City council eyes opening a homeless shelter as it quashes funds for Ark Aid drop-in space
Social Sharing
A city council committee is considering asking the Ontario government for funds to open a new shelter location in London that would create more spaces for unhoused Londoners and offload the pressures faced by agencies working to bring them indoors during extreme weather.
The community and protective services committee on Monday unanimously supported the idea which was pitched by Coun. Hadleigh McAlister, who said challenges for people finding overnight beds this winter made him realize that more shelter spaces are needed in the city.
"Our service providers did their best through the cold weather to free up space but I fully recognize that we do not have enough spaces and I think we have to start the work of opening a new shelter," he said. "I really do think we've reached the point where we need a new shelter."
McAlister referred to the temporary overnight shelter that was suddenly stationed at the Carling Heights Optimist Community Centre in east London in January during an extreme cold weather alert. It opened hours after eight frontline social agencies called for more overnight supports.
Existing overnight shelters in the city include the Centre of Hope, Men's Mission and the Ark Aid Mission.
Coun. Susan Stevenson, whose ward includes the Ark's 696 Dundas Street location, which has been a point of contention among business owners due to the over-saturation of social agencies in the Old East Village area, supported the idea of another shelter.
However, Stevenson questioned whether the city was following through on its Whole of Community response which was intended to move away from shelters and toward highly supportive housing and an encampment strategy.
"There's no question there's a need. I would prefer to have shelter beds than resting spaces so we don't have this lottery every day to find out who gets a bed that night," she said. "I support this but I don't see how this fits into our plan."
In response, McAlister said the homelessness crisis can't be tackled with just one solution, and a multi-faceted approach is needed to address its complexities. Another shelter would be one piece of a larger puzzle, he added.
Kevin Dickins, deputy city manager for social and health development, said city staff have approved three separate highly supportive housing projects which would total more than 200 units, along with a 60-bed provincial HART Hub, operated by CMHA Thames Valley, which is set to open next month.
Ark Aid drop-in space funding rejected
The committee gave a more than $510,000 raise to The Salvation Army Centre of Hope to have 18 women's-only emergency shelter spaces from April 1 to the end of March, 2026.
It also approved $3 million dollars for the Ark Aid Mission to operate 70 overnight beds at its Cronyn Warner location, which was welcomed by its executive director Sarah Campbell.
The agency initially asked for a total $3.6 million, with $610,577 going toward a "day drop-in space" to offer basic services like showers, meals and laundry at its Dundas Street location, but the committee voted against it, asking for more information on how it differs from overnight shelters.
"Stabilizing services is critical," said Campbell. "The implications of reducing funding for other areas of services that need to be stabilized is something you need to consider."
Campbell said consistent funding is important to continue meeting the high demand, and allows the Ark to plan ahead. Funding changes will prevent it from continuously being able to support people in need, she said.
Councillors will vote on the matters on April 1.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
28-05-2025
- CTV News
No Quick Fix: $110M gap to bring LMCH public housing up to ‘good' condition
A recently completed Asset Management Plan (AMP) has determined that bringing public housing operated by London Middlesex Community Housing (LMCH) up to a 'good' condition would require up to $110 million over the next decade. A condition assessment of 31 residential properties generated an overall grade of 'poor', with none evaluated as being in 'good' or 'very good' condition. According to the report, seven were in 'fair' condition, 18 in 'poor' condition, and six in 'very poor' condition. 'These assets are a different type of asset because there's a human factor here-- people live in these units,' Councillor Sam Trosow told colleagues on the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee. Councillor Hadleigh McAlister, who also sits on the LMCH Board, explained, 'Many of these properties were built in the 1960s and 1970s. So, all of these properties are falling into the same trap, which is aging infrastructure.' Escaping that financial trap will be costly. The AMP determined it will cost $6.4 million to simply maintain the overall 'poor' condition and not slip into 'very poor' over the next 10 years. Making improvements to achieve an overall 'fair' condition would boost the 10-year cost to $34.6 million. An estimated $110.3 million would need to be spent over the next decade to improve to an overall 'good' condition. 'These are discussions that have to happen through the multi-year budget, because they have ramifications in terms of the financial impacts,' said McAlister. Mayor Josh Morgan suggested there is no quick fix. 'There is not going to be a plan that is going to bring that gap to zero in a short period of time,' Morgan told colleagues on SPPC. 'It would require significant investment from other levels of government, and those other levels of government know that this is a challenge many municipalities have.' The mayor cited financial investments made in the 2020-2023 budget as an indication that there's a commitment to address the problem. 'Work through 2025 will have over $60 million in capital repair investments into our community—so that work has begun,' said Paul Chisholm, CEO of LMCH after the meeting. 'The data tells us there's more work (and) that we need to up the level of maintenance and capital work we do.' City staff will provide LMCH with support, assisting LMCH in developing action plans to implement recommendations in the short, medium, and long-term. The committee voted to receive the report.
