're doing everything right,' he said at the time.
The Queensland election was one of a series of either poor or underwhelming state, territory and council results in 2024 that suggested the Greens were in trouble or had stalled as a movement.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
The pundits and the Greens' political opponents blamed Bandt's federal team, reasoning that its 'blocking' of Labor's agenda, particularly on housing, its stance on the Gaza conflict and even Chandler-Mather's attendance at a pro-CFMEU rally were turning voters off.
The major parties believe the new Greens MPs are vulnerable.
Labor is increasingly optimistic about snatching Stephen Bates's seat of Brisbane, while the Coalition is hopeful of winning back Ryan from Elizabeth Watson-Brown.
The government desperately wants to topple Chandler-Mather to regain Kevin Rudd's old seat. Albanese held a campaign rally in Griffith on 6 April, unveiling the sort of election pledge – a household battery subsidy scheme – it hopes will sway voters weighing up whether to choose Labor or the Greens.
The Greens are confident of holding Griffith while Labor strategists concede it is a tough ask, even with the best efforts of a highly regarded candidate, Renee Coffey.
The Greens are also under constant assault from the rightwing group Advance, which will reportedly spend $4m during the five-week campaign alone highlighting the party's 'radical' agenda.
For all noise of the past year, the Greens' national primary vote remains steady at about 13% according to Guardian Australia's poll tracker.
Kos Samaras, a director at the research firm RedBridge, says he would be 'alarmed' if the Greens lost Griffith but expected tight races in Brisbane, Ryan, Wills and Macnamara.
Samaras says the Greens' national vote is holding up but its supporter base has not expanded as the former Labor strategists thought it might after 2022.
'I think this is going to be a status-quo election [for the Greens],' he says.
'What I mean by that is that, yes, they are going to try and win seats like Wills and Macnamara, but that's always been the case.'
The best attempts of minor parties such as the Greens to focus the national political debate on their terms so often come to nothing.
But every once in a while, the major parties do it for them.
Bandt believes such a moment occurred last Sunday, when Albanese and Peter Dutton used the respective Labor and Coalition campaign launches to unveil policies designed to make it easier for first-home buyers to break into the property market.
As economist after economist lined up on Monday and Tuesday to warn the policies would drive up house prices, Bandt's team saw their central message to voters – 'you can't keep voting for the same two parties and expecting different results' – reinforced in real time.
Sensing an opportunity, the Greens will now prioritise housing in the final fortnight of the campaign, including in advertising spending, at press conferences and during door-knocking.
On Thursday, Bandt – wearing a white 'fighting for renters' T-shirt – Chandler-Mather, Bates and senator Larissa Waters stood in a Brisbane park holding a novelty cheque for the sum of $180bn, the Parliamentary Budget Office's latest estimate for the 10-year cost of negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions.
'We have pushed for renters and first-home buyers to be on the political agenda – it has happened,' Bandt said. 'The experts have panned the major parties' policies and now the door is open to some real reform in a minority parliament.'
Bandt and Waters were in the Greens party room during the last hung parliament, as was Sarah Hanson-Young.
The SA senator and the Green's manager of parliamentary business says the major parties are in denial about voters' appetite for a power-sharing parliament.
'The public simply does not want the major parties to have total control any more,' she says.
'There is a growing expectation that a hung parliament will force change, and voters are hungry for it. I was there back in 2010; it was a productive parliament.
'I have seen how perceptions have changed.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tasmanians face a fourth election in seven years – but here are two alternatives to fix the political impasse
Tasmanians face a fourth election in seven years – but here are two alternatives to fix the political impasse

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Tasmanians face a fourth election in seven years – but here are two alternatives to fix the political impasse

