Royal Yacht Britannia's new visitor centre ready to welcome visitors
Two years in development, the visitor centre and retail experience "incorporate the latest in advanced technology" with hand-crafted furniture and fittings.
Designed by 442 Design, with collaboration from the Royal Collection Trust, author/historian Richard Johnstone-Bryden, and former Royal Yachtsmen, the "highly engaging" exhibition tells the story of Britannia's launch from John Brown & Company Shipyard in Clydebank in 1953, to the ship's new life as a five-star visitor attraction in Leith, voted Tripadvisor's No.1 Attraction 2023-2024.
READ MORE:
Major Scottish industry heading for 'choppier waters'
Housebuilder acquires land for 99 new homes overlooking city park
Scottish city shopping park brought to market for sale
Highlights of the new exhibition include: the No.1 uniform of Prince Philip, previously gifted to The Royal Yacht Britannia Trust by Queen Elizabeth II; a cascade of historical photographs storytelling life on board the Royal Yacht; and a 11-foot-long LEGO Britannia model.
Several new and exciting product lines have been created by Director of Retail, Kerry Burns and her team, including a range of fine bone china called the 'Admiral's Collection', inspired by the gold rings insignia worn on the cuffs by Admirals in the Royal Navy.
Chief Executive Franck Bruyère said: 'This is a momentous event for The Royal Yacht Britannia Trust and I'm incredibly proud of the enormous collaborative effort behind the project and the Britannia team who have been integral in ensuring our new space is world-class and enhances our existing five-star visitor experience.
"An additional bonus for us is this month marks the anniversary of Britannia arriving in Leith to start her new life as a visitor attraction 27 years ago in 1998.'
The Royal Yacht Britannia Mr Bruyere added: 'It has been a pleasure working closely with the Royal Collection Trust to source never-before-seen images of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip relaxing and enjoying life at sea on board this iconic ship.'
Director of Visitor Experience, Robert Gill, who led the project on behalf of the Royal Yacht Britannia Trust, commented: 'Through this new exhibition we can amplify the history and heritage of this iconic vessel and spark imaginations before our visitors step on board the Yacht itself. Exhibition designers, 442 Design, have told Britannia's story so magnificently, and specialist interior fit-out company, Hugh Stirling Ltd, have brought our vision to life. We are so proud of the final result.'
Spring also brings a new delivery to The Royal Yacht Britannia Trust's fleet of vintage cars; The British Motor Museum have loaned the original 1966 Land Rover used by Queen Elizabeth II for rural transport and Royal pursuits. Used by the Royal Family for 17 years, the classic green station wagon is on display alongside the Rolls-Royce in recognition of the vehicles Britannia used to carry on board when in Royal Service.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
12 minutes ago
- The National
A macro-economic route to end poverty
Increases in government spending add to money already circulating in the economy, but if the dams and diversions remain all this new money ends up in the hands of the banks, landlords, monopolistic corporations and the wealthy. To explore how reforms can be made to the way our economy works, a useful start is to consider an important concept in macro-economics: sectoral balances. The start point is to understand that one person's spending is another person's income. When governments spend, they end up with a deficit unless they tax back the whole amount. That deficit is matched by an equivalent surplus in the non-government sector. READ MORE: Scottish independence support at 58 per cent if Nigel Farage becomes PM – poll Cumulative annual deficits add up to what we know as the 'national debt', which is the total amount of money circulating in the economy. Understood this way it makes no sense to think that the national debt should be paid off. There are two main components to the non-government sector: a domestic private sector and an overseas sector. The domestic private sector can be broken down further into an industrial sector (manufacturing and services), a financial sector and a household sector. The poorest section of the population occupies the lowest deciles within the household sector; they are the ones most likely to rely on debt to purchase even the most basic essentials and the least likely to own assets or have any savings. The money in the economy barely reaches them and what little money they do have to spend eventually finds its way back to the banks, landlords, big corporations and the wealthy. Since an overseas sector surplus means that some of the national debt is held by foreign actors, such as foreign governments and financial institutions, we need to consider the extent to which this functions as a drain on the economy. If money is lost to the domestic economy, there is less available to reach the poorest. However, a zero overseas sector surplus is not an appropriate objective either. Foreign governments and businesses need to hold a certain amount of our currency in order to facilitate trade – they need our money to buy our exports. Overseas governments and investors like to hold some of our government debt (in the form of government bonds), and demand for them is a good indicator of confidence in our currency and its value. Some losses from the economy can be avoided by reducing reliance on imports, particularly for strategic essentials such as food or energy and critical materials. Capital outflows to foreign investors from the Scottish economy currently amount to about 6% of GDP – or £11 billion per year. The Scottish Government has very limited capacity to grow the economy whilst Scotland remains part of the UK, which is why there has been a focus on attracting foreign investment. However, once independent and having our own currency we can rely less on foreign investment, and should then seek to grow our own companies instead. Increasing domestic ownership of our businesses and resources will reduce the outflow of profits, meaning more money is retained and circulated within the economy. Realistically, some foreign investment