CBC
04-05-2025
- CBC
Q&A: Why we're still counting federal election ballots by hand
When Londoners voted in the federal election on Monday, they likely noticed there wasn't an electronic tabulator when they cast their ballot. While electronic voting is used in the Ontario election and by other countries around the world, Elections Canada continues to use the simple ballot box. For insight into why votes are still counted by hand, London Morning host Andrew Brown spoke with Aleksander Essex, an associate professor of software engineering at Western University. The following interview has been edited for length and clarity. Andrew Brown: So what do we know about why Elections Canada is still doing the paper ballot in the box? Aleksander Essex: Well, that's a great question for the chief electoral officer, and they have, I'm sure, their reasons. But I think one comment made in a recent CBC interview gives us some insight. They described their method of vote counting as "open to scrutiny." That means independent observers and candidate representatives can actually stand there and watch with their own eyes as the ballots are being counted. AB: A lot of us who voted in the Ontario election will remember our ballots going through a machine, and then we got the results quickly on election night. I think they called the PC government in six minutes. Why is Ontario able to pull this off? AE: Well, in fairness, Elections Canada was also able to count up the election fast enough for CBC to call it on election night. Elections Ontario moved toward tabulators for a variety of reasons, including cost and general ease of administration. One advantage is that you don't need as many people in the polling place — at least in theory. So you can do a faster vote count. That said, Elections Canada's vote counts are still pretty fast because it's usually just one contest. If it were a large, American-style ballot, there'd be a stronger use case for tabulators in terms of practicality. But for a single-race ballot, we can manage just fine without them. AB: Is there any downside to using tabulators? AE: It's not about tabulators versus hand-counting — it's about being open to scrutiny. You can make tabulators open to scrutiny, but we don't. And that's something that really needs to be addressed. AB: Could you elaborate on that a little bit? What do you mean by "open to scrutiny?" AE: I've worked at the polls, and when I'm a deputy returning officer, I have to count the ballots in full view of candidate representatives. You've got people standing there watching, and if they have a problem with how you interpret a ballot, they can challenge it in the moment. Those ballots are put aside in a separate bag for adjudication. With tabulators, you punch in a shutdown code at the end of the night, and the machine prints out a grocery store-style receipt with the vote totals. Scrutineers can be there, but they can't observe the count itself — just the receipt. So they're left to simply accept the results. AB: Because they can't look at the individual ballots at that point? AE: Right. The only way to look at the paper ballots is through a judicial recount. And to get that, the candidate has to provide evidence to support the challenge. Challenging an election is traumatic for everyone involved, so there's a high burden of proof. But in fairness, the burden of proof should be on the election official to demonstrate the count is correct — not on the candidate to prove it's wrong. AB: OK, so it sounds like you prefer the way the federal election works? AE: I prefer any method that provides openness to scrutiny. In the U.S., they deal with this in tabulator-based systems through something called a risk-limiting audit. It's a statistical sampling of paper ballots, so you don't have to recount everything. Many U.S. states have laws requiring these audits. If we're going to use tabulators, we need similar laws here. But we're not there yet. AB: So how does that sampling work in the States? AE: Well, they literally use Dungeons & Dragons-style dice to generate a random seed. That tells them which ballots to check. They then look at that random sub-sample and use statistics to determine whether the results support the tabulator count. Worst case, they do a full recount. Best case, just a small