Man guilty of fatal one-punch attack on football fan
A man has been found guilty of killing a football fan with a single punch after violence broke out between rival fans following a football match.
Tony Johnson, 55, suffered a fatal head injury outside The Manchester pub on Blackpool promenade after a match between Blackpool and Burnley on the evening of 4 March 2023.
Jake Balmforth, 35, of Tarvin Close, Burnley, was found guilty of manslaughter by a jury at Preston Crown Court earlier following a six-day trial.
He was remanded in custody until a sentencing hearing set for 22 May.
Mr Johnson had been among a group of Blackpool fans who gathered outside the pub, which was a designated pub for Burnley fans that day, the court heard.
A disturbance followed and CCTV footage showed Balmforth punch Mr Johnson once in the face.
He was taken to Blackpool Victoria Hospital but was pronounced dead on 6 March, having not regained consciousness.
Tony Johnson never regained consciousness and died in hospital two days later [Lancashire Police handout]
Speaking after the hearing, Det Chief Insp Andy Fallows, from Lancashire Police, said: "My thoughts remain first and foremost with Tony Johnson's family and loved ones.
"During the trial over the last few days they have had the distressing experience of having to relive the events of that evening in March 2023.
"This case highlights what the tragic consequences can be when violence breaks out."
Nine other men who pleaded guilty to affray will be sentenced at a later date.
Following Mr Johnson's death, his partner paid tribute to him, saying she was "devastated" to have lost her "best friend, life partner and soul mate".
"We all, as a family, are so heartbroken and our lives are never going to be the same," she added.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
More on this story
Related internet links
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ormond Beach police arrest man on federal warrant for threats against Donald Trump, others
Ormond Beach police said they arrested a 25-year-old man on Thursday, June 5, on a federal warrant for making online threats against President Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and others. Sheldon Biddle, whose last known address was in Ormond Beach, has made antisemitic statements and radical threats of violence, police said, while also expressing hostility toward law enforcement. Threats were made against Trump, billionaire Elon Musk, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino on an X social-media account determined by the Secret Service to be Biddle's, according to Ormond Beach police. Court records show that this was the second time Biddle had been arrested for making threats against Trump and the others. On April 11, Ormond Beach police charged him with written threats to kill or do bodily injury, or conduct a mass shooting or an act of terrorism. He spent two days in jail before bonding out. Records show he was jailed again on Thursday, June 5, as a fugitive from justice and was being held without bond. On April 7, one of the posts read: "If I was in DC I'd shoot you @netanyahu." On April 2, the account posted: "Trump is gonna get assassinated for being a treasonous traitor." A March 19 post read: "You're gonna eat led tyrant boy," in response to a post by Bongino. A YouTube account associated with Biddle included video titles "Joe Biden molested me" and "Shooting up the YouTube headquarters for all the censorship." Biddle has at least three previous arrests after which he pleaded no contest to charges including possession of a concealed firearm, battery (domestic violence), trespassing and resisting an officer without violence. In each case, the State Attorney's Office withheld adjudication. In 2023, he was charged with resisting arrest with violence, a felony, but the charge was reduced to a misdemeanor and moved to county court, records show. "We have absolutely no tolerance for threats of violence in our city," Ormond Beach Police Chief Jesse Godfrey said. "No one should feel unsafe in their place of worship, neighborhood or community, and we will act swiftly to hold offenders accountable." This article originally appeared on The Daytona Beach News-Journal: Ormond Beach man arrested on charges of posting threats on X
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns
The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT 'are not capable of conducting reliable legal research." 'Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect,' Judge Sharp wrote. 'The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue.' That doesn't mean lawyers cannot use AI in their research, but she said they have a professional duty 'to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources, before using it in the course of their professional work.' Judge Sharp suggested that the growing number of cases where lawyers (including, on the U.S. side, lawyers representing major AI platforms) have cited what appear to be AI-generated falsehoods suggests that 'more needs to be done to ensure that the guidance is followed and lawyers comply with their duties to the court,' and she said her ruling will be forwarded to professional bodies including the Bar Council and the Law Society. In one of the cases in question, a lawyer representing a man seeking damages against two banks submitted a filing with 45 citations — 18 of those cases did not exist, while many others 'did not contain the quotations that were attributed to them, did not support the propositions for which they were cited, and did not have any relevance to the subject matter of the application,' Judge Sharp said. In the other, a lawyer representing a man who had been evicted from his London home wrote a court filing citing five cases that did not appear to exist. (The lawyer denied using AI, though she said the citations may have come from AI-generated summaries that appeared in 'Google or Safari.') Judge Sharp said that while the court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings, that is 'not a precedent.' 'Lawyers who do not comply with their professional obligations in this respect risk severe sanction,' she added. Both lawyers were either referred or referred themselves to professional regulators. Judge Sharp noted that when lawyers do not meet their duties to the court, the court's powers range from 'public admonition' to the imposition of costs, contempt proceedings, or even 'referral to the police.' This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns
The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT 'are not capable of conducting reliable legal research." 'Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect,' Judge Sharp wrote. 'The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue.' That doesn't mean lawyers cannot use AI in their research, but she said they have a professional duty 'to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources, before using it in the course of their professional work.' Judge Sharp suggested that the growing number of cases where lawyers (including, on the U.S. side, lawyers representing major AI platforms) have cited what appear to be AI-generated falsehoods suggests that 'more needs to be done to ensure that the guidance is followed and lawyers comply with their duties to the court,' and she said her ruling will be forwarded to professional bodies including the Bar Council and the Law Society. In one of the cases in question, a lawyer representing a man seeking damages against two banks submitted a filing with 45 citations — 18 of those cases did not exist, while many others 'did not contain the quotations that were attributed to them, did not support the propositions for which they were cited, and did not have any relevance to the subject matter of the application,' Judge Sharp said. In the other, a lawyer representing a man who had been evicted from his London home wrote a court filing citing five cases that did not appear to exist. (The lawyer denied using AI, though she said the citations may have come from AI-generated summaries that appeared in 'Google or Safari.') Judge Sharp said that while the court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings, that is 'not a precedent.' 'Lawyers who do not comply with their professional obligations in this respect risk severe sanction,' she added. Both lawyers were either referred or referred themselves to professional regulators. Judge Sharp noted that when lawyers do not meet their duties to the court, the court's powers range from 'public admonition' to the imposition of costs, contempt proceedings, or even 'referral to the police.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