will be needed, especially where we lack home-grown technology and/or know-how but, in future, foreign investment should be limited to the degree that is supports long-term industrial and economic strategy. Scotland should establish a Foreign Investment Evaluation Agency to assess all proposals for foreign investment to ensure it is aligned with strategic priorities. We should welcome foreign investors who respect our values and will uphold the guarantees of fundamental socio-economic and human rights written into our future Constitution. The FIEA remit should include the evaluation of prospective foreign investors' commitments and record before recommending the issue of a 'licence to operate' in Scotland. Foreign investors must not be able to rely on 'investor-state dispute settlement' provisions in trade agreements. Any litigation against the Scottish Government by an investor must be dealt with in the Scottish courts where the constitutional rights of citizens can be given due weight against the rights claimed by investors. If foreign investors are deterred by the conditions, we must ensure that our own financial institutions step up to the mark to support the formation and development of Scottish capabilities including the recruitment of essential talent from overseas if necessary. In the next article, we will turn our attention to how the domestic private sector surplus can be redistributed so that sufficient money reaches the most disadvantaged households in our society.
The National
12 minutes ago
- The National
It's time to put renewed emphasis on life skills for our young people
Worse, the same report suggests that the prospect of securing a good job is just as dependent now as it was 20 years ago on who you know, rather than what you know. Perhaps most worrying, the report suggests that in a world where the nature of work is changing very rapidly, young people are being prepared by the education system for a career in traditional professions which might not even exist in the very near future, so significant is going to be the impact of AI. You could dismiss the report, except for the fact that it comes from a source as authoritative as the OECD. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is a Paris-based think tank that is, admittedly, dominated by the world's richest countries, but it is also noted for producing the best comparison statistics on education in the world. READ MORE: Scottish independence support at 58 per cent if Nigel Farage becomes PM – poll In fact, the report is so persuasive because what the researchers did was compare current world data with data from 20 years ago, when they first undertook work of this sort, and they would appear to be shocked to find that so little has changed. I am not surprised by this. If anyone had told me when I was at university, in the 1970s, that I would be making most of my income as a social media content creator, I would have been bemused by the suggestion. No-one had heard of the internet, or YouTube, or electronic recording data of the type we now use. Nor did any of the technology we use to consume social media exist back then. I make the point for a good reason. If my own career has changed this radically, and the rate of change in the nature of work is increasing and things are changing more often, what is it that we should now be training young people so that they have skills that may support them for decades, rather than a year or two at most after they leave either school or university? I have had six university appointments over the past 28 years and I appreciate the value of an academic education. But what I also realise is that this type of education, which dominates Highers and university courses, does not suit most people. In fact, in many disciplines, unless you want to be an academic, it is not much use at all. That is most especially true as far too many courses do not encourage much critical thinking at undergraduate level. All that means I am not surprised by what the OECD has found. I know that there might be exceptions to my comments in the case of some applied disciplines, such as medicine or veterinary science, and some engineering courses, but even then, these subjects exist in a real-world context once the person studying them has left university. To ignore this fact when they are training is quite ridiculous. So, what do I suggest we should do? I think the time has come for the unnecessary focus on academic disciplines in education to go. If the tiny minority who want to pursue a career in that area need concentrated training, that is for postgraduate education, above all else. At the level of Highers, in particular, the focus has to be very heavily on life skills. Of course, two or three more specialist subjects should be taken, but as important as these might be, so are essential and transferable life skills to ensure that people have the opportunity to change careers as time develops, as will inevitably happen to almost everyone now. So, what skills do I think are required? Try this list, which are things that matter to me now as an employer (which I am): Effective written communication Effective verbal communication Applied numeracy, including how to construct business-oriented spreadsheets Basic bookkeeping, accounting and budgeting An outline of the tax system Website creation and management The essentials of marketing Time management Basic employment law and contract law There is no job that exists for anyone over the age of 21 that does not require most skills, and most young people arrive in employment missing many of them. If, however, young people arrived with them, it would then be relatively easy for employers to provide more vocational training after the age of 21, using apprenticeship schemes if appropriate. Even those schemes are, however, at present, being hindered by a lack of these basic essentials, even among graduates. My suggestion is that at least 40% of the required undergraduate courses should also be cut on these issues. The result would be degrees that might be useful, and more fun to study, which is an issue that really matters to me when I know that so many students do not get very excited by their undergraduate university courses at present. Scotland could make these changes. Everyone would be a winner.
