
Ukraine can strike deep inside Russia as Merz claims US, Germany, UK, and France lift range restrictions on weapons; Moscow calls move 'dangerous'
As the Russia-Ukraine war drags on with little headway made to secure a peace deal of ceasefire despite some attempts by US President
Donald Trump
, German
Chancellor Friedrich Merz
has dropped a bombshell. In what could lead to a major escalation in the ongoing conflict, Chancellor Merz stated that the US, Germany, UK, and France have lifted range restrictions on weapons to Ukraine.
What this effectively means that Ukraine has got the go ahead and weapons from the western nations to hit targets deep inside the Russian territory. The only long-range weapons Ukraine has used against Russia till now are its indigenous armed drones. Some of these drones have hit targets in Moscow.
Ukraine has also fired some long-range missiles supplied by the United States to hit targets in Bryansk and Kursk oblasts of the
Russian Federation
. But the US and NATO supplied weapons have not been able to alter the course of the fight in Ukraine's favour.
Also Read:
Trump calls Putin 'CRAZY', predicts Russia's downfall due to the Ukraine war
Now, Merz's statement, which has been called "dangerous" by Moscow, can change the dynamics of war and force Russia to escalate the fighting.
Live Events
"There are no longer any range restrictions on weapons delivered to Ukraine, neither by the British nor by the French nor by us nor by the Americans. This means that Ukraine can now defend itself, for example, by attacking military positions in Russia... With very few exceptions, it didn't do that until recently. It can now do that," Merz said on Monday (May 26) at the WDR Europaforum 2025 at the re:publica digital conference in Berlin.
However, there seems to be some confusion with Germany's ruling coalition on Merz's statement with the country's Vice Chancellor and Social Democratic Party (SPD) leader Lars Klingbeil explaining that as far he is concerned that has been no no development or agreement between countries on expanding the range of missiles supplied to Kiev.
Klingbeil's party colleague Ralf Stegner opined that Merz making such statements "are not helpful". Merz's Christian Democratic Union (CDU) is supported by the SPD and Christian Social Union (CSU).
Yet, Merz maintained that his statement was made only after the countries he mentioned decided to lift the range restriction, a decision he called was made "quite some time ago".
"So yesterday in Berlin I merely described what has been underway for a couple of months, namely, that Ukraine has the right to use the weapons it receives beyond its own territory against military targets on Russian soil," he said during a joint conference with Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo.
German government not on one page?
Meanwhile, Merz's remarks were met with confusion even within his own coalition. German Vice Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil (Social Democratic Party, SPD) told journalists that no new agreements were made on the issue of range restrictions on German weapons sent to Ukraine for strikes on Russian territory.
Also Read:
China's 35 million leftover men are hunting for brides in Russia, Southeast Asia, Bangladesh and Pakistan
The reaction from Moscow was along expected lines with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov outlining that any range restriction removal will be "dangerous".
"If these decisions have indeed been made, they are completely at odds with our aspirations for a political [peace] settlement... These are quite dangerous decisions, if they have been made," Peskov said.
Russia has long criticized Western countries for supplying Ukraine with long-range weapons. The Kremlin has also warned Germany against providing Kyiv with the
Taurus missile system
.
Long-range weapons with Ukraine
Ukraine has several long-range weapons supplied by western nations in its arsenal. The UK and France have sent Storm Shadow/Scalp cruise missiles with a range of about 250 kilometers (150 miles). The US during the administration of former president
Joe Biden
had in November 2024 greenlighted Ukraine to use its Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) against targets in Russia. The ATACMS have a range of 305 km (190 mi).
The Germans have not supplied any long-range missile to Ukraine although they have the option of sending Taurus, which has a range of 500 km (310 mi).
