IIM Kozhikode cuts ties with Turkish university, cites national interest
KOZHIKODE: As India recalibrates its international academic collaborations in line with national interests, the Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode (IIMK) has taken a decisive step by terminating its Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Sabanci University, Turkiye.
The move comes in response to Turkiye's public support for Pakistan amid heightened diplomatic tensions with India, prompting a firm reaction from Indian academic institutions.
Originally signed in September 2023 for a five-year term, the MoU had aimed to foster academic collaboration, primarily through student exchange programmes between the two institutions. However, given the evolving geopolitical landscape, IIMK has chosen to unilaterally terminate the agreement.
In an official statement, IIMK said the suspension of ties was a direct consequence of the 'current geopolitical situation involving Turkiye'. The institution has also formally communicated its decision to Sabanci University and has requested the immediate removal of IIMK's name and association from all Turkish university records, websites, and affiliated platforms.
Commenting on the development, Professor Debashis Chatterjee, director of IIMK, said: 'At IIM Kozhikode, we place utmost importance on aligning our global engagements with the national interest.
The decision to annul the MoU with Sabanci University has been taken after careful consideration and is in keeping with our institutional responsibility to uphold the values and priorities of our nation. We remain committed to fostering international collaborations that reflect mutual respect, strategic alignment, and shared national values.'
The move comes as several other Indian academic institutions are reassessing international collaborations in light of national security and diplomatic sensitivities.
IIM Kozhikode's firm stance underscores a broader trend of Indian institutions prioritising geopolitical awareness in shaping international academic partnerships.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
SP jibe at BJP: Caste census will be held under PDA govt
1 2 Lucknow: Hours after the Centre announced that population census, which will include caste enumeration as well, will begin from March 1, 2027, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav took a jibe at UP govt expressing confidence that caste census in state will be held under the PDA govt. Next UP elections are due in early 2027. SP leadership said the fact that Centre's announcement came on Wednesday was a good omen for the party as exactly a year ago PDA had registered a historic win in the Lok Sabha polls results announced on June 4. The Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) announced on Wednesday that population census along with the enumeration of castes will be conducted in two phases from March 1. Akhilesh quoted MHA announcement to claim that when the people's headcount will be done in UP, PDA government will be in place in the state as SP's victory in 2027 assembly polls. "June 4 is that historic day in Indian politics on which exactly one year ago the unity of PDA community registered a sweeping victory over communal politics of negativity. The date marks the beginning of a new chapter in Indian politics which is receptive to human sensitivities and believes in communal amity," Akhilesh said in a statement. In the run up to 2024 polls, SP focussed on bringing together PDA – comprising Pichrde (Backward classes), Dalits and Alpsankhyaks (Minorities) and the move paid rich dividends. SP had emerged as the single largest party in UP with 37 seats – its best ever performance. "PDA's unity will prove to be a milestone in building the future of the county. The PDA of today comprise every Pirdit (those subjected to sufferings), Dukhi (unhappy) and Apmanit (humiliated) backward class member, Dalits and minorities. It also includes "Aadhi Abadi" (exploited women), exploited tribals, poor farmers, labourers, businessmen, unemployed youth and every section of the society that has been subjected to neglect of the BJP government," Akhilesh said. "All deprived, neglected sections of the society are coming together to form the PDA family," the former UP CM said. Akhilesh said PDA was the future of India and every Pirdit was an integral part of the PDA.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Allahabad High Court denies relief to Rahul Gandhi over remarks on Army
