Govt accused of 'causing permanent damage' to kids by 'breaking disability law'
A disabilities advocate will tell Taoiseach Micheál Martin and the Government that they are "causing permanent damage to children" by "breaking the law" on Assessments of Needs.
Cara Darmody, 14, will tell the Oireachtas Disabilities Committee this morning that 15,000 children are being "left to rot" on waiting lists.
An Assessment of Needs (AON) identifies whether a child has a disability, the nature and extent of the disability and any health and education needs that may arise.
Under law, once the HSE receives an application in writing, they must start the assessment within three months and complete it within an additional three months.
However, there are now 15,296 assessments overdue.
At the Disabilities Committee, Miss Darmody will tell politicians that she slept on the "dirty street outside" Leinster House last month as part of a 50-hour protest.
She will say that she has two brothers, Neil and John, who are autistic and "severely and profoundly intellectually disabled". She will argue that they were both "failed dramatically by the State".
Miss Darmody will say: "I cannot do anything to change the permanent damage caused to Neil and John, but I can advocate to stop damage being done to autistic children in the future.
"Let's cut straight to the chase, I'm here today to call out the blatant Assessments of Needs law-breaking by the Taoiseach and the Government.
"Three different Taoisigh have made promises to me to fix this issue, and all have dramatically failed."
She will continue: "Let's call a spade a spade – the law is being systematically smashed by the Government."
Miss Darmody will say there are 15,000 who have been "left to rot" on AON waiting lists.
She will add: "So I'm going to be blunt to the Taoiseach – your law-breaking is causing permanent damage to children with disabilities.
"You and your Cabinet need to wake up and show some initiative and urgency. Children are suffering permanent damage at your hands and your conduct needs to be called out.
"We are an international embarrassment in how we treat children with autism and intellectual disabilities."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
33 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Russia's embassy in Dublin accuses Tánaiste of spreading 'anti-Russian propaganda'
The Russian embassy in Ireland has accused Tánaiste and the Irish Government of spreading "anti-Russian propaganda" about recent Russian attacks in Ukraine. In a statement on Thursday morning, Simon Harris condemned "ongoing and escalating" Russian attacks on critical infrastructure in Ukraine, noting that Russia had launched more than 2,000 drone and missile attacks throughout Ukraine since the beginning of the month. Mr Harris said that, in these attacks, the Russian military has targeted "medical facilities, including a maternity hospital" as well as "first responders seeking to save lives". He said: These attacks have targeted Ukraine's towns and cities, people's homes and places of work, and Ukraine's critical infrastructure. We should be clear that these are attacks against civilians. "I condemn them completely, as I do Russia's ongoing war of aggression." Mr Harris also stated that Ireland's solidarity with Ukraine "remains steadfast". "Russia started this war. As the aggressor, it is for Russia to demonstrate a genuine commitment towards peace by halting its brutal attacks," he added. "It can do so at any time. It is past time for Russia to agree to a full, unconditional ceasefire as a first step towards arriving at a just and lasting peace." In a lengthy response on Thursday afternoon, the Russian embassy in Dublin called Mr Harris's statement "pathetic", claiming it was "yet another example of anti-Russian propaganda by the Irish government, which distorts reality and misleads the public". The embassy said Mr Harris had neglected to mention what it described as "large-scale terrorist attacks" by Ukrainian special services on "passenger and civilian freight trains in Bryansk and Kursk regions of Russia with large number of killed and wounded". The embassy said that recent "retribution" strikes by Russian armed forces across Ukraine were launched in response to these "heinous crimes". The embassy also stated that these attacks were not against civilians, but against a "large number of military targets" in Ukraine, including "aviation, missile, armor and shipbuilding industry enterprises" in Kyiv and other parts of Ukraine, as well as command posts, military airfields, ammunition and fuel depots, and other "deployment sites" of the Ukrainian army. The embassy said Mr Harris's questioning of Russia's commitment to "peaceful settlement of the Ukrainian crisis" was "misplaced and dishonest" "He should know that Russia had been consistently proposing political and diplomatic ways to avoid conflict in 2014, 2021, and 2022, which have been as well consistently ignored by the Western governments, including Ireland, since their plan has always been not peace in Ukraine but imposition of war on Ukrainian and Russian peoples," the embassy statement added. The Irish Examiner has contacted the Department of Foreign Affairs for a response to the Russian embassy's statement.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Defence Forces taking part in EU missions without triple lock 'could breach neutrality'
