Landsec swings to profit as London rents rise and shops get bigger
Commercial property giant Land Securities has returned to an annual profit after benefiting from rising rents and retail chains investing in their biggest shops.
The company shrugged off any impact of US tariffs on business investment.
Land Securities (Landsec) reported a pre-tax profit of £393 million for the year to the end of March, rebounding from a loss of £341 million the year prior.
The total value of its property portfolio jumped to £10.88 billion, from £9.96 billion this time last year.
Landsec's portfolio includes office space, retail destinations and landmarks such as the White Rose shopping centre in Leeds, the Bluewater shopping centre in Kent, and the Piccadilly Lights in London.
The London-listed company said demand for 'modern, sustainable office space' in London remained strong, and that brands continue to focus on 'fewer, but bigger and better stores in key locations'.
'As supply of both is constrained, rents in our portfolio continue to grow,' it told investors on Friday.
For example, it pointed to fashion chain Next tripling the size of its Bluewater store, Primark doubling the size of its shop in White Rose, and new openings in shopping centres such as Bershka, Pull&Bear, and JD Sports.
The top 1% of all shopping destinations in the UK provide brands with access to 30% of all retail spending in stores, according to Landsec, which said that nearly 90% of its retail assets were in that top bracket.
The company plans to ramp up investment in popular retail destinations by £1 billion over the next one to three years.
It told investors that if brands were feeling squeezed by higher national insurance contributions, or wider economic uncertainty, then that would serve to sharpen the focus on their best stores – and 'put more pressure on the tail-end' of their chains.
Furthermore, it said uncertainty caused by Donald Trump's new tariffs on US imports was not yet having any noticeable impact on demand among its customers or on the investment market.
'Owning the right real estate has never been more important and, with a very healthy pipeline of occupier demand, this trend looks set to continue,' chief executive Mark Allan said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's tariffs will cost UK steel industry £150m
US trade tariffs have dealt a £150 million blow to the UK steel industry as a wave of cheap products driven from American shores are being dumped in Britain, senior industry figures warn. The UK risks being hit harder than other countries in the tariff chaos despite having negotiated a deal with Donald Trump on exports of steel to the US. This, steel bosses say, is because the UK does not have 'the right defences' to prevent countries such as China from flooding our market with cheap steel that would have been sold to the US. That will drive down prices and crowd out domestic British steelmakers. By contrast, EU countries have erected barriers to protect their steel industries. Trade body UK Steel said imports were 'flooding on to the UK market depressing prices' as a result of the US tariffs, which last week rose to 50 per cent for steel and aluminium from a previous rate of 25 per cent. The UK managed to avoid the higher levy after securing a last-minute exemption. But Russell Codling, commercial director at Tata Steel, told MPs urgent measures were needed to protect UK industry. He said steel prices in the UK were tanking below those in Europe following the US tariffs – a price difference 'leading to something like a £100 million- £150 million-a-year loss in the UK compared with Europe.' The UK industry is already struggling to remain profitable due to high energy costs and environmental taxes, which are heavier than those on EU manufacturers. Codling added that the UK market for foreign steel imports was 'far more free-flowing than into mainland Europe'. The latest crisis comes hard on the heels of Government intervention to prevent the country's last blast furnaces at the British Steel plant in Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire, from being closed by Chinese owners Jingye in April. Codling, whose firm employs 8,000 people, said the UK needed to bring in measures to shield producers against cheap imports that 'are as least as good as our trading partners around the world.' A 25 per cent levy will still apply until the Government finalises a proposed trade deal with the US which should see tariffs cut to zero. Steel exports from Britain to the US are worth £400 million a year, making it the sector's second-biggest market. But UK bosses fear the Trump administration could alter the terms of any deal before it is signed. Gareth Stace, director general of UK Steel, said the Government needed to take 'decisive action' to protect producers. He added: 'The EU has stepped up its trade defences, and now we must do the same.' Respected industrialist Andrew Cook warned that the dumping of cheap steel would cause 'great damage'. He said: 'China built 600 million tons of surplus steel-making capacity