MLB players' union, Bad Bunny agency agree to dismiss lawsuit over discipline
NEW YOR (AP) — Bad Bunny's sports representation firm and the Major League Baseball Players Association filed an agreement Thursday to dismiss the union's lawsuit over penalties imposed for making improper inducements.
The sides submitted a stipulation telling U.S. District Judge Jennifer H. Rearden in Manhattan they had settled the matter.
The MLBPA disciplined Rimas Sports, the agency co-owned by Puerto Rican musical artist Bad Bunny, last April over violations of its agent regulations. It revoked the agent certification of Rimas' William Arroyo and denied certifications of executives Noah Assad and Jonathan Miranda, citing citing a $200,000 interest-free loan and a $19,500 gift. The union issued a $400,000 fine for misconduct.
Arbitrator Ruth M. Moscovitch last October upheld the union's five-year suspensions of Assad and Miranda and cut Arroyo's suspension to three years. The union filed a petition to confirm the 80-page decision in New York Supreme Court, and the case was shifted to federal court.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lilli Tagger wins French Open girls title
Great Britain's Hannah Klugman, left, hugs Austria's Lilli Tagger aftre losing the girl's singles final match of the French Tennis Open at the Roland-Garros in Paris, Saturday, June 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson) Great Britain's Hannah Klugman sits after losing the girl's singles final match of the French Tennis Open against Austria's Lilli Tagger at the Roland-Garros in Paris, Saturday, June 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson) Austria's Lilli Tagger celebrates after winning the girl's singles final match of the French Tennis Open at the Roland-Garros against Great Britain's Hannah Klugman in Paris, Saturday, June 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson) Austria's Lilli Tagger celebrates after winning the girl's singles final match of the French Tennis Open at the Roland-Garros against Great Britain's Hannah Klugman in Paris, Saturday, June 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson) Great Britain's Hannah Klugman, left, hugs Austria's Lilli Tagger aftre losing the girl's singles final match of the French Tennis Open at the Roland-Garros in Paris, Saturday, June 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson) Great Britain's Hannah Klugman sits after losing the girl's singles final match of the French Tennis Open against Austria's Lilli Tagger at the Roland-Garros in Paris, Saturday, June 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson) Austria's Lilli Tagger celebrates after winning the girl's singles final match of the French Tennis Open at the Roland-Garros against Great Britain's Hannah Klugman in Paris, Saturday, June 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson) PARIS (AP) — Lilli Tagger of Austria has won the girls title at the French Open without dropping a set in the tournament. Making her junior Roland-Garros debut this year, the 17-year-old Tagger beat eighth-seeded Hannah Klugman of Britain 6-2, 6-0 in the final on Saturday. Advertisement Tagger saved all five break points she faced and hit 19 winners. She is the first Austrian player to win a junior singles title at the French Open. Her previous best result at a major tournament was reaching the quarterfinals at the Australian Open this year. ___ AP tennis:
San Francisco Chronicle
14 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Yui Kamiji wins fifth French Open wheelchair singles title
PARIS (AP) — Top-ranked Yui Kamiji of Japan won a fifth wheelchair singles title at the French Open by beating second-seeded Aniek Van Koot on Saturday. Kamiji won 6-2, 6-2 in the women's final on Court Suzanne-Lenglen. It was the 72nd meeting between Kamiji and her Dutch rival, and their 20th at a Grand Slam tournament. Kamiji extended her winning record to 51-21. Kamiji has now won 10 Grand Slam singles titles. She also won the US Open in 2014 and 2017, and the Australian Open in 2017, 2020 and 2025. ___
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court
LONDON (AP) — Lawyers have cited fake cases generated by artificial intelligence in court proceedings in England, a judge has said — warning that attorneys could be prosecuted if they don't check the accuracy of their research. High Court justice Victoria Sharp said the misuse of AI has 'serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system.' In the latest example of how judicial systems around the world are grappling with how to handle the increasing presence of artificial intelligence in court, Sharp and fellow judge Jeremy Johnson chastised lawyers in two recent cases in a ruling on Friday. They were asked to rule after lower court judges raised concerns about 'suspected use by lawyers of generative artificial intelligence tools to produce written legal arguments or witness statements which are not then checked,' leading to false information being put before the court. In a ruling written by Sharp, the judges said that in a 90 million pound ($120 million) lawsuit over an alleged breach of a financing agreement involving the Qatar National Bank, a lawyer cited 18 cases that did not exist. The client in the case, Hamad Al-Haroun, apologized for unintentionally misleading the court with false information produced by publicly available AI tools, and said he was responsible, rather than his solicitor Abid Hussain. But Sharp said it was 'extraordinary that the lawyer was relying on the client for the accuracy of their legal research, rather than the other way around.' In the other incident, a lawyer cited five fake cases in a tenant's housing claim against the London Borough of Haringey. Barrister Sarah Forey denied using AI, but Sharp said she had 'not provided to the court a coherent explanation for what happened.' The judges referred the lawyers in both cases to their professional regulators, but did not take more serious action. Sharp said providing false material as if it were genuine could be considered contempt of court or, in the 'most egregious cases,' perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. She said in the judgment that AI is a 'powerful technology' and a 'useful tool' for the law. 'Artificial intelligence is a tool that carries with it risks as well as opportunities,' the judge said. 'Its use must take place therefore with an appropriate degree of oversight, and within a regulatory framework that ensures compliance with well-established professional and ethical standards if public confidence in the administration of justice is to be maintained.'
