
Man behind Gyeongbokgung graffiti sentenced to additional year for money laundering
A 31-year-old man previously convicted of orchestrating graffiti at Gyeongbokgung, the iconic Joseon-era (1392-1910) royal palace in Seoul, has been sentenced to an additional year in prison for laundering criminal proceeds, according to local media outlets.
Previously, the man, identified by the surname Kang, was sentenced to seven years in prison in December for inciting two high school students he met via Telegram to deface the historic sites with graffiti promoting an illegal video-sharing website.
Last week, the Seoul Central District Court handed down an additional one-year sentence for violating the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment. Two accomplices were also given suspended prison sentences for participating in the laundering scheme.
'The purpose of the crime was to conceal Kang's criminal profits, which amounted to approximately 2.5 billion ($1.8 million), making their criminal responsibility significant,' the judge said. 'They also committed the crime during a repeat offense period.'
In December 2023, Kang instructed two teenagers to paint a 30-meter-long advertisement for his illegal site on the walls of Gyeongbokgung Palace, the National Palace Museum of Korea and the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency building. He paid them 100,000 won.
Kang claimed he had no assets, arguing that his illegal website had not generated significant profits. However, prosecutors conducted a forensic analysis of his smartphone and traced his cryptocurrency transactions.
The investigation found that between December 2023 and May 2024, Kang received 2.5 billion won from advertisers of illegal gambling websites, which he attempted to launder with two accomplices.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Triple special prosecutors set sail on sweeping Yoon-era probe
Veteran prosecutor, judiciary watchdog, and military legal expert named as special counsels Three separate special prosecutor teams have swung into action simultaneously, targeting allegations against former President Yoon Suk Yeol and his wife, as well as the death of a Marine during Yoon's administration. The passage and promulgation of the bills, and the nomination and subsequent appointments of special prosecutors was completed in an unusually short time — just eight days. Several bills to set up special probes of Yoon and his wife were passed in the National Assembly before Lee began his presidency on June 4, but they were consistently vetoed by the previous conservative administration over the limitations on the choice of prosecutor. Lee appointed three prosecutors to conduct independent special counsel probes on Thursday night: Cho Eun-suk, former acting chief of the Board of Audit and Inspection; Min Joong-ki, former chief prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Court; and Lee Myeong-hyeon, a former senior official at the Defense Ministry's prosecutors' office. According to the presidential office, the special prosecutors will investigate major controversies, including Yoon's alleged insurrection and treason, interference with a military investigation into the death of a marine and multiple suspicions against Yoon's wife, including the interference in the People Power Party's nomination of candidates for a National Assembly seat. It is the first time in South Korea's history that three special prosecutor probes are being launched at once. Two special counsel probes — into allegations of a Samsung slush fund and a scandal surrounding the investment firm BBK — were conducted simultaneously in 2007. Three special probes will have up to 20 days to form their investigation teams by appointing assistant special prosecutors, dispatching different prosecutors and investigators, and setting up the special probe office. Cho, who was named as the special prosecutor in charge of investigating the insurrection case, is set to look into whether Yoon's botched martial law declaration would constitute treason as well as insurrection. Cho is expected to examine whether Yoon allegedly attempted to instigate an armed conflict with North Korea and subvert the Constitution with the martial law declaration in December. 'We will do our utmost to ensure that the efforts made by the police's National Office of Investigation, the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials and the prosecution who have dedicated themselves to the investigation, are not in vain,' Cho said in an official statement Friday. Cho added that he would carefully carry out his duty as the special prosecutor, guided solely by the logic of the investigation. Cho previously led the joint investigation into the Sewol ferry disaster as the chief of the criminal division at the Supreme Prosecutors' Office in 2014. Under the Moon Jae-in administration, he served as the chief of the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office and director of the Institute of Justice. But he came into conflict with Yoon's government after criticizing a targeted audit against Jeon Hyun-heui, former chairperson of the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission and the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea's findings over the alleged corruption at the presidential residence as insufficient Min leads first lady inquiry Min will look into allegations surrounding former first lady Kim Keon Hee, including stock price manipulation, acceptance of a luxury bag and interference in Assembly election nominations. 'I understand that the cases have raised many questions by the public. I believe my task is to thoroughly examine the facts and key issues. Given that they have been major controversy, I believe the cases should be approached with objectivity,' Min was quoted as saying by local media outlet Yonhap. Min is a former member of the progressive judicial group Lawyers for a Democratic Society, more widely known by the Korean acronym Minbyun. He previously conducted the investigation into the aalleged blacklisting of judges deemed critical of the nation's judicial leadership. Min reportedly explained that he cannot share any investigative priorities among the suspicions raised against Kim as he did not expect to be appointed as the special prosecutor, but that he fully grasped the matter. Special prosecutor Lee, a former military prosecutor, will probe Yoon's alleged interference with the investigation into the death of Cpl. Chae Su-geun. 'Regardless of any outside pressure or interference, I will uncover the truth behind the unjust death,' Lee said Friday. According to the Democratic Party, Yoon tried to hinder the investigation into Lim Seong-geun, the then-commander of the deceased Marine's division, for possible negligence or other wrongdoing in Chae's death. Lee, who investigated allegation of illegal draft-dodging by the son of Rep. Lee Hoi-chang — a political bigwig who was considered a conservative party's presidential front-runner in 1997 and 2002 election, vowed to carry out the probe with conviction and dedication.


Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Constitutional complaint filed against suspension of Lee Jae-myung's criminal trials
A court complaint has been filed with the Constitutional Court of Korea to examine whether the Seoul courts' recent decisions to delay President Lee Jae-myung's criminal trials were constitutional. According to the Constitutional Court, four complaints were submitted to the court from Monday to Tuesday, claiming that the indefinite delays of Lee's trials, granted by the Seoul High Court and the Seoul Central District Court, violated the equal rights. The constitutional complaint can be filed by anyone whose basic rights guaranteed under the Constitution have been infringed upon by public authorities. The complaints included claims that the application of presidential immunity to Lee's retrial on charges of election law violation and a separate criminal trial related to alleged breach of trust charges over Daejang-dong development projects in Seongnam, Gyeonggi Province, is unconstitutional. They also requested the court to declare Article 84 of the Constitution unconstitutional. Article 84 of the Constitution stipulates that the president cannot be criminally prosecuted while in office except in cases of insurrection or treason. But it does not clarify whether this immunity extends to ongoing trials that began before the president took office, making it difficult to have a consistent interpretation of the law. The constitutional complaints stemmed from a narrow interpretation, which suggests that prosecution solely refers to the act of indictment, meaning Lee's ongoing criminal trials could legally proceed regardless of his status as president. Meanwhile, the Seoul Central District Court and the Seoul High Court postponed Lee's hearing schedules as they found that prosecution constitutes not only the act of indictment, but encompasses all ensuing judicial proceedings as well. 'The court has rescheduled the hearing date and will set a new date later. The decision was made after considering Article 84 of the Constitution,' the Seoul High Court said on Monday, without giving a new date for the hearing. Cheon Dae-yeop, chief of the Supreme Court's Court Administration Office and a Supreme Court justice, previously claimed that the judges of each court will have to decide whether to stop or proceed with the trials by applying Article 84 of the Constitution to a criminal defendant who has been elected president. The Constitutional Court reportedly assigned the complaint to a panel of three justices to conduct a preliminary review. If the panel finds the complaint legally sufficient, it will be referred to the full court session for a hearing.


Korea Herald
05-06-2025
- Korea Herald
Woman who pestered IU online slapped with another fine, for another attack
Court awards 3 million won fine for malicious comment, after the writer had already been fined for the same offense last year A 40-year-old woman previously punished for contempt against IU has been sentenced to a fine for another malicious comment, once again against the K-pop superstar. Seoul Central District Court found the defendant surnamed Kim guilty of insult, a criminal offense in South Korea, sentencing her to 3 million won ($2,200) fine. The defendant was accused of posting sexually offensive comments against the 32-year-old singer and actor, along with the accusation that her agency Edam Entertainment had bribed the judges in recent litigations. Kim denied writing the comments, and claimed that they did not specify a target and it did not damage IU's reputation. The court rejected the defendant's claims, pointing out that Kim had already been punished for similar crimes and that she had not been forgiven by the victim. But the court issued a relatively lenient sentence in giving her the same punishment handed when she had no priors, as the offense had been committed before she was indicted for her previous offense. In the previous online attack against the victim, Kim wrote comments disparaging IU for her singing and attire in April 2022. Kim said the comments merely expressed her personal preference and that her linguistic skills are limited due to her mental condition, but the court sentenced her to 3 million won fine in December of last year. Edam Entertainment has been engaged in legal battles against those posting malicious comments against IU, with the agency saying in November that it has filed for criminal punishment against 180 individuals. IU, one of the most popular and influential figures in the Korean pop culture, has been subject to online attacks for years. She was recently targeted by supporters of disgraced ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol, expelled for his martial law imposition in December, when she paid for food and drinks to be provided for protesters calling for Yoon's impeachment earlier this year.