Israel deports six from Gaza aid boat Madleen, two more still in custody
Palestinian rights group Adalah has confirmed Israel's deportation of six more activists detained on board the Madleen aid ship as they sought to draw international attention to Israel's illegal blockade of Gaza.
The rights group, which legally represented the 12 passengers who were seized by Israeli forces in the eastern Mediterranean earlier this week, said on Thursday that the six detainees – two French citizens, including Member of the European Parliament Rima Hassan, and nationals of Brazil, Germany, the Netherlands and Turkiye – had departed Israel.
Another two French nationals remain in Israeli custody awaiting deportation on Friday, Adalah told the news agency AFP.
'While in custody, volunteers were subjected to mistreatment, punitive measures and aggressive treatment, and two volunteers were held for some period of time in solitary confinement,' said Adalah.
Hassan, a French-Palestinian member of the European Parliament, had previously been barred from entering Israel and the Palestinian territory, due to her support for boycotts of the country in light of Israel's occupation of Palestinian land.
Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which had dismissed the aid boat as a 'selfie yacht', posted a photo of Hassan on what appeared to be an aeroplane, confirming the deportation of the six passengers.
Four of the ship's passengers, including Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg and Al Jazeera Mubasher reporter Omar Faiad, were deported on Tuesday.
On Thursday, Hassan's X account featured a post, calling on supporters to assemble in Place de la Republique in Paris, where protests calling for the release of the passengers still in Israeli detention and a lifting of the Gaza blockade had been held earlier in the week.
German citizen Yasemin Acar was also among Thursday's deportees. A video circulating online showed her saying that she had arrived in Germany. 'I just arrived in Germany. I am safe. But one thing is very clear: The siege of Gaza is still ongoing. The illegal blockade is still ongoing. People are still starving.'
'The only reason I did this, as a German citizen, is because my country, the very ground that I'm standing on, is not doing what they're supposed to do. They're sending more weapons … We need to stop this. We need to hold our politicians accountable for the genocide, for the starvation, for the killing of children, thousands of men and women. We will not stop.'
All 12 people on board the Madleen have been banned from Israel for 100 years.
The United Nations has warned that Gaza's entire population faces 'catastrophic hunger' following nearly two years of war and over two months in which Israel has been blocking or heavily restricting the entry of food and other essential supplies.
Following an 11-week total blockade from March to May, Israel set up a new aid programme replacing existing networks run by the United Nations and charities, run by the shadowy US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).
However, the sporadic distribution of supplies to Palestinians has been marred by repeated shootings, with more than 220 aid seekers killed by Israeli forces in the two weeks since the GHF began operations, according to the health authorities. On Thursday alone, at least 26 aid seekers were killed in Israeli drone attacks.
Israeli forces seized the Madleen and detained its crew early on Monday, about 100 nautical miles (185km) off the coast of Gaza, according to the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, the group that organised the journey.
The vessel, accompanied by Israel's navy, arrived in the Israeli port of Ashdod on Monday evening, according to the Foreign Ministry.
It was carrying humanitarian aid, including rice and baby formula, to Gaza, in a bid to raise awareness about the humanitarian crisis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
The Take: Why is Israel attacking Iran now?
After Israel launched strikes in Tehran and other Iranian cities, Iran responded with its own firepower. What is behind this dramatic escalation, and what will it mean for the region and beyond? In this episode: Episode credits: This episode was produced by Marcos Bartolomé, Amy Walters, and Tamara Khandaker with Catherine Nouhan, Phillip Lanos, Spencer Cline, Mariana Navarette, Haleema Shah, and our guest host, Manuel Rapalo. It was edited by Noor Wazwaz. Our sound designer is Alex Roldan. Joe Plourde mixed this episode. Our video editor is Hisham Abu Salah. Alexandra Locke is The Take's executive producer. Ney Alvarez is Al Jazeera's head of audio. Connect with us: @AJEPodcasts on Instagram, X, Facebook, Threads and YouTube
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘Drop Israel': How military escalation with Iran divides Trump's base
Washington, DC – After taking the oath of office for his second term in January, United States President Donald Trump said he would push to 'stop all wars' and leave a legacy of a 'peacemaker and unifier'. But six months in, missiles are flying across the Middle East after Israel attacked Iran, risking an all-out regional war that could drag US troops into the conflict. The Israeli strikes on Iran, which Trump has all but explicitly endorsed, are now testing the president's promise to be a harbinger of peace. They are also dividing his base, with many right-wing politicians and commentators stressing that unconditional support for Israel is at odds with the 'America First' platform on which Trump was elected. 'There is a very strong sense of betrayal and anger in many parts of the 'America First' base because they have truly turned against the idea of the US being involved in or supporting any such wars,' said Trita Parsi, executive vice president at the Quincy Institute, a US think tank that promotes diplomacy. 