Observing that freedom of speech is subject to reasonable restrictions, the Allahabad High Court last week denied relief to the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, in a defamation case filed against him over his alleged remarks against the Indian Army. Rejecting Mr. Gandhi's plea challenging the defamation case as well as the summoning order passed in February 2025 by an MP-MLA court in Lucknow, a Bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi on May 29 said the trial court was right to summon the Congress leader to face trial for the offence under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code, as it had taken into consideration all the relevant facts and circumstances of the case. 'No doubt over the fact that Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech and expression but this freedom is subject to reasonable restrictions and it does not include the freedom to make statements which are defamatory to any person or defamatory to the Indian Army. Therefore, the ratio laid down in Javed Ahmad Hajam (Supra) and Kaushal Kishore (Supra) would not apply to the facts of the present case,' the Court noted. The matter pertains to a case filed against Mr. Gandhi by a former Border Roads Organisation (BRO) Director, Uday Shankar Srivastava, who alleged that his statements, given after a clash between the Indian and Chinese armies on December 9, 2022, had defamed the Indian Army. The remarks were made by Mr. Gandhi during the Congress's Bharat Jodo Yatra on December 16, 2022. Also read: Rahul Gandhi's surrender barb insult of armed forces, says BJP The plea quoted Mr. Gandhi as allegedly saying, 'People will ask about Bharat Jodo Yatra, here and there, Ashok Gahlot and Sachin Pilot and whatnot. But they will not ask a single question about China capturing 2000 square kilometers of Indian territory, killing 20 Indian soldiers and thrashing our soldiers in Arunachal Pradesh. But the Indian press doesn't ask a question to them about this. Isn't it true? The nation is watching all this. Don't pretend that people don't know.' The lower court in Lucknow had in February summoned Mr. Gandhi in the case, following which the Congress leader approached the High Court. In his plea, Mr. Gandhi said the complainant was not an officer of the Indian Army and hence the defamation case did not hold water. While rejecting the contention of the Congress leader, the High Court noted that under Section 199(1) the Cr.P.C., a person other than the direct victim of an offence can also be considered an 'aggrieved person' if they are impacted by the offence.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
India's and Pakistan's 'dueling' delegations land in Washington
Teams of politicians and diplomats were sent from New Delhi and Islamabad to present their views on the recent conflict between the nations Delegations of both Indian and Pakistani diplomats and politicians have arrived in Washington to meet with US officials and present their side of the recent conflict between the two countries. India's delegation led by Shashi Tharoor, an MP for the opposition Indian National Congress party, landed in Washington on Wednesday to present its case about the terrorism allegedly emanating from Pakistan. "Tomorrow almost they will be in Washington, while we are in Washington on the same date. So there's going to be perhaps an increase in interest because there are two dueling delegations in the same city," Tharoor said in an interview with the news agency ANI. New Delhi has sent seven teams to over 30 countries to counter what it perceives as poor press coverage about the confrontation with Islamabad. External Affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India wants the world to "hold Pakistan accountable" for what he claimed was 40 years of cross-border terrorism against India. An MP from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) party told the Press Trust of India that the delegations sent across the world will convey India's message of "zero tolerance against terrorism" and the "propaganda they (Pakistan) have been doing since 1947." The Pakistani delegation, which is led by former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, was tasked by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to "expose Indian propaganda," state-run Pakistan Radio reported in May. It traveled to Washington on Wednesday after concluding a two-day visit to the UN headquarters in New York, where it accused India of "unilateral aggression" and dismissed India's claims about Islamabad's links to the terrorists behind the Kashmir attack. The delegation also proposed that the Pakistani and Indian intelligence agencies could work together to "decrease" terrorism in South Asia. New Delhi, however, maintained it will only engage in talks with Islamabad after it takes concrete action against terrorism. "If Pakistan is as innocent as they claim to be, why do they give a safe haven to wanted terrorists?... Why are they able to live peacefully, to conduct training radicalize further people, to equip arms and get people to practice their arms and Kalashnikovs...," Tharoor told the PTI agency before heading to Washington. READ MORE: Truce or trap? India's calculated calm with Pakistan The escalation between the two neighbors began on May 7, when India launched Operation Sindoor against what it called terrorists in Pakistan. This was in response to the terrorist attack in India's Jammu and Kashmir Union Territory in late April that killed 26 tourists. Islamabad denied any involvement in that attack. After a brief but fierce military standoff, a ceasefire was announced on May 10. US President Donald Trump took credit for playing a role in the ceasefire, a claim that New Delhi rejected.
