
U.S. to Resume Iran Nuclear Talks
Arabian Post Staff -Dubai
U.S. President Donald Trump has announced that American and Iranian officials will meet next week to discuss Tehran's nuclear ambitions, following a concerted military campaign that he claims has effectively neutralised key Iranian enrichment facilities. The announcement came at the NATO summit in The Hague.
Trump defended the use of bunker-busting bombs against the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan sites, asserting they had been 'obliterated' and describing the bombing campaign as a decisive blow to Iran's nuclear programme. He struck a triumphant tone, crediting the strikes with hastening the end of the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, though he expressed reservations about formalising a diplomatic agreement: 'We may sign an agreement. I don't know, to me, I don't think it's that necessary,' he told reporters.
ADVERTISEMENT
U.S. intelligence assessments, however, diverge on the scale of success. A preliminary report from the Defence Intelligence Agency concluded the setbacks to Iran's nuclear efforts might be limited to a matter of months, not years. CIA Director John Ratcliffe affirmed that the programme had been 'severely damaged' but stopped short of declaring it destroyed. Israeli officials estimated the setbacks to be multi‑year, while the International Atomic Energy Agency emphasised uncertainties over Iran's stockpile and called for robust inspections.
Diplomatic activity has meanwhile resumed. This U.S.–Iran meeting will follow six rounds of indirect talks mediated by Oman and Italy, which collapsed in mid‑June as the military confrontation intensified. Earlier this week, European envoys from the E‑3—France, Germany and the UK—engaged in direct negotiations in Geneva with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Those discussions aimed to bridge differences after stalled U.S. efforts.
White House special envoy Steve Witkoff reiterated red‑line U.S. stipulations ahead of next week's meeting: Tehran must renounce nuclear weaponisation and accept restrictions on uranium enrichment. He noted the U.S. is open to crafting a comprehensive peace framework, building on what Trump described as a de‑escalation following 'a victory for everybody'.
From Tehran, Iranian officials have not confirmed next week's meeting but emphasised national security. The Iranian parliament accelerated a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, pending guarantees for the safety of nuclear infrastructure targeted in the strikes. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf accused the IAEA of failing to condemn the U.S. attack. Meanwhile, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi urged renewed inspections to clarify the status of enriched uranium moved before the bombings.
Regional and global actors are also weighing in. France has called for robust diplomacy to carve a sustained peace path. China has echoed the call for diplomatic restraint. Israel hailed the strikes as a critical setback to Iran's programme; Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu endorsed Trump's strong posture and emphasised the need to keep pressure on Tehran.
ADVERTISEMENT
Analysts note the gravity of waging diplomacy in the shadow of military action. One specialist observed that while bombings may degrade enrichment infrastructure, they can complicate trust and cooperation needed for inspections and verification. Moreover, uncertainty lingers over the status of highly enriched uranium caches. Rebuilding diplomatic channels will require assurances, reciprocal transparency, and a mutual understanding of consequences.
Trump has warned that if Iran attempts to rebuild its nuclear programme, the U.S. is prepared to act again: 'Sure,' he said when asked about further strikes. Yet the pendulum has swung toward a blend of military deterrence and diplomatic engagement.
As next week's talks approach, key questions remain: who will represent each side, where the dialogue will occur, and whether the focus will be solely nuclear constraints or broader regional stability. White House administration officials have yet to disclose details, but the U.S. envoy confirmed Washington's intent is to establish a framework that could replace the 2015 agreement.
Trump also signalled openness to exploring a bilateral relationship beyond nuclear confines: 'We'll end up having something of a relationship with Iran,' he said, as long as Tehran adheres to non‑weaponisation terms.
As the diplomatic window opens under the spectre of military force, the world watches to see whether this fragile blend of coercion and conciliation can unfold into a sustainable agreement—one that might ensure Iran never pursues nuclear weapons and stabilises a volatile region.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Middle East Eye
34 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Netanyahu thanks Trump after call to cancel his trial
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanked US President Donald Trump on Thursday after the latter called for the cancellation of his corruption trial. "I was deeply moved by your sincere support for me, and your incredible support for Israel and the Jewish people," Netanyahu wrote in English on X, after reposting Trump's message Wednesday on Truth Social in which the US president called his trial in Israel a "witch hunt". This trial "should be CANCELED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Great Hero granted a pardon," Trump wrote.