'They have largely turned sceptical of Israel, and they strongly believe that these types of wars are what cause Republican presidencies to become failures — and what causes their broader domestic agenda to be compromised.' Several conservatives questioned the Israeli strikes on Friday, warning that the US must not be dragged into a war that does not serve its interests. Influential conservative commentator Tucker Carlson — seen as a major figure in Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement — said the US should not support the 'war-hungry government' of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases. But not with America's backing,' the Tucker Carlson Network morning newsletter read on Friday. It added that a war with Iran could 'fuel the next generation of terrorism' or lead to the killing of thousands of Americans in the name of a foreign agenda. 'It goes without saying that neither of those possibilities would be beneficial for the United States,' the newsletter said. 'But there is another option: drop Israel. Let them fight their own wars.' Republican Senator Rand Paul also cautioned against war with Iran and slammed hawkish neoconservatives in Washington. 'The American people overwhelming[ly] oppose our endless wars, and they voted that way when they voted for Donald Trump in 2024,' Paul wrote in a social media post. 'I urge President Trump to stay the course, keep putting America first, and to not join in any war between other countries.' Right-wing Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene also sent a message suggesting that she opposes the strikes. She has previously cautioned Trump against attacking Iran based on Israeli assertions that Tehran is about to acquire a nuclear weapon. 'I'm praying for peace. Peace,' she wrote on X. 'That's my official position.' While many of Israel's supporters have cited the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran, the government in Tehran has long denied pursuing a nuclear weapon. Trump's own intelligence chief, Tulsi Gabbard, testified in March that the US 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon'. Charlie Kirk, a key Republican activist and commentator who is a staunch Israel supporter, also voiced scepticism about engaging in a war with Iran. 'I can tell you right now, our MAGA base does not want a war at all whatsoever,' Kirk said on his podcast. 'They do not want US involvement. They do not want the United States to be engaged in this.' Hours before Israel started bombing Iran on Friday — targeting its military bases, nuclear facilities and residential buildings — Trump said that his administration was committed to diplomacy with Tehran. ' Look, it's very simple. Not complicated. Iran can not have a nuclear weapon. Other than that, I want them to be successful. We'll help them be successful,' Trump said at a news conference on Thursday. A sixth round of denuclearisation talks between US and Iranian officials was set to be held in Oman on Sunday. Nevertheless, on Friday, Trump told reporters he had known about Israel's attacks in advance. He did not indicate he had vetoed the bombing campaign, though Secretary of State Marco Rubio did describe Israel's actions as 'unilateral'. Instead, Trump put the onus for the attacks on Iran, saying its officials should have heeded his calls to reach a deal to dismantle the country's nuclear programme. 'I told them it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told, that the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come,' Trump wrote in a social media post. Parsi said that, at the outset, Trump wanted to reach a deal with Iran, but his demands for Tehran to end uranium enrichment led to a deadlock in the talks. 'Instead of pursuing the negotiations in a reasonable way, he adopted the zero enrichment goal, which predictably would lead to an impasse, which predictably the Israelis used to push him towards military strikes and escalation,' he told Al Jazeera. Parsi added that he believed Trump engaged in deception over the past week by pushing diplomacy while knowing that the Israeli strikes were coming. 'Trump deliberately made statements in favour of diplomacy, in favour of not having Israel attack, leading everyone to think that, if there is an attack, it would happen after the six rounds of talks on Sunday,' he said. 'Instead, it happened sooner.' While the Israeli strikes garnered some criticism in Congress, many Republicans and Democrats cheered them on. But a key part of Trump's base has been a segment of the right wing that questions the US's unconditional support for Israel. 'They really are representative of a solid constituency within the Republican Party, especially if you look at younger individuals,' said Jon Hoffman, research fellow in defence and foreign policy at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. Hoffman pointed to a recent Pew Research Center survey that suggested 50 percent of Republicans under the age of 50 have an unfavourable view of Israel. 