After a week of drama, the political future of Tasmania could look starkly different by the end of today. The state may be about to get its fourth election in seven years. But there are a couple of alternatives to consider. Let's walk through them. On Tuesday last week, the state opposition leader, Dean Winter, surprised many by moving a motion of no confidence in the Liberal premier, Jeremy Rockliff. The motion was tabled at the end of a budget supply speech. The motion was ostensibly about the budget, arguing Rockliff had wrecked the state's finances, planned to sell public assets and had mismanaged a crucial ferries project. The Greens supported Labor's motion, but unsuccessfully pushed for it to also touch on the government's response to gambling harm and the proposed AFL stadium. After days of debate, the motion succeeded by a razor-thin margin: 18-17. This appears the most likely outcome. After the vote on Thursday, Rockliff said he planned to visit the state's governor on Tuesday to request a statewide poll. But this won't happen until some important business is taken care of. State parliament will resume on Tuesday morning to pass routine supply bills that are essential to keep government departments running. If an election is called later in the day, then Rockliff would lead the Liberal party. The date of any potential election is not yet known. Potentially. The governor, Barbara Baker, is not obliged to accept Rockliff's request. She could adopt two alternatives. Baker could instead request the Liberal party room elect a different leader to avoid an election just 15 months after the last state poll. On Monday, some Liberal party figures were quoted in the Mercury calling for Rockliff to resign and be replaced by the former senator Eric Abetz. Guy Barnett and Michael Ferguson have also been touted as potential leaders. But so far, Rockliff has refused to resign and the party room has expressed its support for him. Baker could also ask the Labor opposition to test its numbers and seek support from a collection of minor parties and independents. Theoretically, this is possible. At the last election, Tasmanians elected 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, three MPs from the Jacqui Lambie Network (JLN) and three independents. Some call this a rainbow parliament, others call it chaos. But Winter has repeatedly ruled out a power-sharing arrangements with the Greens, despite the minor party being a willing participant. So this appears unlikely. The AFL's proposed stadium is a controversial issue in Tasmania but both the Liberals and Labor remain committed to its construction. One of the conditions set by the AFL for a new team in Tasmania was a roofed stadium, but the expensive project – set to cost about $1bn – faces opposition from some in Tasmania, who instead have called for the money to be spent elsewhere. If an election is called, the stadium would be central issue along with the state's finances and help shape the outcome of the next parliament. An election is likely to delay parliamentary approvals for the stadium for several months. These delays could cost the state government if approval is ultimately granted and the Tasmanian team is forced to play at Bellerive Oval, as it would need to pay fines to the AFL.

TikTok creating more than 500 new British jobs as UK users top 30 million
TikTok creating more than 500 new British jobs as UK users top 30 million

North Wales Chronicle

time2 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

TikTok creating more than 500 new British jobs as UK users top 30 million

The Chinese-owned social media firm said its UK workforce would expand to 3,000 this year as part of its 'deep commitment' to the UK. It will also open a new 135,000sq ft office in London's Barbican, which is set to open early next year. The group already has its UK headquarters in Farringdon, London, which were opened in 2022. TikTok unveiled the plans as it said it now has more than 30 million regular users in the UK each month, which makes the market is biggest user community in Europe. Adam Presser, director of TikTok UK and global head of operations and trust and safety, said: 'Whether through direct investment in jobs and innovation, or the wider economic contribution from millions of British businesses on TikTok, we're pleased to be increasing our investment and presence here in the UK, an important hub for TikTok.' But it comes after Cabinet minister Pete Kyle signalled he was looking at measures to restrict the amount of time children spend on their phones, including through a possible 10pm curfew. Mr Kyle was asked on Sunday morning whether he would look at limiting the time children spend on social media to two hours per app after the Sunday People and Mirror reported the measure was being considered by ministers. The Online Safety Act has passed into law, and from this year will require tech platforms to follow new Ofcom-issued codes of practice to keep users safe online, particularly children. Hefty fines and site blockages are among the penalties for those caught breaking the rules, but many critics have argued the approach gives tech firms too much scope to regulate themselves. TikTok's Mr Presser said that, as well as its UK expansion plans, the group also invests 'significantly' in safety. He said: 'What underpins our continued growth is our deep commitment to safety and to creating an enjoyable and secure digital space to sustainably support creators, entrepreneurs and the wider economy, which is why we also invest significantly in safety.' TikTok first launched its UK operations in 2018 and is financially incorporated in Britain. The group was fined 530 million euro (£446 million) by the Irish data protection watchdog last month for breaching EU privacy rules around transferring user data to China. The video-sharing app was also sanctioned for not being transparent with users about where personal data was being sent and ordered the platform to comply with data protection rules within six months. TikTok said it would appeal against the decision. The social media giant, which is owned by China-based ByteDance, has been under scrutiny from regulators around the world over how it handles personal data, and is also facing a ban in the United States over its China links, which the US government has said is a national security issue.