The Herald Scotland
20 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Land reform Bill: Labour MSP in bid to introduce 500ha cap
The MSP is to lodge amendments that would introduce a presumptive cap on land ownership. Her proposal would prevent any individual or entity from buying, selling or owning more than 500 hectares by default. READ MORE: MSPs backed the general principles of the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill in March. Holyrood's Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee is set to begin Stage 2 scrutiny on Tuesday, considering hundreds of proposed amendments. The Bill has two parts. The first would place a duty on the owners of the largest landholdings to engage with the local community about the use of the land. It also proposes mechanisms to make it easier for community groups to purchase land when it is put up for sale. The second part addresses the agricultural and environmental use of leased farmland. Ms Villalba's amendment would mean any transaction exceeding the 500 hectare threshold would trigger a forward-looking public interest test, assessing whether the sale benefits local communities and Scotland more broadly. Where estates fail the test, ministers could require them to be divided and sold in smaller parcels—a measure aimed at curbing further concentration. She also plans to amend the Bill's definition of 'large-scale' landholding to account for total land owned, rather than just contiguous holdings. This is intended to prevent landowners from avoiding regulation by holding multiple, smaller, separate parcels. A further amendment would stop ministers from raising the acreage thresholds without full scrutiny by the Scottish Parliament, amid concerns future governments could dilute the reforms. Ms Villalba said more ambitious action is needed to dismantle Scotland's entrenched 'land monopoly'. Mercedes Villalba outside the Trump course in Balmedie (Image: Contributed) Despite over two decades of land reform legislation, the country is often cited as having the most unequal land ownership in the western world. Research published last year by former Green MSP and land reform advocate Andy Wightman found that half of Scotland's privately owned rural land—some 3.2 million hectares—is held by just 433 owners, including estates, corporations and trusts. Community bodies, by contrast, own only around 2.8% of rural land. Campaigners argue that this extreme concentration has remained largely unchanged since the early 20th century, resulting in 'localised monopoly' power in some areas. However, in response to the Scottish Government's consultation, Scottish Land and Estates argued there is no substantial evidence that the scale of landholdings negatively impacts the country. They said scale and concentration should be treated as separate issues. 'There appears to be no evidence that there is a detrimental impact on Scotland due to the scale of land holdings,' they said. ' The Scottish Land Commission's own evidence points to the issue being potentially one of concentrated land ownership in specific areas, rather than scale itself. Therefore any measure of scale will always be an inappropriate instrument in dealing with any adverse impacts on communities or the prosperity of Scotland in a wider context.' READ MORE Ms Villalba said:'To deal with the serious problem of concentrated land ownership, we need a radical shift that prioritises community benefit and empowers local people to shape the future of their land, rather than merely tinkering round the edges. 'Today, Scotland's land is concentrated in the hands of the new nobility—asset managers, foreign billionaires, and the inheritors of huge estates. Just 0.025% of the population own 67% of our countryside. 'This Bill presents a chance to change that, break the ultra-wealthy's grasp on Scotland's resources and build a fairer, more prosperous Scotland for all of us. But currently it simply does not meet the scale of the challenge. 'That is why the proposals must include a presumed limit on ownership over 500 hectares, unless it is in the public interest. 'Without a meaningful public interest test, we risk allowing land to be sold or managed in ways that benefit private interests at the expense of the public good. We need a mechanism that ensures that decisions about land are made with the long-term wellbeing of our communities at heart.'