'Among the electorate itself, the American people are sick and tired of these endless wars,' he told Al Jazeera. Foreign policy hawks who favour military interventions dominated the Republican Party during the presidency of George W Bush, who launched the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan in the aftermath of the attacks on September 11, 2001. But those two conflicts proved to be disastrous. Thousands of US soldiers were killed, and many more were left with lasting physical and psychological scars. Critics also questioned whether the wars advanced US interests in the region — or set them back. The nation-building project in Iraq, for instance, saw the rise of a government friendly to Iran and the emergence of groups deemed to be a threat to global security, including ISIL (ISIS). In Afghanistan, meanwhile, the Taliban returned to power in 2021, almost exactly two decades after the group was ousted by US forces. The US-backed Afghan government quickly crumbled as American troops withdrew from the country. During his campaign for re-election in 2024, Trump tapped into the anger that the two conflicts generated. On multiple occasions, he sketched an alternative timeline where, if he had been president, the collapse of the Afghan government would have never occurred. 'We wouldn't have had that horrible situation in Afghanistan, the most embarrassing moment in the history of our country,' Trump said at one October 2024 rally in Detroit. The US president also slammed his Democratic opponent Kamala Harris for her alliance with Dick Cheney, who served as Bush's vice president, and his daughter Liz Cheney, criticising them as 'war hawks'. 'Kamala is campaigning with Muslim-hating warmonger, Liz Cheney, who wants to invade practically every Muslim country on the planet,' Trump told another crowd in Novi, Michigan. He added that Dick Cheney 'was responsible for invading the Middle East' and 'killing millions'. But critics say Trump's posture towards the Israeli strikes in Iran risks embroiling him in his own Middle East conflict. Hoffman, for instance, pointed to the closeness of the US-Israel relationship and the persistence of officials within the Republican Party who have been pushing for conflict with Iran for decades, like Senator Lindsey Graham. 'There is a tremendous risk of the United States being dragged into this war,' Hoffman said.
Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
UN officials urge Israel, Iran to show ‘restraint' at emergency meeting
Israel's aerial assault on Iran has destroyed the above-ground enrichment plant at Natanz, where there is now 'contamination', according to Rafael Grossi, chief of the United Nations nuclear watchdog. Grossi delivered the update during an emergency UN Security Council meeting in New York on Friday, where he and other senior UN officials urged both Israel and Iran to show restraint to prevent a deeper regional conflict. 'I have repeatedly stated that nuclear facilities should never be attacked regardless of the context or circumstances, as it could harm both people and the environment,' said Grossi, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). He reported radiological and chemical contamination inside the Natanz facility, where Iran was producing uranium enriched up to 60 percent. However, he added that the contamination is 'manageable with appropriate measures', and said the IAEA is ready to send nuclear security experts to help secure the sites if requested. 'I call on all parties to exercise maximum restraint to avoid further escalation,' he added. UN Undersecretary-General for Political Affairs Rosemary DiCarlo also urged both sides to show 'maximum restraint at this critical moment'. 'A peaceful resolution through negotiations remains the best means to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme,' she told the council. 'We must at all costs avoid a growing conflagration which would have enormous global consequences.' The 15-member Security Council, also joined by representatives of Israel and Iran, met at Iran's request after Israel struck several Iranian nuclear facilities and military sites in the early hours of Friday, and carried out assassinations of senior military officials and nuclear scientists. Iran's UN Envoy Amir Saeid Iravani told the emergency meeting that the attacks, which he described as a 'declaration of war' and 'a direct assault on international order', had killed 78 people and injured more than 320. He accused the US of providing Israel with both intelligence and political support for the attacks, the consequences of which he said it 'shares full responsibility' for. 'Supporting Israel today is supporting war crimes,' he said. The US representative, McCoy Pitt, insisted the US was not involved militarily in the strikes, but defended them as necessary for the self-defence of Israel. He warned that the 'consequences for Iran would be dire' if it targeted US bases or citizens in retaliation. 'Iran's leadership would be wise to negotiate at this time,' he said. Israel's UN envoy Danny Danon cast its attack on Iran's nuclear sites as 'an act of national preservation', claiming Iran was days away from producing enough fissile material for multiple bombs. 'This operation was carried out because the alternative was unthinkable,' said Danon. 'How long did the world expect us to wait? Until they assemble the bomb? Until they mount it on a Shahab missile? Until it is en route to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem?' 'We will not hesitate, we will not relent, and we will not allow a genocidal regime to endanger our people,' said Danon An Iranian counterattack on Israel took place while the UN meeting was in progress, with Iran firing waves of ballistic missiles at Israeli targets. 'Iran affirms its inherent right to self-defence,' said Iran's Iravani, promising to respond 'decisively and proportionately' against Israel. 'This is not a threat, this is the natural, legal and necessary consequence of an unprovoked military act,' he said. Vassily Nebenzia, Russia's UN ambassador, told the council Israel's actions in the Middle East are 'pushing the region to a large-scale nuclear catastrophe'. 'This completely unprovoked attack, no matter what Israel says to the contrary, is a gross violation of the UN Charter and international law,' he said.