They hoped their children's deaths would bring change. Then a Colorado bill to protect kids online failed
They hoped their children's deaths would bring change. Then a Colorado bill to protect kids online failed

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

They hoped their children's deaths would bring change. Then a Colorado bill to protect kids online failed

Bereaved parents saw their hopes for change dashed after a bill meant to protect children from sexual predators and drug dealers online died in the Colorado state legislature last month. Several of those parents had helped shape the bill, including Lori Schott, whose 18-year-old daughter Annalee died by suicide in 2020 after consuming content on TikTok and Instagram about depression, anxiety and suicide. 'When the legislators failed to vote and pushed it off onto some fake calendar date where they're not even in session, to not even have accountability for where they stand – as a parent, it's a slap in the face,' said Schott, who identifies as a pro-second amendment Republican. 'It's a slap in the face of my daughter, and to other kids that we've lost.' Had the legislation passed, it would have required social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to investigate and take down accounts engaged in gun or drug sales or in the sexual exploitation or trafficking of minors. It also mandated the creation of direct hotlines to tech company personnel for law enforcement and a 72-hour response window for police requests, a higher burden than under current law. Additionally, platforms would have had to report on how many minors used their services, how often they did so, for how long and how much those young users engaged with content that violated company policies. Several big tech firms registered official positions on the bill. According to Colorado lobbying disclosures, Meta's longtime in-state lobby firm, Headwater Strategies, is registered as a proponent for changing the bill. Google and TikTok also hired lobbyists to oppose it. 'We're just extremely disappointed,' said Kim Osterman, whose 18-year-old son Max died in 2021 after purchasing drugs spiked with fentanyl from a dealer he met on Snapchat. '[Legislators] chose big tech over protecting children and families.' Protections for users of social media (SB 25-086) passed both chambers before being vetoed on 24 April by governor Jared Polis, a Democrat, who cited the bill's potential to 'erode privacy, freedom and innovation' as reasons for his veto. Colorado's senate voted to override the veto on 25 April, yet those efforts fell apart on 28 April when the state house opted to delay the vote until after the legislative session ended, effectively blocking an override and keeping the bill alive. The bill originally passed the senate by a 29-6 vote and the house by a 46-18 margin. On 25 April, the senate voted 29-6 to override Polis's veto. Lawmakers anticipated that the house would take up the override later that day. At the time, according to those interviewed, there appeared to be enough bipartisan support to successfully overturn his veto. 'It was an easy vote for folks because of what we were voting on: protecting kids from social media companies,' said the senator Lindsey Daugherty, a Democrat and a co-sponsor of the bill. She said she urged house leadership to hold the vote Friday, but they declined: 'The speaker knew the governor didn't want us to do it on Friday, because they knew we would win.' The parents who advocated for the bill attribute its failure to an unexpected, 11th-hour lobbying campaign by a far-right gun owners' association in Colorado. Two state legislators as well as seven people involved in the legislative process echoed the parents' claims. Rocky Mountain Gun Owners (RMGO) cast the bill as an instrument of government censorship in texts and emails over the legislation's provisions against 'ghost guns', untraceable weapons assembled from kits purchased online, which would have been prohibited. RMGO launched massive social media and email campaigns urging its 200,000 members to contact their legislators to demand they vote against the bill. A source with knowledge of the workings of the Colorado state house described the gun group's social media and text campaigns, encouraging Republicans voters to contact their legislators to demand opposition to the bill, as incessant. '[Legislators] were getting countless calls and emails and being yelled at by activists. It was a full-fledged attack. There was a whole campaign saying: 'This is a government censorship bill,'' they said. The group's actions were instrumental in a campaign to deter house Republicans from voting against the veto, resulting in the quashing of the bill, and unexpected from an organization that had been facing funding shortfalls, according to 10 people interviewed who were involved in the design of the bill and legislative process. Sources in the Colorado state house spoke to the Guardian on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal from RMGO. The house had delayed the vote until 28 April, which allowed RMGO time to launch a campaign against the bill over the weekend. When lawmakers reconvened Monday, the house voted 51-13 to postpone the override until after the legislative session ended – effectively killing the effort. The gun activists' mass text message campaign to registered Republican voters asserted the social media bill would constitute an attempt to 'compel social media companies to conduct mass surveillance of content posted on their platforms' to search for violations of Colorado's gun laws, describing the bill as an attack on first and second amendment rights, according to texts seen by the Guardian. Founded in 1996, RMGO claims to have a membership of more than 200,000 