logo
Trump moves on education coming fast, but schools waiting for official guidance

Trump moves on education coming fast, but schools waiting for official guidance

Yahoo20-02-2025

President Trump's education initiatives are coming on fast, but school officials say changes in the classroom will happen at a much slower pace.
While officials say the past few weeks have been a whirlwind of education news, from Title IX changes to Department of Education funding cuts, K-12 schools are waiting for more specific guidance on what has to change and ensuring they don't act too quickly one way or another.
The more cautious approach also might help avoid community panic
'I'm not gonna lie. It is a lot,' said Kenny Rodrequez, superintendent of the Grandview C-4 School District in Missouri. 'Every administration change, it is a lot, it typically is a lot of changes and a lot of things. This just seems to have sped everything up […] there's a lot more things coming out in a shorter period of time than what we've maybe been used to in the past. '
'I will say it's not necessarily too overwhelming as of yet just because lot of the things that have been said aren't necessarily law yet, or are not necessarily things that can 100 percent be put into motion, but a lot of it is fear,' added Rodrequez, who has been in school administration for 20 years and a superintendent for 9.
The firestorm began last month, when Trump signed multiple executive orders affecting both grade schools and higher education. Among the orders was a directive for critical race theory and gender issues to be banned from K-12 schools, with an emphasis on a 'patriotic education.'
The pipeline from Trump's desk to classroom changes is not a straight shot as districts do not tend to make any changes until guidance comes from their state Department of Education that is then reviewed by school boards and superintendents.
Once an order is signed, 'we still wait for our district to give us guidance, and the district usually waits on guidance from lawmakers and policy makers, from the state Department of Education, from the federal government, saying that this is what's enacted, and this is what we have to do,' said Nicole Paxton, assistant principal of Mountain Vista Community School in Colorado.
'And so we're kind of in a waiting game right now to see what those next steps might look like,' Paxton added.
Along with Trump's executive orders, the Department of Education has been very active despite not having nominee Linda McMahon confirmed as secretary.
The department has reverted the definition of Title IX back to the one used during the first Trump administration, taking away protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity that were adopted under former President Biden.
The federal agency has also cut more than a billion dollars in funding, including for teaching training grants and research support.
'I think we have some hesitancy about what's coming, but we're just now starting with the Department of Education,' said Marcus Belin, principal of Huntley High School in Illinois.
'Nothing has really reached the states, and the states haven't reached the local municipalities. So, I think what's rolling downhill just hasn't come yet. And so, I think the hesitancy is that we're all leery about what potentially is coming,' Belin added.
The biggest challenge schools have undertaken so far with all the federal moves is addressing the concerns of the community as parents, students and teachers struggle to parse through what the Trump administration means for their future.
'A lot of the families and a lot of the people internally with my staff, they do get very concerned and very scared thinking that funding is going to be shut off tomorrow, and it's not the way it works, but we are monitoring those things,' said Rodrequez.
Fears among some families began early in the administration when the Department of Homeland Security said immigration enforcement could go into schools. Although there have been no reports of immigration raids in schools, some have kept their students home and away from the classrooms.
' We have policies, we have procedures, we have guidance that governs that. But it doesn't mean that there's not a lot of concern and a lot of fear. So, for us, it's trying to dismantle what's real, what should we be concerned about now and what do we continue to monitor and watch over a longer period, knowing that these things might come to fruition and some of them might not, but it's all stuff that we have to kind of monitor, so it definitely is a lot more in a shorter period of time than what we've maybe seen in previous administrations,' Rodrequez added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret
I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret

Business Upturn

time26 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret

By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 11, 2025, 12:44 IST In what appears to be a shift in tone, Elon Musk on Tuesday posted that he regrets some of his recent remarks about President Donald Trump, saying, 'They went too far.' I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025 This comes just days after Trump addressed their ongoing feud, stating he wished Musk 'very well' and suggesting the tech mogul might be seeking a conversation. In a gesture that caught attention, Musk had responded with a heart emoji on X (formerly Twitter), sparking speculation about a possible reconciliation. Tensions between the two escalated last week after Musk called Trump's proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' a 'pork-filled abomination' and accused the President of suppressing Jeffrey Epstein-related files. The latter post, which Musk later deleted, reportedly infuriated Trump, who retaliated with harsh criticism and even threatened to sever government contracts with Musk-led firms. The feud intensified when Musk countered by threatening to halt NASA-linked SpaceX missions and claimed Trump would have lost the 2024 election without his support. He also floated the possibility of impeachment. However, Musk's latest message—posted at 12:34 PM on June 11—marks a notable departure from his confrontational stance, possibly signaling the beginning of a de-escalation. While no official conversation has been confirmed, both camps appear to be softening their positions, leaving the door open for future dialogue. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.

Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill

time30 minutes ago

Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress includes more than tax breaks and spending cuts — it also seeks to pour billions of dollars into the administration's mass deportation agenda. Republican leaders capitalized Tuesday on the demonstrations in Los Angeles, where people are protesting Trump's immigration raids at Home Depot and other places, to make the case for swift passage of their sprawling 1,000-plus-page bill over staunch Democratic opposition. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers 'much-needed reinforcements,' including 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, $45 billion to expand migrant detention facilities and billions more to carry out at least 1 million deportations a year. 'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families," he said. "It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.'

Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump
Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump

(Reuters) -Billionaire Elon Musk said on Wednesday that he regrets some of the posts he made last week about U.S President Donald Trump, in a message on his social media platform X. "I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote. Trump and Musk began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination." Musk's post comes days after Trump said his relationship with Musk was over.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store