to dump on foreign markets. This is the main reason why Britain's steel industry has suffered so badly.' Currently, the UK sets a quota for steel imports allowed into the country tariff-free. Imports above that level incur a 25 per cent levy. But UK Steel says the quotas do not offer 'adequate protection'. The UK's Trade Remedies Authority (TRA), which monitors unfair practices, is reviewing whether the measures, which are based on EU controls from 2018, suffice. Industry minister Sarah Jones insisted the Government – which is set to unveil its £2.5 billion steel strategy later this year – is backing the industry 'to the hilt'. She said: 'The TRA has been working at pace to identify stronger measures to defend the industry.' Rajesh Nair, head of Tata Steel UK, urged Ministers to ensure the US doesn't require British exports to have been 'melted and poured' in the UK to be tariff-exempt. This process now only happens at British Steel's Scunthorpe blast furnaces. Tata, which closed its UK blast furnace last year, is having to import steel until electric arc furnace steelmaking starts in Port Talbot in late 2027, Nair said.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
It's great to have a female Chancellor - just not this one!, says jeweller Kiki McDonough
Kiki McDonough's status as a successful businesswoman would have come as a surprise to her father, her teachers and at least one bank manager. It even seems to slightly surprise Kiki herself, who has the air of an accidental entrepreneur. Her eponymous jewellery brand, which celebrates its 40th anniversary this summer, is worn by the Princess of Wales and the Queen. She is invited to give her views on business and the economy on high-profile TV programmes, including Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, where she lambasted the Labour Government. McDonough, who turns 71 this month, started her business in the heady 1980s when Mrs Thatcher was in Downing Street and women were storming the City and setting up businesses of their own. 'Unless you were there you can't understand how extraordinary it was to have the first woman Prime Minister,' she says. 'She pushed her way through the old school network. There were so many entitled men. I knew some of them.' She has considerably less admiration for the country's first female occupant of No 11 Downing Street, Rachel Reeves. 'It's great to have a female Chancellor but unfortunately this one... it hasn't worked as well as we would have liked. Being the first woman chancellor and to have screwed up,' she says, referring to the increases in employer National Insurance Contributions. 'These tax changes Labour has brought in – it is completely counterproductive. If you want business to succeed you don't pile on a lot of hurdles and barriers. They spread doom and gloom like butter, and once you have done that, it is very hard to unspread it. Rumour has it Reeves might take more taxes in the next Budget. She shouldn't be spending so much.' McDonough started her business when a family friend, Nigel Milne, asked her to design modern jewellery for his shop in Mayfair. Until then, she had been a secretary, including for David Stirling, the founder of the SAS, having left school as soon as she could because lessons bored her. Though her father had an antique jewellery shop, she says she knew nothing about the business, adding: 'But I was young and you just go for it. I'm not much of a feminist but I priced my jewellery between £95 and £950 as women were starting to earn more, to make their own decisions and buy their own jewellery.' Her first designs included crystal heart earrings with a diamond-set bow on top. 'Well it was the 80s,' she says. David Deakin, whom she had lined up to make them, told her he didn't think they would sell. 'I wasn't sure either. We laugh about it now,' she says. The designs, which are still on sale today, proved wildly successful. 'I asked my father for £5,000 to start my own jewellery business,' she says. 'He had been a jeweller – I am from five generations of jewellers – but none women. 'He looked rather bemused and said he was not sure it was a good idea. He loaned me the money for two years. I paid him back within a year, and no one was more surprised than me, let alone him.' 'Women were not taken as seriously back then. I remember going to the bank manager at Barclays when I had been in business six or seven years. 'He asked me into a meeting where he said he didn't think this was the bank for me. 'I rang up HSBC and they have been fantastic ever since. I do feel a little bit of that Pretty Woman thing, that he made a big mistake, huge. It was definitely because I was a little woman with a little jewellery company.' One or two snooty rivals on Bond Street 'thought I was pathetic' she says. 'I never let it bother me. Have a laugh and soldier on. 