Russia has warned Germany against sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine, stating any use of the weapon by Kiev against Moscow would be viewed as "direct participation" by Berlin in the over three-year long war.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
11 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Time to drop the bomb': Elon Musk claims Trump named in Epstein Files
In a dramatic escalation of their ongoing feud, Elon Musk has in his latest public attack claimed that US President Donald Trump 'is in the Epstein files' and that's 'the real reason' they have not been released in his latest public attack. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk posted on X. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Meanwhile, the US President has threatened to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts and tax subsidies for Elon Musk's companies. In a post on Truth Social, he wrote, "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" In another post, he wrote, "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" Trump, Musk air dirty laundary in public Earlier in the day, Trump said that he's unsure whether their 'good relationship' will continue, following disagreements over a key tax bill and electric vehicle (EV) mandates. "I'm very disappointed with Elon. I've helped him a lot," Trump said. 'He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it—until he found out we're going to cut the EV mandate.' The remarks come days after Musk vocally opposed Trump's flagship tax legislation — dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill' — urging lawmakers via social media to reject what he described as a 'megabill' that would increase the national deficit and place a heavy debt burden on Americans. In response, Elon Musk claimed that Trump would have lost the 2024 election 'without me'. The Tesla chief also accused Trump of showing 'such ingratitude'. What are the Epstein files? Jeffrey Epstein was a wealthy financier known for spending time with famous people, including politicians, celebrities, royals, and academics. His legal troubles began in 2005 in Palm Beach, Florida, when he was accused of paying a 14-year-old girl for sex. In the years that followed, many other young girls came forward with similar claims of abuse. In February this year, a document titled *"The Epstein Files: Phase 1"* was made public. It included a list of people linked to Epstein and brought the spotlight back to the long-running sex trafficking case that had made headlines around the world. Epstein was believed to have made his money by managing the finances of extremely rich individuals, although much about his business activities was unclear. He often surrounded himself with powerful and well-known figures, including former US Presidents, British royals, and Hollywood stars. His downfall began in 2008, when he admitted to charges related to child prostitution in Florida. He received a 13-month sentence, during which he was allowed to leave jail for work — a decision that sparked widespread criticism. In 2019, Epstein was arrested again, this time by federal authorities, who accused him of running a large sex trafficking ring involving minors. He reportedly lured underage girls with offers of money or career help, then exploited them. Later that year, Epstein was found dead in his jail cell in New York. His death was ruled a suicide, but questions and conspiracy theories have continued ever since. One of the most disturbing parts of the case involved Epstein's private island, Little St. James, in the US Virgin Islands. Nicknamed 'Pedophile Island' by some, it was said to be a key location for his abuse, where young girls were brought in and mistreated. Wealthy and well-known guests allegedly visited the island by flying on Epstein's private plane, known as the 'Lolita Express.' Court records and witness statements have described the island as a hidden site where exploitation took place.


Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What is the International Criminal Court?
THE HAGUE, - President Donald Trump's administration on Thursday imposed sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court, an unprecedented retaliation over the tribunal's work on issuing an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Here are some facts about the court: WHEN WAS THE ICC SET UP AND WHY? The court was established in 2002 to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and the crime of aggression when member states are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. It can prosecute crimes committed by nationals of member states or on the territory of member states by other actors. It has 125 member states. The court's budget for 2025 is about 195 million euros . WHAT IS THE ICC INVESTIGATING? The ICC is conducting investigations from the Palestinian territories to Ukraine and African states such as Uganda, Democratic Republic of Congo and Kenya, to Venezuela in Latin America and Myanmar and the Philippines in Asia. It says there have been 32 cases before the court, with some having more than one suspect. ICC judges have issued at least 60 arrest warrants. HOW MANY PEOPLE HAS THE COURT CONVICTED? ICC judges have issued 11 convictions and four acquittals. Twenty-one people have been held in the ICC detention centre in The Hague and have appeared before the court, and 31 people remain at large. Charges have been dropped against seven people due to their deaths. Of the 11 convictions, only six have been for the court's core crimes of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The others were for crimes such as witness tampering. The six convicted men were all African militia leaders from Democratic Republic of Congo, Mali and Uganda. Terms ranged from nine