I'm a physician who has looked at hundreds of studies of vaccine safety, and here's some of what RFK Jr. gets wrong
In the four months since he began serving as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made many public statements about vaccines that have cast doubt on their safety and on the objectivity of long-standing processes established to evaluate them.
Many of these statements are factually incorrect. For example, in a newscast aired on June 12, 2025, Kennedy told Fox News viewers that 97% of federal vaccine advisers are on the take. In the same interview, he also claimed that children receive 92 mandatory shots. He has also widely claimed that only COVID-19 vaccines, not other vaccines in use by both children and adults, were ever tested against placebos and that 'nobody has any idea' how safe routine immunizations are.
As an infectious disease physician who curates an open database of hundreds of controlled vaccine trials involving over 6 million participants, I am intimately familiar with the decades of research on vaccine safety. I believe it is important to correct the record – especially because these statements come from the official who now oversees the agencies charged with protecting Americans' health.
In 1986, the childhood vaccine schedule contained about 11 doses protecting against seven diseases. Today, it includes roughly 50 injections covering 16 diseases. State school entry laws typically require 30 to 32 shots across 10 to 12 diseases. No state mandates COVID-19 vaccination. Where Kennedy's '92 mandatory shots' figure comes from is unclear, but the actual number is significantly lower.
From a safety standpoint, the more important question is whether today's schedule with additional vaccines might be too taxing for children's immune systems. It isn't, because as vaccine technology improved over the past several decades, the number of antigens in each vaccine dose is much lower than before.
Antigens are the molecules in vaccines that trigger a response from the immune system, training it to identify the specific pathogen. Some vaccines contain a minute amount of aluminum salt that serves as an adjuvant – a helper ingredient that improves the quality and staying power of the immune response, so each dose can protect with less antigen.
Those 11 doses in 1986 delivered more than 3,000 antigens and 1.5 milligrams of aluminum over 18 years. Today's complete schedule delivers roughly 165 antigens – which is a 95% reduction – and 5-6 milligrams of aluminum in the same time frame. A single smallpox inoculation in 1900 exposed a child to more antigens than today's complete series.
Since 1986, the United States has introduced vaccines against Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis A and B, chickenpox, pneumococcal disease, rotavirus and human papillomavirus. Each addition represents a life-saving advance.
The incidence of Haemophilus influenzae type b, a bacterial infection that can cause pneumonia, meningitis and other severe diseases, has dropped by 99% in infants. Pediatric hepatitis infections are down more than 90%, and chickenpox hospitalizations are down about 90%. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that vaccinating children born from 1994 to 2023 will avert 508 million illnesses and 1,129,000 premature deaths.
Kennedy has asserted that only COVID-19 vaccines have undergone rigorous safety trials in which they were tested against placebos. This is categorically wrong.
Of the 378 controlled trials in our database, 195 compared volunteers' response to a vaccine with their response to a placebo. Of those, 159 gave volunteers only a salt water solution or another inert substance. Another 36 gave them just the adjuvant without any viral or bacterial material, as a way to see whether there were side effects from the antigen itself or the injection. Every routine childhood vaccine antigen appears in at least one such study.
The 1954 Salk polio trial, one of the largest clinical trials in medical history, enrolled more than 600,000 children and tested the vaccine by comparing it with a salt water control. Similar trials, which used a substance that has no biological effect as a control, were used to test Haemophilus influenzae type b, pneumococcal, rotavirus, influenza and HPV vaccines.
Once an effective vaccine exists, ethics boards require new versions be compared against that licensed standard because withholding proven protection from children would be unethical.
Kennedy has insisted on multiple occasions that 'nobody has any idea' about vaccine safety profiles. Of the 378 trials in our database, the vast majority published detailed safety outcomes.
Beyond trials, the U.S. operates the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, the Vaccine Safety Datalink and the PRISM network to monitor hundreds of millions of doses for rare problems. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System works like an open mailbox where anyone – patients, parents, clinicians – can report a post-shot problem; the Vaccine Safety Datalink analyzes anonymized electronic health records from large health care systems to spot patterns; and PRISM scans billions of insurance claims in near-real time to confirm or rule out rare safety signals.
These systems led health officials to pull the first rotavirus vaccine in 1999 after it was linked to bowel obstruction, and to restrict the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine in 2021 after rare clotting events. Few drug classes undergo such continuous surveillance and are subject to such swift corrective action when genuine risks emerge.