Ireland's Defence Forces could become embroiled in peacekeeping missions that could jeopardise Ireland's military neutrality if Government proposals to scrap UN authorisation for such deployments is passed, an Oireachtas committee has heard. Ray Murphy, a professor at the Irish Centre for Human Rights, University of Galway, said if Ireland took part in an EU force without a UN mandate — with the monitoring and controls coming with that — it could end up in situations not originally envisaged that would end up breaching our neutrality. Prof Murphy was one of three academics who took part in a three-hour session at the Oireachtas defence and national security committee, which is holding hearings on the Defence Bill 2025. The draft legislation proposes to remove the requirement for UN approval to send Defence Forces abroad. It also plans to increase from 12 to 50 the number of personnel that can be sent overseas without the Government needing the support of the Dáil. Defence Bill 2025 The bill would authorise Irish troops to take part in an 'international force' for the purposes of peacekeeping, conflict prevention, and international security 'consistent with the principles of the United Nations charter'. Examples of such bodies include the OSCE, the EU, or 'any other body' that operates in manner consistent with UN principles. All three academics at the committee are strongly opposed to the Government proposals to remove the 'triple lock'. It is not clear if the committee is due to hear from academics who are non-committed on the issue or who are in favour of removing the triple lock. Prof Murphy said: 'Any deployment of Defence Forces with an international force will be subject to certain mandatory principles. These are that the particular international force will be mandated to operate for peacekeeping, conflict prevention, and/or strengthening international security, in accordance with international law and consistent with the principles of the UN.' He asked who would determine if a regional body 'operates in a manner consistent' with the UN charter and international law, especially if Security Council or General Assembly approval is not obtained. Situations on the ground 'can change' Prof Murphy said situations on the ground can change and that Irish troops 'could become embroiled in something' that wasn't originally envisaged — and that such a situation could 'certainly jeopardise' military neutrality. He described the proposals as a 'betrayal' to commitments made by governments to its citizens and that they would grant any government 'excessive authority'. Karen Devine, lecturer in European politics at DCU, told the committee that as an academic her job is to 'tell the truth'. She said public support for neutrality has been consistent over the decades, with four in five people in favour of it. She alleged that 'militarists', consisting of the EU, Nato, and the military-industrial complex, 'seek to eradicate' Irish neutrality including the triple lock and want to 'militarise' the EU. She further alleged that these were joined by 'university agents', (professors she effectively identified), think tanks, and the 'mass media', who promoted this agenda.
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Government intends to change defamation laws in this term
Taoiseach Mícheál Martin has said that the Government intends to change Irish defamation laws. Speaking in response to a question on Gerry Adams recently winning a defamation case against the BBC, Mr Martin said that a change in the laws was needed to allow for a balanced environment. "I think the defamation laws need to be changed. We're going to change them. We've published heads of the bill, and Minister (for Justice, Jim) O'Callaghan is going to proceed. We're going to do it in this Government. We said we would," he said. "We will look at the pre-legislation, it'll go to the Oireachtas, but a lot of work has been done on it. Minister James Browne did a lot of work on that in the previous Government, he's a good legislator. "I think we do need to get it through to create a balanced environment for commentary and for investigative journalism," the Taoiseach added. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him €100,000, after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Féin leader's legal costs. At the time, the director of BBC Northern Ireland Adam Smyth said there were "profound" implications from the jury's decision. "As our legal team made clear, if the BBC's case cannot be won under existing Irish defamation law, it's hard to see how anyone's could - and they warned that today's decision could hinder freedom of expression," he said.