to 30 years in prison. The maximum possible term is life imprisonment. WHO IS ON THE COURT'S ARREST WARRANT LIST? Former Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte was arrested on March 11 on a warrant from the ICC. Prosecutors accuse him of forming and arming death squads held responsible for the killing of thousands of perceived drug users and dealers during his rule. Duterte has said he takes full responsibility for the "war on drugs" as he braces for the legal battle. Other notable ICC suspects are Netanyahu, who is accused of being criminally responsible for acts including murder, persecution and using starvation as a weapon of war in the Gaza conflict, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, accused of the war crime of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Both Israel and Russia have repeatedly denied that their forces have committed atrocities in Gaza and Ukraine respectively and have argued the ICC has no jurisdiction over them. When it issued the warrant for Netanyahu, the ICC also issued a warrant for the arrest of Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, whose death was confirmed after the warrant was issued. The ICC prosecutor has also requested arrest warrants for senior Afghan and Myanmar leaders, but those have not been officially approved by judges. WHICH COUNTRIES ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THE ICC? Although the court is supported by many United Nations members and the European Union, other countries such as the United States, China and Russia are not members, arguing the ICC could be used for politically motivated prosecutions. Myanmar is not a member of the court, but in 2018 and 2019 judges ruled the court had jurisdiction over alleged cross-border crimes that partially took place in neighbouring ICC member Bangladesh, such as deportation and persecution, and said prosecutors could open a formal investigation. Israel is not a member and does not recognise its jurisdiction, but the Palestinian territories were admitted as an ICC member state in 2015. This, together with a ruling by judges, means the court can look at potential war crimes carried out by Hamas fighters in Israel and by Israelis in the Gaza Strip. The Philippines is not currently a member of the ICC but was between 2011 and 2019, when the unilateral withdrawal by Duterte became final. Under the court's founding 1998 Rome Statute, even if a state withdraws as a member it retains jurisdiction over crimes within its jurisdiction committed during the membership period. In February 2025, Trump authorised economic and travel sanctions targeting people who work on International Criminal Court investigations of U.S. citizens or U.S. allies such as Israel. Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan has so far been the only ICC staff member targeted by sanctions, which are set to go into force on April 7.


India Today
17 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump and Musk's bromance implodes over 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Once political power partners, US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk are now locked in a testy back-and-forth that shows no sign of Musk, the billionaire mogul who just weeks ago left the White House with a ceremonial key in hand and praise from President Donald Trump, now finds himself in a bitter public spat with the man he claims would have 'lost the election' without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk declared on X, the platform he owns. 'Such ingratitude,' he added, replying to his own post for emphasis. The comment came after Trump publicly rebuked Musk, expressing 'disappointment' over the Tesla CEO's fierce criticism of the president's sweeping 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' — a Republican-backed mega-bill that Musk has labelled 'disgusting' and bloated with 'pork.''Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said Thursday from the Oval Office, ahead of his meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'I'm very disappointed I've helped Elon a lot.'But Musk wasn't buying the nostalgia.'False,' he shot back. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!'advertisementMusk's rage seems fuelled in part by the bill's elimination of EV tax credits -- a direct blow to Tesla -- while preserving subsidies for fossil fuels.'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' he fallout follows Musk's abrupt departure as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a short-lived post in Trump's second-term administration. His tenure lasted just 130 response was classic: 'He's not the first. People leave my administration and they love us and then at some point they miss it so badly and they become hostile. I don't know what it is, it's sort of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), I guess they call it.'The billionaire didn't hold back, firing back with archived Trump tweets on deficits and spending. In one 2013 tweet, Trump wrote: 'I cannot believe the Republicans are extending the debt ceiling — I am a Republican & I am embarrassed!''Wise words,' Musk posted in Trump hinted that Musk was merely nostalgic for the prestige of the West Wing, Musk deadpanned a one-word reply on X: 'Whatever.'advertisementIn the words of Musk: 'Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.'Meanwhile, GOP leaders are scrambling to salvage the controversial bill before Independence Day, even as the Congressional Budget Office warned the legislation could balloon the deficit by $3 Speaker Mike Johnson acknowledged Musk's outbursts, noting, 'I know that the EV mandate is very important to him; that is going away because the government should not be subsidising these things as part of the Green New Deal.'With inputs from AP