sample is enough to verify the result. AB: OK. That makes sense. So which direction do you think Elections Canada should go in? AE: Elections are hard to design in a way that meets every possible need. There are always trade-offs. One area where Elections Canada could be criticized is accessibility. For example, voters with visual impairments in Canada often have to vote with an assistant. In the U.S., the law requires that voters with disabilities be able to vote unassisted, which means they use more electronics at the polling places. That's something Elections Canada might have to improve. AB: Right. Do you see any changes coming to Elections Canada voting in the future? AE: Openly and overtly, I don't see any changes on the horizon from Elections Canada. But I do know there's a lot of pressure and interest in electronic voting, and it is achievable. If we're going to go there, we have to do it right. That means designing a system that allows for scrutiny of vote counting. The UN, for goodness' sake, requires transparency in that process. If we can provide that electronically, I don't have an issue. But it's going to take more thought — and more funding — to deliver.
CBC
28-04-2025
- CBC
London voters cast ballots saying they're motivated by different factors
Election day has finally arrived after a busy month-long campaign, and London voters wasted no time getting to the polls on Monday to cast their ballots. Polling stations across the city opened at 9:30 a.m. and will stay open until 9:30 p.m. Those still waiting in line when polls close will still be able to vote, Elections Canada says. Some Londoners voting at Carling Heights Optimist Community Centre said they were doing so to exercise their democratic right — and had no issues or delays casting a ballot. Cat Olcsvary said not voting would mean giving up the "right to complain about things," but said she felt the month-long campaign was "kind of a crapshow." "There was a lot going on, and everybody's kind of arguing with each other. We do need better for Canada ... I'm tired of the back and forth," said Olcsvary, who voted Liberal. "I just hope to see some change in a positive direction," said voter Kelsey Blais, who cast her ballot for the NDP. "I hope to see less conflict all over, and I hope to see a prime minister that is focused on our country's benefit." For Brad Fishleigh, who voted Conservative, a shortened campaign "might give an upper hand to one party over the other," he said. "I'm 35, and I'm self-employed, and I think it's important to try to represent your demographic and try to make a change." One voter, Nathan Stock, said he is casting a strategic ballot, in this case voting Liberal. "Dirka [Prout] is my riding, and normally I vote for her, but the strategic vote was more important this time," he said, referring to the NDP's candidate in London Centre. Some voters said this election was much too important to skip out on. "I think this is probably one of the most important elections we've had in a long time with what's going on down south and just on the world stage and the future of Canada," said Hali Blake, who voted with her husband, Jordan. Both cast a ballot for the Liberals, though Jordan noted he's normally an NDP supporter. "Canada will win either way. We're a great country. We don't subscribe to the things down south. I think we'll be winning either way. There's lots of great, great, great political leaders out there right now," he said. Record-breaking numbers during advance polls A number of Londoners CBC News spoke with Monday said they had already voted in advance polls, and were taking part in other activities offered at the polling station location. Elections Canada estimates 122,234 electors cast ballots between April 18 and 21 in the ridings of Middlesex—London, Elgin—St. Thomas—London South, London West, London Centre and London-Fanshawe. They are among the record-breaking 7.3 million Canadians who voted during advance polls. In London's three urban ridings alone, Elections Canada estimates 68,554 votes were cast in advanced polls last weekend. More than 26,000 people have also voted using special ballot voting kits, which are issued to electors, both in Canada and abroad, when an elector votes by mail, or when they vote in person at a local Elections Canada office.