On June 9, Kennedy took the unprecedented step of dissolving vetted members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the expert body that advises the CDC on national vaccine policy. He has claimed repeatedly that the vast majority of serving members of the committee – 97% – had extensive conflicts of interest because of their entanglements with the pharmaceutical industry. Kennedy bases that number on a 2009 federal audit of conflict-of-interest paperwork, but that report looked at 17 CDC advisory committees, not specifically this vaccine committee. And it found no pervasive wrongdoing – 97% of disclosure forms only contained routine paperwork mistakes, such as information in the wrong box or a missing initial, and not hidden financial ties.
Reuters examined data from Open Payments, a government website that discloses health care providers' relationships with industry, for all 17 voting members of the committee who were dismissed. Six received no more than US$80 from drugmakers over seven years, and four had no payments at all.
The remaining seven members accepted between $4,000 and $55,000 over seven years, mostly for modest consulting or travel. In other words, just 41% of the committee received anything more than pocket change from drugmakers. Committee members must divest vaccine company stock and recuse themselves from votes involving conflicts.
Kennedy has warned that vaccines cause 'immune deregulation,' a term that has no basis in immunology. Vaccines train the immune system, and the diseases they prevent are the real threats to immune function.
Measles can wipe immune memory, leaving children vulnerable to other infections for years. COVID-19 can trigger multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Chronic hepatitis B can cause immune-mediated organ damage. Preventing these conditions protects people from immune system damage.
Today's vaccine panel doesn't just prevent infections; it deters doctor visits and thereby reduces unnecessary prescriptions for 'just-in-case' antibiotics. It's one of the rare places in medicine where physicians like me now do more good with less biological burden than we did 40 years ago.
The evidence is clear and publicly available: Vaccines have dramatically reduced childhood illness, disability and death on a historic scale.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Jake Scott, Stanford University
Read more:
Vaccine misinformation distorts science – a biochemist explains how RFK Jr. and his lawyer's claims threaten public health
RFK Jr's shakeup of vaccine advisory committee raises worries about scientific integrity of health recommendations
Vaccines tell a success story that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Trump forget – here are some key reminders
Jake Scott does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fast Company
18 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Merck's RSV shot for infants gets key approval despite RFK Jr.'s panel shakeup
Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has previously made statements skeptical of vaccines, is now recommending the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine for infants. On Thursday, RFK's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted to recommend clesrovimab, a new RSV antibody shot made by Merck, for infants 8 months and younger who don't have protection from a maternal vaccine (a vaccine received in pregnancy). A broader vaccine review is underway The decision comes after the panel announced on Wednesday it would be reviewing the current childhood immunization schedule. The committee is set to vote on recommendations for the influenza vaccine, as well. The RSV shot was approved for use in infants earlier this month by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 'ENFLONSIA provides an important new preventive option to help protect healthy and at-risk infants born during or entering their first RSV season with the same dose regardless of weight,' said Dr. Dean Y. Li, president, Merck Research Laboratories, said at the time. Li continued, 'We are committed to ensuring availability of ENFLONSIA in the U.S. before the start of the upcoming RSV season to help reduce the significant burden of this widespread seasonal infection on families and health care systems.' According to the CDC, RSV infects nearly everyone by age 2, causing cold symptoms, and sometimes, breathing struggles. In the U.S., around 300 infant deaths are caused by RSV each year. The vote, which passed with five for the vaccine and two against, is the first decision from RFK's committee, made up of members whom RFK handpicked after dismissing the previous panel of 17 members in its entirety. The current panel includes some vaccine skeptics. Retsef Levi, an operations management professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Vicki Pebsworth, the research director of a group focused on preventing vaccine injuries and deaths, were the two members who voted against the shot. Kennedy's history of vaccine misinformation Trump's controversial pick for HHS Secretary has frequently made false claims on the topic of vaccines. In regard to COVID, Kennedy once falsely claimed that some race groups have natural immunity to the virus. 'COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately,' Kennedy said. 'COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.' RFK's critics feel that having a vaccine skeptic at the helm of the HHS is already cause for concern after the CDC began postponing meetings on national vaccine recommendations in February. After the committee also announced that it would start a renewed review of all recommended pediatric vaccines, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) put out a video titled, 'AAP Steps up on Vaccine Recommendations,' which warned that immunization policy through ACIP is 'no longer a credible process' under RFK's leadership. The AAP added that it will continue to publish its own recommendations on vaccines for children. Uncertainty at the CDC's helm Thursday's recommendation from RFK's panel still has to be endorsed by the CDC. However, there is major confusion surrounding who is currently in charge of the organization, as it doesn't seem to have a clear leader. Kennedy, and others, have recently sidestepped questions about the matter. Then, last week, RFK gave the name 'Matt Buzzelli,' who he described as 'a public health expert' when Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester pressed him on who the current acting director was. The CDC's leadership page has Matthew Buzzelli, a trial lawyer with no health-related experience, listed fourth as the agency's chief of staff. Following the exchange, the Senator sent RFK a letter, expressing grave concern.


Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump admin ends contracts with publishing giant Springer Nature amid bias, China concerns
The Trump administration has stopped key funding for Springer Nature, the retraction-plagued, controversial publishing behemoth of more than 3,000 scientific and medical journals. Springer Nature publications have long earned subscription revenue from academic and government institutions, but the Trump administration has terminated one key contract and allowed three others to expire, a Trump administration official told Fox News Digital. National Institutes of Health (NIH) and cancer research pacts were deemed "mission essential" and therefore will remain intact, Fox News Digital has learned. The Trump administration has cracked down on organizations with perceived political bias, business practices that the president believes misuse U.S. taxpayer dollars and foreign control. The German-owned Springer Nature was forced to issue 2,923 retractions in 2024, according to Retraction Watch. The publishing giant has also been accused of significantly downplaying the COVID lab-leak theory and censoring content to appease the Chinese government. It also has a "peer review" process that critics believe is dominated by woke groupthink. The brand's popular "Nature Medicine" journal was cited frequently in a 2023 congressional report from the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic titled, "The Proximal Origin of a Cover-up." Nature Medicine republished in March 2020 a report from a month earlier in Virological titled "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" that concluded the virus was "not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus." "This is one of the single most impactful and influential scientific papers in history, and it expressed conclusions that were not based on sound science nor in fact, but instead on assumptions," the congressional report's executive summary stated. The Select Subcommittee report even suggested former NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci pushed for the publication of the entry that sought to dispel the Wuhan lab-leak theory. Fauci has denied any role in the article and said while he favored the natural-origin theory for the virus, he always had an open mind about the lab leak. In 2017, Springer Nature was "caught blocking access to academic research in China," CNN reported at the time. A spokesperson for Springer Nature brushed off concerns when asked for comment about the Trump administration terminating a contract and allowing others to expire. "We are proud of our track record in communicating U.S. research to the rest of the world for over a century and continue to have good relationships with U.S. federal agencies," a spokesperson for Springer Nature told Fox News Digital. "We don't comment on individual contracts, but across our global business there is no material change to our customers or their spend," the spokesperson continued. "We remain confident about the strength of the service we provide." Springer Nature did not immediately respond to follow-up questions about political bias, allegedly appeasing China, or use of taxpayer funds. The funding termination was first reported by Axios. Axios also reported that the Justice Department formally sent a letter asking a Springer publication about "its editorial practices and accusing the publishing house of acting as a partisan in scientific debates, as well as wrongfully advocating for positions," citing a source with knowledge of the matter. Springer Nature also publishes Scientific American, which endorsed then-Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the 2024 presidential election. It was only the second time in 179 years that the publication endorsed a candidate for president. "Before making this endorsement, we evaluated Harris's record as a U.S. senator and as vice president under Joe Biden, as well as policy proposals she's made as a presidential candidate. Her opponent, Donald Trump, who was president from 2017 to 2021, also has a record—a disastrous one," Scientific American editors wrote. Springer Nature also practices diversity, equity, and including (DEI) policies, according to its website. The company's website has a "diversity commitment" section that details the publisher's commitment to "promoting practices that support diversity and inclusion in science communication and publishing." "As a guiding principle, we aim to foster equity, diversity and inclusion within our internal practices and in published content, embody these values in all our editorial activities and to support and promote these values in the research community," the website states. Springer Nature lists its priorities as increasing gender diversity among commissioned authors, and peer reviewer population and editorial board members, while promising to maintain a "no men-only" policy at its conferences. Nature magazine also has "a language sensitivity guide," billed as a "resource of appropriate language to use when writing about topics such as ethnicity, race, gender, sexuality, disability and health" to ensure "appropriately diverse representation" in its pages. "We are currently developing our commitment on other aspects of diversity, prioritizing ethnic and racial diversity," the website states. At the height of the George Floyd protests in June 2020, the company committed to ending "anti-Black practices in research." The following month it published an editorial recognizing "the existence of systemic racism in medicine" and calling for it to stop. Along the way, Springer Nature issued 2,923 retractions in 2024, according to Retraction Watch. Springer Nature noted that the majority were from articles published before 2023. "61.5% (1797 articles) of retractions were for papers published before January 2023 as part of our commitment to cleaning up the academic record. 38.5% (1126) of retractions were for articles published after January 2023," it stated. It also published 482,000 articles in 2024, so there were many that checked out, and Retraction Watch co-founder Ivan Oransky doesn't believe the correction issue is as alarming as it seems. "Springer Nature, like all major scientific publishers, has had to retract thousands of papers over the past several years because paper mills and other bad actors have taken advantage of poor quality control," Oransky told Fox News Digital. Springer Nature retracted articles for "compromised peer review process," "inappropriate or irrelevant references," and "citation behavior" that resulted in the publisher no longer having "confidence in the results and conclusions" that were published. Last year, Springer Nature found itself in the news when Laura Helmuth, the top editor at its "Scientific American" journal, referred to Americans who voted for Trump as the "meanest, dumbest, most bigoted" group and "f---ing fascists." As Trump pulled ahead on Election Day, Helmuth repeatedly attacked the candidate's supporters on Bluesky, a social media platform that is popular with liberals. "Solidarity to everybody whose meanest, dumbest, most bigoted high-school classmates are celebrating early results because f--- them to the moon and back," Helmuth wrote, while another post said, "I apologize to younger voters that my Gen X is so full of f---ing fascists." Helmuth eventually apologized and deleted the comments. She resigned a few days later.