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Legal experts tell Fifa Israel breaking international law as it considers sanctions
A group of legal experts that includes two former UN special rapporteurs has told Fifa that Israel and its football association is breaking international law by holding professional football matches on occupied Palestinian territory. The unprecedented letter to international football's governing body comes as it continues to deliberate over whether it should sanction the Israeli Football Association (IFA), after a proposal submitted by the Palestine Football Association (PFA) in March 2024. Over a year later, two Fifa committees are still investigating the complaints, one of which relates to discrimination by the IFA, the other to Israeli football teams playing in illegal settlements on occupied Palestinian territory. Since the start of its war on Gaza, Israel has also killed over 350 Palestinian footballers, including Hani al-Masdar, one of Palestine's greatest players, and has destroyed the blockaded enclave's pitches and stadiums. In December 2023, footage showed Israeli troops turning Gaza's al-Yarmouk, once a 9,000-seat football ground, into a makeshift internment camp for Palestinian detainees. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Beitar Jerusalem, whose Israeli fans call themselves 'the most racist team in the country', has a de facto policy to exclude Arabs and Palestinians. The club has received support from senior Israeli government figures, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Letter to Fifa In the letter to Bruno Chiomento, chairman of Fifa's governance, audit and compliance committee, which is investigating what it calls 'the participation in Israeli competitions of Israeli football teams allegedly based in the territory of Palestine', the group of judges, lawyers and scholars outlined the 'unassailable facts' relating to the illegality of Israeli settlements. The 30 signatories to the letter include former UN special rapporteurs on human rights in occupied Palestine John Dugard and Michael Lynk, Ardi Imseis, who is representing Palestine at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Israeli historian Ilan Pappe and William Schabas, a member of the Sierra Leone truth and reconciliation commission. 'This letter doesn't explicitly tell Fifa to suspend or expel Israel, but it leaves them in no doubt that that's what their own rules require them to do' - Nicholas McGeehan, FairSquare The letter cites ICJ's 2024 pronouncement on Israel's illegal occupation of Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem. It refers as well to the Fourth Geneva Convention, to UN Security Council Resolutions 446 from 1979, and to 2016's UN Security Council Resolution 2334, which describes settlements as 'a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-state solution'. 'In light of the above, the governance, audit and compliance committee need not concern itself with the question of the legality of Israeli settlements, but simply the issue of whether Israeli teams continue to play football matches in settlements in the West Bank,' the letter reads. 'If that is the case, as the PFA alleges and the IFA has never denied, then the IFA is ipso facto in violation of article 64 (2) of the Fifa Statutes, which states that 'Member associations and their clubs may not play on the territory of another member association without the latter's approval'.' Legal obligations Nicholas McGeehan, founder of FairSquare, a non-profit human rights group, told Middle East Eye that 'it speaks to the seriousness of the issue at hand, that academics of this stature would make an intervention like this'. McGeehan said that while 'this letter doesn't explicitly tell Fifa to suspend or expel Israel from international football, it leaves them in no doubt that that's what their own rules require them to do.' Shane Darcy, a law professor who signed the letter and is the deputy director of the Irish Centre for Human Rights, told MEE that the ICJ opinion of 2024, which found that Israel's presence in occupied Palestine was unlawful and must be ended 'as rapidly as possibly', was 'especially significant'. 'International organisations such as Fifa must play their part to ensure the respect of long-established rules' - Shane Darcy, Irish Centre for Human Rights 'Moreover, the court said that international organisations - which would include Fifa - are under an obligation not to recognise as legal the unlawful situation arising from Israel's presence in the West Bank,' he said. By allowing Israeli teams to play there, Darcy said, Fifa was not just going against its own statutes, it was going 'against fundamental precepts of international law as laid out by the World Court'. 'At a time when international humanitarian law is being disregarded with impunity in Gaza, international organisations such as Fifa must play their part to ensure the respect of long-established rules by its members.' The PFA first complained to Fifa about Israeli teams playing matches in occupied West Bank settlements, including Ma'aleh Adumim, Kiryat Arba, Givat Zeev, Bikat Hayarden and Ariel, in 2013. Four years later, in 2017, Fifa's council declined to take any action, saying that the 'final status of the West Bank territories is the concern of the competent international public law authorities', and that Fifa 'must remain neutral with regard to political matters'. In May 2024, after the PFA submitted its request to adopt sanctions against Israel, citing international law violations and the failure of the IFA in 'taking decisive action against discrimination and racism', Fifa President Gianni Infantino ignored requests for the matter to be put to a vote at the 74th Fifa congress. The decision has continued to be deferred since then. The IFA has called the Palestinian Football Association's request a 'cynical political move'.


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Iran's uranium stock largely intact, say European officials
Iran's uranium stock has remained largely intact following US and Israeli strikes on the country, European officials have reportedly said. Citing preliminary intelligence reports, two European officials told the Financial Times that Iran's stockpile of 408kg of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels was not concentrated in Fordow, one of its two main enrichment sites. The reports said it had been distributed to various other locations across the country. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said that just five days into the war, its inspectors lost track of Iran's uranium stocks. That amount, which could be easily transported in a container by truck, is enough for 10 nuclear warheads if Iran were to pursue weaponisation. Before Israel's attack, Iran and the US were in talks to curb the Islamic Republic's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Tuesday, after hostilities ended, that his country was willing to return to negotiations over its nuclear programme. Since launching strikes on Iran over the weekend, Trump has moved to de-escalate tensions. He thanked Iran on Monday for providing advance notice about its retaliatory strike on the US's al-Udeid military base in Qatar. Trump then announced a ceasefire a few hours after the attack. On Tuesday, he lashed out at both Israel and Iran when the truce appeared to wobble, saying the two foes "have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing'. Speaking at the Nato summit on Wednesday, Trump said both Iran and Israel were 'tired, exhausted' and 'satisfied to go home and get out'. He also said he would have no problem with Iran selling its oil to China. The US slapped sanctions on Iran's oil sales to Beijing during the nuclear talks. 'They just had a war. They fought it bravely. They are in the oil business… they are going to need money to put that country back into shape…. If they are going to sell oil, they are going to sell oil,' Trump said.