'My mother said it is terribly unattractive to complain. My father was a prisoner-of-war and that puts it in perspective.' McDonough's Royal connection goes back to 1986, when Sarah Ferguson arrived at Bordeaux airport wearing onyx heart and bow earrings and a pearl and onyx heart necklace. Soon after, Diana, Princess of Wales, began wearing Kiki jewellery too. McDonough knew Diana's sisters and thinks they must have said something to her about McDonough's jewellery. 'She was lovely. When she came to my shop she waited her turn. 'The jewellery I do is not bling or cutting edge, it is pretty and hopefully makes you feel prettier. 'That's what I think jewellery should be, it shouldn't walk in the door before you. It suits the working mother lifestyle, where you can wear it every day and love it. Twice divorced, she combined the business with bringing up two sons. She says: 'I had children quite late and thought why have them if you're not going to see them? I didn't take a break, I just ran the business at a slightly slower growth rate. Then when the children went away to school, I thought right, that's it. 'My prices are now £950 to about £25,000. I still love seeing people in the street wearing my jewellery. It's a bore to keep something in a safe, I think jewellery should be worn with jeans. I put on a pair of earrings on a Monday and take them off on a Friday.' She is, she says in cut-glass tones, a 'great Liverpool fan', a passion acquired from her youngest son. Her other great passion is ballet, and she has designed a collection inspired by prima ballerina Lauren Cuthbertson. She says: 'Ballet and football are both about really neat footwork and amazing athleticism and strength, but ballet is my ultimate. I love it.' Next on the agenda is expanding in the US. She hasn't seen Melania Trump wear her jewellery, adding: 'Though I have to say, she does dress beautifully. I think she's amazing. She is a cool customer.' McDonough has no plans to retire, and says her two sons won't take over when she eventually steps back. She says: 'I don't have that ambition to pass on a family business. I have had the best 40 years any woman could possibly ask for, and counting, so whoever has it next – lucky them.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
BP battles for its independence amid takeover talk
BP is determined to preserve its status as an independent UK-listed oil company amid speculation that a sinking share price and uncertainty over leadership could push it into an unwanted merger. The firm's shares have plunged 22 per cent over the past year (see chart). With a market value of just £56 billion, it is seen as a tempting bid target for one of the US oil giants or a British bid from Anglo-Dutch rival Shell. Predators see the temporary power vacuum caused by the impending departure of chairman Helge Lund as a vulnerability. An urgent hunt for a strong replacement is being led by Amanda Blanc, BP's senior non-executive director, who is also boss of the insurer Aviva. BP is seeking to convince investors that it can dial down the radical green transition led by former boss Bernard Looney by embracing an aggressive drilling and cost cutting agenda. Chief executive Murray Auchincloss, former finance director, is seeking to restore the company's stock market rating by focusing on capital spend and cost cutting. He has so far failed to convince activist investor Elliott Management, which has built a 5 per cent stake in BP, that the company can drill its way out of difficulty and that his cost cuts are sufficient. However, BP has long history of successful exploration and production, and has recently secured valuable drilling rights in India and Azerbaijan, where it has become the leading oil company. Since taking over as chief executive last year, Auchincloss has consulted 70 per cent of the company's shareholding base. It is thought that long-standing British owners, such as insurer Legal & General, which controls 38 per cent of the stock, would be deeply unhappy if BP were to be taken over. It is also thought that the UK Government is supportive of BP as a national champion which is developing the country's biggest electric vehicle network of charging stations with Marks & Spencer. A bid by Shell for BP, favoured by some investment bankers, is seen as much harder to accomplish than generally thought. Both companies, as international explorers, have large trading operations and a deal would almost certainly cause competition problems. Some 35 per cent of the two London-listed firms' operations are understood to overlap. US rivals Chevron and Exxon Mobil, mentioned as possible bidders for BP, have in recent times virtually withdrawn from exploration beyond the Americas, unlike the two big London-listed players. They have instead focused on the riches of the Permian Basin in Texas and Guyana in South America. Chevron is seeking to complete its $53 billion merger with US group Hess. Oil mergers are seen as notoriously tricky to navigate. A quarter of a century after BP, then led by John Browne, took over Amoco, the group is still wrestling with integration of complex accounting systems. BP believes that if it can lift its annual cashflow from $8 billion in 2024 to $14 billion by 2027, it can raise the value of the group, securing its status.