Gizmodo
29 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
RFK Jr.'s Vaccine Panel Votes Against Thimerosal Flu Shots, Citing Debunked Risks
Robert F. Kennedy's war against vaccines has garnered another victory. This week, an outside advisory panel assembled by RFK Jr. voted to recommend against people using vaccines containing thimerosal, a once-common ingredient that anti-vaccination advocates have wrongly blamed for causing autism and other health problems. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices met this week to issue several vaccine-related recommendations. In a majority vote, the ACIP recommended against children, pregnant people, and adults receiving certain flu vaccines with thimerosal, despite decades of data showing no harm. The decision is the strongest indicator yet that the country's public health has been hijacked by anti-vax zealots. The ACIP is a panel of outside experts organized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Their recommendations greatly influence which vaccines are routinely provided to the public. For example, states often mandate that children receive vaccines universally recommended by the ACIP, such as the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, before they can enter public school. RFK Jr., who has a long history of spreading vaccine-related misinformation, has been busy stacking the deck against vaccines in several ways, including via the ACIP. In early June, he unilaterally fired all 17 members of the ACIP. He then quickly, without any public review, restocked the panel with new appointees, some of whom have misrepresented the science on vaccine safety or have financially benefited from testifying against vaccine manufacturers. The new ACIP panel met for the first time Wednesday and Thursday. Its members did pass some non-controversial votes, such as recommending the routine use of clesrovimab, a recently approved lab-made antibody treatment to prevent severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants not protected by maternal vaccines. And it continued to recommend a yearly seasonal flu shot for Americans aged six and over with no contraindications. But the ACIP was also tasked with reexamining a long-debunked talking point from anti-vaccination proponents concerning the supposed health risks of thimerosal in flu vaccines. Lyn Redwood, a former president of the anti-vaccine group founded by RFK Jr., Children's Health Defense, gave a presentation to the ACIP Thursday morning blaming thimerosal for neurological issues. Thimerosal is a mercury-based preservative once commonly added to many vaccines in the U.S. In the late 1990s, it became a bogeyman of the anti-vaccination movement, who argued it was a possible culprit behind the supposed link between higher rates of autism and vaccines. In 1999, in an abundance of precaution, health agencies and some pediatric groups pushed for the removal of thimerosal from childhood vaccines. These days, in the U.S., it's primarily used in multi-dose formulations of the flu vaccine, which is what the ACIP panel was asked to review. But the vast majority of studies have since failed to find any solid evidence that thimerosal in vaccines causes any health issues, let alone autism. This week, prior to the ACIP meeting, CDC scientists even published a report that supported this conclusion and outlined the methodological flaws of the few studies contrary to it. But the document was soon taken down from the CDC's website, purportedly because it did not go through the 'appropriate process to be posted,' according to the HHS. Meanwhile, Redwood's original ACIP presentation appeared to reference a study that doesn't exist—not the first time something similar has happened recently (the presentation was later reuploaded without the fake citation). None of this stopped Redwood from giving a presentation to the ACIP Thursday that ignored the scientific consensus on thimerosal. Kennedy has also now appointed Redwood, a retired registered nurse, to work in the CDC's vaccine safety office. And despite misgivings from some ACIP members, the majority agreed to recommend against the use of thimerosal-containing flu vaccines. The recommendation will hopefully have little practical effect, since most flu vaccines are single dose. Other available ingredients could replace its preservative effects if vaccine manufacturers so desire. But the decision is frustrating, given the complete lack of evidence behind it, and foreboding. RFK's reshuffling of the ACIP seems to have worked as expected in boosting the voice of the anti-vaccination movement and their nonsensical ideas. Today, it's thimerosal. Tomorrow, it might be many of the most important vaccines we rely on.