activists. It is recognized as a far-right group that takes a 'no-compromise' stance on gun rights. Dudley Brown, its founder and leader, also serves as the president of the National Association for Gun Rights, which positions itself further to the right than the National Rifle Association (NRA). RMGO has mounted criticism against the NRA for being too moderate and politically compromising. Critics have described RMGO as 'bullies' and 'extremists' because of its combative tactics, which include targeting and smearing Democrats and moderate Republicans. The group did not respond to requests for comment on its legislative efforts. RMGO is a well-known presence at the Colorado capitol, typically opposing gun-control legislation. Daugherty described its typical campaign tactics as 'scary'. She got rid of her X account after being singled out by the group over her work on a bill to ban assault weapons earlier this year. 'When we were running any of the gun bills at the capitol, they put my and some other legislators' faces on their websites,' she said. A screenshot of a tweet from RMGO showed Daugherty with a red 'traitor' stamp on her forehead. The group's campaign resulted in the spread of misinformation about the bill's impact on gun ownership rights, sources involved in the legislative process said. 'The reason I was in support of the bill, and in support of the override, was it has to do with child trafficking and protecting the kids,' said the senator Rod Pelton, a Republican, who voted in favor of the veto override in the senate. 'I just didn't really buy into the whole second amendment argument.' Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion The bill had enjoyed the backing of all 23 of Colorado's district attorneys as well as bipartisan state house support. RMGO's late-stage opposition to the social media bill marked a break from its usual playbook. The group generally weighs in on legislation earlier in the process, according to eight sources, including two of the bill's co-sponsors, Daugherty and the representative Andy Boesenecker. 'They really ramped up their efforts,' Boesenecker said. 'It was curious to me that their opposition came in very late and appeared to be very well funded at the end.' In recent years, RMGO group had been less active due to well-documented money problems that limited its ability to campaign on legislative issues. In a 2024 interview, the group's leaders stated plainly that it struggled with funding. Daugherty believes RMGO would not have been able to embark on such an apparently costly outreach campaign without a major infusion of cash. A major text campaign like the one launched for SB-86 was beyond their financial capacity, she said. Others in Colorado politics agreed. 'Rocky Mountain Gun Owners have not been important or effective in probably at least four years in the legislature. They've had no money, and then all of a sudden they had tons of money, funding their rise back into power,' said Dawn Reinfeld, executive director of Blue Rising Together, a Colorado-based non-profit focused on youth rights. The campaign made legislators feel threatened, with primary elections in their districts over the weekend, Daugherty said, particularly after accounts on X, formerly Twitter, bombarded the bill's supporters. 'Folks were worried about being primaried, mostly the Republicans, and that's kind of what it came down to,' Daugherty said. Aaron Ping's 16-year-old son Avery died of an overdose in December after buying what he thought was ecstasy over Snapchat and receiving instead a substance laced with fentanyl. Ping saw the campaign against the bill as an intentional misconstrual of its intent. 'It was looking like the bill was going to pass, until all this misinformation about it taking away people's gun rights because it addresses people buying illegal shadow guns off the internet,' he said. Ping gave testimony in support of the bill in February before the first senate vote, alongside other bereaved parents, teens in recovery and a district attorney. 'The bill gave me hope that Avery's legacy would be to help. So when it didn't pass, it was pretty soul-crushing,' said Ping. Several states, including California, Maryland, Vermont, Minnesota, Hawaii, Illinois, New Mexico, South Carolina and Nevada, have introduced legislation aimed at improving online safety for children in the past two years. These efforts have faced strong resistance from the tech industry, including heavy lobbying and lawsuits. Maryland became the first state to successfully pass a Kids Code bill, signing it into law in May 2024. But the victory may be short-lived: NetChoice, a tech industry coalition representing companies including Meta, Google and Amazon, quickly launched a legal challenge against the measure, which is ongoing. Meanwhile, in the US federal government, the kids online safety act (Kosa), which had wound its way through the legislature for years, died in February when it failed to pass in the House after years of markups and votes. A revamped version of the bill was reintroduced to Congress on 14 May. In California, a similar bill known as the age-appropriate design code act, modeled after UK legislation, was blocked in late 2023. A federal judge granted NetChoice a preliminary injunction, citing potential violations of the first amendment, which stopped the law from going into effect. In the US, you can call or text the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline on 988, chat on or text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor. In the UK, the youth suicide charity Papyrus can be contacted on 0800 068 4141 or email pat@ and in the UK and Ireland Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@ or jo@ In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store